Hat tip and Thanks to Patriots Corner
Hat tip and Thanks to Patriots Corner
This should come as no surprise to those that read TheOPINIONATOR as I have written hundreds of blog posts regarding incidents of muslim men/gangs cowardly attacking and beating (usually lone) victims. The vast majority of these attacks are unprovoked and clearly are race hate attacks targeting white British men.
A few earlier UK incidents from this year:
British Man left with 68 stitches in his face after brutal muslim gang slash attack Yes, a DIFFERENT attack!
So now it is crystal clear - that despite all the efforts of the police to obfuscate these muslim racist attacks as a "one off" or "incidents like this are rare" - they are neither.
Clearly there is a pattern of escalating muslim violence against non-muslims in the UK. It is past time that the British government, leaders and media start connecting the dots and admitting that there is a BIG problem with muslim Street Jihad in the UK - particularly England. (which has the highest concentration of muslims) - instead of arresting innocent Englishmen for NO reason.
And, clearly the government's continual pandering to and coddling of muslims (examples far too numerous to list) has done nothing to stem this violence or to protect the British people. Unfortunately for the people of Great Britain and other European countries - perhaps that is exactly what the British/EU government wants.
Article in full:Armed mob in random revenge attacks
July 28, 2010
A mob of teenagers armed with a fearsome array of weapons attacked total strangers.
One victim, then 17, was left with brain damage after the nine-strong gang ‘mercilessly beat him’.
Bolton Crown Court heard how the gang travelled from Manchester to Rochdale armed with retractable batons, knuckle-dusters and spanners in May 2008 on a ‘mission of retaliation’ to avenge an alleged attack on the ringleader’s brother.
The mob arrived at Denehurst Park, near Spotland, and ‘sprang out of bushes’ to attack a group of young friends. Faizan Samirudin approached Sheldon Hague, then 17, and said: "Who battered my brother?"
Witnesses told how Samirudin, 19, was carrying a cosh with a knuckle duster over his right hand. Sheldon tried to run away, but tripped.
Andrew Nuttall QC, prosecuting, said: "He was quickly reached and mercilessly beaten by a number of these defendants. He was defenceless and they beat him with their weapons with great force and at least one of the defendants stamped upon his face with such force that the shoe left an imprint."
The court was told that Sheldon, robbed of his watch and mobile phone, almost died. He was left with brain damage and is partially deaf. He also finds it hard to speak.
The nine defendants were due to be sentenced today. The court was told that none of the victims was linked to the alleged attack on Samirudin’s brother. Four other teenagers were also attacked in the park. None was seriously hurt.
After the attack the gang split up and ran off. Before they regrouped, one faction robbed another teenage boy and threatened another, Mr Nuttall said.
Faizan Samirudin, 19, of Epson Close, Rochdale, has pleaded guilty to robbery, violent disorder, affray and unlawful wounding. Talha Siddique, 19, of Byrom Street, Old Trafford, has pleaded to violent disorder and affray. Ajay Singh, 19, of Fulford Street, Old Trafford, has pleaded guilty to robbery, violent disorder, and affray. Muzammel Taufiq, 18, of Langshaw Street, Old Trafford, has pleaded guilty to violent disorder and affray.
Muneed Chowdrey, 18, of Reynolds Road, Old Trafford, admitted robbery, violent disorder and affray. Saim Malik, 18, of Reynolds Road, Old Trafford, pleaded guilty to violent disorder and two counts of affray. Huzifan Bhamjee, 18, of Darnley Street, Old Trafford, admitted robbery, violent disorder and affray. Mundir Selougha, 18, of Upper Chorlton Road, Whalley Range, admitted violent disorder and affray. Safwan Salejee, 18, of Derbyshire Lane, Stretford, pleaded guilty to robbery, violent disorder and affray.
'My boy will never be same . . . I hate them'
The mother of victim Sheldon Hague has told how doctors said he had just three hours to live after the brutal attack.
Sheldon was on a life support machine as mum Lesley, 40, rushed into the hospital.
He confounded doctors and pulled through, but remained in hospital for five days.
Sheldon, who suffered brain damage and is now partially deaf, also struggles to talk.
Lesley said: "He will be like this for the rest of his life. He will never fully recover.
"I hate these people for what they have done. It looks like they have shown no remorse at all."
Sheldon, a former pupil at Oulder Hill School, Rochdale, is now 19 and studying to be a mechanic, but says he rarely leaves his house and has nightmares.
In a victim statement read out to the court, he said: "I think about what happened all the time and I cannot sleep. I think that this will be with me for the rest of my life."
Lesley added: "Sheldon did nothing to them. He was totally defenceless and was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
"When I saw him on a life support machine the doctor said he had three hours to live. I would not wish that on anyone."
Tags: Bolton, Britain, England, hate crime, knuckle dusters, Manchester, muslim gangs, race hate crime, street jihad
From Pamela Gellar's excellent web site - Atlas Shrugs:
The EDL, the standard bearers of freedom in the UK, planned on another peaceful demonstration in Dudley today. They have come under fierce attack. Details are sketchy at the moment. Will update as news breaks. Do not look to the media for accurate reporting. They will report on this the way they report on the tea party: lies, distortions, slander.
