TheOPINIONATOR

WORSE than a "pack of animals" - 3 Muslim Men Jailed for Rape of 16 yr old British girl

Worse than a 'pack of animals' - how apt a phrase for these sorry excuses for men. Clearly so vile that they somehow believe forcibly holding down a young girl and subjecting her to violent gang rape was acceptable? Otherwise what kind of degenerate, moronic fiends would do such revolting acts? (answer below)

I am sick to the back teeth of my near weekly posts of the rampant raping of British girls. (and I highlight only a small portion of the actual rapes occurring)  Yet the rapes continue and seem to be reaching a par with the rape epidemic reported on in Sweden which I have also writtin about in the past.

Clearly the abhorrent attitude of muslims, in Sweden, towards Western women,  is representative of the general attitude of European muslim men and the main force behind Rape Jihad:

Some Muslim immigrants admit their bias quite openly. An Islamic Mufti in Copenhagen sparked a political outcry after publicly declaring that women who refuse to wear headscarves are "asking for rape." Apparently, he's not the only one thinking this way. “It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,” says Hamid. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably fucked before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity until she marries.” It was no coincidence that it was a Swedish girl that was gang raped in Rissne – this becomes obvious from the discussion with Ali, Hamid, Abdallah and Richard. All four have disparaging views on Swedish girls, and think this attitude is common among young men with immigrant background. “It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore…… girl, I mean;” says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. “Many immigrant boys have Swedish girlfriends when they are teenagers. But when they get married, they get a proper woman from their own culture who has never been with a boy. That’s what I am going to do. I don’t have too much respect for Swedish girls. I guess you can say they get fucked to pieces.” LINK

The above Islamic rationalisations for rape do not fit into Western laws or civilization yet our daughters, mothers, wives, sisters, aunts, friends, etc on a near daily basis, pay a violent, humiliating and unacceptable high price for the muslim colonisation of Europe and the ludicrous pandering that the governments, religious leaders, police and liberals have given to the fast growing muslim population. What is also clear is that political leaders do not want to admit their failed ideology of multiculturalism regardless of who pays the price for their stubborness. 

Undoubtedly the vast majority of these rapes are RACIST attacks by cowardly muslim men specifically targeting white English girls - but the lily-livered media consistently refuses to call them such. Malignant political correctness is also at fault as it more often than not gags the media from accurately reporting muslim crime statistics. Thus, non-muslim victims of muslim violence, particularly rape, are not being acknowledged and reported for what they obviously are: - VICTIMS OF MUSLIM HATE CRIME (OR RAPE JIHAD).

If the situation were reversed and the women were muslims and the men were white there would be an outcry of outrage from every politician, muslim apologist and muslim groups and individuals in the UK.  But because these are white British girls - politicians and leaders show their own racism against the indigenous British population by remaining silent and veritably unconcerned. Such rapes will continue as long as muslim apologists (many of whom are women) persist in making excuses for muslim rapists and choosing to say such despicable rapes are not rape jihad - just a result of "bad character".

The questions loom = Will Britain, as a thousands year old civilised society, protect British girls and women? --or will they be thrown upon the funeral pyre along with the British culture, laws, courage and humanity?

(Seems a bit of "prison justice" has already taken place.)

Article in full:

Rape gang were like a 'pack of animals'

01 October 2009

JAILED: Kamal Hussein.

THREE men who attacked a 16-year-old girl like a 'pack of animals' as they raped her have been jailed for a total of more than 30 years.

The teenager, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was raped at a friend's flat in Gravesend in March last year.

RINGLEADER: Kamal Hussein.

Kamal Hussain, 22, and Koyeas Miah, 23, were each given 11-year prison sentences for two counts of rape to be served concurrently at Maidstone Crown Court.

They were sentenced last Friday alongside Salah Uddin, 22, who received eight-and-a-half years in jail after he had earlier pleaded guilty to one count of rape. He was described as "the principal perpetrator".

RAPIST: Koyeas Miah.

Judge Philip St John-Stevens said: "It's clear each of you played your part in subjecting a young girl of just 16 years of age to an appalling and degrading ordeal that has had a profound effect on her and may live with her for many years.

"The three of you acted together in a way a pack of animals could not.

"She described how she tried to push you off and pleaded with you not to continue.

"She said she felt someone else holding her hands preventing her from moving."

He added: "It must have been petrifying with you three men there.

