TheOPINIONATOR

MOSQUE COSTS RUB SALT IN TAXPAYER'S "WOUNDS"

Talk about adding insult to injury!!! After more than 23,000 people signed a petition in opposition to the building of mosque in Dudley, taxpayer now get to pay $200,000 (100,000 pounds) for the hearing & other costs that were needed for the Dudley Council to vote to overturn their original decision to ban the mosque.

Clearly the inspector, who ruled on the matter, doesn't believe in listening to the citizens of Britain but prefers to pander to muslims and build yet another mosquetrosity - he is another example of a dictatorial NuLabour minion who is (purposely) out of touch with the British people (in addition to being a pompous wanker).

There is a small glimmer of hope that the mosque - with its Christianity domineering 65' minaret that will undoubtedly blast the 5 times a day "screech to prayer" - will not be built as there is some question that the building must be completed by year's end - which is extremely unlikely.  But, you can count on groups of whinging muslims shouting "Islamophobia" and "racism" seeking said term be extended and that the city dhimmis will comply.

It is high time for British citizens to vote for politicians who will not only listen to and act upon the wishes of the British people but also - when required -appoint others to do so.  "Democracy be damned" NuLabour is clearly out to decimate the indigenous non-muslim British population and place us/them in a permanent position of submission to Islam. These quislings need to GO!

entire article:

Mosque inquiry will cost taxpayers £100k

Taxpayers will pick up a £100,000 bill for the planning inquiry which resurrected plans for a Black Country mosque, it has been revealed.

The cost of the four-day hearing will be met by Dudley Council after the Government’s planning inspectorate overturned its decision to reject the £18 million proposal.

The authority was forced to hire security staff to police the summit at the inspector’s request - but will not receive a penny from Whitehall to cover costs.

The decision to allow the appeal for the project in Hall Street, Dudley, was this week announced after the public inquiry in June.

Dudley Council boss David Caunt described the decision as a “sad day” for local democracy saying it ignored the 22,000 people who signed a petition in opposition.

And Councillor Caunt said that the £100,000 bill rubbed salt in the wound.

“I’m very frustrated that a one man government-appointed judge and jury can turn up, listen to the arguments for four days and drive around the borough before coming to the conclusion that he knows better than the locals. The councillor added: “And then we have to pick up the bill for it.

“The security was requested by the inspector himself, but we have to pay,” he went on to say.

The council chief warned the price of the inquiry could even run over the authority’s initial £100,000 estimate because of the tight security measures.

Work on the mosque, featuring a 65-feet minaret, could start before Christmas. However the plans could yet be scuppered by a land-swap deal which states that the building must be “substantially” built by the end of the year.

Dudley Muslim Association now has outline planning permission for the scheme, but still needs to submit a detailed application which the council has up to 13 weeks to determine.

When the site was transferred to the association in 2003 there was a legal agreement that if the project was not “substantially” completed by the end of this year the land would be returned to the council. Muslim leaders have called for an extension to the deadline.

Mushtaq Hussain, secretary of Dudley Muslim Association, said: “We always maintained the condition was subject to us getting planning permission and having a reasonable and realistic time to get the project completed.”

MUSLIM TERRORISTS TAKE TOP PRIORITY OVER 7/7 BOMBINGS SURVIVORS

A disturbing story from the British newspapers exposes the fact that 72 survivors of the 7/7 muslim terrorist bombings have, some three years after the bloodbath, still not received the compensation promised them by the NuLabour government. One Labour MP, David Winnick. understates the obvious - that the failure of the NuLabour government to proved the promised compensation to these innocent victims is "unacceptable".

One questions why the government is so slow at helping these people who are casualties of four muslim suicide bombings. Especially as it is clear that the victims suffered severe emotional and physical trauma.

So what has the British government been spending taxpayer's money on - if not on settling its obligation to the victims of the 7/7 bombings? What are the top priorities of the government?  Let's list just a few of the more recent expenditures that the government deemed MORE "important":

UK TAXPAYERS PROVIDE THE "GOOD LIFE" FOR CONVICTED TERRORIST

UK GOVERNMENT GIVES GRANT TO MUSLIM HATE BLOGGERS

BROTHER OF 7/7 BOMBER GETS FREE TRIP TO PAKISTAN (Note that this trip to Pakistan happened just in time for him to attend the July 7, 2008 BIG party celebrating his suicide bombing brother, Shehzad Tanweer, as a martyr - coincidence???)

AL QAEDA "PIPELINE" SUSPECT LIVED ON THE DOLE

BIN LADEN'S "RIGHT HAND MAN" SET FOR LIFE ON BRITISH BENEFITS

CONVICTED TERRORIST FINDS TAXPAYER PAID SAFETY IN THE UK

TERRORISTS NEED THERAPY NOT INCARCERATION

So while the living victims of the 7/7 bombings continue to wait and wait - the NuLabour government's priorities lie with swiftly attending to the needs of muslims hate mongerers and to improving the lives of muslim terrorists.