The "Muslim Defense League" had planned to be there. According to EDL media, the EDL is being subjected to assaults by the police. Injuries have been caused and there is rioting in Dudley...gangs of Muslims are attacking people...THE MEDIA IS NOT REPORTING ANY OF THESE EVENTS...
UPDATE: We have eyewitness accounts coming in of Muslims using cars to drive down English protesters in Dudley. There has been one report of an incident in which a car drove into four people, leaving them seriously injured and one woman dead. An air ambulance has landed to assist the injured. We are waiting for confirmation of this incident.
Six hurt as car hits pedestrians in Dudley BBC
Six pedestrians were injured, three seriously, when they were struck by a car in the West Midlands.
The ambulance service was called to the junction of King Street and Stafford Street, Dudley, at 1605 BST.
Three men, aged 42, 37 and 32 suffered head injuries. The 37-year-old also broke his leg.
Three others, including a girl aged 16 whose leg was broken, also needed hospital treatment.
An 18-year-old man suffered a foot injury and a 19-year-old man has a suspected broken leg, the West Midlands Ambulance Service said.
UPDATE: Sky news has reported damage to a Hindu Temple in Dudley.
Here, from the EDL, is an explanation of why they were holding a demonstration:
The Dudley super mosque still looms over the people of Dudley.
The council do not want it, the people of Dudley do not want it, the nation does not want it. They STILL try to force this mosque upon the people over-riding all accepted democratic processes.
The EDL will not leave the... people of Dudley to this fate. When we went there on April 3rd people came out of their houses to applaud us as we passed. People got out of their cars to give us the thumbs up. We have received hundreds of emails thanking us for our help in this matter.
We are proud to stand by the people of Dudley. We will not surrender.
There are two more videos that show:
the main body of the EDL demonstration continued to be confined in this penned area. Numbers are lower than at previous demonstrations, but there were EDL Facebook reports claiming that some coaches full of supporters were being prevented from reaching their destination. As can be seen, there is no sign of violence in any of the videos posted here.
UPFATE 4:43 pm: From Van
"The be all and end all of it is - as agreed by a number of people today - the Police simply didn`t want all the EDL who travelled in Dudley. 3 buses were laid on to ferry people to the demo. The buses went 2 miles or so to the demo point and never came back for the rest. Everyone started to walk, the police blocked everyone. After what seemed ages, most people had made their way to Castle hill and the police were there in force. Nobody was going to pass and they didn`t. Members were assaulted and sent on their way. Small groups were picked off by local Asians [UK speak for Muslims - Atlas] - police confirmed this. I can`t comment what happened in the demo site as I never made it. But i did witness our coaches being stoned while police looked on, and a mob wandering around Dudley as if they owned the place - they then attacked police. Apologies if I have repeated myself - raging at the moment. "
Posted at 07:58 PM in (Myth of) Islamophobia, Creeping Sharia, Current Affairs, Immigration in UK, Islam in UK, Jihad, Kaffirophobia, Muslim Crime, Muslim Terrorism, Politics in UK, Street Jihad | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Tags: Britain, Dudley, EDL, England, English Defence League, Islam, mosque, muslims, street jihad, UK
It is no longer safe for a young father to walk down the streets England with his child and girlfriend - innocent people are not safe from escalating muslim gang violence. (aka street jihad)
Likely the above statement will not come as a surprise news alert to most English people - . A few - but far from all of - other recent instances:
Now we have "Reece Johnson, 23, who was left with a six-inch laceration that needed 68 stitches after being attacked by a mob of 20 Asian 'youths'. Medics told him that the blade had stopped just short of his jugular vein and that he could have bled to death......He was then set upon and punched before one of the gang cut open his left cheek with a Stanley knife....Mr Johnson was taken to a specialist facial unit at the Royal Blackburn Hospital on Saturday night. He was given 20 stitches inside his face and another 48 on the outside." See article below
Young Mr Johnson will be left with a gigantic scar across his face and his 5 year old son, Tyrel, is traumatised from watching his father being brutally attacked and slashed.
So what was the supposed motive for this heinous violent attack? The excuse - and you know that law enforcement and judges will always give muslims an "excuse"for criminal behaviours, was revenge for a 2007 attack by 2 white teens that resulted in a death of a muslim man. Both assailants are now serving time for the crime.
Mr Johnson had nothing to do with that incident.
A clear sign of the cowardly nature of these racist, Kuffarophobic muslim thugs is they only attack is when they are in much greater numbers than the victims. This muslim gang proceeded to exact their racist, vigilante wrath onto the innocent Reece Johnson.
"They were saying "your lot killed one of ours" meaning white people killed an Asian lad.
'One of the guys was acting aggressively and the group was swearing and hurling racist abuse. They were very racist.
'I saw one of them in front of me with a small hand knife and I was watching him. But then another lad came at the side of me and punched me and that's when I was slashed." See article below
Reece Johnson - left with a large, highly visible facial scar covering the once gaping wound - worries:
"I'm scarred for life now and people might look at me and think I'm a violent thug.'
So the innocent victim will bear the mark of a 'violent thug'.