"Her age is an aggravating feature, she was just 16, a young and vulnerable girl."

The court heard how Uddin and Miah raped the girl over a 15-minute period while Hussain, who did not have any sexual contact with the girl, stood with a chair by the door blocking her escape.

It was also revealed that while in prison, father-of-one Uddin, of Tarling Street, Whitechapel, was stabbed and father-of-one Miah, of Thorold Road, Ilford, suffered substantial burns when he had boiling water thrown over him.

Raana Sheikh, mitigating for Hussain, of Second Avenue, Manor Park, said he did not have any physical contact with the victim despite accepting the attack was "a joint enterprise".

He contemplated suicide while in prison.

Hussain and Miah were found guilty following a trial in July.

michael.adkins@archant.co.uk

 

The Muslim Wolf at Feminism's Door

Excellent post from the Canada Free Press web site:

Honor killing spreads when those whose who practice it emigrate to Western countries

The Muslim Wolf at Feminism’s Door

By Daniel Greenfield  Sunday, September 6, 2009

More than 5,000 women are victims of honor killings each year. Most of those women are Muslim, and while most of them are killed in Muslim countries—more and more of them are being killed in Europe, Canada and America. A 2007 study by Dr. Amin Muhammad and Dr. Sujay Patel in Canada’s Memorial Hospital observed that honor killing spreads when those whose who practice it emigrate to Western countries.

Honor killings however are only the final act in the drama of a Muslim woman’s life. Before that she is expected to walk behind a man, to be a second class citizen, to cover herself as much as possible in order to deflect male desire and to take the blame for the sexual intentions that men have toward her. She knows that if she fails to deflect male desire, she may suffer a variety of penalties from imprisonment to death. In countries like Saudi Arabia or Iran, those penalties are imposed by courts. In countries like Afghanistan or Pakistan, they are imposed by rough tribal justice. In the West, where there is no Islamic court system or tribal courts, they are imposed by the family.

The burka, the chador, the hijab or any of the other covering garments are assigned to Muslim women to “protect” them from men, and to protect men from them. These garments are meant to cover their “Awrah”, which in Arabic means nakedness, fault or defect. While for a Muslim man “Awrah” is only the swimsuit region, a Muslim woman is entirely “Awrah”.

Al-Qadhi Ibn-Al-Arabi Maliki states: “And all of a woman is ‘awrah; her body, her voice, and it is not permissible for her to uncover that unless out of necessity, or need such as witnessing in court, or a disease that is affecting her body…” [Ahkam Al Quran 3/1579]

Imam Al-Qurtubi stated went even further stating; “It is forbidden for a woman to speak when non-related men are present and it is forbidden for men to hear the voice of a non-mahram woman as long as there is no need for that.”

What that means is that all of a woman is “a zone of shame” and obscene. Even the sound of her voice is a form of “nakedness” or “lewdness”. Various Muslim authorities claim that this applies to even a woman’s fingernails and eyes. A woman who fails to dress this way is behaving obscenely and is open to being assaulted, as the Koranic verse which orders Muslim women to cover themselves makes clear.

“O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested.” -Al-Ahzab:59 (Qur’an)

The key word here of course is “that they shall be known as such and not molested”. Conversely the failure to fully cover up (a covering that Mohammed demonstrated by cloaking himself and leaving only one eye uncovered in order to see) leaves them open to being molested under the code of “she was asking for it.”

In the wake of the brutal Sydney gang rapes in which the perpetrators told the victims and exchanged messages among themselves making it clear that the attacks were motivated by the girls being Australian and Christian, Australia’s top Muslim cleric, the infamous Sheikh Hilaly delivered a sermon stating;

“When it comes to rape, it’s 90 percent the woman’s responsibility. Why? Because a woman owns the weapon of seduction. It’s she who takes off her clothes, shortens them, flirts, puts on make-up and powder and takes to the streets, God protect us, dallying. It’s she who shortens, raises and lowers. Then, it’s a look, a smile, a conversation, a greeting, a talk, a date, a meeting, a crime, then Long Bay jail. Then you get a judge, who has no mercy, and he gives you 65 years.”

“But when it comes to this disaster, who started it? In his literature, writer al-Rafee says, if I came across a rape crime, I would discipline the man and order that the woman be jailed for life. Why would you do this, Rafee? He said because if she had not left the meat uncovered, the cat wouldn’t have snatched it.”

