TheOPINIONATOR

When does 'NO' mean 'Yes'? Hint: Islam

For decades if not longer parents in the UK and other Western nations have taught their sons (and daughters)  when a woman says 'no' to sexual advances then no means no=full stop.  To proceed further is to commit the crime of sexual assault or rape. Certainly this shows the utmost civility and respect for the woman's choice and recognizes tht the majority of women are still the 'weaker' sex when it comes to brute force - thus their verbal sentiments are often their only means of defense.

So what religion/political ideology  supports the often violent oppression of women and that 'no' means 'yes' or women have no right to their own bodies or to their own decisions?

Why Islam of course. (Excellent video)

In the past, we have heard backward and degrading proclamations directed at women issued by various Islamic clerics living in Middle Eastern  and other muslim countries stuck in third-world-mentality Islam. But what does it say about Assimilation vs islamisation when such tripe is spouted from a Western nation? From the so-called 'moderate' male muslim population?

"Britain's leading Muslim TV channel was accused of encouraging “marital rape” and promoting other intolerant views of women in a report on extremism published today.

The report by think tank Quillam says that the London-based Islam Channel broadcast comments saying that “the idea a woman cannot refuse her husband relations” was “not strange” and was instead part of “maintaining a strong marriage”.

It says that the channel also broadcast advice that a wife should not leave her home without her husband's permission and that a woman who wears perfume in public is a prostitute.

...The guest said “it is a bit strange... to refuse relations. It would harm a marriage. The idea that a woman, even if married, can refuse relations with her husband because of individual choice'... is part of the Western culture, but not Islam.'"

Clearly it shows, as in so many other instances - far too many for me to cite them all - that many muslims have absolutely no desire to assimilate into Western cultures - to believe so is ignoring the obvious  - precisely what the multiculturists would have us do.  These muslims prefer instead to colonize our nations  and bring their backwards ideas out  into the mainstream and instill sharia law as the law of our land.

Thus it will not be only women who pay a high price for multiculturalims/Islamisation  - we all will.

Article in full:

UK's Muslim TV: Wives must not refuse sex with spouse

Britain's leading Muslim TV channel was accused of encouraging “marital rape” and promoting other intolerant views of women in a report on extremism published today.

The report by think tank Quillam says that the London-based Islam Channel broadcast comments saying that “the idea a woman cannot refuse her husband relations” was “not strange” and was instead part of “maintaining a strong marriage”.

It says that the channel also broadcast advice that a wife should not leave her home without her husband's permission and that a woman who wears perfume in public is a prostitute.

The think tank, which is calling for an investigation by broadcasting watchdog Ofcom, also accuses the channel of advertising talks by al Qaeda-supporting preacher Anwar al-Awlaki, who is alleged to have inspired failed Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, and of giving a platform to other extremist Islamists.

The report, which was based on an analysis of broadcasts over three months, also states that Islam Channel's programmes have undermined trust between community groups by airing hostile comments about non-Muslims and those who follow alternative versions of Islam.

The channel's website says that it aims “to present the Islamic viewpoint and values” and provide “authoritative and impartial Islamic information”. It aims to act as an “interface” between Muslims and non-Muslims and remove misconceptions about the religion.

But Talal Rajab, the report's author, said the programmes regularly promoted an “intolerant and out-of-date” form of Islam with unacceptable views. He said: “It is the most-watched Muslim TV channel in the UK. During the three-month period that we monitored its output, it repeatedly promoted bigoted and reactionary views towards women, non-Muslims and other Muslim sects.

“Although the channel does not directly call for terrorist violence, it clearly helps to create an atmosphere in which religiously-sanctioned intolerance and even hatred might be seen as acceptable.

"By promoting a single narrow version of Islam, Saudi Wahhabism, the Islam Channel is wasting an enormous opportunity to positively shape the nature of Islam in Britain.”

Among the comments highlighted by the report were those by a guest on the programme Muslimah Dilemma on whether a wife should always agree to sex with her husband.