There is also eerie similarity to THE most despicable race hate crime in Scotland/Britain - the horrific murder of 15 year old schoolboy, Kriss Donald - who was tortured and killed by muslim gang/men for no other reason than the young lad was white.
as well as Rob Hughes, who was left with the imprint of a trainer on his forehead and nose following a vicious muslim gang attack.
AND brothers Thomas and David Barry, had their bodies pummelled and their faces smashed when they were set upon by a gang of up to 30 "youths" armed with hammers. The brothers had gone outside the pub to go to the aid of Thomas's son and his 16 yr. old girlfriend who the muslim gang had already attacked.
So far what is the sum total result of the police investigation into the muslim slasher-gang attack on Mr. Johnson?
"A 16-year-old was arrested but later released without charge."
I'd like to predict there will be more arrests and prosecutions.........but it is far more likely the police will let the entire incident drop without the perpetrators being brought to justice.....for the sake of 'community cohesion'.
An innocent father was slashed across the face in front of his five-year-old child in a random 'anti-white' revenge attack over the murder of an Asian teenager.
Reece Johnson, 23, was left with a six-inch laceration that needed 68 stitches after being attacked by a mob of 20 Asian youths.
Medics told him that the blade had stopped just short of his jugular vein and that he could have bled to death.
Victim: Reece Johnson, 23, was attacked by a mob of youths as he walked with his girlfriend and son. The laceration to his face needed 68 stitches
Today Mr Johnson, a labourer, said: 'My face is a mess but the fact is I'm very lucky to be alive.
'The doctors told me if the blade had continued another few millimetres then it would have hit my jugular vein.
'The nurse said it must have been a very sharp blade, like a razor.
'She said another finger tip across my neck and that would have been it, I would have died. These guys picked on me for no other reason than because I was a white and killers of that young lad were white.'
Mr Johnson, who lives in Great Lever, near Bolton, Greater Manchester, had been walking home with his girlfriend and son Tyrel on Saturday evening when a mob of 20 Asian youths surrounded him snarling: 'Your lot killed one of ours.'
He was then set upon and punched before one of the gang cut open his left cheek with a Stanley knife.
As Tyrel screamed in horror, his father was left reeling with a giant gaping wound in his face.
Police believe the attack was motivated by revenge after the murder of college student Saffer Khan, 19, by two white youths in the same area over two years ago.
Mr Johnson said: 'It's just unbelievable. Obviously I had nothing to do with what happened to Mr Khan yet I was tarred with the same brush as the killers simply because of the colour of my skin.
'I'm scarred for life now and people might look at me and think I'm a violent thug.'
Mr Johnson had been for a day out with his family and friends in Blackpool and was walking past the entrance of Bobby Heywood Park in Great Lever where Mr Khan was beaten to death for pleasure by two teenagers in November 2007.
Crime scene: Mr Johnson was set upon near the entrance to Heywood Park in Great Lever, Bolton. He was rushed to hospital, where medics told him he could have bled to death
He said Tyrel had been particularly badly affected by the attack.
'I was with my son and a girlfriend when this mob of 20 Asian youths came up to us,' he said.
'They were saying "your lot killed one of ours" meaning white people killed an Asian lad.
'One of the guys was acting aggressively and the group was swearing and hurling racist abuse. They were very racist.
'I saw one of them in front of me with a small hand knife and I was watching him. But then another lad came at the side of me and punched me and that's when I was slashed.
'I was scared for my life. The lads who attacked me have no respect. My little son was with me - he's five years old.
'He was screaming, clinging on to one of my friend's legs.
'He was hysterical and has been left traumatised.
'He woke up the other night crying. That is not normal for him.'
Mr Johnson was taken to a specialist facial unit at the Royal Blackburn Hospital on Saturday night. He was given 20 stitches inside his face and another 48 on the outside.
He left hospital at 6.30am on Sunday and is now recovering at his parents' home in Farnworth, near Bolton.
The father-of-three said he and his girlfriend will now move home because they are scared to return to the area.
He added: 'There are people in the community that know who has done it but it is whether they are brave enough to admit it.'
A Greater Manchester police spokesman said: 'The 23-year-old man had been out with his girlfriend when he was confronted by a group of up to 20 youths.
'An argument broke out and during this, the man was slashed across the left cheek, suffering a six-inch wound. Inquiries are ongoing.'
A 16-year-old was arrested but later released without charge.
Mr Khan was kicked to death by 18-year old Joseph Booth who ripped off an electronic tag he had been ordered to wear as a condition of his early release from jail.
Manchester Crown Court was told that in the hours before the killing, Booth had been on a boozing spree.
After downing cheap cider, he simply broke open the tag and threw it away - an action which triggered the authorities.
As the police began to search for Booth, the the teenager and a 15-year old boy began prowling the park looking for a victim to mug.
They ambushed Mr Khan who was punched kicked and and had his head stamped on.
Booth and the 15-year old were later jailed for life for murder.