IT'S ALL A MATTER OF PRIORITIES.

Article in full:

72 Victims Still Waiting for London Bombings Payout

Paul Waugh, Deputy Political Editor
11.07.08

More than 70 victims of the 7/7 bombings are still awaiting full compensation, government figures revealed today.

Labour MP David Winnick branded the failure to sort out the payments more than three years after the atrocities in London as "unacceptable".

His outburst came after he received a Parliamentary answer from Justice Minister Maria Eagle which said that, as of 8 July, the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority still has to finalise compensation to 72 of those injured in the bus and Tube blasts.

A final offer of cash to 18 of the cases has been made and of the remaining 54 active cases, 37 people have either received or been offered only an interim payment, four have been offered final awards but have rejected them, four are suspended and nine are subject to " continuing inquiries", Miss Eagle said.

Mr Winnick told the Evening Standard: "This is totally unacceptable."

On Monday, Mayor Boris Johnson and London Minister Tessa Jowell stood with survivors and victims' families to remember the 52 people killed.

Mr Johnson has written to Ms Jowell asking the Government to ensure the backlog is dealt with immediately.

CICA says £7.5 million has been paid to victims and relatives.

2 ENGLISH SCHOOLBOYS PUNISHED FOR NOT KNEELING & PRAYING TO ALLAH

One cannot open any hard copy newspaper or internet news site today without the blazing headling stating "BRITISH MUSLIMS FEEL LIKE THE JEWS OF EUROPE". Now anyone who reads TheOPINIONATOR or any of the MANY other blogs and websites that have chronicled what can only be described as the mass immigration/colonisation of Great Britain by muslims knows with great certainty that the exact opposite is occuring. We highlight the daily pandering and dhimmi behaviour shown to muslims by British government, police and other authorities thus this jawdropping headline is nothing more than claptrap used to abet the continuation of the muslim initiated exaggerated claims of victimisation and the myth of Islamophobia. For as long as muslims can be percieved as victims the longer they can reap the rewards of being seen as the "downtrodden"  and the subsequent sympathies of the multicultural gulping, heritage loathing European/British liberals. In turn, Muslims have used victimisation and "hurt feelings" as a shield to implement their culture and Sharia Law into Britain.

This brings me to a far more egregious example of the so called "victims"- who of course are not the muslims at all - but the children of Great Britain who are systematically being deprived of their heritage, being made to feel guilty for the heritage OR having muslim customs forced upon them. In this latest case - two schoolboys received punishment for not submitting to demands -BY THEIR TEACHER - that they dress up as muslims bow down and worship Allah- in Arabic - in their school classroom.

"Two schoolboys were given detention after refusing to kneel down and 'pray to Allah' during a religious education lesson.Parents were outraged that the two boys from year seven (11 to 12-year-olds) were punished for not wanting to take part in the practical demonstration of how Allah is worshipped.They said forcing their children to take part in the exercise at Alsager High School, near Stoke-on-Trent - which included wearing Muslim headgear - was a breach of their human rights."

This brainwashing by the teacher (notice how the principal pleads ignorance)should cause more than just outrage - it should cause fear to grip the hearts of every true British man and woman as to how far their "leaders" are willing to go to sacrifice the thousands year old culture and customs of Great Britain on the altar of multiculturalism in order to muslmise the country and appease the muslim population. For that is EXACTLY what is happening.

The real victims are are our children and every single one of us is guilty of allowing their minds to be warped into believing that British pride is wrong and that other imported cultures are not just equal to(that was never the goal of multiculturalism) but superior to Britain. In every country where multiculturalism has taken hold the indigenous people and culture has suffered. Thus multiculturaliam has opened the British and European door to Islamic domination. Islam does not reciprocate as one mother noted:

"But if Muslims were asked to go to church on Sunday and take Holy Communion there would be war."

She's right. Now we must ask ourselves - just what will it take for us to say NO to the stealth implementation of Islam/Sharia Law and the consequential deterioration of our Western culture?

Will we allow our children to be punished for NOT bowing to Islam?

Entire article:

Schoolboys punished with detention for refusing to kneel in class and pray to Allah

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 11:30 AM on 04th July 2008

Two schoolboys were given detention after refusing to kneel down and 'pray to Allah' during a religious education lesson.

Parents were outraged that the two boys from year seven (11 to 12-year-olds) were punished for not wanting to take part in the practical demonstration of how Allah is worshipped.

They said forcing their children to take part in the exercise at Alsager High School, near Stoke-on-Trent - which included wearing Muslim headgear - was a breach of their human rights.

Alsager School, near Stoke, has received furious complaints from parents after two Year 7 boys were punished for refusing to kneel to Allah during a religious studies class

One parent, Sharon Luinen, said: "This isn't right, it's taking things too far.

"I understand that they have to learn about other religions. I can live with that but it is taking it a step too far to be punished because they wouldn't join in Muslim prayer.

