TheOPINIONATOR

British Man Faces 6 Months in Dubai Jail for 'Giving the Finger'

A heated verbal altercation with Iraqi Mahmud Rasheed caused British man,  Simon Andrews, 56, to supposedly let loose with the nonverbal "international sign of disapproval" towards Mahmud. 

Rattled by the (supposed) gesture, 18 year old student, Mahmud,  ran and complained to police and Mr Andrews was arrested for outraging public decency last August. Mr Andrews has been banned from leaving the country ever since as he awaits trial.

A brief background as to how 'flipping off" or "giving the one finger salute" or "the highway salute" or just plain old 'the finger" came into being:

 The finger

"It is identified as the digitus impudicus (impudent finger) in Ancient Roman writings^[1] and reference is made to using the finger in ancient Greek comedy to insult another person. The widespread usage of the finger in many cultures is likely due to the geographical influence of the Roman Empire and Greco-Roman civilization.

Another possible origin of this gesture can be found in the first-century Mediterranean world, where extending the digitus impudicus was one of many methods used to divert the ever present threat of the evil eye.^[2]

Do Muslim countries also flash the digitus impudicus? Apparently it IS one of those rare Western cultural phenomena that some muslim nations have actually assimilated:

In India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka the social circles exposed to the western cultures use the middle finger gesture in the same sense that it is used in those cultures. The same is true for most South Asian countries.^[5]  SOURCE

Simon Andrews swears the finger 'assault' never happened:

 "According to a court source: 'Mr Andrews says the offensive gesture never happened. The Iraqi has never appeared in court to testify against him and there are no witnesses.

'Mr Andrews has told the court there is no evidence he did anything wrong and that it is Mr Rasheed's word against his.

'He has been banned from leaving the country and has been warned he could be jailed then deported.'

A friend of Mr Andrews, who surrendered his passport as a surety, has been told it will not be returned until another passport is provided. " (See Article below)

Personally I might have given Mahmud a bit more credence had he describe the gesture as the more British 'two finger salute' - as shown by these two footballers 

Ferguson and McGregor were shown making V-signs on international duty

In essence this is a case of one man's word against another.

Clearly by not appearing in court to give testimony against the alleged finger perpetrator, Muhmad has nonverbally  'given the finger" to both the Dubai courts and Mr. Andrews  --or -- maybe Muhmad Rasheed is afraid of the evil eye of justice?

Meanwhile Simon Andrews is held captive by Dubai courts and prevented from returning home to Great Britain - for an UNCONFIRMED gesture.

Obviously it is the captive Simon Andrews who is really on the receiving end of THE FINGER!

Article in full:

Briton faces six months in a Dubai jail for 'giving Iraqi student the finger'

A Briton is facing six months in jail in Dubai for allegedly making a rude gesture at an Arab.

Police arrested Simon Andrews, 56, on suspicion of public indecency after receiving a complaint from an Iraqi aviation student.

It was said the pair got into a heated argument before Mr Andrews stuck one finger up at 18-year-old Mahmud Rasheed.

Mr Rasheed complained to police and the Briton was arrested for outraging public decency last August. Mr Andrews has been banned from leaving the country ever since as he awaits trial.

Strict: Simon Andrews, 56, faces six months in a Dubai jail and being deported after he was arrested for making an offensive gesture at an Iraqi student

But eight months on, he appeared in a Dubai court and protested his innocence only for the trial to be adjourned until April 4 after Mr Rasheed failed to appear to give evidence.

Mr Andrews has another court date scheduled for next Sunday.

According to a court source: 'Mr Andrews says the offensive gesture never happened. The Iraqi has never appeared in court to testify against him and there are no witnesses.

'Mr Andrews has told the court there is no evidence he did anything wrong and that it is Mr Rasheed's word against his.

'He has been banned from leaving the country and has been warned he could be jailed then deported.'

A friend of Mr Andrews, who surrendered his passport as a surety, has been told it will not be returned until another passport is provided.

But a blog posted by Seabee on life in Dubai said foreigners were often falling foul of its lax legal system.

It states: 'In this part of the world a personal insult is taken very, very seriously.

'So seriously that it's a criminal offence which can lead to jail, and deportation for foreigners.

'It's a case of needing to understand the culture of the place you're in and acting accordingly.

'It's another example of an unsubstantiated accusation. One person's word against another's. There is no evidence, there are no witnesses.

'It surely must be wrong that a case can even be brought on that basis.'

