TheOPINIONATOR

The Other 9/11 Mosque

Is another Ground Zero mosque currently under construction in the United States? 

While tens of thousands gather in protest of the New York City proposed mosque-trocity many believe there is an even more glaring example of the Islamization of our 9/11 memorials going on in Shanksville Pennsylvania - virtually unnoticed.  Those concerned fear the Flight 93 Memorial is nothing more than a shrine to Islam - an open air mosque that is thinly disguised as a memorial.

Is the Flight 93 memorial honoring the heroes who died trying to stop the hijacking Islamist terrorists from causing even more carnage? Or is this really a Islamic symbol/memorial to the murdering muslim hijackers?

Coincidence or Plan? Conspiracy or Reality?

What do you think?

Flight 93 Memorial centerpiece

Under Construction - the Other 9/11 Mosque

 By Cynthia Yacowar-Sweeney  Tuesday, October 12, 2010

With eyes on New York, it’s easy to overlook the other ground-zero mosque that is presently being built in Shanksville Pennsylvania at the Flight 93 crash site. That 9/11 site is home to what will soon be the world’s largest open-air mosque disguised as a memorial, contends author Alec Rawls. After five years of insignificant media coverage and minimal public awareness, construction of the Flight 93 Memorial centerpiece is already in progress.

The giant half-mile wide Islamic-shaped red crescent of maple trees is slated for completion next year on the 10th anniversary of 9/11, when the autumn leaves of the crescent’s trees turn a brilliant flaming red. The 40 brave American heroes who seized control of the plane from Islamic terrorists and averted what would have been another 9/11 terror attack, are going to be honored with a design that features the major symbol of their murderers - a red Islamic crescent large enough to be seen from aircraft flying overhead.

According to Rawls, this crescent is one of many mosque features embedded in architect Paul Murdoch’s winning “Crescent of Embrace” design, later changed mainly in name only, to “Circle of Embrace”. Another important and mandatory mosque feature is Mecca orientation for prayer. For this memorial to be a proper mosque, it must face Mecca. And Rawls proves it does, in his book “Crescent of Betrayal: Dishonoring the Heroes”. Using math and geometry, Rawls calculates that the center of the crescent points almost exactly towards Mecca. That makes the Flight 93 Memorial a mosque. 

Another feature of paramount significance is a colossal 93-foot minaret-like tower that Rawls argues indicates time for prayer by functioning as an Islamic sundial.    The tower is shaped like a crescent with a crescent-shaped top. More crescents of trees surround the tower and together they too are oriented towards Mecca. The massive size of the tower and crescent displayed on over 2,000 acres of national park land, will undoubtedly convey a message of endorsement, proselytization, and aggrandizement of Islam that is not appropriate to the memory of the 40 American heroes. Not a peep from the ACLU – it is too busy purging the country of Christian symbols and remains silent as the huge religious symbol of Islam is being built according to plan.

The design was selected over five years ago from approximately 1,000 entries worldwide in a public design competition that was overseen by the National Park Service.  Referring to the memorial as a “terrorist memorializing mosque”, Rawls claims it is replete with Islamic symbolism of monumental proportions to emphasize triumph, and pays tribute to the 9/11 terrorists. In fact, every single detail of the design is symbolic. A string of coincidences or a conscious slap in America’s face?

Islamic imagery is certainly not foreign to Murdoch, having worked with award-winning architects Charles Moore and Arthur Erickson who did major design work in Islamic   architecture, the latter of whom designed an open-air mosque in the centre of the campus for the Islamic University of Medina. Erickson’s design appears to be the original model for Murdoch’s outdoor mosque (according to Rawls writing to blogger Hesperado). Furthermore, one of the Park’s design consultants, an expert in the history of mosque design and professor of Islamic architecture at MIT, did his Masters in Architecture at UCLA with Murdoch. Interestingly enough, the crescent and star are featured as the logo for Davis Langdon, the global construction consultant company that assisted Murdoch with the design. His landscape architect Nelson Byrd Woltz, also had a thing for crescents, according to Rawls, and incorporated many in earlier projects. Is it possible that Murdoch’s associates enabled him to properly incorporate mosque features into his design? Or was the design innocently conceived?

Intentional or not, the symbolism does matter and has remained an issue of grave concern for many, especially against the backdrop of the growing threat of Sharia Law in America - the legal code of the Quran which can be brutally oppressive when interpreted by radical Islamists who view the West as the enemy to be conquered. Just recently, on September 15th, a national security report released in Washington by Frank Gaffney’s The Center for Security Policy concluded that the threat posed by Sharia to America is critical. One way the teachings of Sharia can infiltrate and undermine western civilization is via mosques. 

If Rawls is correct in his contention that the memorial is truly a victory mosque in disguise, then there is ample reason for concern, given that many American mosques   are funded by Saudi Arabia, the country that gave America 15 of the 19 terrorists on 9/11, and are radicalized by its Wahhabi hardliners - meaning that these radicals   choose and train the imams and also write or give final approval of the sermons. The Wahhabists aren’t the only ones who have the freedom to force their hate ideology upon the mosque’s worshippers. American mosques are also being infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist movement that seeks to convert the world to Islam and to establish Sharia Law worldwide. The Brotherhood’s message of transforming the U.S. into an Islamic state (and eventually establishing a global Islamic state) became crystal clear back in 1991 when a key operative of the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S., Mohamed Akram, presented Islam (in his strategy memo) as a “civilization alternative” that can be “enabled within the souls, minds and the lives of the people of the country”. He wrote: “The Brotherhood must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within”. Part of that process, which Akram refers to as “Civilization-Jihad”, includes building Islamic centers and mosques. 

