TheOPINIONATOR

ROAD RAGE/SUDDEN JIHAD LEAVES BRIT WITH MANGLED LEG

What the below article describes as "road rage" could more accurately be described as another incident of muslim rage -called Sudden Jihad Syndrome- against the Kaffir. Sudden Jihad Syndrome is when a normal appearing muslim suddenly erupts into violence (against the kuffar).

In the UK, a muslim man, along with his burka enveloped female companion, left a supermarket and began to leave in a car -only to nearly rear end the car belonging to 55 yr old Keith Fielding. Mr. Fielding courteously pulled over to let the man pass then stopped & exited his car to question the other driver. Fielding was then attacked by the t-shirt wearing bearded muslim man who took a 2 ft long knife and repeatedly slashed Mr. Fielding so many times that the cricketeer's leg needed hours of surgical reconstruction. Whether or not this vicious act of muslim violence against a British man is an example of Sudden Jihad remains to be verified but it does bring up the subject - one that is important for us to review.

The blog - Freedom's Enterprises - has a long list of incidents of Sudden Jihad . Other reputable publications such as the newspaper The Washington Times or Investor's Business Daily have also written about Sudden Jihad. Whereas many examples are from the USA it is clear that this savage behavior is found in all Western Nations.

Thus it appears that the muslim perpetrator is yet another "victim" of the Religion of Peace - a relgion that manages to keep its ardent followers constantly whipped up in a frenzied rage ready to attack, maim or kill the "infidel". Unfortunately muslim apologists prefer to rely upon the "mental illness" excuse for Sudden Jihad which makes one wonder if mental health professionals really believe that followers of the Quran (or Islamic Jihad) are to be considered suffering from a legitimate mental illness and if so why hasn't this position been publicized?

Curiously the apologists (and frequently the media) reaction to incidents of muslim Sudden Jihad have four key elements:

1. Denial that the attack is motivated by Islam;
2. Strong hint that the attacker is insane;
3. Assurance that the attacker(s) acted alone, and that there is no al-Qaeda link;
4. Prominent publicity to the Muslim “community’s” expressions of shock & horror.
Claim that—if the attacker is a Bosnian Muslim—his behavior was caused by the trauma of the 1990s war in which his people were supposedly the victims. (The O -rationalization)

How many times have we seen the above list of rationalizations used to explain or justify muslim violence? Or does the truth lie more in line with Michelle Malkin's post titled "A Random Gallery of 'Lone' Shooters------------------ "IT'S THE JIHAD STUPID!"

entire article:

Man recovers from surgery after road rage horror

by Mark Cowan

A MAN stabbed with a 2ft long knife in a supermarket car park road rage clash was today recovering from surgery to re-construct his leg.

Retired company boss Keith Fielding suffered a deep wound after being slashed in a row on the car park of Asda, Small Heath, at 9.10am yesterday.

Relatives of the avid cricketer, a senior member of Castle Bromwich Cricket Club, said he was attacked after he remonstrated with a man who had roared up behind him on the car park.

The 55-year-old was recovering in hospital as police continued a hunt for his attacker.

His brother-in-law Terry Coton said: “He’d just gone there to do a bit of shopping. He’s always first in the store.

“He was pulling out of a parking bay when this guy came up behind him flashing his lights. As Keith pulled over in the taxi bay to let him past this guy came up behind him.

“Keith got out to ask ‘what’s going on?’ when this man jumped out of the car and hit him with a knife.

“Its hard to take in really. You go down to do a peaceful bit of shopping and this sort of thing happens. It was over something trivial.

“He was in a lot of pain in hospital obviously.

“He has come through the operation all right but he is still heavily sedated. We’re still waiting to hear what they had to do.”

Mr Coton said that Keith had been able to speak to police.

Police said initial witness reports suggested the stabbing followed a row in the car park over the manner of driving but police said they are keeping an open mind over the motive for the attack.

The offender, an Asian man in his late 30s or early 40s, was thought to have been shopping in the store minutes before the incident.

Det Insp Simon Vowles, from Stechford CID, said: “I’d appeal to anyone who witnessed the incident or who has any information to come forward and make contact with us.”

The offender was short and stocky with a full beard and wearing a T-shirt. He was with a woman dressed in a full burka. They are believed to have sped off in a silver saloon car.

THE MUSLIM RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE OF BRITISH GIRLS

Yet again comes another tragic incidence of a muslim man raping a young British girl - this time a 14 year old girl, innocently walking her dog, was raped by a man "described as Asian, in his early twenties..." Of course the politically correct media-speak word "Asian" consistently means Muslim.