"Making them pray to Allah, who isn't who they worship, is wrong and what got me is that they were told they were being disrespectful.

"I don't want this to look as if I have a problem with the school because I am generally very happy with it."

Another parent Karen Williams said: "I am absolutely furious my daughter was made to take part in it and I don't find it acceptable.

"I haven't got a problem with them teaching my child other religions and a small amount of information doesn't do any harm.

"But not only did they have to pray, the teacher had gone into the class and made them watch a short film and then said 'we are now going out to pray to Allah'.

"Then two boys got detention and all the other children missed their refreshment break because of the teacher.

"Not only was it forced upon them, my daughter was told off for not doing it right.

"They'd never done it before and they were supposed to do it in another language."

"My child has been forced to pray to Allah in a school lesson." The grandfather of one of the pupils in the class said: "It's absolutely disgusting, there's no other way of putting it.

"My daughter and a lot of other mothers are furious about their children being made to kneel on the floor and pray to Islam. If they didn't do it they were given detention.

"I am not racist, I've been friendly with an Indian for 30 years. I've also been to a Muslim wedding where it was explained to me that alcohol would not be served and I respected that.

"But if Muslims were asked to go to church on Sunday and take Holy Communion there would be war."

Parents said that their children were made to bend down on their knees on prayer mats which the RE teacher had got out of her cupboard and they were also told to wear Islamic headgear during the lesson on Tuesday afternoon.

Deputy headmaster Keith Plant said: "It's difficult to know at the moment whether this was part of the curriculum or not. I am not an RE teacher, I am an English teacher.

"At the moment it is our enterprise week and many of our members of staff are away.

"The particular member of staff you need to speak to isn't around. I think that it is a shame that so many parents have got in touch with the Press before coming to me.

"I have spoken to the teacher and she has articulately given me her version of events, but that is all I can give you at the moment."

A statement from Cheshire County Council on behalf of the school read: "The headteacher David Black contacted this authority immediately complaints were received.

"Enquiries are being made into the circumstances as a matter of urgency and all parents will be informed accordingly.

"Educating children in the beliefs of different faith is part of the diversity curriculum on the basis that knowledge is essential to understanding.

"We accept that such teaching is to be conducted with some sense of sensitivity."

ANOTHER CASE OF THE TAIL WAGGING THE DOG

Undoubtedly I am far from the only one who is absoutely SICK & TIRED of the muslim minority, in the UK, thinking that every bit of their culture should be implemented in Great Britain with NO regard to the thousands year old culture that the British people themselves have achieved and lived for millenia. (We could take this worldwide - but that is for a future blog) Let's face it - no one dragged these muslims, kicking and screaming into the UK. No one is forcing them to stay. Even more sickening is the British police and government who (for what appears to be on a daily basis) twist and turn themselves into apologetic dhimmi pretzels (let's emphasize that to DHIMMI PRETZELS) trying to appease bleating, whining and constantly "offended" muslims - offended by the same culture that THEY have chosen avail themselves - the same country that provides so many of those generous financial and physical benefits.  This isn't just insidious multiculturalism -  this is British cultural apartheid.

The muslim daily whinge and moan today - is none other than a picture of an adorable puppy sitting inside a police hat to advertise a new police non-emergency phone number. (I have written extensively about muslims & dogs - to read a few go here and here.) You would think, based on the muslim indignation, granted it is far short of that shown regarding the Danish MO-Cartoons or the Teddy Bear Teacher, but nevertheless defiant in its demands that the puppy poster not be used and vowing that, regardless of its importance, it will not be displayed in muslim businesses, etc.

Of course, based on past acrobatics used by politicians and police to instantly react to publicly appease the muslim community - local Dundee councillor Mohammed Asif immediatly contacted Tayside Police Chief Constable John Vine to discuss the "offence".  Asif said: 'My concern was that it's not welcomed by all communities, with the dog on the cards. It was probably a waste of resources going to these communities....'People who have shops just won't put up the postcard. Apparently the "expected" apologetic statement, from the Chief Constable came forthwith: 'This was an oversight and did not seek to offend or upset.'

Oversight? Why is it that the muslims think that every niche and cranny of British life, culture, mores, etc must first be approved by muslims? (Is it because the constant drumbeat of government and police appeasement?) Yet when it comes to muslims and the stealth implementation of Sharia Law into the UK or its customs -some of which are untenable and barbaric -- the British people (and everyone else) are immediately labeled as Islamophobic if great respect and subservience is not immediately shown. This is exactly what muslims want, expect and unfortunately have so far succeeded in establishing not only in the UK but most of Europe.

I'd like to think that the "Puppy Incident" will help to wake up the nation that has always loved it's dogs. In fact a huge number of dog breeds originated in the British Isles - more than anywhere else in the world.  Are we going to let the Islamic spurred hatred and disgust of our cherished "best friends" dictate to us? It is time to stop letting the tail wag the dog - and high time for the dog to start biting back-

WHAT DO YOU FIND OFFENSIVE?