The guest said “it is a bit strange... to refuse relations. It would harm a marriage. The idea that a woman, even if married, can refuse relations with her husband because of individual choice'... is part of the Western culture, but not Islam.”

There was concern about the religious advice programme IslamiQA, in which viewers were told “the majority of people in the hell will be women” because they are the cause of “calamities, hardship and suffering” in Western society. The same presenter tells viewers that if a woman wears perfume in public and it is smelt by a stranger “then she is declared a prostitute”.

The privately funded Islam Channel, which launched in 2004, has already been found by Ofcom to have breached the broadcasting code on impartiality during elections, and for broadcasting an unbalanced programme about the ownership of Jerusalem.

 

Facial Reconstruction for UK Brothers Bludgeoned in Muslim Gang Hammer Attack

What started out as a family celebration of New Year's Eve in the Angel and Crown pub on Roman Road, Bethnal Green ended with four family members being attacked by a gang of muslim thugs. Two brothers, Thomas and David Barry,  had their bodies pummelled and their faces smashed when they were set upon by a gang of up to 30 "youths" armed with hammers. The brothers had gone outside the pub to go to the aid of Thomas's son and his 16 yr. old girlfriend who the muslim gang had already attacked.

Clearly these hammer carrying muslim 'pack of animals' were looking for and maliciously prepared to wage street jihad - with their usual cowardly MO of greatly outnumbering any chosen victims:

"Thomas's wife Bridget said: "They hit my husband in the head with a hammer four times. He went down on the fourth blow.

"I came out of the pub and saw him lying on the ground in a pool of his own blood. I thought he was dead."

Bridget, who lives in Grove Road, said her husband had suffered deep cuts and bruising to his head, a broken foot and had surgery to piece his eye socket back together on Monday.But she said her brother-in-law was in an even worse state and needed facial reconstructive surgery to repair his jaw, which had been broken in six places, and a broken palate.

Bridget's 18-year-old son escaped with minor injuries but his 16-year-old girlfriend needed eight stitches to her head and ear after she was hit in the side of the head with a vodka bottle. "  SOURCE

David and Thomas Barry were left smashed, bloody and laying unconscious in the road.

Police from the muslim 'enriched' Tower Hamlets  "... said the suspects are all aged 16-18 and are Asian. One suspect is described as fat with black spiky hair  and was wearing a black jacket."

I suppose we should at least be thankful that the police didn't trot out the usual statement of this attack being a "one off". Clearly evidence grows  daily  as to the contrary.

The results of this latest Street Jihad attack - here is an image of David Barry's face/skull - post attack:

But for the miracle of breakthrough maxillofacial surgery, David and his brother Thomas would have been disfigured for life. As it is David has suffered permanent nerve damage with no feelings in the right side of his face as well as impaired hand/eye coordination which is likely to have a deleterious affect on his resuming his career as a communications engineer.

Channel 4 is currently preparing a documentary on the Barry brothers' surgery.

What do you think are the chances Channel 4 will highlight escalating muslim gang violence as being responsible for the Barry's horrific injuries?

Article in full:

BROTHERS who began 2010 in hospital after a horrific hammer attack have undergone radical facial reconstruction surgery to heal their horrendous injuries.

Anyone who did not know what happened to Thomas and David Barry on New Year's Eve would not believe the ordeal they have been through over the last few weeks.

Both brothers were hit with hammers by a gang of up to 30 youths during the attack near the Angel and Crown pub in Roman Road, Bethnal Green, knocking them both unconscious and leaving them needing expert surgery to rebuild their faces.

But less than three weeks after their surgery, the signs of both the attack and their operations have almost completely vanished thanks to the specialist maxillofacial surgical team at the Royal London Hospital.

The injuries of younger brother David, 41, were so severe that half of his face was caved in with a broken cheekbone, broken jaw in six places, broken palate and broken teeth.

Experts at the hospital in Whitechapel, led by consultant surgeon Simon Holmes, worked for four-and-a-half hours to rebuild the right side of his face, fixing titanium plates to his bone with 25 nuts and bolts.