The case is the latest in a string of incidents involving British people in Dubai.

In 2008, IT firm manager Vince Acors and publishing company executive Michelle Palmer were both jailed after they were accused of having sex on Jumeirah Beach.

In January, a British man and his girlfriend faced jail for having unlawful sex outside marriage in a Dubai hotel and last month marketing executive Ayman Najafi and Charlotte Adams were arrested for outraging public decency after sharing a kiss in a bar.

 

UK - Muslim Chef Gets A £76,000 'Kick' in his Bacon Butt-ie

Halleluiah!

Below is a follow up story to my prior post :

MUSLIM POLICE CHEF SUES OVER TRADITIONAL ENGLISH BREAKFAST

"...(a)  muslim police chef suing for having to cook meals for the police men and women for which it is his JOB to cook.

"Hasanali Khoja is accusing the force of religious discrimination after it refused to guarantee in his contract that he would be excused from handling pork products."

For once I am actually pleased to be able to state that Mr. Khoja has been handed his lying bacon butt-ie on a platter by Judge Michael Southam:

"Hasanali Khoja accused the Metropolitan Police of failing to consider his Islamic beliefs when he was asked to handle pork products as a catering manager at a police station.  The £23,000-a-year chef claimed suggestions by his bosses that he should wear gloves and use tongs left him 'stressed and humiliated'. Muslims are banned from eating pork under Islamic law.

But Mr Khoja, 62, lost his claim in May after a police employee told an employment tribunal how she saw Mr Khoja eat bacon rolls and sausages. The Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) has now won a ruling ordering Mr Khoja to pay its costs, which total at least £76,200. In its costs claim, the Met said Mr Khoja 'knew that he had asked for a bacon roll two or three times for personal consumption before bringing his claim and throughout the conduct of his claim'.

'The fact that he had knowingly come into contact with pork products before bringing the claim shows that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success from the outset.'

Mr Khoja gave further insight into his greed when he was caught telling more lies:

Mr Khoja, from Edgware, North London, who is still employed by the Met, claimed at a hearing in Watford that he could afford to pay only £80 a week as he has little income, lives in rented property and is struggling with £30,000 legal bills of his own. But the court discovered he had sold another home last year, splitting profits of almost £200,000 with his wife and two sons.

I'd like to think that this ruling will deter future "nice little earner" seekers - but as such lawsuits - by muslims - have frequently produced lucrative results in the past I doubt that they will cease padding their pockets with the proceeds from such 'trauma's' as "hurt feelings over head scarf"  -

And let's not forget muslim Fatah Lemes who took a job as a cocktail waitress then sued saying the red dress she was "forced to wear hurt her feelings'.  A dhimmified tribunal awarded her £2,919.95 for those hurt feelings and loss of earnings" - Of course no one on the tribunal saw the Facebook pictures of a smiling Miss Lemes flaunting her two "hurt feelings" in a far more revealing dress.

One needs no better example - than Ms Lemes -  as to why so many muslims have turned British employers - via the soft headed, muslim pandering British judicial system -into "hurt feelings" cash cows. 

But at least for today...........there is a glimmer of hope.

Article in full:

Muslim police chef defeated in 'bacon roll' tribunal faces £75,000 legal bill

By Tom Harper
Last updated at 10:02 PM on 19th December 2009

Costly case: A caterer told the court that Hasanali Khoja ate pork

A Muslim chef who lost a claim of religious discrimination against Scotland Yard after complaining he was forced to cook sausages and bacon faces a legal bill of more than £75,000.

Hasanali Khoja accused the Metropolitan Police of failing to consider his Islamic beliefs when he was asked to handle pork products as a catering manager at a police station.  

The £23,000-a-year chef claimed suggestions by his bosses that he should wear gloves and use tongs left him 'stressed and humiliated'. Muslims are banned from eating pork under Islamic law.

But Mr Khoja, 62, lost his claim in May after a police employee told an employment tribunal how she saw Mr Khoja eat bacon rolls and sausages.

The Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) has now won a ruling ordering Mr Khoja to pay its costs, which total at least £76,200. In its costs claim, the Met said Mr Khoja 'knew that he had asked for a bacon roll two or three times for personal consumption before bringing his claim and throughout the conduct of his claim'.

'The fact that he had knowingly come into contact with pork products before bringing the claim shows that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success from the outset.'

Judge Michael Southam agreed and ruled Mr Khoja should pay costs, though these would be determined at a later date at a county court.