Posted at 11:15 AM in (Myth of) Islamophobia, Creeping Sharia, Crime, Current Affairs, Immigration in UK, Islam in UK, Jihad, Kaffirophobia, Multiculturalism, Muslim Crime, Street Jihad | Permalink | Comments (8) | TrackBack (0)
Tags: Asian youths, Bolton, Britain, England, Great Britain, Great Lever, Heywood Park, Kris Donald, muslim gang, race hate attack, Reece Johnson, slasher, street jihad
Cross post from Center for Security Policy web site - written about the USA but applicable to all Western nations where muslims have immigrated.
American Legion Magazine | Apr 09, 2010
By Frank Gaffney, Jr.
For the first time in its history, the United States is trying to wage and win a war without accurately identifying the enemy or its motivations for seeking to destroy us. That oversight defies both common sense and past military experience, and it disarms us in what may be the most decisive theater of this conflict: the battle of ideas.
Such a breakdown may seem incredible to veterans of past military conflicts. Imagine fighting World War II without clarity about Nazism and fascism, or the Cold War without an appreciation of Soviet communism and the threat it posed.
Yet today, the civilian leaders of this country and their senior subordinates - responsible for the U.S. military, the intelligence community, homeland security and federal law enforcement - have systematically failed to fully realize that we once again face a totalitarian ideology bent on our destruction.
That failure is the more worrisome since the current ideological menace is arguably more dangerous than any we have faced in the past, for two reasons. First, its adherents believe their mission of global conquest is divinely inspired. Second, they are here in the United States in significant numbers, not just a threat elsewhere around the world.
What, then, is this ideology? It has been given many names in recent years, including political Islam, radical Islam, fundamentalist Islam, extremist Islam and Islamofascism. There is, however, a more accurate descriptor - the one its adherents use. They call it "Shariah."
Perhaps the most important thing to understand about Shariah is that it is authoritative Islam, which presents itself as a complete way of life - cultural, political, military, social and religious, all governed by the same doctrine. In other words, this comprehensive program is not simply the agenda of extremists hunkered down in caves in Afghanistan or Pakistan. Neither can its directives be attributed to deviants hijacking Islam.
Rather, Shariah - which translates from Arabic as "path to God" - is actually binding law. It is taught as such by the most revered sacred texts, traditions, institutions, top academic centers, scholars and leaders of the Islamic faith. Fortunately, hundreds of millions of Muslims around the world do not wish to live under a brutally repressive, woman-demeaning, barbaric and totalitarian program. Such Muslims are potentially our allies, just as those who do adhere to Shariah are our unalterable foes.
The immutability of Shariah-adherent Muslim hostility toward the rest of us derives directly from the central tenet of Shariah: Muslims are explicitly required to seek the triumph of Islam over all other faiths, peoples and governments.
The ultimate objective of Shariah is the establishment of a global Islamic state - Sunni Muslims call it "the caliphate" - governed by Shariah. The means by which this political outcome is to be achieved is called "jihad."
Since 9/11, many Americans have become unhappily acquainted with the terrifying, violent strain of jihad. Under Shariah, violence - often described by non-Muslims as "terrorism" - is the preferred means of securing the spread and dominion of Islam, as it is the most efficient.
While Shariah deems jihad to be the personal obligation of every faithful Muslim capable of performing it - man or woman, young or old - they can forgo the violent form when it is deemed impracticable. In such circumstances, the struggle can be pursued through means that are, at least temporarily, non-violent. Taken together, the latter constitute what renowned author and expert Robert Spencer calls "stealth jihad." Adherents to Shariah call it "dawah."
Examples of stealth jihadism abound in Western societies, notably Europe and increasingly in the United States. They include the demand for symbolic and substantive accommodations in political, economic and legal areas (for example, special treatment or rights for Muslims in the workplace, in public spaces and by government); the opportunity to penetrate and influence operations against government at every level; and the insinuation of the Trojan horse of "Shariah-compliant finance" into the West's capital markets.
If stealth jihad seems less threatening than terrorism, the objective is exactly the same as that of violent jihad: the subjugation to the Dar al-Islam (House of Islam) of all non-Islamic states that, like the United States, make up the Dar al-harb (House of War). It follows that those who seek ostensibly to impose Shariah through non-violent techniques - notably in the West, the organization known as the Muslim Brotherhood - are our enemies every bit as much as those who overtly strive to defeat us by murderous terrorism.
Many Western elites, including the Obama administration, have been seduced by the seemingly benign quality of the Muslim Brotherhood. In fact, we know from the 2008 prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation - the largest terrorism-financing trial in U.S. history - that the Muslim Brothers' mission in the United States is "a kind of grand jihad to destroy Western civilization from within ... by their own miserable hands."
Another Brotherhood document, titled "The Rulers," was seized in a 2004 raid and describes how the organization will try to overthrow the U.S. Constitution in five phases:
"The Rulers" makes plain that all the above-mentioned phases "are preliminary steps to reach the (fifth) phase."
The Muslim Brothers know that by masking their ideological agenda as a religious program, they can use Western civil liberties and tolerance as weapons in their stealthy jihad. For this strategy to succeed, however, they must suppress any discussion or understanding of the true nature of Shariah.
Adherents to Shariah insist that their law prohibits any slander against Islam or Muhammad. Under such a catch-all restriction, virtually any kind of conversation about - or critique of - Islam can be considered impermissible if Muslims find it offensive. Particularly in Europe, the ever-present prospect of violence, like that which followed the September 2005 publication of Danish cartoons poking fun at Muhammad, is generally sufficient to induce self-censorship.