This latest crime leads one to wonder just how many rapes of British girls and women, by muslim men, have recently occurred in the UK. Below are some VERY recent incidents of muslim rape in the UK:

The one noted above - Girl -14  -raped while out walking her dog

Man jailed for committing more rapes while on bail for rape

Sex Attack by mosque leader "Changed my girl" says Mum

Muslim man kidnaps 14 yr old school girl for sex

Muslim Men rape four British School Girls at Amusement Park

UK Muslim preacher jailed for rape

Accounts of the above rapes made the pages of British newspapers in the past few months. Clearly not all rapes, in the UK, are perpetrated by muslims but considering that muslims currently only account for approximately 3% of the British population - with muslim men being an even smaller percentage - one must be alarmed at the high rate of rape crime caused by so small a group. (For more on the relationship between Islam and rape go here ) Also note that muslim leaders or holy men have been found guilty of rape.

Equally alarming is the fact that the same type of rapes of non-muslim girls and women appears to be escalating across Western Europe in direct proportion to muslim immigration and population increase. Well know blogger Fjordman has chronicled how authorities in both Sweden and Norway have purposely obfuscated the increasing numbers of violent "immigrant" rapes on non-muslim women.

From an Oslo, Norway newspaper Aftenposten = "Two out of three charged with rape in Norway's capital are immigrants with a non-western background according to a police study. The number of rape cases is also rising steadily. The study is the first where the crime statistics have been analyzed according to ethnic origin. Of the 111 charged with rape in Oslo last year, 72 were of non-western ethnic origin, 25 are classified as Norwegian or western and 14 are listed as unknown.....Police Inspector Gunnar Larsen of Oslo's Vice, Robbery and Violent crime division says the statistics are surprising - the rising number of rape cases and the link to ethnic background are both clear trends. But Larsen does not want to speculate on the reasons behind the worrying developments."

Obviously European government authorities do not want to besmirch their beloved quest for multiculturalism by tainting it with tales of rampant rapes by "Asian immigrants" as well their fear of the truth-strangling political correctness that threatens anyone with accusations of "racism" or "Islamophobia" if muslims are pointed out as being grossly over involved with crimes.

In the UK, muslim leaders have made it quite clear the they believe muslim men are entitled to rape non-muslim women: See LEADING ENGLISH MUSLIM LAWYER ENDORSES THE KILLING AND RAPE OF NON-MUSLIMS or MUSLIM CLERIC LIKENS WOMEN NOT WEARING VEILS TO "UNCOVERED MEAT".

Despite the facts has the UK fallen into lockstep with the castrated, dhimmi behaviour shown by most EU countries? When will this clear outrage of an epidemic of Rape Jihad against our women and young girls be publicly outed, condemned and ceased?

Will we as a thousands year old civilised society protect our British girls and women? --or will they be thrown upon the funeral pyre along with our British culture, laws, courage and humanity?

UK TAXPAYERS PROVIDE THE "GOOD LIFE" FOR CONVICTED TERRORIST

This is a follow-up on a blog I wrote a few weeks ago titled "Where Are Terrorists Safe?"  The answer of course is NuGreat Britain:

"The most recent case of  Abu Qatada, a convicted terrorist, whose rights to be free on bail and of avoiding deportation back to his homeland of Jordan on the CHANCE that he may receive punishment there, has clearly placed his comfort and safety as a higher priority than that of the British people. To add insult to injury the intended victims of his violence, the British people, are then forced to pay thousands of pounds for this man's food, shelter, and all living expenses - including a bonus for his "bad back........So how does Qatada show his gratitude for the hard working taxpayers generosity?  Why by immediately releasing a book telling muslims to commit terrorist attacks against the "non-believers"- Western nations. Thus is the sham of the ludicrous British judicial system which in conjunction with the EU Human Rights laws has placed the perpetrator (particularly if he/she is a muslim) with greater value than the victims. To add to the farce - Qatada was warned by judge to not meet with Osama Bin Laden."

What kind of additional punishment did Qatada receive for publishing a book inciting violence and hatred? Surely he should at least receive universal vocal condemnation on a par like the worldwide elites loaded upon the cartoonist and newpapers that published the Mo-cartoon or the international denouncing of Geert Wilders for have the audacity to expose Islam in his movie. But there was nothing but "cricket chirping" silence from the dhimmi British government, judiciary, law enforcement and world organizations.

So what kind of life does a Al Qaeda terrorist actually live post conviction-in the UK? What does the annual million pounds ($2,000,000 US dollars) the taxpayers are billed for keeping a "disabled" terrorist in their midst actually buy? One could only describe it as the "good life" - free from concerns of safety, hunger, and housing ---- all the worries that the law abiding British families feel - especially with the current bad economic conditions.

"On the day the nation mourned the 52 innocents massacred in the 2005 outrage, he had the nerve to flash a smug grin. Qatada managed to lug his shopping despite claiming £150 a week incapacity benefit for a BAD BACK...... He also had a rucksack on one shoulder. At one point on his trip, Qatada stroked his beard and shared a joke with a woman about his prayer beads.