David said: "The roof of my mouth was split in half so the right side of my face had dropped and my eyes weren't level. Half of my teeth were in the normal place and the other half were about an inch lower.

"They went in through the inside of my mouth and popped my eye out of its socket so they could fit the plates in my cheek; it's amazing what they can do.

"And I've been left with absolutely no scarring because it was all done from inside."

But David, a communications engineer who lives in Ilford, said the repercussions of the attack will stay with him for life and doctors do not yet know the extent of the permanent damage done.

"I've got no feeling in the right side of my face," he explained. "The nerves were so badly damaged that I'm never going to get it back and I'll have to live with it forever.

"My eyes are still slightly out of alignment and because of that my hand-eye coordination has gone out the window.

"I don't know how that'd going to affect my ability to do my job yet; I work with very fine wires so hand-eye coordination is very important."

Brother Thomas, 45, a French polisher who lives in Arbery Road, Bow with his wife Bridget and son Christopher, was hit once in the face and three times over the head with a hammer during the attack.

He also underwent surgery by Mr Holmes at the Royal London for a shattered eye socket.

He said: "They made an incision in my hairline and basically tyre levered my eye socket back out."

Both brothers are due to take part in a Channel 4 documentary about the work of the

Maxillofacial department at the Royal London Hospital.
 

ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST - UK FEMALE TV JOURNALIST SACKED BY AL JAZEERA FOR BEING WHITE FEMALE & CHRISTIAN

Well .... here we go again. Another professional woman shocked and appalled at the way she has been treated by muslim MEN...when are these dhimwits going to learn?

This latest incident of "reverse Islamophobia" finds veteran TV journalist, Jo Burgin, stunned at the Arabic station Al Jazeera (abbreviated as AJ) network's treatment of her and has filed a £1million ($1.9 million)compensation claim for race, sex and religious discrimination. But first some history on the situation.

Back in the Spring of  2005, Miss Burgin and many other British journalists flocked to AJ's base in Doha, Qatar in order to assume positions in AJ's English speaking division - they all planned on elevating their careers and the TV station to a level that would rival CNN. Jo Burgin apparently was performing well enought that she was elevated to the position of the most senior level woman working for AJ where she headed planning at the service's 24-hour English language. But the honeymoon period would not be long.

Despite being promised "Western style working condition" what Miss Burgin experienced was "her Arab bosses had 'publicly humiliated' her and eventually sacked her for being a 'white, Christian, British female'.........."Miss Burgin said the station's deputy managing director Ibrahim Helal 'harboured anti-Western sentiment', could not relate to women and rolled his eyes whenever she spoke.....he shouted her down in meetings and ignored her in favour of her male deputies. ...While a blind eye was turned to Muslim couples working together, Miss Burgin claimed her relationship with director of news Steve Clark - now her husband - was given as the reason for her sacking in April last year."

Miss Burgin complained "'It left me publicly humiliated, deeply hurt and professionally smeared,' she said."

Perhaps Miss Burgin should have done a little less listening to her multicultural, Islam pandering liberal media co-horts and politicians and done alot more background reading on the subject of treatment of women in Islam. If she had done so at the least she would have perhaps shown more caution in laying years of her career and life into the hands of those who believe:

MEN ARE SUPERIOR TO WOMEN : Sura (4:34) - "Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them."

A WOMAN IS WORTH LESS THAN A MAN : Sura (4:11) - (Inheritance) "The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females" (see also Sura (4:176)).

Sura (2:282) - (Court testimony) "And call to witness, from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not found then a man and two women"

Sura (2:228) - "and the men are a degree above them [women]"

Sura (24:31) - Women are to lower their gaze around men, so they do not look them in the eye

The above quotes can be found on The Religion of Peace web site.