In this country, the application of such prohibitions seems unthinkable, given the guarantees of free speech enshrined in the Constitution's First Amendment. Unfortunately, the Obama administration last year co-sponsored with Egypt a relevant and deeply problematic resolution in the U.N. Human Rights Council, promoted for years by the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), a group of 57 Muslim-majority nations that stridently embraces Shariah and seeks to legitimate and promote its advance around the world.
The resolution calls on members of the United Nations to prohibit statements that offend Islam. It also calls for criminal penalties to be applied to those who make such statements.
The U.S. implementation of such a resolution would obviously be a matter not just for the executive branch, which supported it, but for Congress and the judiciary as well. It is a safe bet that any formal effort to supplant the First Amendment in this way would meet with great resistance.
To a stunning degree, U.S. leaders have been effectively conforming to Shariah slander laws for some time now. For instance, presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama have both repeatedly described Islam as a "religion of peace," without acknowledging the requirement for jihad its authorities demand, pursuant to Shariah.
At the Muslim Brotherhood's insistence, the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department have barred the use of perfectly accurate terms like "Islamic terrorism." The U.S. government has also embraced the Muslim Brothers' disinformation by translating jihad as nothing more than "striving in the path of God."
Under the Bush and Obama administrations, the favored name for the enemy has been "violent extremism" - a formulation that neither offers clarity about the true nature of our foe nor lends itself to a prescription for a successful countervailing strategy. Even when al-Qaeda is identified as the enemy, it is almost always accompanied by an assurance that its operatives and allies have "corrupted" Islam. Ignored, or at least earnestly obscured, are two unhappy realities: such enemies are implementing Shariah's dictates to the letter of the law, and they have millions of fellow adherents around the world who view Islam's requirements the same way.
One of the most egregious examples of this practice of unilateral disarmament in the battle of ideas is the January report of the independent review of the Fort Hood massacre, co-chaired by former Army Secretary Togo West and former Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Vernon Clark. Their 86-page unclassified analysis purported to dissect an event allegedly perpetrated by Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan - a medical officer whose business card described him as "Soldier of Allah," whose briefings justified murder of his comrades in the name of jihad, and who shouted the Islamic martyr's cry "Allahu Akbar!" ("God is great!") as he opened fire, killing 13. Incredibly, the words "Islam," "Islamic terror," "Shariah," "jihad," and "Muslim Brotherhood" were not used even once in the West-Clark report.
Such political correctness, or willful blindness up the chain of command, doubtless caused Hasan's colleagues to keep silent about his alarming beliefs, lest they be punished for expressing concerns about them. Now, reportedly, six of them have been designated as the scapegoats for what is manifestly an institutional failure.
The painful truth is that however we rationalize this sort of behavior, our Shariah-adherent enemies correctly perceive it as evidence of submission, which is the literal meaning of the word "Islam," and what Shariah demands of everyone, Muslim and non-Muslim alike.
Indeed, Shariah offers non-believers only three choices: conversion to Islam, submission (known as dhimmitude) or death. Historically, dhimmitude was imposed through successful Muslim conquests. In more recent years, tolerant Western nations have increasingly succumbed to stealthy jihadism, backed by more or less direct threats of violence.
That trend, worrying as it is, may be giving way in this country to a new campaign: jihad of the sword. The past year saw a fourfold increase in the number of actual or attempted terrorist attacks in the United States. Sadly, that statistic will likely be surpassed in the year ahead. Four of the nation's top intelligence officials have testified before Congress that it is certain new acts of violence will be undertaken in the next three to six months. Worse yet, a blue-ribbon commission has calculated that the probability of the use of weapons of mass destruction somewhere in the world by 2013 is now over 50 percent.
Is this dramatic upsurge in violent jihad directed at the United States unrelated to our behavior? Or does it reflect a growing calculation on the part of our Shariah-adherent enemies that violence against the United States is now, once again, practicable?
Either way, the time has clearly come to make a far more serious effort to defeat both the violent and stealthy forms of jihad being waged against this country. If we are to do so, however, we have to start by telling the truth.
Our enemy is not "violent extremism," or even al-Qaeda alone. Rather, it is the millions of Muslims who - like the Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda and their allies - adhere to Shariah and who, therefore, believe they must impose it on the rest of us.
We are at war with such individuals and organizations. Not because we want to be. Not because of policies toward Israel or the Middle East or anything else we have pursued in recent years. Rather, we are at war with them because they must wage jihad against us, pursuant to the dictates of Shariah, the same law that has guided many in Islam for some 1,200 years.
What is at stake in this war? Look no further than The American Legion's Americanism Manual, which defines Americanism as "love of America; loyalty to her institutions as the best yet devised by man to secure life, liberty, individual dignity and happiness; and the willingness to defend our country and Flag against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
Such values cannot coexist with Shariah, which demands the destruction of democratic nations like the United States, its governing institutions and liberties. Shariah would supplant them with a repressive, transnational, theocratic government abroad and at home.