Mr Khoja, from Edgware, North London, who is still employed by the Met, claimed at a hearing in Watford that he could afford to pay only £80 a week as he has little income, lives in rented property and is struggling with £30,000 legal bills of his own.

But the court discovered he had sold another home last year, splitting profits of almost £200,000 with his wife and two sons.

The decision is another setback for the police chef, who believed he was on course for a large settlement when he launched his case in 2007.

Mr Khoja, who sits on a Foods Standards Agency advisory committee on Muslim issues, decided to take action after Scotland Yard chiefs placed him on unpaid leave for a year after his refusal to work with pork.

He said he was then given work in a different building but his role was downgraded.

But his case fell apart when another caterer, Mary Boakye, told the court she served him bacon rolls 'two or three' times at the Met canteen at Heathrow in West London.

When she told him she was surprised because his religion banned him from eating pork, Mr Khoja allegedly replied: 'I eat them once in a while.'

Another chef said he saw Mr Khoja once happily eat a sausage dish and told the court 'he was not as strict as some Muslims'.

Judge Southam also heard how Mr Khoja had made 'wild and baseless' allegations about a human resource manager, allegedly making racial facial gestures.

Mr Khoja is one of several ethnic minority staff to launch racial discrimination claims against Scotland Yard. The most high-profile was former Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur, who last year accused Sir Ian Blair of excluding him from the upper echelons of the force because of his skin colour.

Mr Ghaffur retired after receiving an out-of-court settlement and dropped the allegations.

WTF!! What DOES it take for a muslim lawbreaker to go to jail?

Just when I think it can't get any more idiotic in the UK - it always does.

The latest tale comes on the heels of my Friday post regarding the multiple chain and blade slicing machine carrying muslim Mohsin Khan who avoided jailtime when the judge/jury swallowed the excuse that Khan kept the flagellator (Zanjeer) as a spare in his car just in case he got the urge for some self mutilation and didn't intend to use it as an "offensive weapon".  Now comes the news that a muslim man - with criminal record taller than the gallons of ale you'll want to drink after reading about the below insanity -stays out of jail when he admits to brandishing an........offensive weapon (along with other violent acts).

Yes - yet another boneheaded (obviously dhimmified) judge has made yet another asinine decision. Prompting one to repeat the oft asked question  -- what does it take for a muslim to be sent to jail in Britain?.  

Britain is already the number one destination for throngs of asylum seekers  and  illegal immigrants  looking to take advantage of generous free (taxpayer paid) benefits and healthcare - many if not most being muslims.  Now it appears that the judicial system is vying to get the top award for judicial buffoonery.

29 year old Wajid Hussain brandished a Samurai dagger

and threatened "I'm going to cut you" to two boys who annoyed him. This was after he threw a bed frame down a stairway then slashed two tyres with the knife & frightened several neighbors. Add in the fact that Hussain is a repeat offender and already been in jail numerous times including for possession of an........ "offensive weapon".

"Hussain, who has almost 30 previous convictions and has been to jail for robbery and attempted robbery, admitted affray and possessing an offensive weapon. The defendant, now of Bicknell Street, Blackburn, received 26 weeks in jail, suspended for two years, with 12 months supervision and the Controlling Anger and Learning to Manage it programme. He must pay £100 costs."

WTF!!!! suspended jail term??? - 12 months nanny supervision??? and taking a course in how to control his anger???!!!

You've got to be having a laugh.............but yet again we find the only one left smiling and laughing is the muslim thug, in this case -Wajid Hussein, who found another one of Britain's politically correct imbecilic judges - Judge Jonathan Gibson. Judge Gibson undoubtedly possesses an overdeveloped fear of being called Islamophobic and/or racist- (Horrors!!) thus he allowed the muslim Hussein to remain free - free to continue to live his felonious life preying on the law abiding British people.

Maybe I should sign up for the Anger Control programme?

Man armed with Samurai dagger escapes jail

November 23, 2009

A KNIFEMAN who chased and threatened two 17 year old boys with a samurai dagger has walked free from court.

Burnley Crown Court heard how Wajid Hussain, 29, then living at an upstairs flat in Clayton-le-Moors, was said to have had a confrontation with the two teenagers, who lived in the flat below.

He then brandished the knife and threatened to cut them with it, as a horrified neighbour cleaning his car watched the early afternoon rumpus in terror.