Paralleling the construction of the Shanksville memorial-mosque is the growing number of mega-mosques across America, especially in rural areas similar to that of Shanksville. “It does seem to be part of a larger strategy to build mosques in rural areas and create Islamic communities, large Islamic communities, in rural areas for some larger purpose,” says Rebecca Bynum, a columnist for the New English Review. The possibility of propagating radical Islam from some of these mosques is not a far cry from reality. Is it any wonder why the colossal crescent design in rural Pennsylvania has raised numerous questions and eyebrows? Has radical Islam found rural ground upon which to rear its ugly head and spread its detestable ideology?

It’s high time to more effectively address the five-year controversy surrounding the design of the Flight 93 Memorial and give it the exposure and awareness it so rightly deserves. If Americans are to protect their way of life, it is imperative they ensure that this memorial honours the heroes, not the hijackers. Questioning where the estimated $58 million needed to fund this project is coming from, is a start. Does this extravagant and expensive design really do justice to how the heroes would best be remembered? Can’t a more fitting symbol be found to honor their sacrifice? Who were the jury participants of the design competition and who chose them? Who are the university and religious scholars with whom the National Park Service consulted? What other companies did Murdoch refer to and could they have possibly collaborated to come up with a design that actually honours Islam? And if so, why would Murdoch want to infuse Islamic imagery into a design meant to commemorate the legacy of those heroes who died at the hands of radical Islam?

Questions like these, which may be too politically incorrect for many to explore, let alone utter, are finally finding a place in American society and require more attention and investigation. Radical Islam is counting on our ignorance and complacency not only in the United States, but in Canada as well. There’s work to be done, so “let’s roll”.

End of article.

Memorial does face Mecca:

Those that question the (hidden) meaning behind the design of the Flight 93 memorial - use this designer's drawing to prove the memorial does indeed face Mecca.  SOURCE

Green circle was obtained from the Salat Times utility at Islam.com. It shows the direction to Mecca from Somerset PA. The red arrow shows that a person standing halfway between the tips of the giant crescent and facing into the center of the crescent is facing almost exactly at Mecca. The meaning? A crescent that Muslims face into to face Mecca is called a mihrab and is the central feature around which every mosque is built. (Everything you see in this graphic remains completely intact in the superficially altered Bowl of Embrace redesign.)

Here are some links to the war that is ongoing between the press and myself.

Yesterday's large color copy here:
http://www.crescentofbetrayal.com/WideSite-PlanAdCopyCMYK,PDF.pdf

Today's large color ad copy here:
http://www.crescentofbetrayal.com/Star+BlocksCMYK,FinalPDF.pdf

The Tribune Democrat's fact-checking free reporting here:
http://www.tribune-democrat.com/local/local_story_196231439.html

And here:
http://www.tribune-democrat.com/local/local_story_202233829.html

Manchester shopkeeper fends off 'Asian' robbers by throwing beer cans at them - Will he be charged with hate crime?

Throwing beer cans at muslims?  Surprised the police initial reaction is so mild - especially in view of their usual pandering and constant support of muslims leveling ludicrous accusations of supposed hate crimes and discrimination leveled against them - often regarding alcohol - such as:

Devout muslim sues Tesco for making him carry alcohol

Muslim trucker sues Tennessee firm over alcohol load

Muslim sues company claiming "hurt feelings" due to wine gift

Muslim bank employee sues - says he was fired for being Muslim and told " if someone doesn't drink (alcohol) he should not be in banking"

Muslim cab driver's refuse to transport customers with alcohol

Taxi driver refuses to take home woman carrying bottle of alcohol

Thus the shopkeeper shouldn't be too surprised when the police "come to their senses" and charge him with a crime against the gun-toting muslim thieves who were victimised by the tossed beer cans.

Expect Compensation tribunal  to be forthcoming.

Article in full:

Radcliffe shopkeeper fends off robbers with beer cans

A shopkeeper from Greater Manchester fought off armed raiders - by hurling cans of beer at them.

Three masked men, armed with a gun, entered an off-licence in Lord Street, Radcliffe, at 1230 BST on Thursday.

They threatened the 53-year-old shopkeeper with the gun but he threw the cans at them, a Greater Manchester Police spokesman said.

The men - described as Asian, between 5ft 6in (1.7m) and 5ft 10in (1.8m) and wearing dark clothing - fled.

Det Con Peter Graham, of Greater Manchester Police, said: "What this man did was courageous - in sharp contrast to the cowardly actions of the robbers themselves.

"With no thought to his own safety he fought them off and they fled with their tails between their legs."

He appealed to anyone with information to contact police.