Article in full:

MUSLIMS OUTRAGED AT POLICE ADVERT FEATURING CUTE PUPPY SITTING IN A POLICEMAN'S HAT

A postcard featuring a cute puppy sitting in a policeman's hat advertising a Scottish police force's new telephone number has sparked outrage from Muslims.   

Tayside Police's new non-emergency phone number has prompted complaints from members of the Islamic community.

The choice of image on the Tayside Police cards - a black dog sitting in a police officer's hat - has now been raised with Chief Constable John Vine.

The advert has upset Muslims because dogs are considered ritually unclean and has sparked such anger that some shopkeepers in Dundee have refused to display the advert.

Dundee councillor Mohammed Asif said: 'My concern was that it's not welcomed by all communities, with the dog on the cards.

'It was probably a waste of resources going to these communities.

'They (the police) should have understood. Since then, the police have explained that it was an oversight on their part, and that if they'd seen it was going to cause upset they wouldn't have done it.' 

Councillor Asif, who is a member of the Tayside Joint Police Board, said that the force had a diversity adviser and was generally very aware of such issues.

He raised the matter with Mr Vine at a meeting of the board.   

Tayside Police Chief Constable John Vine said the advert was not intended to cause any offence

The chief constable said he was unaware of the concerns and that the force had not sought to cause any upset but added he would look into the matter.

Councillor Asif said: 'People who have shops just won't put up the postcard. But the police have said to me that it was simply an oversight and they did not seek to offend or upset.'

Cards featuring police dog-in-training Rebel have been distributed to communities throughout the area to advertise the single number point of contact for non-emergency calls to the police.

Rebel has proved a popular recruit for Tayside Police after coming through the very first Lothian and Borders Police dog-breeding programme in February.   

One of seven German Shepherd pups born in early December, he has now completed his course of inoculations, and is free to venture out onto the streets of Tayside.

A spokesman for Tayside Police said: 'Trainee police dog Rebel has proved extremely popular with children and adults since being introduced to the public, aged six weeks old, as Tayside Police's newest canine recruit.

'His incredible world-wide popularity - he has attracted record visitor numbers to our website - led us to believe Rebel could play a starring role in the promotion of our non-emergency number.

'We did not seek advice from the force's diversity adviser prior to publishing and distributing the postcards. That was an oversight and we apologise for any offence caused.'

MUSLIM DOCTORS BETRAY FORCED MARRAIGE VICTIMS

The NuLabour governments has actively recruited many muslims to fill National Health Service (particularly medical doctors) and other goverment jobs. All this is occurring despite continual instances of national safety & health concerns regarding muslims - showing that such policies should be implemented with great care - Such as (to cite a few examples):

45 UK doctors plot terror attacks against USA

UK Muslim Doctor's Association Exposes They Only Care About Muslims

Doctor pleads guilty in Glasgow Airport attack

UK Muslim medical workers refuse to follow hygiene rules causing Superbug threat to patients

Now comes proof that muslim medical doctors along with other members of the hospital and medical staff and people in other goverment postitions such as Job Centers are betraying muslim women hiding from abusive families and forced marriages. These employees are breaching confidentiality rules by using the central computer information to give address and other information to the families and people these women are hiding from. Doctors have given birth control information over to the muslim women's male relatives knowing she will be punished. Thus these unethical government employees are purposely "outing" women who are hiding, often in fear of their lives/"honour" killings. This collusion has place many muslim women in serious harm's way and shows that muslim allegiances more often than not lies in Sharia Law NOT in the British institutions where they work or in British law.

"Doctors and Job Centre workers are breaching confidentiality rules and passing on vital information to families, allowing them to trace and punish Asian women who are attempting to escape coerced marriages and "honour"-based domestic violence. ......Doctors and Job Centre workers are breaching confidentiality rules and passing on vital information to families, allowing them to trace and punish Asian women who are attempting to escape coerced marriages and "honour"-based domestic violence.

As the police, in many British cities and towns, are actively recruiting more and more muslims to become police officers saying this will help combat the (myth of) Islamophobia and better represent the community - we find that muslim girl's, hiding and living in fear of their families, avoid telling the police of their plight as so often the women have been brought back to the abusive families by - the police!

"Shahien Taj, director of the Cardiff-based women's group The Henna Foundation, said: "Recently I had a case in Birmingham of a woman who said she can't trust the police because nine times she had run away and nine times the police returned her to her family where she got abused. Fortunately ACPO are now addressing this kind of problem openly and trying to do something about it.In another case, reported to a women's group, a Chief Inspector offered to help a family track down a girl who fled a forced marriage. Zalikha Ahmed, director of the South Yorkshire based women's refuge Apna Haq, said: "We have to be careful with the police, especially the Asian ones. We don't visit the station where certain Asian officers are on because some of them are perpetrators and one of them on the record said he would not arrest someone who used force on his wife."