Let's see Miss Burgin is upset that she was " publicly humiliated, deeply hurt and professionally smeared"....now where have we heard that before -- from other British women who blithely pandered to muslims and believed in muslim integration and  Westernization? -- only to have both thrown back into their face?  How about:

Former Mayor of Kirklees, Jean Calvert, who was shocked that the same muslim men she has so handily pandered to for years - refuse to have their picture taken with her or to shake her hand -while they all were gathered at a "community cohesion" get together. For story go HERE

OR even

Grandmother of three and local Liberal Democrat (political group known for its pandering to muslims) Councillor, Jo Calvert-Mindell, weary from months of sleeplessness caused by drunken, noisy college students finally decided to complain to the students who (unfortunately for her) contained two male "Asian" (aka muslim) students.  Thus immediately the racism bomb was lobbed by the muslim students at Cllr. Calvert-Mindell so she was carted off by the UK police. Racism charges against (the outraged) Miss Calvert were dropped but only AFTER she made an embarrassing appearance in Court. The students were never charged.  For story go HERE

The names and places may change but the results will continue to be the same. Let's face it - women in the UK can't even trust many of their muslim doctor's  nevermind most other muslim males. Were these three women so naive, conceited or stupid to honestly believe that muslim men would treat them any differently?

MUSLIM THUGS CONTINUE TO TAKE OVER EAST END LONDON

In what can only be described as a sinister etched pattern comes yet another incident of a muslim gang attacking a lone victim. The attack took place in the East End of London. An area once known for its tough but "heart of gold" indigenous British Londoners who inspired the long running TV show by the same name.

Under the banner of multiculturalism and diversity and aided by the actively pro-muslim immigration Labour government, the East End of London, particularly the Tower Hamlets area, is growing into a bastion of Islam with narry a traditional London "barrow boy" to be found. What you will find are burkas and expanding no-go areas where twice in the recent past Christian priests, Canon Michael Ainsworth and Reverend Kevin Scully  were brutally attacked by muslim gangs. (note that another good samaritan who tried to help one of the priest was also given a beating). Both were attacked for being Christian in what the muslim thugs believe should only be a muslim area. These attacks prompted well known authors, Melanie Phillips, to write Jihad in Londonistan.  and Christopher Hitchens to say that London is now a breeding ground for Jihadists.

In this latest case a good samaritan came to the aid of an 18 year old girl who was under threat from one of the gang members. So did the muslim man solely attack the samaritan. NO! True to form the cowardly thug called up his gang pals so that the six of them could chase and stab the passer-by. The man, who valiantly try to help a young woman in distress, was then viciously stabbed by the gang in the neck, chest back and arm.-- "Police are looking for six Asian men. One was described as having gold teeth, wearing a grey tracksuit and was driving a blue Nissan."

Sadly, the samaritan need not expect too much justice from the politically correctness worshipping, foppish British judicial system which recently was shown to hand out milquetoast soft sentences to convicted murderers, terrorists and other lawbreakers. Or where the license funded BBC places a victims pro indigenous British political affiliation as a reason for being murdered by a muslim killer - (with the bias extending to today's headline).

And what about the East End of London?  Well we know that the muslim councillors in the Tower Hamlets area have already tried to impose Ramadan fasting rules on non muslim councillors. And that £1.3 million ($2.5 million) " has just been allocated over the next three years to help Tower Hamlets council deal with extremism and get disparate communities back into mainstream society." 

But with plans for six skyscrapers recently submitted to the Tower Hamlets planning commission that will include "four courtyard buildings of five to 10 storeys each and six towers reaching up 22 to 28 storeys, housing 822 flats" -(undoubtedly to be filled up with more muslims)  there is little hope for the dwindling numbers of indigenous British who are toughing it out in East End London.

MUSLIM VICTIM OF WHITE RACIST CRIME? - MEDIA GETS IT WRONG- AGAIN

This past week an Asian boy(media doublespeak for muslim), Amar Aslam, was battered and killed in Crow's Neck Park in Dewsbury, UK. In typical lockstep the British media rushed to jump to their preconceived conclusion and portrayed the murder as a racist crime by a gang of white men. Unfounded headlines and biased reporting such as: "Racism fear over youth's murder in park" and "Gang blamed for battering" led the world to believe that British whites had killed a defenseless young muslim man and muslims are the inevitable victims of white hatred. The reporter went on to quote an unnamed "source close to the family" (of the victim):

"The man, who asked to remain anonymous, said there had been trouble between a white gang and a "non-white" gang during the day."  (Apparently all gangs made up of white members are racist??)