Muslims Reach Majority in Britain - on Scotland Yard's Most Wanted List

Hat Tip - NB

If ever there was a glaring example of the deleterious effect of rampant muslim immigration into Great Britain it's the recently published Scotland Yard's Wanted List where clearly the muslim minority is well represented.

Please recall this the next time some Lefty nutter starts blathering on and on about the wonders of diversity and multiculturalism. So often these multiculturalists toss out the ludicrous example of citing all the ethnic 'Asian' restaurants in London and elsewhere in Britain  (some of which they might want to think twice about) as a BIG plus for multiculturalism  --as if a tasty meal makes up for the enormous downside of DIEversity.

So as muslim criminals dominate Scotland Yard's Wanted List, as  muslim gangs impose sharia law in Britain's prisons and as muslim thugs brag about their take over of the British underworld  ---- I think I'll stick to my bangers and mash.

SCOTLAND YARD WANTED LIST

UK - Muslim Chef Gets A £76,000 'Kick' in his Bacon Butt-ie

Halleluiah!

Below is a follow up story to my prior post :

MUSLIM POLICE CHEF SUES OVER TRADITIONAL ENGLISH BREAKFAST

"...(a)  muslim police chef suing for having to cook meals for the police men and women for which it is his JOB to cook.

"Hasanali Khoja is accusing the force of religious discrimination after it refused to guarantee in his contract that he would be excused from handling pork products."

For once I am actually pleased to be able to state that Mr. Khoja has been handed his lying bacon butt-ie on a platter by Judge Michael Southam:

"Hasanali Khoja accused the Metropolitan Police of failing to consider his Islamic beliefs when he was asked to handle pork products as a catering manager at a police station.  The £23,000-a-year chef claimed suggestions by his bosses that he should wear gloves and use tongs left him 'stressed and humiliated'. Muslims are banned from eating pork under Islamic law.

But Mr Khoja, 62, lost his claim in May after a police employee told an employment tribunal how she saw Mr Khoja eat bacon rolls and sausages. The Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) has now won a ruling ordering Mr Khoja to pay its costs, which total at least £76,200. In its costs claim, the Met said Mr Khoja 'knew that he had asked for a bacon roll two or three times for personal consumption before bringing his claim and throughout the conduct of his claim'.

'The fact that he had knowingly come into contact with pork products before bringing the claim shows that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success from the outset.'

Mr Khoja gave further insight into his greed when he was caught telling more lies:

Mr Khoja, from Edgware, North London, who is still employed by the Met, claimed at a hearing in Watford that he could afford to pay only £80 a week as he has little income, lives in rented property and is struggling with £30,000 legal bills of his own. But the court discovered he had sold another home last year, splitting profits of almost £200,000 with his wife and two sons.

I'd like to think that this ruling will deter future "nice little earner" seekers - but as such lawsuits - by muslims - have frequently produced lucrative results in the past I doubt that they will cease padding their pockets with the proceeds from such 'trauma's' as "hurt feelings over head scarf"  -

And let's not forget muslim Fatah Lemes who took a job as a cocktail waitress then sued saying the red dress she was "forced to wear hurt her feelings'.  A dhimmified tribunal awarded her £2,919.95 for those hurt feelings and loss of earnings" - Of course no one on the tribunal saw the Facebook pictures of a smiling Miss Lemes flaunting her two "hurt feelings" in a far more revealing dress.

One needs no better example - than Ms Lemes -  as to why so many muslims have turned British employers - via the soft headed, muslim pandering British judicial system -into "hurt feelings" cash cows. 

But at least for today...........there is a glimmer of hope.

Article in full:

Muslim police chef defeated in 'bacon roll' tribunal faces £75,000 legal bill

By Tom Harper
Last updated at 10:02 PM on 19th December 2009

Costly case: A caterer told the court that Hasanali Khoja ate pork

A Muslim chef who lost a claim of religious discrimination against Scotland Yard after complaining he was forced to cook sausages and bacon faces a legal bill of more than £75,000.

Hasanali Khoja accused the Metropolitan Police of failing to consider his Islamic beliefs when he was asked to handle pork products as a catering manager at a police station.  

The £23,000-a-year chef claimed suggestions by his bosses that he should wear gloves and use tongs left him 'stressed and humiliated'. Muslims are banned from eating pork under Islamic law.

But Mr Khoja, 62, lost his claim in May after a police employee told an employment tribunal how she saw Mr Khoja eat bacon rolls and sausages.

The Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) has now won a ruling ordering Mr Khoja to pay its costs, which total at least £76,200. In its costs claim, the Met said Mr Khoja 'knew that he had asked for a bacon roll two or three times for personal consumption before bringing his claim and throughout the conduct of his claim'.

'The fact that he had knowingly come into contact with pork products before bringing the claim shows that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success from the outset.'

Judge Michael Southam agreed and ruled Mr Khoja should pay costs, though these would be determined at a later date at a county court.

Mr Khoja, from Edgware, North London, who is still employed by the Met, claimed at a hearing in Watford that he could afford to pay only £80 a week as he has little income, lives in rented property and is struggling with £30,000 legal bills of his own.

But the court discovered he had sold another home last year, splitting profits of almost £200,000 with his wife and two sons.

The decision is another setback for the police chef, who believed he was on course for a large settlement when he launched his case in 2007.