Indeed the National Health Service and ALL jobs with access to personal information and public safety must immediately fire ANY employee who misuses their job or data to aid and abet Sharia Law in the UK. Steps must be taken to insure future hirees do not misuse their positions. It is a matter of life and death.

full article:

FORCED MARRIAGE VICTIMS BEING BETRAYED BY DOCTORS

By Patrick Sawer

Young women fleeing forced marriages are being betrayed by GPs and benefits staff who "collude" with families to return them against their will, a senior police officer police has revealed.

Doctors and Job Centre workers are breaching confidentiality rules and passing on vital information to families, allowing them to trace and punish Asian women who are attempting to escape coerced marriages and "honour"-based domestic violence.

Commander Steve Allen, who is the spokesman on forced marriages for Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), revealed that some doctors have informed girls' families that they have asked for the contraceptive pill, placing them at risk from fathers or brothers who believe this means the family's honour has been besmirched.

Cmdr Allen also told The Sunday Telegraph that Job Centre workers have accessed the National Insurance details of women who flee violent husbands, tracing where they collect benefits and passing the details on to their families so they can be found and forced back to their marital home.

In one case the family of an 18-year-old Pakistani woman attempted to kidnap her from a south London Job Centre after being tipped off by a member of staff. The plot was only foiled because her boyfriend intervened.

Cmdr Allen, of the Metropolitan Police, said: "GPs will tell fathers their daughter has seen them and is on the pill. That can get a girl killed. Public sector employees will pass on to a family member an individual's National Insurance number knowing it can be used to trace their new whereabouts around the country.

"There is collusion by certain public servants and people in a position of authority, such as doctors, which supports these offences. It means many victims don't have the faith or the trust to be able to report their situation."

Cmdr Allen revealed the problem is compounded by some police offices treating women fleeing a forced marriage as 'teenage runaways' and returning them to their families – unwittingly placing them in danger. This has led to a breakdown of trust in some areas, with young Asian girls scared to tell the police of their plight for fear their families will be told.

He also said that in some Asian communities women do not trust the police because they suspect local officers will inform their families if they attempt to flee a forced marriage. ACPO is now taking urgent steps to address the problem by increased training for officers in how to deal with cases.

Cmdr Allen's warnings come in advance of a European-wide campaign against forced marriages and honour-violence being launched tomorrow (Mon).

The campaign, backed by ACPO, will work with women and young people in Asian communities to highlight the problem and produce information material for victims who need help.

Shahien Taj, director of the Cardiff-based women's group The Henna Foundation, said: "Recently I had a case in Birmingham of a woman who said she can't trust the police because nine times she had run away and nine times the police returned her to her family where she got abused. Fortunately ACPO are now addressing this kind of problem openly and trying to do something about it."

In another case, reported to a women's group, a Chief Inspector offered to help a family track down a girl who fled a forced marriage.

Zalikha Ahmed, director of the South Yorkshire based women's refuge Apna Haq, said: "We have to be careful with the police, especially the Asian ones. We don't visit the station where certain Asian officers are on because some of them are perpetrators and one of them on the record said he would not arrest someone who used force on his wife."

The 500 cases of forced marriage currently known to the authorities are only a tiny proportion of the numbers of young girls and even men suspected of being forced to marry against their will.

Every week one British citizen has to be rescued from Pakistan alone by the Foreign and Commonwealth's Forced Marriages Unit.

Cmdr Allen said such marriages result in years of assault and rape, psychological and emotional abuse for the victim, sometimes culminating in kidnapping and even murder when they try to flee.

Citing the case of 19-year-old Rukhsana Naz, a 19-year-old Derby girl killed by her mother and brother after she became pregnant from her childhood sweetheart, he said: "I would never have believed that a mother could hold down her pregnant daughter while her brother strangled her because she was carrying the child of a man she should not have been seeing."

But senior officers admit that despite the horror of such cases they face widespread complacency over the issue among certain police forces.

Cmdr Allen said: "We have too many areas where people don't believe this is an issue for them. But we are seeing situations across the country where victims, who are at extreme risk, are being moved to another part of the country, away from their home towns, by their families.

"We also are talking here about bounty hunters and professional killers being used to track down relatives and these people are going to be killed. This is about child protection, human rights and young people having their lives destroyed and all too often being murdered because they dared to love with their heart."

ISLAM & THE MYTH OF MULTICULTURALISM

Clearly the European Union and more specifically the UK government have for decades proceeded on a course of social engineering and indigenous cultural suicide through multiculturalism. This has been done through no democratic vote of the British people but by the stealth elitists changing laws, discouraging British ethic pride,  encouraging rampant immigration into and across UK/European countries and by embellishing the immigrant cultures. Also used as a tool is vehemently enforced political correctness which greatly punishes anyone who voices or writes their disagreement with multiculturalism OR expressed overt pride in their British history and culture. The anti-thesis of multiculturalism is moral, religous and cultural solidarity.