Watching this convicted BAD BACK terrorist freely walk around the streets of London lugging a rucksack, 6 large bottles of Coca Cola, and a mega package of toilet paper is enough to outrage any law abiding person. As Abu Qatada stands around chatting and joking with his friends the REAL joke is on the British people.

for article go to "Smirk of Hate"

Below is a picture of Osama bin Laden's #2 out for a stroll and some toilet rolls:

MUSLIM DOCTORS BETRAY FORCED MARRAIGE VICTIMS

The NuLabour governments has actively recruited many muslims to fill National Health Service (particularly medical doctors) and other goverment jobs. All this is occurring despite continual instances of national safety & health concerns regarding muslims - showing that such policies should be implemented with great care - Such as (to cite a few examples):

45 UK doctors plot terror attacks against USA

UK Muslim Doctor's Association Exposes They Only Care About Muslims

Doctor pleads guilty in Glasgow Airport attack

UK Muslim medical workers refuse to follow hygiene rules causing Superbug threat to patients

Now comes proof that muslim medical doctors along with other members of the hospital and medical staff and people in other goverment postitions such as Job Centers are betraying muslim women hiding from abusive families and forced marriages. These employees are breaching confidentiality rules by using the central computer information to give address and other information to the families and people these women are hiding from. Doctors have given birth control information over to the muslim women's male relatives knowing she will be punished. Thus these unethical government employees are purposely "outing" women who are hiding, often in fear of their lives/"honour" killings. This collusion has place many muslim women in serious harm's way and shows that muslim allegiances more often than not lies in Sharia Law NOT in the British institutions where they work or in British law.

"Doctors and Job Centre workers are breaching confidentiality rules and passing on vital information to families, allowing them to trace and punish Asian women who are attempting to escape coerced marriages and "honour"-based domestic violence. ......Doctors and Job Centre workers are breaching confidentiality rules and passing on vital information to families, allowing them to trace and punish Asian women who are attempting to escape coerced marriages and "honour"-based domestic violence.

As the police, in many British cities and towns, are actively recruiting more and more muslims to become police officers saying this will help combat the (myth of) Islamophobia and better represent the community - we find that muslim girl's, hiding and living in fear of their families, avoid telling the police of their plight as so often the women have been brought back to the abusive families by - the police!

"Shahien Taj, director of the Cardiff-based women's group The Henna Foundation, said: "Recently I had a case in Birmingham of a woman who said she can't trust the police because nine times she had run away and nine times the police returned her to her family where she got abused. Fortunately ACPO are now addressing this kind of problem openly and trying to do something about it.In another case, reported to a women's group, a Chief Inspector offered to help a family track down a girl who fled a forced marriage. Zalikha Ahmed, director of the South Yorkshire based women's refuge Apna Haq, said: "We have to be careful with the police, especially the Asian ones. We don't visit the station where certain Asian officers are on because some of them are perpetrators and one of them on the record said he would not arrest someone who used force on his wife."

Indeed the National Health Service and ALL jobs with access to personal information and public safety must immediately fire ANY employee who misuses their job or data to aid and abet Sharia Law in the UK. Steps must be taken to insure future hirees do not misuse their positions. It is a matter of life and death.

full article:

FORCED MARRIAGE VICTIMS BEING BETRAYED BY DOCTORS

By Patrick Sawer

Young women fleeing forced marriages are being betrayed by GPs and benefits staff who "collude" with families to return them against their will, a senior police officer police has revealed.

Doctors and Job Centre workers are breaching confidentiality rules and passing on vital information to families, allowing them to trace and punish Asian women who are attempting to escape coerced marriages and "honour"-based domestic violence.

Commander Steve Allen, who is the spokesman on forced marriages for Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), revealed that some doctors have informed girls' families that they have asked for the contraceptive pill, placing them at risk from fathers or brothers who believe this means the family's honour has been besmirched.

Cmdr Allen also told The Sunday Telegraph that Job Centre workers have accessed the National Insurance details of women who flee violent husbands, tracing where they collect benefits and passing the details on to their families so they can be found and forced back to their marital home.

In one case the family of an 18-year-old Pakistani woman attempted to kidnap her from a south London Job Centre after being tipped off by a member of staff. The plot was only foiled because her boyfriend intervened.

Cmdr Allen, of the Metropolitan Police, said: "GPs will tell fathers their daughter has seen them and is on the pill. That can get a girl killed. Public sector employees will pass on to a family member an individual's National Insurance number knowing it can be used to trace their new whereabouts around the country.

"There is collusion by certain public servants and people in a position of authority, such as doctors, which supports these offences. It means many victims don't have the faith or the trust to be able to report their situation."

Cmdr Allen revealed the problem is compounded by some police offices treating women fleeing a forced marriage as 'teenage runaways' and returning them to their families – unwittingly placing them in danger. This has led to a breakdown of trust in some areas, with young Asian girls scared to tell the police of their plight for fear their families will be told.

He also said that in some Asian communities women do not trust the police because they suspect local officers will inform their families if they attempt to flee a forced marriage. ACPO is now taking urgent steps to address the problem by increased training for officers in how to deal with cases.

Cmdr Allen's warnings come in advance of a European-wide campaign against forced marriages and honour-violence being launched tomorrow (Mon).