Mr Khoja, who sits on a Foods Standards Agency advisory committee on Muslim issues, decided to take action after Scotland Yard chiefs placed him on unpaid leave for a year after his refusal to work with pork.

He said he was then given work in a different building but his role was downgraded.

But his case fell apart when another caterer, Mary Boakye, told the court she served him bacon rolls 'two or three' times at the Met canteen at Heathrow in West London.

When she told him she was surprised because his religion banned him from eating pork, Mr Khoja allegedly replied: 'I eat them once in a while.'

Another chef said he saw Mr Khoja once happily eat a sausage dish and told the court 'he was not as strict as some Muslims'.

Judge Southam also heard how Mr Khoja had made 'wild and baseless' allegations about a human resource manager, allegedly making racial facial gestures.

Mr Khoja is one of several ethnic minority staff to launch racial discrimination claims against Scotland Yard. The most high-profile was former Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur, who last year accused Sir Ian Blair of excluding him from the upper echelons of the force because of his skin colour.

Mr Ghaffur retired after receiving an out-of-court settlement and dropped the allegations.

UK - Another Muslim Joins the Fecal Jihadist Hall of Fame

Another nauseating story that appears to be a nasty and disgusting pattern emerging - muslim men conducting a body fluids or fecal Jihad. Such body fluids are considered  bio-hazardous waste in a medical setting.

The most recent incident finds (now ex) Asda grocery store employee, Adeel Ayub , being filmed:

Urinating in a toilet bin

Slashing furniture and colleague's coats in the staffroom

Setting off a fire extinguisher

Filming firefighters responding to a false alarm

Playing cricket and football with stock

Poking his fingers in, stamping on and licking an uncooked chicken

Smashing boxes of eggs in the stockroom

Wow! Adeel must be vying for Asda "employee of the month"?! 

Recently, in Britain there have been numerous instances of muslims refusing to 'defile' themselves by touching various "offensive" items. One has to wonder if this same muslim man, as many other muslims, refused to 'defile' his hands with alcohol, pork sausages , seeing eye dogs or that  "unclean Bible" yet clearly thought his licking uncooked chicken (then placing it back for sale to customers) and urinating in a waste bin was alright.

Lets recall a few of the other members of the Muslim Fecal Jihadist Hall of Fame:

--Sahnoun Daifallah sprayed a mixture of urine and faeces in two supermarkets, a pub and a bookshop in Gloucestershire...... is alleged to have caused damage estimated at £700,000. LINK 

--Two shop-owners, Saeed Hasmi and Jan Yadgari were today fined for selling chocolate cake - which had been sprinkled with human faeces - a horrified customer ate the foul-smelling gateaux but noticed that it didn't taste or smell "quite right" and handed the cake to public health scientists. ...they were each fined £1,500 and ordered to pay £200 costs. Fortunately for us all they have opted to get out of the food industry.  LINK

--Cab driver, Behrouz Nahidmobarekeh, threw feces on pastries at a Fiesta grocery store in Dallas Texas. Police said that during an investigation, they found a pile of human feces by his bed. Investigators believe Nahidmobarekeh would dry the feces, either by microwave or just letting it sit out, grate it up with a cheese grater and then sprinkle it at the store. LINK

With the numbers of serious and often fatal diseases, including polio and hepatitis, that can be carried by human waste and body fluids - there needs to be harsh penalties for these Fecal Jihadists.

Article in full:

Simply fowl: Asda workers film former colleague licking a raw chicken... before putting it back on display at flagship store

Police are probing a video of an ex-Asda worker caught on camera licking a chicken from one of the supermarket's displays before replacing it. 

The scene comes at the end of a shocking video which shows Adeel Ayub running amok in Asda's store in the Fulwood area of Preston.

He is seen:

• Urinating in a toilet bin
  
• Slashing furniture and colleague's coats in the staffroom
• Setting off a fire extinguisher
• Filming firefighters responding to a false alarm
• Playing cricket and football with stock
• Poking his fingers in, stamping on and licking an uncooked chicken
• Smashing boxes of eggs in the stockroom

The chicken-licking yob unwraps a raw bird

The man stamps on chickens while they are on display

The same Asda store features in a new TV advertising campaign filmed in May.

A spokesman for Asda said: 'We are absolutely disgusted and appalled by the  behaviour of this man.

'Despite leaving our business three years ago, we now have video evidence of criminal damage and we have taken this matter up with the police.'

Inspector Jameel Murtza of Lancashire Constabulary, Fulwood said: 'We are currently in the process of reviewing CCTV footage of the incident.

We are liaising with the management at Asda with the aim of identifying any criminal offences that have taken place.'

Ayub worked at the supermarket between 2005 and 2008. At the start of the film, Ayub is seen wearing Asda's distinctive green uniform as he lets off a fire extinguisher and gloats as the fire service respond to a false alarm at the supermarket.

The film, which was left anonymously in a brown envelope at the front desk of a local newspaper, was then passed to Asda, who are now investigating the incident.

The thug makes no effort to conceal his identity as he gloats and boasts throughout the film as he wreaks havoc in the aisles.

He then returns to the store in 2009 dressed in a hoodie - after he has left Asda's employment - where he is first seen stamping on whole chickens out on display.