So after the media stoked countrywide, if not worldwide, anti-white British feelings among their readers - who was arrested for murdering Amar Aslam? Headlines, absent of any racial hate connotations and accusations, appeared today - "Police arrest two boys for Yorkshire Park murder"  Two boys - surely they must be those hate filled white boys?

"The victim and three of the suspects, two 15-year-olds and a 20-year-old, are all Asian, suggesting initial suspicions of a racial motive were ill-founded." LINK

Have all the news media, who clearly were wrong, publicly apologized for their gross error and slandering the British white population??  Don't hold your breath waiting for that to occur!!! The notion just doesn't fit into the media led muslim/minority victimization theory.

Factually just who are the largest group to be the victims of hate crime in the UK?

"Nearly half of all victims of racially motivated murders in the last decade have been white, according to official figures released by the Home Office. .... The disclosure will add to the intense debate over multiculturalism in British society. The figures also overturn the assumption that almost all racial murders are committed against ethnic minority victims."

"......Senior police officers have admitted that 'political correctness' and the fear of discussing the issue have meant that race crime against white people goes under-reported. One chief constable has claimed that white, working-class men are more alienated than the Muslim community."  LINK

It is past time for the media to stop their biased reporting with their overt, pre-conceived premise of assuming that muslims are always the victims of white hate crimes and by spewing accusations of what is actually the MYTH of Islamophobia- particularly since the objective facts clearly disagree with the subjective media agenda.

MOVIE PROPAGANDA AT ITS WORST

With the third anniversary of the horrific 7/7 London bombings in the near future what does the movie industry plan to show in it's first movie commemorating this act of Islamic terrorism against the innocent British people? Perhaps telling us the stories of some of the victims...or how their families are coping with the violent and tragic loss of loved ones?

NO!

By premiering a fictional movie about the shooting of an innocent muslim man by Metropolitan Police in the wake of the outrage about the bombings.  Islamophobia with a gun??

Needless to say the families of the victims of the 7/7 bombings are incredulous at the insensitivity shown to them.  The movie producers say they didn't mean to offend - (after all what better way to show the world the pain of terrorism then to make a muslim man the victim and to dwell on muslim hurt feelings). 

Let's hope in the tradition of the recent box office flops such as Rendition and Lions for Lambs that the British people, like the Americans, will turn their backs and close their wallets to such blatent propaganda.

Bombing victims outraged over third anniversary premiere date for 7/7 terror attack movie about innocent Muslim man being shot dead

Families of those killed by the 7 July bombings today expressed shock at the "insensitive" timing of the premiere and said they knew nothing of what is the first movie based on the attacks.

Shoot On Sight is to be premiered in London on the third anniversary of the terrorist attacks.

With a cast including Brian Cox and Greta Scacchi, the film is a fictionalised account of the killing of an innocent young Muslim man by the Metropolitan Police in the wake of the outrage.

Scroll down for more ...

Tube terror: A scene from Shoot On Sight, a fictionalised account of the killing of an innocent young Muslim by the Metropolitan Police

The real incident killed 52 people as well as the four bombers. Innocent Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes was shot dead by police in a later incident.

But Lisa Cassidy, 28, of Finsbury Park, whose 22-year-old brother Ciaran died at Russell Square, condemned the project.

"Are we going to get to see this beforehand? We want to know exactly what this film is about and what they are portraying. I think it is completely insensitive to release it on July 7 - they are just trying to make money and raise publicity."

Richard Deer, 31, lost his Polish girlfriend Karolina Gluck, 29, at Russell Square. He said: "I think it would have been nice if out of respect they had arranged a way the families could see it first. For some of the families it is still very, very raw.