The extraordinary reality is that none of this - the authoritative and malevolent nature of Shariah, its utter incompatibility with our civilization, and its adherents' determination to force us to convert, submit or die - is concealed from those willing to learn the truth. To the contrary, the facts are widely available via books, the Internet, DVDs and mosques, both here and overseas. Interestingly, on Dec. 1, 2005, Gen. Peter Pace, then-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called on his troops to expose themselves to precisely this sort of information: "I say you need to get out and read what our enemies have said. Remember Hitler. Remember he wrote ‘Mein Kampf.' He said in writing exactly what his plan was, and we collectively ignored that to our great detriment. Now, our enemies have said publicly on film, on the Internet, their goal is to destroy our way of life. No equivocation on their part."
As it happens, Maj. Stephen Coughlin, a lawyer and Army Reserves intelligence specialist recruited by the Joint Chiefs to be their expert on the doctrine and jurisprudence of jihad, took Pace's admonition to heart. He wrote a master's thesis inspired by the chairman's quote, titled "To Our Great Detriment: Ignoring What Extremists Say About Jihad."
Coughlin's briefings explicitly and repeatedly warned military leaders of the enemy's "threat doctrine" - drawing from, among Islamic texts, passages the Fort Hood suspect used to justify his massacre. Unfortunately, engaging in such analysis, let alone acting on it, was powerfully discouraged in January 2008 when Coughlin was dismissed from the Joint Staff after he ran afoul of a Muslim Brother then working for Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England.
In short, we are today confronted by the cumulative effect of a sustained and collective dereliction of duty, one that is putting our country in extreme peril. Our armed forces - like their counterparts in the intelligence community, Department of Homeland Security and law enforcement - have a professional duty to know the enemy and develop appropriate responses to the threat doctrine. If this dereliction is allowed to persist, it is predictable that more Americans will die, both on foreign battlefields and at home.
The American people also need to become knowledgeable about the threat of Shariah and insist that action be taken at federal, state and local levels to keep our country Shariah-free. This toxic ideology, if left unchecked, can destroy the country and institutions that are, indeed, "the best yet devised by man to secure life, liberty, individual dignity and happiness."
Originally published in the American Legion Magazine
Posted at 08:44 AM in (Myth of) Islamophobia, Creeping Sharia, Current Affairs, Dhimmicrat, Dhimmitude, Education, EU, Immigration in UK, Immigration in USA, Islam in Europe, Islam in UK, Islam in USA, Islam in World, Jihad, Kaffirophobia, Miltary, Multiculturalism, Muslim Terrorism, Political Correctness, Politics in the USA, Politics in UK, President Obama, Sharia Law | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
Tags: Afghanistan, Allahu akbar, American Legion, Constitution, dhimmitude, EU, Eurabia, Europe, foreign policy, Frank Gaffney, General Peter Pace, Great Britain, Iraq, Islam, Islamic terrorism, Islamist, jihad, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, Muhammad, muslim, Muslim Brothers, President Barack Obama, taqiyya, terrorism, terrorist, USA, West-Clark report
Most everyone who blogs the truth about the Islam knows they are bound to get ugly emails and comments to their blog - statements that border on or are actual threats. Recently one of the top websites exposing the Religion of Peace was subjected to graphic death threats or Internet Jihad:
"A recent e-mail to a website launched after the 9/11 terror attacks to document the instances of Islamic violence said simply: "We will kill you. Like this ... "
The message included a photograph of a man who had been beheaded, his body resting chest down on grass and his lifeless head placed in the middle of his own back. Another photograph showed a bloody knife." SOURCE
I can honestly say that I have received somewhat similar threats (sans picture of a headless body). I also know of another blogger who stopped writing after receiving threats and experiencing the horror of having his young daughter nearly snatched from their front garden. The two experiences were not coincidence.
Thus you have the plight of many who choose to debunk the Religion of Peace.
Yet the muslim enablers and apologizers in much of the mainstream media continue to purposely ignore the obvious when threats are made -- as in the case of this woman:
"Jo Cleary, from Broomfield, Herne Bay, set up a Facebook site calling forextremist leader Anjem Choudary and his followers (Islam4UK) to be barred from carrying coffins through the town where residents line the streets to mourn as the bodies of slain service personnel arriving back in the UK......More than 700,000 people have signed up to Mrs Cleary’s campaign – but in the last few days she has found herself on the end of abuse and threats to her life over the internet."
Learn more about hate cleric Anjem Choudary HERE.
So who does the media blame?
"It is believed the messages have been sent by self-styled ‘anti-fascists’ and are not the work of any ethnic or religious group."
Thus following along the lines of the "one off" excuse, which is nearly always stated when any muslim violence, against the British people happens.
Surely the muslim Anjem Choudary -- whose thuggish hate group Islam4UK has just been banned in UK has NO animosity towards Jo Cleary and her highly successful petition??