Hussain, who has almost 30 previous convictions and has been to jail for robbery and attempted robbery, admitted affray and possessing an offensive weapon. The defendant, now of Bicknell Street, Blackburn, received 26 weeks in jail, suspended for two years, with 12 months supervision and the Controlling Anger and Learning to Manage it programme. He must pay £100 costs.

Sentencing, Judge Jonathan Gibson told the defendant: "This was a knife with an eight inch blade. Its inevitable I pass a custodial sentence."

Sarah Statham, prosecuting, told the court on the morning of the incident Hussain had thrown a bed frame down the stairs to prevent the two teenagers going upstairs and there had been some kind of altercation.

Hussain picked up the dagger and chased both the young men out into the street. He was seen by a man cleaning his car at 1.15pm and he reported the defendant had the knife raised in an aggressive manner, shouting after the pair: "I'm going to cut you." They managed to run away. Hussain then tried to slash the tyres of two pedal cycles. The witness was scared and alerted the police.

Miss Statham said the defendant then simply went into the premises and when officers arrived, he was standing at one of the downstairs windows. Police arrested him and recovered a knife from the floor of his lounge.

He was questioned and told officers the two young men had gone into his flat when he was asleep. He claimed they had dropped the knife and he was responsible for chasing them into the street. He had 27 previous convictions and in June last year had been convicted of violent disorder after arming himself with a weapon. His licence ended in February.

Martin Hackett, defending, said it was accepted Hussain had a poor record for offences of public disorder, but he had not been looking for problems that day.

He had found the two young men in his flat. He accepted he chased them out and he had the knife and was brandishing it.

Obama tosses US citizens Under the ICC Bus while giving Muslim Terrorists USA Constitutional Rights

Recently President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder made the controversial decision to bring 9/11 Islamic terrorist Khalid Sheik Mohammed along with four other muslim terrorists (currently held at Guantanamo Bay) to New York City to face civilian trial. The decision is seen, by many, as pandering to the Democratic Party's lefty leaners by a President whose once phenomenal popularity is sinking faster than the Titanic.

Many Americans believe that this will only place the safety of the residents of New York City in jeopardy as well as cause the survivors and family members of the victims of 9/11 to face years of 'in your face' memories and testimony while the trials slowly progress through the US judicial system. Then there are at least three other problems:

* Military commissions are the appropriate venue for trials of unlawful combatant. The US military seized these terrorists on foreign battlefields -- and so didn't read them Miranda rights. The evidence against them was collected by soldiers under war-fighting conditions -- not with sterile gloves and clear plastic bags. And much of the best evidence against them is classified, because making it public would compromise the sources and methods of US intelligence gathering.  In short, these cases do not fit the mold of a typical murder trial in a civilian court.

* The administration is again blurring the line between ordinary crimes and acts of war. Likening terrorists at war with the United States to common shoplifters is wrongheaded. These are not members of our society who refuse to obey our laws: They are enemies of the United States, engaged in war against America and all that it stands for.

* The administration has offered no clear criteria for deciding which terrorists will be charged as criminals in federal court and which ones will face military commissions. Attorney General Holder, in announcing the decision, suggested that the five cases were appropriate for civilian trial simply because the evidence against the terrorists is so strong that they'll surely be found guilty. SOURCE

Despite the above concerns Obama and Holder are insisting upon giving foreign Islamic terrorists the Constitutional rights of United States citizens.

Now comes the news that Pres. Obama is not so interested in the reverse - in preserving the Constitutional rights of US citizens in other countries. In fact he is in the process of negotiating a treaty with the International Criminal Court  (ICC) to give the Court jurisdiction over American citizens who commit certain crimes by 2010:

"President Obama has dispatched a delegation this week to The Hague to explore issues involving the United States' possible participation in the International Criminal Court, an organization critics charge could be used to prosecute Americans under international legal standards for actions that are not crimes in the U.S. 

Additional explanation of how this could affect Americans:

"Supposing the U.S. engages in a military action and that action results in civilian casualties. We do an investigation of the matter and find no guilty party. If we are a member of the court, if we are a party to the Rome Statute, the ICC at that point has the opportunity to second-guess us," he said. "They may be able to use evidence and they may be able to pursue routes of trial that would not be portable in the U.S. because of the different standards established in the U.S. legal system and the rules set forth in the Rome Statute."

His warning is that the ICC could, "in essence … come and prosecute U.S. citizens, U.S. soldiers, U.S. officials for actions the U.S. deems entirely lawful." SOURCE

Yes the is the exact same treaty which former US President George W. Bush refused to sign - or in essence unsigned - for obvious reasons.