"I think for this kind of film that is going to be on the world stage it is very insensitive not to tell us and to show it on July 7. We are all at different stages and dealing with it in a different ways."

Jean Charles de Menezes. A spokesman said: 'I think it is good that they are exploring the role of the police'

A spokesman for the Jean Charles de Menezes Family Campaign, Justice4Jean said: "I think it is good that they are exploring the role of the police."

However Jag Mundhra, the Indian Hindu director who was living in London at the time, said the aim of the film was not to offend.

The story is told from the perspective of a Muslim police officer - played by Naseeruddin Shah - with a white wife and children who are well integrated into British society until "something happens and there is this ripple effect in communities that were otherwise co-existing."

It stemmed from Mundhra's personal experience of the consequences of the 7 July attacks. "I couldn't stop a taxi after the bombings because of the way I looked," he said.

"Then I started noticing that on television suddenly Scotland Yard was represented by a Muslim police officer [Tarique Ghaffur]. I knew it was because the way they wanted to tell the Muslim community 'look, we have a Muslim police officer.'

"Then I could see that if I sat on an Underground train everyone looked at you and moved away. I could feel the fear."

The aim of the film was to address these issues. "I wanted to see the point of view of a shooter who had to pull the trigger and shot the wrong guy. You're damned if you do and damned if you don't.

"I knew that it might create some controversy but I thought the issue was important enough to not fear controversy. Everyone says the wounds are still raw. But facing up to a situation is more cathartic than hiding from it."

Mundhra said he spoke to Assistant Commissioner Ghaffur before making the film and also won the cooperation of the Regent's Park mosque where some of the filming took place. The bombings themselves are not represented as the film is based on the aftermath.

The film is being released in the UK on 11 July with the premiere benefiting Flame, a charity for the education of women in Asian communities, and in America and India. It is being sold at this week's Cannes Film Festival, where there has been strong interest from the Middle East and Africa.

MUSLIMS AND MOHAMMED TAKEN "HEAD ON" in USA

Well, well - looks like some brave USA Christian TV personalities are taking muslims and Mohammed "head on" by devouring the Prophet, in the form of a sugar cookie, on the TV show "Flamethrower" --- WHOA!!!!!!! (Of course you would NEVER see this happening in the UK and most of the EU countries as the programme would be immediately banned as being "insensitive to muslim feelings" - For a list of Things That Offend Muslims go here)

It is interesting to note that the initial reaction to this "blasphemy" by a large United Muslims of America Interfaith Alliance in South San Francisco was to ask people to ignore the actions. (What no riots in the streets? Time will tell.) Of course this statement was immediately followed with the usual muslim complaint of Islamophobia and whining that muslims are being picked on..........................

Someone please hand me a kleenex AND a Mohammed sugar cookie.

For original article and video clip go here
--------------------UPDATE TO THIS STORY BELOW ARTICLE --------

Christian warriors to eat 'Muhammad'
Political TV hosts fed up with PC Islam will devour cookie with face of prophet

---

Posted: January 24, 2008
1:00 a.m. Eastern




There's also a regular segment titled, "WWMD? (What Would Muhammad Do?)"

By Joe Kovacs
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com

This cookie with a depiction of the Muslim prophet Muhammad will be eaten on 'Flamethrower,' a new political program on Faith TV

A new, cutting-edge, political TV show will challenge Islam with biting humor tomorrow night, placing the face of the prophet Muhammad onto a cookie and then having it eaten on camera.

"We're going to take a stand and say Muhammad's face is delicious," said Molotov Mitchell, the 28-year-old incendiary creator and host of "Flamethrower," a program described as a low-budget, gritty cross between the "The Daily Show," "The Colbert Report," and "The View" if Ann Coulter were the producer. "This is religious and culinary history in the making."

The theme of this week's episode is "All Things Islam," as panelists take on the faith of Muslims in a no-holds-barred fashion.