The campaign, backed by ACPO, will work with women and young people in Asian communities to highlight the problem and produce information material for victims who need help.

Shahien Taj, director of the Cardiff-based women's group The Henna Foundation, said: "Recently I had a case in Birmingham of a woman who said she can't trust the police because nine times she had run away and nine times the police returned her to her family where she got abused. Fortunately ACPO are now addressing this kind of problem openly and trying to do something about it."

In another case, reported to a women's group, a Chief Inspector offered to help a family track down a girl who fled a forced marriage.

Zalikha Ahmed, director of the South Yorkshire based women's refuge Apna Haq, said: "We have to be careful with the police, especially the Asian ones. We don't visit the station where certain Asian officers are on because some of them are perpetrators and one of them on the record said he would not arrest someone who used force on his wife."

The 500 cases of forced marriage currently known to the authorities are only a tiny proportion of the numbers of young girls and even men suspected of being forced to marry against their will.

Every week one British citizen has to be rescued from Pakistan alone by the Foreign and Commonwealth's Forced Marriages Unit.

Cmdr Allen said such marriages result in years of assault and rape, psychological and emotional abuse for the victim, sometimes culminating in kidnapping and even murder when they try to flee.

Citing the case of 19-year-old Rukhsana Naz, a 19-year-old Derby girl killed by her mother and brother after she became pregnant from her childhood sweetheart, he said: "I would never have believed that a mother could hold down her pregnant daughter while her brother strangled her because she was carrying the child of a man she should not have been seeing."

But senior officers admit that despite the horror of such cases they face widespread complacency over the issue among certain police forces.

Cmdr Allen said: "We have too many areas where people don't believe this is an issue for them. But we are seeing situations across the country where victims, who are at extreme risk, are being moved to another part of the country, away from their home towns, by their families.

"We also are talking here about bounty hunters and professional killers being used to track down relatives and these people are going to be killed. This is about child protection, human rights and young people having their lives destroyed and all too often being murdered because they dared to love with their heart."

WHERE ARE TERRRORISTS SAFE?

As we approach the third anniversary of the 7/7/05 bombings and reflect upon the security changes that (should) make Britain an even safer place to live - one is startled by the daily news articles that speak to the opposite occurring. In fact one could say that terrorists could and do live quite safely in the Nu-UK.

The British people feel that whilst they are being monitored by CCTV cameras  -seemingly invading nearly every facet of daily life- that the real threats - the muslim terrorists/prisoners are being handled with kid gloves and given preferential treatments. The most recent case of  Abu Qatada, a convicted terrorist, whose rights to be free on bail and of avoiding deportation back to his homeland of Jordan on the CHANCE that he may receive punishment there, has clearly placed his comfort and safety as a higher priority than that of the British people. To add insult to injury the intended victims of his violence, the British people, are then forced to pay thousands of pounds for this man's food, shelter, and all living expenses - including a bonus for his "bad back":

"Abu Qatada is to receive almost £8,000 a year in benefits because he has a bad back. The fanatical cleric, said to be Osama Bin Laden’s ambassador in Europe, will get £150 a week of taxpayer’s cash after being released from jail last week. He was granted the incapacity benefit because his condition makes him unfit to work – even though a curfew allows him out of his home for only two hours a day, meaning it would be almost impossible for him to get a job. Qatada left Long Lartin prison in Worcestershire after the Appeal Court blocked his deportation to Jordan. He is now living in an £800,000 four-bedroom Edwardian semi in a tree-lined street in West London. His incapacity allowance will push the family’s total annual handouts to more than £50,000. His wife has been claiming £45,000 a year in child benefit, income support, housing benefit and council tax credit for the past four years.....Taxpayers are also footing an estimated £500,000 a year bill to provide round-the-clock surveillance on Qatada, who has been described by a judges as a ‘truly dangerous individual’.
He arrived in Britain 14 years ago on a forged passport and was granted asylum the following year."

So how does Qatada show his gratitude for the hard working taxpayers generosity?  Why by immediately releasing a book telling muslims to commit terrorist attacks against the "non-believers"- Western nations. Thus is the sham of the ludicrous British judicial system which in conjunction with the EU Human Rights laws has placed the perpetrator (particularly if he/she is a muslim) with greater value than the victims. To add to the farce - Qatada was warned by judge to not meet with Osama Bin Laden.

That brings us to the next question.  What IF Osama bin Laden were to be found in Great Britain - what kind of life and punishment would he receive? The below article, though a bit "tongue in cheek" aptly spells out Osama's likely fate in the UK:

ENTIRE ARTICLE:

OSAMA WOULD BE SAFE IN THE UK

Published: 24 Jun 2008

POOR old Osama bin Laden, scuttling around the war-torn Afghan mountains to avoid death or capture.

He must find those stinking caves bad for his health. And where does a chap go for a beard trim or a clean set of robes?

But hope is on the horizon for the world’s most wanted terrorist.

There’s one place on Earth where he would be perfectly safe. Britain.