So there you have it - President Barack Hussein Obama is more than willing to toss US citizens under the ICC "bus" by placing Americans under the jurisdiction of the international court and thus preventing these citizens from accessing their Constitutional rights. 

But sitting securely on the top of the bus we find Obama - in full dhimmi mode and twisting himself in judicial pretzel knots - to ensure NON US citizens/ confessed muslim terrorists will be imported into the United States and given Constitutional rights and defenses even though doing so places actual US citizens lives at risk and will cost - the already financially strapped US taxpayers ---multi millions of dollars.

You couldn't make this up - nor would you want to. Sure as hell infuriates me!
 

No deportation for Muslim Serial Rapist as UK Immigration Officials let him get away

Innumerable times I have reported on the myriad of muslim terrorists, rapists, murderers, paedophiles, fraudsters, etc. that have been convicted of their heinous crimes -- served jail sentences -- only to be released and NOT deported thereby being permanently inflicted upon the British people. Proving time and time again that the Labour government and British courts place the safety of the British people far below that of lawbreakers - in particular muslim lawbreakers.

So, FINALLY the British government decides to actually deport failed muslim asylum seeker and convicted "horrific" rapist, Imtiaz Hussain, 44 -- back to Pakistan (after he served a 'whopping' 50% of his jail sentence) -- and the dunderheads at immigration let the violent sex attacker slip through their incompetent fingers! Maybe law enforcement ought to 'investigate' area curry houses?

Thus we find ANOTHER serial rapist is back on the streets of England.

You couldn't make this stuff up..........but it sure as hell makes you sick!

Article in full:

Convicted rapist escapes immigration officials days before he was due to be deported to Pakistan

Imtiaz Hussain: The convicted rapist is on the run after escaping guards

A convicted rapist is on the run after escaping security guards at the Pakistan High Commission in London days before he was due to be deported.

Imtiaz Hussain, 44, had been transported from prison, where he was serving a nine-year sentence for rape, to the Pakistan High Commission to get a new passport in preparation for his deportation.

But the serial rapist gave immigration officials the slip, escaping through a window after claiming he needed the toilet.

He was last seen running along Sloane Square.

Police have now launched an nationwide manhunt for the sex attacker said to be 'very dangerous' and a 'serious threat to women'.

The failed asylum seeker was convicted on May 14, 2004 of rape and false imprisonment after attacking two prostitutes at knife-point in March of that year.

He was jailed for nine years, but after serving half of that his sentence expired last week.

But Hussain was still being held in a prison in the north of England pending his deportation to Pakistan.

Last Thursday he was transported in a secure prison van to Colnbrook immigration removal centre in Slough.

The following day he was escorted by immigration officials to the Pakistan High Commission in Victoria for his appointment about a replacement passport.

He was due to be sent back to prison following the interview, but he escaped at 2.30pm on Friday.

Scotland Yard is now liaising with police officers in Derbyshire, where he last lived.

At his trial at Derby Crown Court, the jury heard Hussain had threatened two women with a knife, beaten and raped them when they  refused to do what he wanted.

Sentencing him, Judge David Pugsley said: 'You have perpetrated two rapes in circumstances which were horrific.'

Yesterday Detective Chief Inspector Brent Lancaster said: 'This individual is believed to very dangerous and we need to apprehend him as soon as possible.

'If anyone sees him, please don't approach him but call or alert police immediately.'

Hussain is described as around 5ft 5ins, of medium to chubby build, with dark cropped hair, and was wearing a blue T-shirt, blue jeans and white trainers.

David Wood, head of Criminality and Detention for the UK Border Agency said: 'A 44-year-old Pakistani male has absconded whilst on an escorted visit to the High Commission in London.

'Police were immediately informed. His details have been placed on the Police National Computer and watch-lists.

'We are actively searching for this individual to return him in to custody and remove him from the UK.'

 

Somali Islamist "Youths" Whip Women for Wearing Bras

"Somalia's hardline Islamist group al-Shabaab has publicly whipped women for wearing bras they say violate Islam by constituting a deception, north Mogadishu residents said on Friday.

.....Residents said gunmen had been rounding up any woman seen with a firm bust and then had them publicly whipped by masked men. The women were then told to remove their bras and shake their breasts.

"Al-Shabaab forced us to wear their type of veil and now they order us to shake our breasts," a resident, Halima, told Reuters, adding that her daughters had been whipped on Thursday.