It is hard to say if multiculturalism is the tool that has caused the imposition of the muslim culture on the British people OR if the proponents of Islam played a major role in the root cause or impetus of and behind the derisive multiculturalism - regardless the end effect has often proven deleterious to the British people and culture. One only has to read their daily newspaper to see constant changes in British society to embrace - in fact - to embellish the muslim culture over that of the British heritage. Yet, though said with bold "forked tongue" the UK politicians still tell us that they want enculturation or assimilation of the muslim population into the Western world. They spout rhetoric telling us that second and third generations will become more British and less "muslim" citing "Britishness" is to be re-emphasized to fit the Nu Great Britain. Yet the exact opposite is occurring.  Islam refuses to change and its youth often face death for turning to western ways. The government in turn have chosen to act more like dhimmis.

Now comes yet another of what is really going on in the muslim community. Muslims imams are adding roadblocks to the westernization of muslim women. These women are now being told that they must NOT marry non-muslim Western men. Obviously the imams want to keep their women for muslim-only procreation and thus the progeny of these marriages will remain under the control of Islam and Sharia law not western/British governments. Yet another fact showing us that what is occurring in Great Britain and Europe is muslim colonization NOT the assimilation of the rapidly growing muslim population.

For article go to here

SCARF WEARING BUSHRA NOAH WINS PAYOUT FOR "HURT FEELINGS"

Being an "urban and funky" hair salon just doesn't cut it in Britain - neither does an employer hiring an employee who best fits into the business model. Thus is the case of Bushra Noah - who recently sued the new entreprenuer Sarah Desrosiers - owner of the Wedge Salon in North London. The nineteen year old headscarf wearing muslim, Ms Noah, had applied for a job at the trendy hairdressing salon but Ms Desrosiers expressed concern, during the subsequent in person interview, that as hair styling was her business that it made no sense to have a stylist whose hair could not be used as an advertisement for the salon. Apparently ALL the other employed stylists showcased various alternative haircuts with their own hair.

"But the devout Muslim insisted that wearing her headscarf was essential to her beliefs. Miss Noah, who has been rejected for 25 different hairdressing jobs after interviews, is suing Miss Desrosiers for more than £15,000 for injury to her feelings plus an unspecified sum for lost earnings."

At a hearing that just took place Ms Noah described how her "hurt feeling" caused her such distress - one wonders why the other 25 hairdresser's did not also get sued for Noah's supposed mental discomfort.

"During the hearing Ms Noah, who lives in Acton, west London, told the tribunal that she was "devastated" that she was not offered the job of assistant stylist "due to my headscarf". "

Whereas the salon owner, Ms Derosiers, gave several legitimate reasons why she did not hire Ms. Noah - to no surprise the tribunal decided to award Busrha Noah $8,000:

"The panel found that Ms Noah had been badly upset by the 15-minute interview . She was awarded £4,000 damages for "injury to feelings".

Ms Derosiers commented that : "I never in a million years dreamt that somebody would be completely against the display of hair and be in this industry. I don't feel I deserve it."

Well I don't feel that you deserve to be punished for deciding what is in the best interest of your business either!  Apparently the question of the 25 other hairdressing job denials never made it into the tribunal evidence. Isn't that an indication that Ms Noah may have been trolling for the right person to "set up" for a lawsuit? Or, are 25 other salon owners going to be sued by Ms Noah for hurt feelings? This tribunal decision clearly interferes with an owner being able to use good business judgement.

It also is yet another example where muslim's suing for "hurt feelings" always pays.

entire article:

Muslim stylist wins £4,000 payout

Bushra Noah accused Sarah Desrosiers of religious discrimination when she failed to offer her a job at her Wedge salon in King's Cross, central London.

An employment tribunal panel dismissed the 19-year-old's claim but upheld her complaint of indirect discrimination.

Ms Desrosiers said she needed stylists to showcase alternative hairstyles.

During the hearing Ms Noah, who lives in Acton, west London, told the tribunal that she was "devastated" that she was not offered the job of assistant stylist "due to my headscarf".

Urban image

Ms Desrosiers, 32, told the panel that Ms Noah lived too far away, but was persuaded to give her an interview in May last year.

When the applicant arrived for the interview she claimed the Canadian salon owner was clearly shocked by the fact she wore a headscarf.

Ms Desrosiers told the tribunal she was surprised it had not been mentioned earlier and expected her staff to reflect the "funky, urban" image of her salon.

The panel found that Ms Noah had been badly upset by the 15-minute interview .

She was awarded £4,000 damages for "injury to feelings".

In its judgment, the panel stated: "We were satisfied by the respondent's evidence that the claimant was not treated less favourably than the respondent would have treated a woman who, whether Muslim or not, for a reason other than religious belief wears a hair covering at all times when at work."