Here, in the land where we throw nobody out, Bin Laden has every chance of ending his days amid peace and plenty.

His mate and fellow 9/11 monster Abu Qatada has been freed from detention by our judges on human rights grounds. He spent his time behind bars writing a book calling for British troops to be killed.

One of Qatada’s bail conditions is that he must not meet Bin Laden.

Comfy

But suppose Osama slipped in through Heathrow, as many do, without being spotted?

Suppose cops find him paying a visit to his old chum Qatada

We could hold him without charge for 42 days, yes.

But what hard evidence could we produce to put him in court and convict him?

Can we really prove it is him on those grainy videos ranting against the West?

When his 42-day detention ended, the Human Rights Act would stop us deporting him to the United States, or his native Saudi Arabia, or even Pakistan, as they all have the death penalty.

Pesky human rights campaigner Shami Chakrabarti would doubtless be on the case. Bin Laden would demand as his brief Abu Hamza’s Muslim lady lawyer Mudassar Arani, whose firm has pocketed £3.5million from the taxpayer to defend terror suspects.

In no time Osama would be installed in a large and comfy free house and showered with benefits.

Taxpayers would have to provide him with round-the-clock protection.

The NHS would turf some poor old chap out of his hospital bed to make way for sickly Bin Laden to be given priority treatment.

Vast compensation for unlawful arrest would set him up nicely for a life of leisure.

He’d end up on Question Time. He could try his luck as another dancing Muslim on Britain’s Got Talent.

Maybe Celebrity Big Brother would beckon.

Perhaps tea at No10. Or a peerage.

Pray silence for Lord Bin Laden of Tora Bora.

You think I’m joking?

Abu Qatada, a dangerous enemy of our nation, is living in luxury in an £800,000 house paid for by you and me.

He is being given £150 a week sick benefit because he says he can’t work because of a bad back. How did he injure it? Hauling explosives around?

Qatada’s wife pockets £45,000 of our money every year in handouts.

The bill for keeping tabs on him now he’s free will be £500,000 a year.

While Labour have been strutting their stuff about 42-day detention, the reality of the situation could not be clearer. Our courts, our laws, our way of life have been reduced to a farce by Labour’s folly of embracing EU human rights legislation. The result is that Abu Qatada — and Bin Laden too, should he come here — have all the rights in the world. The rest of us can do nothing about it.

DISABLED ELDERLY MAN LATEST VICTIM OF BRITAIN'S "STREET JIHAD"

A 73 year old disabled pensioner was brutally attacked, outside his own home, and beaten by a young muslim man. The plucky Ray Mills had gone outside to see why a group of 10 teens were throwing stones at his home  (clearly provoking him to do so) and to tell them to stop.  Undoubtedly he is from a former British mindset where such requests might be met with a few retorts from the youths but not a life threatening beating.

Mr Mills, who normally uses crutches, was coldcocked from behind by one of the teens thus leaving him vulnerable to the heinous actions of a cowardly muslim youth who proceeded to beat the elderly man with a brick. Mr. Mills was beaten unconscious and was hospitalized for two days where he received brain scans. He suffered numerous contusions and abrasions and may also have damage to his vision from the merciless beating.   All the youths fled when neighbours came to the elderly man's assistance.

One cannot help but compare this incident to that of a 67 yr old man in Bradford who died  (note the BBC's typical "extensive coverage of the death) from injuries received also at the hand of muslim "youths". Police believe "the pensioner became involved in a confrontation with a group of Asian youths and was then assaulted". (Undoubtedly there are more such incidences of elderly being assaulted and harmed by muslim gangs or individuals but more often then not the media appear to purposely obscure the assailants identity - see above BBC for typical example.) At even more risk are British youngsters who also seem to be purposely marked for violence by muslim gangs. See here -  here - here and here for a few recent examples.

Well, welcome to Jolly NU England where the elderly and young are seen as vulnerable prime prey for mounting muslim violence - what I refer to as Street Jihad. This predatory behaviour, clearly a form of hate crimes and elder abuse   must be stopped and stopped NOW - otherwise the British elderly and youngsters face the continuing threat of being seen as little more than an avenue for vile, hate-filled acts by cowardly muslim thugs.

As an aside - look what this elderly ex-British cop, who worked with Oldham's Bangladeshi community as a police officer patrolling Westwood and Coldhurst for 15 years, is doing for the Bangladeshi muslim community - one wonders if he would be safe cycling in Great Britain.....

entire article - for pictures go to link in title:

Have A Go OAP Beaten by Gang

A DISABLED pensioner was battered unconscious with a brick after he went to confront a gang of stone-throwing teenagers.

Ray Mills, aged 73, took on the 10-strong crowd outside his Birmingham home and was knocked to the floor by one of them.

The retired welder, who walks on crutches, is waiting for tests on his eye to see whether his sight has been damaged and has undergone brain scans in hospital.

As he recovered at his Stechford Road home today, he condemned the thugs and said: “I’m in terrible pain.”