"They first banned the former veil and introduced a hard fabric which stands stiffly on women's chests. They are now saying that breasts should be firm naturally, or just flat." SEE ARTICLE BELOW

So, according to breast obsessed muslim men (aka "youths"), a woman's wearing a bra is deception?

BUT THIS ISN'T?:

 

   

Men whipped for shaving, women made to shake breasts

Somali hardliners whip women for wearing bras

MOGADISHU (Reuters)

Somalia's hardline Islamist group al-Shabaab has publicly whipped women for wearing bras they say violate Islam by constituting a deception, north Mogadishu residents said on Friday.

The insurgent group, which seeks to impose a strict form of sharia Islamic law throughout Somalia, amputated a foot and a hand each from two young men accused of robbery earlier this month. They have also banned movies, musical ringtones, dancing at wedding ceremonies and playing or watching soccer.

Residents said gunmen had been rounding up any woman seen with a firm bust and then had them publicly whipped by masked men. The women were then told to remove their bras and shake their breasts.

"Al-Shabaab forced us to wear their type of veil and now they order us to shake our breasts," a resident, Halima, told Reuters, adding that her daughters had been whipped on Thursday.

"They first banned the former veil and introduced a hard fabric which stands stiffly on women's chests. They are now saying that breasts should be firm naturally, or just flat."

Officials of al-Shabaab, which Washington says is al-Qaeda's proxy in the failed Horn of Africa state, declined to comment.

The group's hardline interpretation of Islamic law has shocked many Somalis, who are traditionally moderate Muslims. Some residents, however, give the insurgents credit for restoring order to the regions under their control.

Al-Shabaab, which means "youth" in Arabic, control large swathes of south and central Somalia.

Abdullahi Hussein, a student in north Mogadishu, said his elder brother was thrown behind bars when he fought back a man who humiliated their sister by asking her to remove her bra.

"My brother was jailed after he wrestled with a man that had beaten my sister and forced her to remove her bra. He could not stand it," Hussein said.

Men were not spared the' moral cleansing'. Any man caught without a beard was been publicly whipped.

"I was beaten and my hair was cut off with a pair of scissors in the street," Hussein said.

"My trouser was also cut up to the knee. They accused me of shaving my beard but I am only 18. They have arrested dozens of men and women. You just find yourself being whipped by a masked man as soon as leave your house."

Obama Wins Nobel Peace Price - For What?

"OSLO (AP) - President Barack Obama won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," the Norwegian Nobel Committee said, citing his outreach to the Muslim world and attempts to curb nuclear proliferation.

The stunning choice made Obama the third sitting U.S. president to win the Nobel Peace Prize and shocked Nobel observers because Obama took office less than two weeks before the Feb. 1 nomination deadline. Obama's name had been mentioned in speculation before the award but many Nobel watchers believed it was too early to award the president" SOURCE

When I saw the above news - at first glance I thought it was a joke - and when I realized it was for real my next thought was:

 

FOR WHAT??

 

Clearly the neophyte President Obama and his untested international policies have produced NOTHING - no substantive results upon which they can be judged. So now the Nobel Peace Prize is given for fledgling ideas? 

 

But there are things about Obama that would appeal to these European elites:

 

1 He bashes America - so do they - including American writers competing for the Nobel Prize for Literature

 

2  He apologized for America's supposed "past sins" and arrogance - that's what they want to hear - He apologized AGAIN and AGAIN so much so that the British media begged him to stop as they feared in his doing so Obama was weakening America.  But he didn't and when he and his wife Michelle flew to Copenhagen, Denmark to try and talk the Olympic Committee into awarding the 2016 Summer Olympics to Chicago...........he bashed America again.

 

3  He praises Islam - and their despots - and he grossly overrated muslims numbers and importance in American life -so do they.

 

4  He bowed and showed subservience to the Saudi King/Islam even as the Saudis are funding the worldwide Global Caliphate  and terrorism

 

5  He refuses to point the finger directly at Islamics for causing terrorism worldwide -  in fact the elites along with some European leaders think one musn't even put Islam and terrorism in the same sentence (sound familiar)

 

6  He bashes Israel and makes them the 'bad guy' in the Middle East - so do they

 

Thus Obama talked the RIGHT talk and bowed the RIGHT bow----------------and has been prematurely awarded with a prize that should be given for results not lofty rhetoric.

 

I'm sure the Obama's are ecstatic and will be opening a celebratory bottle of champagne - perhaps in doing so they should ponder that  -for most -  one needs to first grow and pick the grapes then make the wine and let it age to perfection before being rewarded with the bubbly results.