The vandal then picks one out, tears off the plastic wrapping and licks the breast before placing the bird back on the shelf.

The footage begins with Ayub in his Asda uniform spraying a fire extinguisher

Sickening behaviour: Ayub urinates in a bin in a gents toilet

The mobile phone footage is thought to have been filmed by a fellow Asda employee over a series of night-time shifts.

Ayub is heard referring to the film as a 'top secret video' that is 'never going to get released'.

In increasingly vulgar footage, Ayub uses a craft knife to slash furniture in the staffroom, which led to it being closed and a £50 reward offered for information.

He also breaks trophies awarded to the store, hurls boxes of eggs around the warehouse, and plays 'Asda football' with boxes of stock. 

 

FOR VIDEO GO TO ARTICLE LINK 

The footage begins with the man in his Asda uniform in the staff section of the superstore releasing a fire extinguisher. 

As firefighters are filmed attending the call out he is heard to boast: 'I think this baby is my last video because if I get caught I'll probably get sacked.' 

Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service, which confirmed it received two false alarm calls to the store in 2008, today condemned the footage. 

Spokesman John Taylor said: 'We deplore this behaviour. Hoax calls take up firefighters time and setting off an alarm system takes crews away from genuine emergencies. It's a criminal activity.'

 

UK - Muslim Woman Wins Payout for "Red Dress Hurt Feelings"

Hiring muslim women (and men for that matter) should come with a giant WARNING notice to all potential UK employers. In fact - in light of this most recent case of a muslim woman's shakedown of an employer for CASH makes one wonder why anyone would bother hiring a muslim at all - especially when it may leave the employer and his/her business financially destroyed.

33 yr old Fata Lemes willingly took a job as a COCKTAIL WAITRESS - note we did not say a job at a day care center for babies, or bookkeeper in a office or as a hairdresser (oops! last one is a BAD example!! That has proved to be a lucrative lawsuit for another muslim woman) Nope - Ms Lemes chose to work in a bar - a bar that clearly serves alcoholic beverages and where she would serve alcohol - which surprisingly didn't enter into her lawsuit - maybe because it didn't prove profitable for this fellow muslim.

No it wasn't the alcohol that offended Fata - it was the dress - a dress that was considered the summer uniform for the cocktail waitresses. (See picture below)Yep - Ms Lemes found a nice little earner for her "hurt feelings"..............in a dress. 

So as she tossed the"alcohol is haraam" offense under the bus Ms Lemes pulled out her muslim modesty and declared the " short, low-cut dress was "disgusting" and made her look "like a prostitute". " One wonders how she didn't notice the sleeveless RED DRESS being worn by other cocktail waitress when she applied to work at the bar? 

That aside Fata told the employment tribunal hearing her reasons why she should receive compensation for being asked to wear what all the other cocktail waitresses wear:

 "Miss Lemes told the tribunal that she "might as well be naked" in the dress, adding: "I was brought up a Muslim and am not used to wearing sexually attractive clothes."

Guess her muslim parents must have skipped over the no alcohol and working in a bar Quran lessons.

But here is the greater travesty - Despite the panel at Central London Employment Tribunal making these determinations :

1)  It accepted that Miss Lemes genuinely believed that the short, low-cut dress was "disgusting" and made her look "like a prostitute". -------Even though a photo of Miss Lemes on Facebook, however, showed her wearing a low cut T-shirt revealing her cleavage.----(Guess patrons in a bar seeing her in a red dress is worse than millions of internet users seeing Fata with her breasts bulging out of her low cut T-shirt. But then again - Facebook isn't worth some easy money.)

Revealing: Fata Lemes on Facebook

2) It found Miss Lemes "overstated" her trauma (No?!? Really??) at being asked to wear the sleeveless dress that was open at the back.

3) It rejected Miss Lemes' claim that she was left with no choice but to walk out of her job after just eight days.  (Bet the employers were real unhappy to have her go??)

4) It branded her compensation claim of £20,000 including £17,500 for hurt feelings - as "manifestly absurd". (and a bold sign of her greediness - wouldn't you say?)

And -- here comes the BIG BUT-----Despite ALL of the above  -- in its final ruling the Tribunal panel says:

""In our judgment, the effect of requiring her to wear the dress was to violate her dignity. We further consider that it created for her an environment which was degrading, humiliating and offensive." It pointed out that a summer uniform of "brightly coloured, figure-hugging garb" had not been introduced for male waiting staff."

Thus it awarded her £2,919.95 for hurt feelings and loss of earnings"

In other words -the panel contradicted its prior rulings in order to justify handing a financial payout to a muslim woman -- even after deciding the other "offenses" against her amounted to naught.

Just when I thought there was a glimmer of hope --- muslim pandering and dhimmitude again rears their ugly heads.

One needs no better example - than Ms Lemes -  as to why so many muslims have turned British employers - via the soft headed, muslim pandering British judicial system -into "hurt feelings" cash cows. 

For article go to:

Muslim waitress wins nearly £3,000 for hurt feelings over skimpy dress

Muslim cocktail waitress - Fata Lemes - in the "offensive" red dress.