It added: "There was no specific evidence before us as to what would (for sure) have been the actual impact of the claimant working in her salon with her head covered at all times."

Speaking after the ruling the salon owner said: "I never in a million years dreamt that somebody would be completely against the display of hair and be in this industry. I don't feel I deserve it."

Ms Noah refused to comment on the matter.

UK GOVERNMENT GIVES GRANT TO MUSLIM HATE BLOGGERS

Just when you think the suicidal pandering of the British Labour government could get no worse comes the news that $70,000 of British taxpayers money has been handed on a silver platter to a radical Islamic website. This grant given only a few weeks before the anniversary of the London 7/7/05 bombings - see the 55 victims here.

This website, Muslimyouth.net carries posts where the writers not only extoll suicide bombings but also praise the beheading of Daniel Pearl and Ken Bigley. Daniel Pearl, a reporter for the Wall St Journal, was beheaded by 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (currently on trial). Ken Bigley, a British engineer working on reconstruction projects in Iraq, was beheaded by  the Tawhid and Jihad ("Oneness of God and Jihad") Islamist group, led by Jordanian Abu Musab al-Zarqawi

The web groups rationalizes the hate spewed toward innocent victims of jihad as a "few people venting anger on the site" - but offers no claims of future monitoring of the hate rants. Muslimyouth.com subsequently insists that they would report, any direct terrorist threat posted, to authorities. Is that supposed to make the British people feel better?

The Labour government justifies its gift as a way to talk about the issues. One would logically assume the issues of muslim radicalism and violence against the British people would be the topic?

Of course not!! The group plans on using the money to make a film, ironically enough, on the difficult life and problems muslims are subjected to in Britain.

ENTIRE ARTICLE:

GRANT FOR MUSLIM HATE BLOGGERS

BY Tom Wells

AN Islamic website which backs suicide bombers got a £35,000 Government grant – a month before the anniversary of the 7/7 attacks.

Muslimyouth.net carries dozens of rants by fanatics on its “support group” site.

One member wrote of suicide missions: “If you can blow dozens of people up at the same time, great, absolutely great.”

And in another vile message a member PRAISED a beheading video of British hostage Ken Bigley.

It said: “I like the beheading videos of the prisoners of war – especially the Daniel Pearl and Ken Bigley one.”

But the Department for Communities and Local Government agreed to fund the group’s film on problems faced by UK Muslims.

A spokesman said: “We can’t prevent violent extremism if we aren’t prepared to talk about the issues.”

VIPs will see the film in London tomorrow, including Cabinet minister Hazel Blears.

Rizwan Hussain, of Muslimyouth. net, said: “We’re conscious of a few people venting anger on our site. If there was a direct threat made we would alert authorities.”

Four suicide bombers killed 52 people in the 2005 7/7 London attacks.

MUSLIM FRIENDLY APARTMENTS OPENED IN UK

To continue carrying todays theme of "you couldn't make this stuff up" - comes a news article from Bristol (where else but in) England/UK. The dhimmis in the British government, in an effort to not offend muslims, have spent $12 million dollars to build the "Muslim Friendly Very Sheltered Housing"

A brand spanking new apartment complex has been built with 19 of the apartments constructed to facilitate the Islamic lifestyle - these flats/apartments have been built with such amenities as toilets that do not face Mecca and with beds that can easily be turned to face the southeast. Also featured are more cabinets and ventilation to aid in "steamy" muslim cooking and shower heads, on the toilet bowl.

So what about the elderly non muslim British people that may find themselves located to a muslimized apartment? Aashyana Housing Association chief executive, Saeed Anwar, said at the time:

"If an English tenant moved in, they would use the cupboards or the toilets and not think about them - but it can make an extra difference to others."

He's right - the British people are already well used to being forced to accept all things muslim.

(An aside - no surprise that Mr Anwar clearly asserts that muslims living in and benefitting from England are not nor will they ever be English)

entire article:

MUSLIM FRIENDLY FLATS OPEN

New flats for elderly people have opened in Bristol - with toilets that do not face Mecca.

The Muslim-friendly Very Sheltered Housing (VSH) scheme in Lincoln Street, Lawrence Hill, also includes beds that allow a tenant's feet to point in the right direction.Lincoln Gardens cost more than £6 million, has 55 bedrooms and was put up by the city council and the Guinness Trust on the site of the former Wainbrook elderly persons' home.

It includes 19 flats suitable for "tenants from the Muslim community" following local consultation.

A council spokesman said: "The toilets in these flats are orientated so that the user doesn't face Mecca.

"Beds are placed so that feet are facing south east and not north west.

"There is a door between the kitchen and living room plus extra ventilation in the kitchen to stop smells escaping.

"And plumbing has been carried out to allow for the addition of a bidet or a shower head to allow the washing of the toilet bowl."

Councillor Derek Pickup, cabinet member for care, tackling crime and deprivation, said: "Older people consistently tell us they want to live as independently as possible for as long as possible.