He hoped that the shocking pictures of his injuries would strike the conscience of the hooligans – understood to include both boys and girls – and result in them contacting police.

“I can’t believe what they did to me – it’s like a bad dream,” said Mr Mills.

“All I did was ask them why they had been throwing stones and one of them went for me.

“If I’d had my crutches with me and I knew it was coming, I’d have defended myself but one of them whacked me without any warning and the next thing I remember is waking up in the house.

“I’m pretty sure he had something like a brick in his hand.

“I’m in terrible pain and I’ll have to go back to the hospital for more scans and X-rays, but I’m most worried about my sight because I rely on my car to get about.”

The attack happened at about 3pm on Friday.

Mr Mills, said he had been upstairs when he spotted the gang hurling rocks and stones at the house where he has lived with his wife, Enid, aged 73, for 51 years.

After shouting from the window, he went to the front of the house where he came face to face with the teenagers and asked: “Why?”

The thug who attacked the pensioner is described as being Asian and 14-16. He was wearing a black baseball cap and a black jacket with white piping on the chest.

Mr Mills was hit to the left side of his face and fell against a neighbour’s garden wall before the mob of seven boys and three girls fled towards Washwood Heath Technology College, chased away by neighbours.

The pensioner was taken to Heartlands Hospital where he spent two days before being released.

Mr Mills, who has one daughter, Julie, aged 40, said: “I did the same as anybody else would do if someone was throwing stones at their house.

“There’s nothing I can say about the person who did this to me that would be fit to print but I can’t believe that people act in this way.

“I’ve been punched a couple of times in my life and the injury was nothing like this.”

Julie, from Polesworth, Staffordshire, added: “I shouldn’t have to see my dad like this and if anybody has got a conscience they will come forward.”

Police said they will interview neighbours in a bid to catch the attacker.

Insp Dale Speed from Stechford Police Station said: “This was an alarming attack, regardless of the motive but it is not part of a pattern of crime in the area.”

Anybody with information is asked to contact police on 0845 113 5000.

MUSLIM "LYRICAL TERRORIST" GOES FREE - WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO STAY CONVICTED IN THE UK?

One has to wonder just what DOES it take to qualify to be considered a terrorist and stay convicted under Britain's Terrorism Act. The "Lyrical Terrorist" Samina Malik had previously been convicted, under the act, having been found with materials that could be used in the conducting or planning of an act of terrorism. Yesterday under appeal - her conviction was overturned.

So clearly what the court is now saying is that the below acts, committed by Ms Malik, do not constitute "collecting information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.":

-Malik wrote extremist poems praising Osama Bin Laden on the back of till receipts while working at W H Smith at Heathrow Airport. In one poem, called The Living Martyrs, she called for Muslims to rise up against the infidels and she wrote and "instructional poem" How To Behead where she warned that the victim should be bound and blindfolded.

-Malik possessed a number of documents related to terrorism including the al Qaida Manual, the Terrorist's Handbook and the Mujahideen Poisons Handbook.

-Malik was a member of an extremist group linked to Omar Bakri Mohammed, a UK muslim preacher who spouted hate of non-muslims and fled to Lebanon from Britain three years ago.

-Malik had a profile on the social networking website Hi-5, where she called for the execution of 'depraved' Westerners.

-Malik, a British-born Muslim, listed her interests as helping the Mujahideen 'in any way I can'.

It would seem to me that surely the above list would be legitimate reasons to consider that Ms. Malik was undoubtedly acting in a manner and collecting information that would be used in inciting/preparing and committing an act of terrorism.

It should also be noted that "Earlier this year five Muslim men had their convictions quashed after the Appeal Court ruled that possessing Islamist videos and downloading jihadi propaganda did not constitute terrorist offences."

According to the article Ms Malik " was not in court yesterday when the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, sitting in the Court of Appeal with Mr Justice Goldring and Mr Justice Plender, said: 'We consider that there is a very real danger that the (previous) jury became confused and that the prosecution have rightly conceded that this conviction is unsafe.'

Thus - like the 5 muslims men mentioned above - Ms Malik's prior conviction was overturned.  The Appeals Court use of the term "the conviction is unsafe" is particularly ironic as those who are now really unsafe are the British people whose judicial system clearly refuses to convict terrorists & keep them convicted. Thus these courts refuse to keep the British people out of harm's way.

Partial article below - link to article in title:

First woman to be found guilty under Terrorism Act has her conviction quashed

By Lucy Ballinger
Last updated at 11:24 PM on 17th June 2008

Samina Malik, who called herself the 'Lyrical Terrorist', won her appeal against conviction

An airport  worker who wrote poems about beheadings and dubbed herself a 'lyrical terrorist' had her conviction for terrorist crimes quashed yesterday.

Samina Malik was the first woman to be convicted under the Terrorism Act after she was found guilty of collecting information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.

The 24-year-old's successful appeal is another severe blow to the government's anti-terror legislation.