Thus - as long as we have law enforcement, the media and our governments minimise or ignore this:
"Bedfordshire police have now officially warned me that there is a threat against my life. The police, through fear of upsetting‘community cohesion’would not divulge where the threat has come from, only that my actions through this blog and the street protests have upset certain (MUSLIM) sections of our society who, now want to harm me."SOURCE
Tags: Adjem Choudary, Facebook, hate email, hate mail, internet jihad, Islam, Islam4UK, jihad, Jo Cleary, muslim, petition, Religion of Peace, Wootten Bassett
Some sad truths - truths discussed in this blog for years now - are highlighted in the below article. There is NO doubt that the UK has been incessantly far TOO soft on radical Islam to the extent it is protected and thriving in the UK. Multicultural worshipping dhimmi bureaucrats, educators and judicial muslim apologists have figuratively paved the streets of Great Britain with Islamic cobblestones as they forced muslim colonisation upon the British people. The British people are treated like second class citizens in their own Country.
"Thus the Quranic inspired desire for muslim domination or Global Caliphate has flown into the UK on a multicultural magic carpet as multiculturalism and Islamisation have become virtually synonymous. The muslim colonization of Britain is encouraged and viewed with delight by drooling, pandering, vote whoring, social engineering, lefty politicians and open border globalizers. While disingenuously waving the multicultural banner, muslims have availed themselves of hundreds of years of British civilization/benefits/ social housing and health care, etc. In other words, they have cherry picked all the good that Britain has to offer but, like true invaders, they have thumbed their noses at assimilation and set up no go areas where they can continue to live their Sharia Law ruled lives, embrace the ideology of Islam, show preference for muslims - and let the millions of non muslim British taxpaying "slaves" fund muslims new "western lifestyles". Including financing the importing of multiple wives, and the exploding muslim birth population- both of which allows muslims to partake of even more lucrative, financial benefits and frees many of them up to spend full time running their own anti-British political agendas all while providing others with extra time to rant against the "infidels" - the same infidels that pay for their every need and mega-family's existence. Ludicrously but not surprisingly, even Osama Bin Laden's Right Hand Man and his family are "set for life" on British benefits." SOURCE
The below article does contain some erroneous accusations - such as the British people forcing muslims to live in ghettos as well as well as preventing muslims from assimilating. In fact there is plenty of evidence to the contrary. Would seem to me that both are conscious choices of muslims to not live amongst the infidels.
Nevertheless if the rest of the world recognizes Britain for aiding and abetting radical Islam thus becoming a threat to primarily the Western world - it is past time for British government to take off their rose-colored glasses and do so. This is not about politics - it is about survival.
Otherwise Great Britain is doomed to be crushed under Islamic bulldozers - just like this Church of England church and the tombstones in it's Christian graveyard- and become one massive Islamic Centre.
See also Mark Steyn post: "I said a few years back that Britain had been so hollowed out by Islamic radicals that it was becoming Somalia with chip shops"
"The security services (MI5) knew three years ago that the Detroit bomber had “multiple communications” with Islamic extremists in Britain, it emerged this weekend.
Counterterrorism officials said Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was “reaching out” to extremists whom MI5 had under surveillance while he was studying at University College London.
Officials said the 23-year-old Nigerian was “starting out on a journey” in Britain that culminated in his attempt to bring down flight 253 as it prepared to land in Detroit, Michigan, on Christmas Day.
None of the information was passed to American officials, which will prompt questions about intelligence failures prior to the attack." SOURCE & MORE INFO
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab prompted warnings
Friday January 1,2010
American anger over the attempted suicide bomb attack by former student Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab prompted warnings that the biggest threat to US security came from Britain.
The 23-year-old Nigerian is thought to have embraced radical views while studying in London.
Daniel Pipes, a former adviser to Rudolph Giuliani during his presidential campaign and an expert on radical Islam, said: “The UK is a menace to the outside world. It’s been a problem for years now. This is just one more example.”
US policy makers also attacked the way British Muslims are pushed into “ghettoes”, which they say compares badly with their assimilation in America.
Pentagon aide Marc Thiessen said Muslim immigrants in the US were much better integrated and considered themselves American within a generation thanks to the US “melting pot” approach.
The former chief speechwriter to President George W Bush added: “That doesn’t exist in Europe in the same way and particularly in Britain, which is more socially stratified than the US.
“They live in Muslim ghettoes and feel alienated from the larger society and not accepted.”
Abdulmutallab, a mechanical engineering student at University College London, was president of the college’s Islamic Society between 2006 and 2007.
Like many British universities, it has been accused of failing to stop radical preachers from spreading an extremist message on campus for fear of being accused of religious hatred.
Mr Thiessen blamed liberal attitudes for allowing Islamic extremism to spread.
We are in grave danger by doing away with vital tools in the war on terror – all in response to the hue and cry from the European Left and to appease European opinion,” he said.
“There is no shame in aggressively interrogating terrorists or treating them as enemy combatants as opposed to criminals. What was attempted in Detroit, what was done to you on the London Underground, these were not crimes – they were acts of war.”
Charles Allen, intelligence chief at the Department of Homeland Security under Mr Bush, said: “There are more challenges in Muslim immigrants integrating into British society than there is in America – a lack of assimilation, a great deal of alienation.”
He said that as a result Al Qaeda had worked much harder to recruit people who lived in the West.
British-based experts point out that radicals have flocked to the UK, attracted by lax immigration controls, generous benefits and the ability to spread their views through respect for free speech.