DOES ISLAM CAUSE OBESITY? -- REDUX

This is a blog I wrote back in October 2007:

DOES ISLAM CAUSE OBESITY?

Well looks like devotion to Islam is bad for the waistline.  The "obesity epidemic" studied in Australia notes that the AU group that has the largest numbers of overweight children is Middle Easterners/muslims.  (17% vs 5.7% of Anglo-Australian children)

One would have to extrapolate that the same group is also a large part (pun intended) of the British obesity problem- both children and adults. If you review the many UK studies of obesity you will find all sorts of reasons and excuses for its occurrence in the UK, lack of exercise, bad choices, etc - but you will not find anyone mentioning the clear relationship between Islamic ideology and obesity.  I did find one US medical research study that did affirm the premise that muslims (in this case muslim women) are heavier than most.- read PDF format study here - see particularly page 11. Apparently wearing burkas is not too conducive to exercising but clearly they do not inhibit eating.

Perhaps muslim men too much time is spent sitting on the floor discussing plans to bomb the infidels & other terrorist acts. (too many examples to link) And for all their posturing about not eating a study found that Gulf muslims actually gain weight during the "fasting" of Ramadan. I wonder if all those non-muslim doctors, nurses and hospital staffs in Scotland actually lost weight during their forced Ramadan fast?

Perhaps a woman, encased in a black shroud, feels little impetus to move especially when her husband or father has so many reasons from the Quran as to why her existence  or actions could cause a beating. Even the nondescript thug has a right to beat a muslim woman.  Jail is safer than freedom for many muslim women. (TOO many examples to link)

So with the cost of obesity & its usual accompanying health problems of heart disease and diabetes, etc. estimated to cost British taxpayers over 45 billion pounds, perhaps this is yet another (of the long, long list) reason that muslims should not be allowed to immigrate into the UK.  Maybe instead of banning vending machines  - we should be more concerned with banning muslims? Maybe this is even a reason some of the faux health conscious looney left might even consider?

I know I'm overreaching.

For article go to:   Childhood obesity 'grossly overstated'

*****Now comes more confirmation showing the link between diabetes and Islam: 

-from the Islam in Europe website:

Belgium: Immigrants more susceptible to diabetes

People of other origins run 2-6 times more of a risk of developing type 2 diabetes than ethnics.  Type 2 diabetes is a disease closely tied to obesity, but bad eating habits are not the only causes.  The risk of diabetes type 2 is also determined by genes.

Antwerp doctor Güven Yildiz is researching diabetes among immigrants.  She says that in Belgium only an estimate can be made regarding the higher susceptibility of immigrants for diabetes, but she turns to data from the Netherlands.  Also according to the Flemish Diabetes Associations (VDV), this data can be extrapolated to Belgium.  In particular Surinamese, Hindus, Turks and Moroccans appear susceptible to the disease.

According to the VDV ethnicity is thus a risk factor.  But the hereditary tendency decides the risk for obesity and type 2 diabetes and the age in which it develops.  Part of the explanation might be found in the difference in the habits with those in the land of origin: metabolism adapts to the surroundings.  In another surroundings it leads to problems.  Moreover, among people of other origin, diabetes develop several years earlier on the average than among ethnics.

Immigrants therefore also need precise information about this disease.  Muslims who have diabetes, for example, should not take part in Ramadan.  "Ramadan is a risk period," says the VDV.  "By suddenly dropping the normal treatment rhythm, there is more of a risk to increase or lower the blood sugar levels."  Also insufficient liquid intake is very important.  Fasting from sunrise to sunset and afterward eating a lot of fat and sugar-rich food, is bad for diabetes treatment.

 

---for rest of article go to link in title---

Well looks like devotion to Islam is bad for the waistline.  The "obesity epidemic" studied in Australia notes that the AU group that has the largest numbers of overweight children is Middle Easterners/muslims.  (17% vs 5.7% of Anglo-Australian children)

One would have to extrapolate that the same group is also a large part (pun intended) of the British obesity problem- both children and adults. If you review the many UK studies of obesity you will find all sorts of reasons and excuses for its occurrence in the UK, lack of exercise, bad choices, etc - but you will not find anyone mentioning the clear relationship between Islamic ideology and obesity.  I did find one US medical research study that did affirm the premise that muslims (in this case muslim women) are heavier than most.- read PDF format study here - see particularly page 11. Apparently wearing burkas is not too conducive to exercising but clearly they do not inhibit eating.

Perhaps muslim men too much time is spent sitting on the floor discussing plans to bomb the infidels & other terrorist acts. (too many examples to link) And for all their posturing about not eating a study found that Gulf muslims actually gain weight during the "fasting" of Ramadan. I wonder if all those non-muslim doctors, nurses and hospital staffs in Scotland actually lost weight during their forced Ramadan fast?

Perhaps a woman, encased in a black shroud, feels little impetus to move especially when her husband or father has so many reasons from the Quran as to why her existence  or actions could cause a beating. Even the nondescript thug has a right to beat a muslim woman.  Jail is safer than freedom for many muslim women. (TOO many examples to link)

So with the cost of obesity & its usual accompanying health problems of heart disease and diabetes, etc. estimated to cost British taxpayers over 45 billion pounds, perhaps this is yet another (of the long, long list) reason that muslims should not be allowed to immigrate into the UK.  Maybe instead of banning vending machines  - we should be more concerned with banning muslims? Maybe this is even a reason some of the faux health conscious looney left might even consider?