Earlier this year five Muslims had their convictions quashed after the Appeal Court ruled that possessing Islamist videos and downloading jihadi propaganda did not constitute terrorist offences.

Malik's case was one reviewed after the hearing.

She wrote extremist poems praising Osama Bin Laden on the back of till receipts while working at W H Smith at Heathrow Airport, and possessed a number of documents related to terrorism including the al Qaida Manual, the Terrorist's Handbook and the Mujahideen Poisons Handbook.

The Crown Prosecution Service conceded the conviction was unsafe and last night said it would not seek a retrial.

UK GOVERNMENT GIVES GRANT TO MUSLIM HATE BLOGGERS

Just when you think the suicidal pandering of the British Labour government could get no worse comes the news that $70,000 of British taxpayers money has been handed on a silver platter to a radical Islamic website. This grant given only a few weeks before the anniversary of the London 7/7/05 bombings - see the 55 victims here.

This website, Muslimyouth.net carries posts where the writers not only extoll suicide bombings but also praise the beheading of Daniel Pearl and Ken Bigley. Daniel Pearl, a reporter for the Wall St Journal, was beheaded by 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (currently on trial). Ken Bigley, a British engineer working on reconstruction projects in Iraq, was beheaded by  the Tawhid and Jihad ("Oneness of God and Jihad") Islamist group, led by Jordanian Abu Musab al-Zarqawi

The web groups rationalizes the hate spewed toward innocent victims of jihad as a "few people venting anger on the site" - but offers no claims of future monitoring of the hate rants. Muslimyouth.com subsequently insists that they would report, any direct terrorist threat posted, to authorities. Is that supposed to make the British people feel better?

The Labour government justifies its gift as a way to talk about the issues. One would logically assume the issues of muslim radicalism and violence against the British people would be the topic?

Of course not!! The group plans on using the money to make a film, ironically enough, on the difficult life and problems muslims are subjected to in Britain.

ENTIRE ARTICLE:

GRANT FOR MUSLIM HATE BLOGGERS

BY Tom Wells

AN Islamic website which backs suicide bombers got a £35,000 Government grant – a month before the anniversary of the 7/7 attacks.

Muslimyouth.net carries dozens of rants by fanatics on its “support group” site.

One member wrote of suicide missions: “If you can blow dozens of people up at the same time, great, absolutely great.”

And in another vile message a member PRAISED a beheading video of British hostage Ken Bigley.

It said: “I like the beheading videos of the prisoners of war – especially the Daniel Pearl and Ken Bigley one.”

But the Department for Communities and Local Government agreed to fund the group’s film on problems faced by UK Muslims.

A spokesman said: “We can’t prevent violent extremism if we aren’t prepared to talk about the issues.”

VIPs will see the film in London tomorrow, including Cabinet minister Hazel Blears.

Rizwan Hussain, of Muslimyouth. net, said: “We’re conscious of a few people venting anger on our site. If there was a direct threat made we would alert authorities.”

Four suicide bombers killed 52 people in the 2005 7/7 London attacks.

TERRORISTS NEED THERAPY NOT INCARCERATION

I must admit that when I saw this headline I thought surely it  must be a joke - something like you would read on tongue-in-cheek  The Onion web site not in a daily news puplication.

But incredibly, as we near the third anniversary of the 7/7 London bombings, the British government "know-it-alls" in their most dhimmi of proclamations and clear lack of understanding of Islam have deemed that most terrorists should not face any type of punishment, for their hate crimes against non-muslims, but instead muslims should receive hand-holding  --lay on the couch --'tell me about your awful childhood'- 'daddy made me do it' psychological therapy:

"Documents being distributed to local councils explain that many people who get drawn into extremism have often suffered some sort of personal trauma or crisis that makes them vulnerable to exploitation."

Home Secretary, Jaqui Smith stated: "We are investing at local level to build resilient communities, which are equipped to confront violent extremism and support the most vulnerable individuals."

Yes - unbelievably the UK government is investing 25 million dollars in "Help Save the Terrorists" programmes and is telling the people of Britain to show understanding and open armed community support to those poor, misguided, Islamic extremists who want to kill the kaffir (unbelievers) .

You couldn't make this stuff up!!  It is obvious that Ms Smith, and her cohorts, are in desperate need of not only psychological testing and therapy themselves but also courses on the teachings of the Religion of Peace - especially on the subject of what the Quran instructs regarding violence.

Perhaps, Ms Smith could also consult with the former Mayor of Kirklees, Jean Calvert, as to how muslims, in Great Britain, treat people who pander to Islam.

article in full - emphasis mine:

ISLAMIST EXTREMISTS SHOULD GET THERAPY, HOME OFFICE TELLS LOCAL COUNCILS

By James Kirkup, Political Correspondent

Islamic extremists could escape prosecution and instead receive therapy and counselling under new Government plans to "deradicalise" religious fanatics.

The Home Office is to announce an extra £12.5 million to support new initiatives to try to stop extremism spreading.

The central element of the Home Office plan is a new national "deradicalisation" programme that would persuade converts to violent and extremist causes to change their views.