"Islam is not even a religion," Mitchell told WND from a location somewhere in Eastern North Carolina. "It's an ideology of 'might makes right' disguised as a religion. We're going to show that Allah was with us when we baked this cookie and ate it. Deal with it!"

Mitchell and his fellow panelists – all of whom are Christians in their 20s and whom he calls the next generation of conservatism – are trying to make the point that America is still a free country, and there's no need to cower in fear from Islamo-fascism. He laments the frequency of Islamic suicide bombings, giving a new twist to a famous line from "It's a Wonderful Life," by stating, "Every time a bell rings, a Muhammad gets his wives."

In recent years, European cartoons featuring Muhammad have caused a tidal wave of violent protests and death threats, as Islamic tradition bans depictions of the prophet.

Molotov Mitchell, the Christian creator of 'Flamethrower,' irreverently sinks his teeth into a cookie featuring a depiction of the Muslim prophet Muhammad

"What were doing is exercising our freedom of speech and freedom of the press to the fullest in order to challenge a tyrannical, oppressive system that has doomed the cultures and countries of the Middle East for centuries," Mitchell told WND. "Now it's trying to invade our borders, and somebody has to speak up about it."

In its two previous episodes, "Flamethrower" has taken on subjects including "Is it ethical to kill abortionists?" and "Let's invade Mexico" – not to stay, but just to get rid of the drug cartels

In it, cast members dress in traditional Muslim clothing and deliver "totally atrocious" real news items, recounting, says Mitchell, "what some jerk named Muhammad did this week."

"I'm not going to be hurt and insulted. I'm going to ask people to ignore this," said Iftekhar Hai, president of United Muslims of America Interfaith Alliance in South San Francisco. "They would dare not do it to any Jewish person, saying 'the Jews killed Jesus.' The Jewish lobby would slaughter the Christians if they did that."

"I don't think this is part of the American character," Hai added, "but it has become part of the American tradition to only pick on Muslims."

Mitchell says politics is the driving force of his show, saying, "The [Christian] church really doesn't seem to get it when it comes to politics. The church likes to ask, 'What would Jesus do?' But it often suggests Jesus would hug somebody for every situation, and that's not what Jesus would do. I'd rather ask, 'What would George Washington do?'


A video teaser for the program offers a sample exchange between Mitchell and Fox News host Alan Colmes.

"Muhammad murdered people and he married a 9-year-old. That makes him a murdering pedophile," said Mitchell. "I don't think that we should burn the Quran. I'm a Christian environmentalist. We should put that thing to use. I mean, at least get some toilet paper out of it."

"Your kind of attitude is a really despicable attitude," responded Colmes.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mitchell's 27-year-old wife says she's "totally fine" with the concept of "Flamethrower."

"At first, I was a little scared," she admitted. "But I'm a Christian, and we shouldn't fear to lose our lives. We're in America, and we have a free voice here, and we want it to stay that way."

The hour-long show airs Friday nights on Faith TV on the Sky Angel Network, channel 9708, at 7 p.m. Eastern, and the complete cookie segment is expected to be posted on the video-sharing site YouTube immediately after tomorrow night's airing.

Mitchell says the show has already been recorded on tape, so it would pointless for any would-be assassin to target him.

"Even if you kill us, the cookie will still be eaten on the air," he said.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE TO THIS STORY:

COOKIE SHOW CRUMBLES

TV station has decided to NOT show the Mohammed cookie show - stating it was in poor taste

I thought it looked a bit "tasty" to me!!!

so much for this groups leading the way of "freedom of speech"

Muslims win again.

BBC FUNDED ISLAMIC TERRORISTS & KEPT MUM ON 21/7 UK BOMBERS ID

When does greed for having the best news story trump honesty, sanity and the safety of the British public? Well it seems that question should be posed to the BBC who not only gave money to an Islamic preacher who was radicalising & training muslim youths in the UK for jihad but also funded a paintball "fun" trip for the terrorists. To make matters worse even after the reporters AND BBC executives knew the identities of the 21/7 bombers - they felt more allegiance to the BBC and their own necks rather then give much needed information to the police.