I know I'm overreaching.

For article go to:   Childhood obesity 'grossly overstated'

*****Now comes more confirmation showing the link between diabetes and Islam: 

-from the Islam in Europe website:

Belgium: Immigrants more susceptible to diabetes

People of other origins run 2-6 times more of a risk of developing type 2 diabetes than ethnics.  Type 2 diabetes is a disease closely tied to obesity, but bad eating habits are not the only causes.  The risk of diabetes type 2 is also determined by genes.

Antwerp doctor Güven Yildiz is researching diabetes among immigrants.  She says that in Belgium only an estimate can be made regarding the higher susceptibility of immigrants for diabetes, but she turns to data from the Netherlands.  Also according to the Flemish Diabetes Associations (VDV), this data can be extrapolated to Belgium.  In particular Surinamese, Hindus, Turks and Moroccans appear susceptible to the disease.

According to the VDV ethnicity is thus a risk factor.  But the hereditary tendency decides the risk for obesity and type 2 diabetes and the age in which it develops.  Part of the explanation might be found in the difference in the habits with those in the land of origin: metabolism adapts to the surroundings.  In another surroundings it leads to problems.  Moreover, among people of other origin, diabetes develop several years earlier on the average than among ethnics.

Immigrants therefore also need precise information about this disease.  Muslims who have diabetes, for example, should not take part in Ramadan.  "Ramadan is a risk period," says the VDV.  "By suddenly dropping the normal treatment rhythm, there is more of a risk to increase or lower the blood sugar levels."  Also insufficient liquid intake is very important.  Fasting from sunrise to sunset and afterward eating a lot of fat and sugar-rich food, is bad for diabetes treatment.

 

---for rest of article go to link in title---

Think I'll pass on this Mouse & Cockroach Infested "Asian" Eatery

 Back in February 2008 I wrote in "I Think I'll Pass on this Cake": excerpt

"UK Pizzaria shop owners, Saeed Hasmi and Jan Yadgari, "accidentally" sold chocolate cake with human faeces on top.  Must be a new muslim icing recipe. Of course these "culinary specialists" admitted the charge but have no idea how the cake got those brown "sprinkles" on top - guess they were airborne."

Then in August 2008 I wrote"Another Case of Muslim Conducting Fecal Jihad": excerpts

"42 year old, Sahnoun Daifallah, appeared in front of a magistrate on charges he squirted a "foul-smelling" substance, later determined to be a mixture of feces and urine, over frozen chips and wine bottles at a Tesco in Gloucester - he then went on to  shower and ruin 706 children’s books at Waterstones in Cirencester, Gloucs.  Not quite satisified with showering his human liquid waste concoction over just two stores, Mr Daifallah proceeded to the Air Balloon pub where, after making offensive comments to the barmaid, he proceeded to sprinkle more feces and urine all over the pub food. This filthy defilement of property has cost the business owners considerable amounts of money to clean their establishment as well as replace the urine-fecal destroyed items."

and

Or another recent case from Dallas, USA where Behrouz Nahidmobarekeh, 49, is on trial for allegedly throwing the feces on pastries at a Fiesta grocery store. Police said that during an investigation, they found a pile of human feces by his bed. Investigators believe Nahidmobarekeh would dry the feces, either by microwave or just letting it sit out, grate it up with a cheese grater and then sprinkle it at the store. A young boy, maybe 3 years old, was later seen on the surveillance tape, eating one of the defiled cookies." LINK

Now the following is not quite as disgusting (if you care to differentiate between human and animal feces & one being more disgusting than the other)........but comes in pretty close and should definitely give someone pause about eating in some "Asian"/muslim run restaurants and judging from reader's comments to the article - this is NOT rare among such eateries - Which also beggars the question - Just who would eat food from such a filthy pit?:

£25k fine for filthy takeaway - highlights:

"THE boss of a mouse-infested takeaway has been fined £25,000...Adeel Nawaz from the Kashmir King takeaway in Whalley Range, Manchester, appeared in the dock on his 22nd birthday after pleading guilty to 10 breaches of food hygiene rules and two health and safety offences at an earlier hearing.

Inspections of the premises revealed serious food hygiene contraventions and health and safety concerns included an active and extensive infestation of mice throughout the premises."

Mouse droppings were found on shelves and floor, on an oven-roasting tray and next to an open container of pizza dough. A sack of rice in the cellar was also found to be `severely contaminated' with mouse droppings and urine.

The staff toilet was also found to be 'grossly dirty' and a drinks refrigerator, the tandoori oven and sink were 'dirty and greasy'.

Inspectors also found a number of electrical defects that `presented a risk of electrocution', as well asa 'very greasy' step at the rear of the takeaway...Nawaz, of Bedford Avenue, Whalley Range, told the officers he was running the takeaway for his father Mohammed Nawaz, who was abroad. His records revealed the premises had been treated for cockroaches on January 10. Work to improve the step had been completed by April, but some cleaning and electrical repairs were still outstanding.