 

 

09/25/09 2nd ADDENDUM - Islamic Call to Prayer to be Broadcast at the USA National Mall - Sept 25

Now is the time for USA's citizens to question the President of the United States and his overt affinity for Islam. Now is the time to call your Representatives and Senators and the White House ask them WHY Islam is being allowed to subjugate a large portion of the 146 acres of the United States in an area that is the location of the USA's most patriotic monuments along with the Nations Capitol Building and White House.

"The Muslim Athan (Call to Prayer) will be broadcast from the United States Capital to the Lincoln Memorial, from the Smithsonian to the White House on Sept. 25 while an estimated 50,000 Muslims converge on the West Steps and lawn of the United States Capital." 

For more information go to:

http://islamoncapitolhill.com/Home_Page.html

"The National Mall is an open-area national park in downtown Washington, D.C., the capital of the United States. The National Mall is a unit of the National Park Service, and is administered by the National Mall and Memorial Parks unit.^[2] The term "National Mall" commonly includes areas that are officially part of West Potomac Park and Constitution Gardens to the west, and often is taken to refer to the entire area between the Lincoln Memorial and the Capitol, with the Washington Monument providing a division slightly west of the center. The National Mall receives approximately 24 million visitors each year."  LINK

Let's remember that Obama not only studied the Qu'ran but also stated the call to prayer is "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset" and he then went on the recite it with an 'first rate' accent. NYTimes LINK

So, on September 25th, visitors and residents of Washington will hear"Allahu Akbar" just like the 9/11 muslim hijackers screamed before killing over 3,000 people. 

Outrageous?? - you bet!

************************ADDENDUM  09/22/09***********************

In response to Thorum's below comment:

First - Barack Hussein Obama, who quickly squelched anyone referring to him as a muslim during this Presidential election campaign and avowed he is a Christian -- has 'sort of' decided upon a Christian church to attend whilst he is living in Washington, DC.  We all know that he, and his wife Michelle, for 20+ years attended the Trinity United Church of Christ - in Chicago. Its' pastor of over 20 years,the racist, anti-American Reverend Jeremiah Wright, is well known for his recorded rants against white people and America.  Barack Obama wants us to believe that he never heard his "spiritual advisor's" rants.  Wright inspired Obama's 'The Audacity of Hope' book as well as advocates muslim leader and racist Louis Farrakhan even as far as to give Farrakhan an award.

I find it also peculiar and telling that the President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, recent minimal observation of the US National Day of Prayer.  (Christianity based)

"President Obama is distancing himself from the National Day of Prayer by nixing a formal early morning service and not attending a large Catholic prayer breakfast the next morning. All Mr. Obama will do for the National Day of Prayer, which is Thursday, is sign a proclamation honoring the day, which originated in 1952 when Congress set aside the first Thursday in May for the observance. LINK

Add the above to the recent Obama administration, via the Pentagon, decision to deny the Blue Angels flyover at the patriotic God & Country Rally:

This marks the first time in the 42 year history of the event that a flyover request was denied by the Pentagon. The event is held ever year to honor the spiritual foundations of our country with a special emphasis on the men and women who serve in the armed forces.

In past years, the "God and Country Rally" has focused on honoring and paying tribute to those veterans who have served our nation in the past and those who are currently on active duty. At the rally this year, all five branches of the armed services were featured with over 60 new recruits sworn into the military at the event.

After a phone conversation and an e-mail response from the Pentagon, Rally Director Patti Syme says they were denied the request for a flyover this year because of the "Christian" nature of the event. "LINK

So whether you think Obama is a muslim - or not. Clearly the man has a problem with the Christian foundations of the United States of America along with Christianity in general. And clearly he does NOT have issues with the religion (aka political ideology) of Islam.

There is little doubt that Barack Obama would not allow a Christian group to put on an overt display of faith at the nation's Capitol and National Mall -- like the muslims will do on September 25th.

**********************ADDENDUM  09/25/09********************************

For update and more information - from the excellent Atlas Shrugs web site - go to

Islam In the Capital, the Culture, Colonization

Excerpt:

"Those of us, through reason and tremendous act of will, who have freed ourselves from the enslaving yoke of Islam placed around our necks from birth, know about all the heinous inside dirt of this plague of humanity. We hardly need to call a toll-free number to hear a phony canned message of deceptions and lies.