Sure makes you want to take this BBC crew to a paintball game - doesn't it??!! Might even make for a good reality TV show for them - and -as we all know the BBC is what is really important.

ENTIRE ARTICLE - emphsise mine

BBC 'funded paintballing trip for Islamic terrorists and didn't pass on information about 21/7 bombers'

By DANIEL BATES - More by this author » Last updated at 08:04am on 5th December 2007

The BBC funded a paintballing trip for men later accused of Islamic terrorism and didn't pass on information about the 21/7 bombers to police, a court heard yesterday.

The organisation gave Mohammed Hamid, an Islamic preacher accused of radicalising British Muslims, a £300 fee and paid for fellow defendants to go and be filmed for a documentary.

After the botched July attacks Hamid told a BBC reporter he had worked with on the programme 'Don't Panic, I', Islamic' that he knew the identities of the culprits - but she felt 'no obligation' to tell police, the court heard.

Scroll down for more...

BBC in hot water: As it is accused of giving Islamic preacher Mohammed Hamid, who is accused of radicalising British Muslims, £300 to be filmed

The journalist informed her boss and the information was passed on up to senior executives but a decision was taken not to pass it on.

The claims emerged during the trial of Mr Hamid who, along with four others, is accused of running a two-year radicalisation programme to groom London Muslims for jihad.

The court was told Mr Hamid was first approached by BBC researcher Nasreen Suleaman in late 2004 when she was making a documentary before the July 2005 attacks.

It was shown on June 12, 2005 on BBC2.

The BBC paid for Hamid, fellow defendants Mohammed Al Figari and Mousa Brown and others to go on a paintballing trip at the Delta Force centre in Tonbridge, Kent, in February 2005.

The court was told that July 21 bombers Ramzi Mohammed and Hussein Osman also went on a trip to the same centre before the 7/7 attacks. Ms Suleaman said she was unaware that they were on the trip.

Hamid, 50, told her he was going to use to the BBC's money to pay a fine imposed by magistrates after he was convicted of a public order offence alongside the man later exposed as the 21/7 ringleader, Muktar Said Ibrahim.

Ms Suleaman said she spoke to Hamid soon after the failed attacks on July 21 2005 and he sounded 'guarded' and 'worried'.

She claimed he had been shocked that he knew the accused and was worried they might call him as they were on the run.

Prosecuting barrister Duncan Penny asked her: 'Did you tell him to go to the police?'

Ms Suleaman replied: 'I don't think I needed to.'

Mr Penny said: 'Here was a man who told you that he knew those individuals who, as I understand it, were currently still at large for what on the face of it was the attempted bombings of the transport network a fortnight after it happened, and he was telling you he had some knowledge of them?

Ms Suleaman said: 'I got the sense that he was already talking to the police.' She added: 'I referred it to my immediate boss at the BBC. I wasn't told that there was an obligation.

'I obviously had to report back to my immediate manager at the BBC. In fact it was referred above her as well.

'It was such a big story. At one stage the head of news at the BBC was involved. No one at any stage said there was an obligation.'

Miss Suleaman also told Mr Penny, that Hamid, who she dubbed 'a documentary-maker's dream', was taken on a paintballing trip for the programme as a fun way of introducing him.

The court also heard from Ms Suleaman's former colleague Phil Rees, who produced Don't Panic, I'm Islamic. He told the court he was impressed by Hamid's sense of humour.

He said: 'I took it as more like a rather Steptoe and Son figure rather than seriously persuasive. I saw him as a kind of Cockney comic.'

Hamid is standing trial at Woolwich Crown Court with Kader Ahmed, 20, Al Figari, 42, Kibley Da Costa, 24, and Brown, 41.

Hamid denies proving weapons training, five charges of soliciting murder and three of providing training for terrorism. The others deny charges relating to training.

Atilla Ahmet, 43, has admitted soliciting murder.

The trial at Woolwich Crown Court continues.