As well as the fine, Manchester magistrates also ordered him to pay £2,010 costs. He was given 28 days to pay.But he (Nawaz) looked stunned after hearing the court's verdict, and said: "How can I pay? I've got no money to pay."  (TheO says: Don't expect this fine to ever be paid - likely against his "Human Rights" to require payment.)

So perhaps the British Health and Safety member should spend more time inspecting filthy "ethnic" restaurants rather than stopping patriotic parades and children's sack races or the wearing of a Crucifix necklace as well as the miriad of other ludicrous activities that they deem a so called threat to public safety

You can be sure I'm definitely "eating in" tonight!

HISTORIC BRITISH PUB RENAMED - WAS OFFENSIVE TO MUSLIMS

More politically correct dhimmi claptrap is being forced down the throats of the British people - this time in the City of Birmingham.

The historic Saracen Head pub is getting a mandatory name change - why? - you no doubt have already guessed the answer:

IT IS OFFENSIVE TO MUSLIMS

and undoubtedly will be added to the ever growing list of THINGS THAT OFFEND MUSLIMS

One has to wonder how many other historic British sites will get renamed to appease the Religion of Perpetual Outrage and their asinine dhimmi enablers - you can be sure this won't be the last.

There is an ongoing, concerted and documented History of Jihad against British customs and people laying the foundation for Eurabia.  Even patriotic parades  and bingo halls have fallen under the cutting blade of political correctness that is intent on wiping out any semblence of the indigenous British culture and cohesiveness.

Incremental Islamisation of Great Britain (and Europe) is happening to the constant drumbeat of appeasement of muslims.

Article in full:

Anger over plans to change name of Saracen's Head pub in Kings Norton Green

Nov 20 2008by Catherine Lillington, Birmingham Mail

BIRMINGHAM Mail readers have spoken out against the decision to change the name of a historic city pub – accusing it of being “politically correct”.

The home of the famous Saracen’s Head, in Kings Norton Green, will become known as Saint Nicolas Place said its owners, at the nearby St Nicolas Church.

Angry letters fired off to the Mail said the church had no right to “wipe away 300 years of history” for fear of offending Muslims.

Ann Spooner, of Kings Norton, wrote: “To us it will always be the Saracen’s Head.”

The 18th-century former inn was originally built as a rich wool merchant’s house in the 1400s and was given to the church in 1930. In 2004 it won £500,000 to help bring it back to its former glory in the BBC programme Restoration.

Cannon Rob Morris said the church consulted with its congregation of more than 300 and the Friends of Historic Kings Norton in reaching the controversial choice.

In 2004 the Birmingham Mail reported how the Very Rev Morris said the name was “offensive” to Muslims. But he said the reason behind the name-change was to stop people from mistaking the building – now a community centre and church office – for a pub. It was also to recognise the role of the church and its more than a million pounds’ worth of investment.

Keith Carton, from Kings Norton, said: “When was the last time anyone can recall coachloads of lager louts turning up for a heavy session?”

Rod Murphy, from Northfield, said: “This barmy decision has nothing at all to do with people thinking the building is still a pub. The only people who use the building are locals and they know full well it is not a pub.”

Rod was among many who felt the new name was prompted by a fear of offending Muslims.

He said: “This is the real reason that the name is being changed. How the misguided, deluded do-gooder Canon Rob Morris can be allowed to wipe away 300 years of history is beyond belief.”

Mr Morris denied the charge adding the site would be home to the Saracen’s Head Cafe.

He said: “I’m surprised at how many people have complained.”

MUSLIM POLICE CHEF SUES OVER TRADITIONAL ENGLISH BREAKFAST

You just KNEW that this was coming - with the plethora of muslims filing so called religious or racial discrimination lawsuits choking the Western world's judicial systems that some jackass would decide that the traditional full English breakfast - which includes sausages and bacon & black pudding - would be on their muslim "hit list".

It also seems that the British Police force seems to have more than its fair share of misunderstood and picked on muslims:

Top Muslim Cop Sues Met

Scotland Yard Sued by Top Asian Woman over "racial bullying"

Anil Patani Sued Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire for racism and not getting promoted (It is stated he later sued the police again stating he had been promoted too fast and didn't have respect of fellow officers)

Patani is also know for his role in instigating the Undercover Mosque fiasco.

Now we have the muslim police chef suing for having to cook meals for the police men and women for which it is his JOB to cook.

"Hasanali Khoja is accusing the force of religious discrimination after it refused to guarantee in his contract that he would be excused from handling pork products."

One has to wonder who is the more stupid - a man who would choose to be a chef, in a country that is well known for fry up breakfasts and other pork meals - knowing they are on a list of non-touchable items that he refuses to cook OR the human resource dolt who hired a chef with a list of non-touchable items that he refuses to cook and are a regular part of the police diet/meals.  Perhaps it is a draw. But you can be quite sure that whinging Mr. Khoja will be counting his compensation money in the near future - funded by the British taxpayers.

It is only a matter of time before pigs are deemed offensive to muslims and removed. Oh wait!! This is already happening!!  See here   and   here!!

For full article go to:

Muslim police chef claims religious discrimination over sausage and bacon breakfasts