Despite the 2005 London attacks and other Islamist plots, they say extremist networks are still allowed to flourish here, blaming a Government obsession with multiculturalism and “human rights”.
Commenting on the American criticism, Robin Simcox, a research fellow at the Centre for Social Cohesion think-tank, said: “The British Government has to be a better ally to the United States.
“It’s appalling that a nation that should be one of the US’s closest partners is providing a significant amount of its enemies.”
Posted at 07:59 AM in Creeping Sharia, Dhimmicrat, Dhimmitude, Immigration in UK, Islam in Europe, Islam in UK, Islam in World, Jihad, Multiculturalism, Muslim Terrorism, Political Correctness, Politics in the USA, Politics in UK, Population Jihad, Religion, Sharia Law, USA Dept. of Homeland Security | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
Tags: Britain, colonisation, dhimmis, Global Caliphate, immigration, Islam, muslim, muslim immigration, radical Islam, terrorism, terrorists, UK
*****UPDATE -11/7/09 - The media and muslim apologists continue to dance around the truth of the Ft. Hood massacre. Many rushing to blame the military or Hasan's co-workers for his state of mind and subsequent murderous rampage. Lame excuses such as Hasan was supposedly "harassed" by other military personnel don't hold water. Hasan was an officer - and anyone who had been in the military KNOWS that particularly officers do NOT get harassed. To do so would be the end of the offenders military career.
"Soldiers who witnessed the shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas that left 13 people dead reported that the gunman shouted "Allahu Akbar!" before opening fire, the base commander said Friday." SOURCE
Recall Allahu Akbar was also screamed by the 9/11 Al Qaeda terrorists as they plunged their airplanes into the twin towers of the World Trade Center killing 2993 innocent people.
This "devout muslim" was also under investigation by the FBI for statements made supporting muslims killing US soldiers:
"The army psychiatrist who shot dead 13 people in murderous rampage at America's biggest military base was facing an FBI investigation for expressing sympathy with suicide bombers....Hasan posted a series of comments on a website which drew parallels between terrorists and a US soldier who sacrificed himself to save his comrades. Investigators were tipped off six months ago by the devout Muslim's worried colleagues."SOURCE
Also extremely disturbing is a video, from the morning of the massacre, showing Hasan wearing a muslim white robe and cap:
"In the video, the individual believed to be Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan appears wearing clothes that would be abnormal for someone of Palestinian descent - Hasan's family is from Jordan. CBS News correspondent Sheila MacVicarreports that the man is wearing a shalwar kameez - long robes far more common in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
He is also wearing white, which in Islam is associated with death or mourning. The prayer cap on his head is also more closely associated with Southeast Asia than with the Arab world." SOURCE
Major Nidal Malik at a local Texas 7 Eleven Store the morning of the massacre
Does the above look like an Army major to you??
This "devout muslim" - earned a six figure income after receiving his "free" psychologist's degree courtesy the USA taxpayers via the US Army:
Hasan, graduated from Virginia Tech in 1997 and earned a doctorate in psychiatry from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda. He spent at least six years at Walter Reed before moving to Fort Hood. SOURCE
Has repaid those same taxpayers by killing and injuring their sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers.
More on Hasan:
He was happy about the Muslim solider who shot and killed a soldier and wounded another at a Little Rock Military recruiting station. Hasan said Muslims should rise up against the aggressors. Maybe we should have more of these.....strapping bombs on and going into Times Square".
The officials had access to Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan's military record. They said he received a poor performance evaluation while at Walter Reed. SOURCE
One has to wonder what psychological damage he has done while counseling soldiers returning from active duty in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The glaring question is why wasn't Hasan booted out of the Army - and instead was promoted and assigned to Fort Hood? Was it due to the insidious Political Correctness and fear of the Army being labeled "Islamophobic"? The ongoing investigation will shed light on this - but sadly far too late for those who had their lives snuffed out by a supposedly "Lone Wolf" terrorist.
This cold blooded military Jihadist needs to face severe punishment for his heinous mass murders - let's hope it is death............and he's shouted his last "Allahu Akbar".
************UPDATE -11/7/09 - Muslim apologists and the lefty mainstream media continue to try to spin Islam out of and dance around the truth of the Ft. Hood massacre. Many are rushing to blame the military or Hasan's co-workers for his state of mind and subsequent murderous rampage. Lame excuses such as Hasan was supposedly "harassed" by other military personnel don't hold water. Hasan was an officer - and anyone who had been in the military KNOWS that particularly officers do NOT get harassed. To do so would be the end of the offenders military career.
Hasan's eyes "lit up" when he mentioned his deep respect for al-Awlaki's teachings, according to a fellow Muslim officer at the Fort Hood base in Texas, the scene of Thursday's horrific shooting spree. As investigators look at Hasan's motives and mindset, his attendance at the mosque could be an important piece of the 'jigsaw'" SOURCE
Hassan also served on President Barack Obama's White House transition team:
NEW YORK - Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the alleged shooter in yesterday's massacre at Fort Hood, played a homeland security advisory role in President Barack Obama's transition into the White House according to a key university policy institute document...... Hasan is listed on page 29 of the document as a Task Force Event Participant SOURCE