Controversially, the new plan makes clear that people who fall under the influence of violent organisations will not automatically face prosecution.

Instead, the presumption should be that some such individuals would face therapy and counselling from community groups instead of criminal charges.

Documents being distributed to local councils explain that many people who get drawn into extremism have often suffered some sort of personal trauma or crisis that makes them vulnerable to exploitation.

"We do not want to put through the criminal justice system those who are vulnerable to, or are being drawn into, violent extremism unless they have clearly committed an offence," a Home Office report says.

"It is vital that individuals and communities understand this and have the confidence to use the support structures that we shall be developing."

Most of the new funding will be set aside for grants to community groups that challenge the messages of violent extremists should be supported.

The plan includes a suggestion that local councils should map their areas religion, surveying and recording the faiths and denominations of local residents.

New guidelines for councils say: "A deeper understanding of local communities should be developed to help inform and focus the programme of action - this may include mapping denominational backgrounds and demographic and socio-economic factors."

The Home Office has told councils they must be prepared to ask police to vet anyone involved in projects that receive government anti-radicalisation funding.

If a group is found to be promoting violent extremism, local agencies and the police should consider disrupting or removing funding, and deny access to public facilities, the document added.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said: "A key element of our strategy aims to stop people getting involved in extremist violence.

"We are investing at local level to build resilient communities, which are equipped to confront violent extremism and support the most vulnerable individuals."

Shadow home secretary David Davis said of today's publication: "This is pointless when the Government is fuelling the problem it is seeking to solve with its draconian approach to 42 days."

MUSLIM GANG USES IRON PIPES AND CLUBS TO BLUDGEON 14 YR OLD ENGLISH BOY

Another case of an innocent young boy being beat to a pulp by a gang of muslim young men.  AND another case of the media and the police purposely avoiding and not recognizing that this is a muslim against white hate crime:

"Detective Inspector Paul Hitchen said: "This was a vicious attack on a lone teenager for no apparent reason. We have a dedicated team of detectives working on this. I would like to add that there is no suggestion of any racial element whatsoever to this assault."

This lad was only 14 year old, as were the two other lads who were walking with him. The trio were walking along, minding their own business, when a group of 10 "Asians" (media-speak for muslim) pounced. The two friends got away leaving the 10 hoodlums to focus their brutal and vicious bludgeoning with iron bars and table legs/clubs on the lone defenseless boy. The lad fell to the ground and curled up into a ball to try and protect himself as best he could. The other bloodthirsty muslim thugs, without weapons, joined in and proceeded to kick and punch the lad on the head and body as he yelled for help.

The boy has been left with a broken arm and gashes about his head. 

This is a serious assault that could have easily led to the death of the boy. Like the lad's mother stated: "They seemed to have had their weapons ready, just looking for trouble". NO robbery occurred leaving the objective observer to conclude that the motive was a race hate crime - yet, as stated above, the police and media quickly jump into obfuscation mode to deceive the public.  Clearly if the situation were reversed, as in the Amar Aslam case - even if the immediate evidence pointed otherwise - the British media (and police) would jump to their preconceived conclusion and portray the beating as a racist crime by a gang of white men.

As the list of muslim attacks, particularly by muslim gangs, against the white British population grows longer by the day, one wonders how long the British people will tolerate the lies and cover-ups offered by their police force and their media.

entire article

Boy, 14, attacked with iron bars and table legs

By Paul Keaveny

A GANG of thugs repeatedly battered a 14-year-old boy with metal bars and table legs.

The teenager was walking home with two friends along Higher Swan Lane, Great Lever, when he was targeted by a group of around 10 youths.

His friends, also aged 14, managed to run away but the gang grabbed him before he could escape.

advertisement

He struggled with two of his attackers before falling to the floor and curling up in a ball as the group pounded him with their weapons.

Other members of the gang, who were not armed, kicked and punched him about the head and body, as he shouted for help.

The boy, from Morris Green, has been left with a broken shoulder and gashes to his head, following the attack, which happened at around 8.30pm on Sunday.

The gang fled when the alarm was raised by local residents.

Police have now released CCTV images of the thugs in a bid to track them down.

The mother of the boy, who asked not to be named, said: "It's terrible. They just pounced on him, hitting him with metal bars and table legs. I am frightened to death of him going out at all now. They didn't rob him. They seemed to have had their weapons ready, just looking for trouble.

"He is bearing up now. It could have been worse; that's what frightens me. He will be worried about going out now, although he is trying to put a brave face on it."

She said her son turned 15 the day after the horrific attack and that he had never seen the lads before.

The gang were all Asian, aged 15 to 17, and were wearing hooded tops.

Detective Inspector Paul Hitchen said: "This was a vicious attack on a lone teenager for no apparent reason. We have a dedicated team of detectives working on this. I would like to add that there is no suggestion of any racial element whatsoever to this assault.

"I would appeal to all members of Bolton society who may have information about this attack to come forward and help us bring these people to justice."