"This very sheltered housing programme helps do just that and is already one of our city's major success stories."

The development is the seventh VSH scheme to open in the city.

Work is under way on an eighth, in Bishopsworth, which is being developed in partnership with Brunelcare and contractors Leadbitter.

The scheme is not the first to be designed with religious sensibilities in mind.

Two and a half years ago a block of housing association flats opened in Wilson Street, St Paul's, with bathrooms especially designed not to offend Muslims.

The toilets were built so they did not face south east. They had powerful extractor fans in the kitchen because, it was said, Asian families preferred steam-cooking, which leads to condensation problems.

They had larger kitchen cupboards because Asian families apparently tended to use more pots and pans.

There was also a designated area of worship for Sikhs.

Aashyana Housing Association chief executive, Saeed Anwar, said at the time: "We didn't need to consult with the Muslim community about the toilets. We knew this would be pleasing to them if the toilets were not facing Mecca. It didn't mean any extra cost to us - it was just a question of making sure they were not facing south east.

"If we can build homes which are pleasing to all members of the community, then this is a good thing.

"If an English tenant moved in, they would use the cupboards or the toilets and not think about them - but it can make an extra difference to others."

At the time Farooq Siddique, from the Bristol Muslim Cultural Society, welcomed developments which considered the cultural diversity of tenants.

TERRORISTS NEED THERAPY NOT INCARCERATION

I must admit that when I saw this headline I thought surely it  must be a joke - something like you would read on tongue-in-cheek  The Onion web site not in a daily news puplication.

But incredibly, as we near the third anniversary of the 7/7 London bombings, the British government "know-it-alls" in their most dhimmi of proclamations and clear lack of understanding of Islam have deemed that most terrorists should not face any type of punishment, for their hate crimes against non-muslims, but instead muslims should receive hand-holding  --lay on the couch --'tell me about your awful childhood'- 'daddy made me do it' psychological therapy:

"Documents being distributed to local councils explain that many people who get drawn into extremism have often suffered some sort of personal trauma or crisis that makes them vulnerable to exploitation."

Home Secretary, Jaqui Smith stated: "We are investing at local level to build resilient communities, which are equipped to confront violent extremism and support the most vulnerable individuals."

Yes - unbelievably the UK government is investing 25 million dollars in "Help Save the Terrorists" programmes and is telling the people of Britain to show understanding and open armed community support to those poor, misguided, Islamic extremists who want to kill the kaffir (unbelievers) .

You couldn't make this stuff up!!  It is obvious that Ms Smith, and her cohorts, are in desperate need of not only psychological testing and therapy themselves but also courses on the teachings of the Religion of Peace - especially on the subject of what the Quran instructs regarding violence.

Perhaps, Ms Smith could also consult with the former Mayor of Kirklees, Jean Calvert, as to how muslims, in Great Britain, treat people who pander to Islam.

article in full - emphasis mine:

ISLAMIST EXTREMISTS SHOULD GET THERAPY, HOME OFFICE TELLS LOCAL COUNCILS

By James Kirkup, Political Correspondent

Islamic extremists could escape prosecution and instead receive therapy and counselling under new Government plans to "deradicalise" religious fanatics.

The Home Office is to announce an extra £12.5 million to support new initiatives to try to stop extremism spreading.

The central element of the Home Office plan is a new national "deradicalisation" programme that would persuade converts to violent and extremist causes to change their views.

Controversially, the new plan makes clear that people who fall under the influence of violent organisations will not automatically face prosecution.

Instead, the presumption should be that some such individuals would face therapy and counselling from community groups instead of criminal charges.

Documents being distributed to local councils explain that many people who get drawn into extremism have often suffered some sort of personal trauma or crisis that makes them vulnerable to exploitation.

"We do not want to put through the criminal justice system those who are vulnerable to, or are being drawn into, violent extremism unless they have clearly committed an offence," a Home Office report says.

"It is vital that individuals and communities understand this and have the confidence to use the support structures that we shall be developing."

Most of the new funding will be set aside for grants to community groups that challenge the messages of violent extremists should be supported.

The plan includes a suggestion that local councils should map their areas religion, surveying and recording the faiths and denominations of local residents.

New guidelines for councils say: "A deeper understanding of local communities should be developed to help inform and focus the programme of action - this may include mapping denominational backgrounds and demographic and socio-economic factors."

The Home Office has told councils they must be prepared to ask police to vet anyone involved in projects that receive government anti-radicalisation funding.

If a group is found to be promoting violent extremism, local agencies and the police should consider disrupting or removing funding, and deny access to public facilities, the document added.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said: "A key element of our strategy aims to stop people getting involved in extremist violence.

"We are investing at local level to build resilient communities, which are equipped to confront violent extremism and support the most vulnerable individuals."

Shadow home secretary David Davis said of today's publication: "This is pointless when the Government is fuelling the problem it is seeking to solve with its draconian approach to 42 days."