We have experienced Islam first-hand and up close from the inside. We have studied the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sunna. We have seen Islam in action where it wields sway. Some of us even tried desperately to cling to this security blanket that was wrapped around us from birth. Yet, the more we studied and the more we experienced Islam, the more our effort to remain in the fold became untenable.

We broke away from Islamic slavery and found it to be our solemn duty to expose this fraud of a religion, help other Muslims to free themselves from it, and warn the good-hearted and gullible non-Muslims against falling prey to it.

The Muslim organizations in America, generously financed by the oil-rich Muslim government and sheikhs, are directed to sell Islam Lite for long enough until the cult runs deep roots and the Real Islam is introduced. One can see how the scheme played out in Europe. Much of Europe is already past the stage of Islam Lite and knee deep into the quagmire of Real Islam. And that’s exactly where things are headed in America."

Dhimmicrat Doofuses Head Two Major British Cities

Looks like I've come up with a new term = Dhimmicrat

A Dhimmicrat is a bureaucrat and/or politician that will sell his/her soul and his/her Country for muslim votes/approval. Anyone can be a Dhimwit - but a Dhimmicrat has to belong to one of the preceding groups.

The first person to earn the new title of Dhimmicrat is Doncaster Mayor, Peter Davies, who thinks that we all can learn a thing or two about 'family values' from the Taliban.

"Mr Davies claimed that under the Taliban, Afghanistan had an 'ordered system of family life'.

He said: 'The one thing that can be said about the Taliban is that they do have an ordered society of some sort and that they don't have hundreds of cases of children under threat of abuse from violent parents as we do in Doncaster.'" LINK

First after establishing that this man does indeed live on planet Earth one can only find his lack of knowledge and understanding of the Taliban to be appalling.

I guess he missed the numerous examples of the "ordered family system" like the Taliban intentionally killing schoolchildren riding on a schoolbus, or buying children to turn them into suicide bombers, or spraying girl's faces with acid for their 'crime' of attending school or teaching a boy how to carry out his first beheading (Note: LINK HAS GRAPHIC VIDEO).

I could go on and on but you get the picture = Some of Peter Davies' Taliban family values pictured below:

Also achieving the Dhimmicrat title is London Mayor Boris Johnson:

"London Mayor Boris Johnson today encouraged people to undergo a day of fasting to help understand their 'Muslim neighbour'. He said Muslims in the capital were 'challenging traditional stereotypes' to show they wanted to be part of the mainstream during a visit to the East London Mosque and London Muslim Centre."  LINK

So to follow Boris' logic - we should all become muslims - for a day - because muslims want to become "mainstream" 

What????????!!!!!!! 

How is our fasting and becoming a stereotypical muslim for ONE minute - nevermind longer- helping muslims assimilate or become mainstream??  Isn't his suggestion obviously creating the exact opposite - Islamisation? Yep - Boris is a Dhimmicrat

No wonder British cities are in such trouble  (undoubtedly these are only two of innumerable British dhimmicrats) and no wonder the British people are getting FED UP!

Adding Insult to Injury - Freed "death bed" Lockerbie Bomber to pen tell all book

I thought this bastard Megrahi was supposed to be on his "death bed"? 

Someone needs to ask that question to muslim apologists and enablers, Gordon Brown-istan and Kenny MacASSkill.

Doesn't sound like it to me:

Book will proclaim Meghrahi's innocence

Lockerbie bomber plans tell-all book: report

The book would detail al- Meghrabi's life behind bars and reveal all he knows about the 1988 bombing (File)

LONDON (AFP)

The Lockerbie bomber is planning to write an auto-biography to "proclaim his innocence" by disclosing new information behind Britain's deadliest terrorist attack, a report said Monday.

Abdelbaset Ali Mohmet al-Megrahi was working on the book that would detail his life behind bars and reveal all he knows about the 1988 bombing that killed 270 people, the Times said.

"He'll be writing a book to proclaim his innocence," said Libya's official envoy to Scotland, Abdurrhman Swessi.

The newspaper said Megrahi's lawyers had collected information for an appeal in the Scottish courts before his release on compassionate grounds last week.

The book is expected to be used as Megrahi's platform to argue that he was framed for the crime.

Scotland's justice minister decided to release ailing Megrahi from prison on compassionate grounds last Thursday, sparking a furious reaction from the United States.

Megrahi is the only person convicted over the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over the Scottish town of Lockerbie. The majority of the victims were American.

Megrahi, who returned to his family in Libya, has terminal prostate cancer and doctors have said he has only about three months to live.