The “uncovered meat” were girls as young as 14, whom the attackers brutalized for hours. Their crime was that they were meat, and they had left themselves uncovered by failing to wear Chadours or Hijabs to prevent themselves from being “molested”.

This is the Muslim wolf that now stands growling outside the feminist door. The wolf dictates that women in any country with a sizable Muslim population have two choices, to cover up or be assaulted. By covering up the woman accepts her inferiority to the male. Refusing to do that could get her raped or killed. There is no third option within Islam. In Iraq, in Kashmir, in Pakistan; women have had acid thrown in their faces for not wearing the appropriate Muslim garb.

But why speak of countries under medieval Islamic laws, when you can speak of the “Free West”. A French survey found that 77 percent of the women who wear Hijabs did so because of threats by Islamist groups. 77 percent. France. We are not speaking about some backward little Third World nation where the tribal elders decide what goes. We are speaking of Paris, the glittering city of lights, the capital of art and music. The birthplace of Republican Europe.

This is what Hijab feminism looks like in France,

More often the girls were under orders from their fathers and uncles and brothers, and even their male classmates. For the boys, transforming a bluejeaned teen-age sister into a docile and observant “Muslim” virgin was a rite de passage into authority, the fast track to becoming a man, and more important, a Muslim man…. it was also a license for violence.

Girls who did not conform were excoriated, or chased, or beaten by fanatical young men meting out “Islamic justice.” Sometimes the girls were gang-raped. In 2002, an unveiled Muslim girl in the cite of Vitry-sur-Seine was burned alive by a boy she turned down.

Jane Kramer, Taking the Veil, New Yorker

Despite that 77 percent number, American feminists insist on fighting for “the right” of Muslim women in France and America to wear the veil. They might as well be fighting for the right of women to be barefoot and pregnant, since they are one and the same.

Much as they might eagerly parrot the propaganda of the Muslim Student Association, itself an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, regarding the veil being liberating, the veil is a statement of female submission and degradation. There is nothing feminist about being inferior. The hijab is part of a larger agenda to force Muslims in the West, and even non-Muslims to live under Islamic law. A law which states that women are inferior to men.

In the process apologists for Islam like Karen Armstrong or Noah Feldman misrepresent key Arabic words, for example defining “Awrah” as beauty, or “Zina” as meaning only adultery, or seizing on whatever property Sharia law allowed women to hold as feminist, while completely ignoring the larger issue that women were considered inferior by Mohammed and his men, and are considered inferior under Islamic law today. Not simply in theory, but in fact. A fact that expresses itself in the rapes, beatings and murders of women, both Muslim and non-Muslim, by Muslim men on a regular basis.

Rather than confront the threat to women posed by Islamic law, feminist authors like Naomi Wolf are instead claiming that the wolf is really a misunderstood poodle. They have tried to transform the Hijab into a statement of Muslim feminism, while completing ignoring the fact that the Hijab only exists because Islamic law views all of a woman as obscene and treats the woman’s presence in the public sphere as a source of Fitna and Zina, Discord and Immorality, that incites men to do immoral things, including rape her. Under Islam the woman is a threat to men that can only be rendered safe for men by fully covering her up and keeping her apart from men as much as possible.

Unfortunately Naomi Wolf, like most modern liberal feminists had no interest in defending those women

What does Naomi Wolf think is an urgent issue? Based on her blog, it isn’t women, but Muslim men. Specifically defending the sort of Muslim men who kill women who don’t wear the veil. Wolf’s blog is filled with posts fulminating against Guantanamo Bay and the plight of the Taliban and assorted other Islamists imprisoned there. The same men who if given a chance would have a knife to her neck in minutes.

This spring in Pakistan’s Sindh province alone, 40 honor killings took place. One woman took refuge in a police station, only to be handed over to her brother who killed her. A 14 year old girl was burned to death. Two women had acid poured on them after being raped. Two women had their noses chopped off for violating family honor. The Sindh province had been overrun by the Taliban.

Rather than writing about any of these women, Naomi Wolf instead wrote demanding to know “What Happened to Mohamed al-Hanashi?” Her article describes Mohamed al-Hanashi as “a young man” who could shed light on many crimes. Not the crimes of Islamist terrorists, but the crimes of the US in detaining in Islamist terrorists. At no point in time throughout the article does Naomi Wolf mention that Mohamed al-Hanashi was a member of the Taliban. The same Taliban which mandated complete covering for women, forbade women to be treated by male doctors or to get an education.

In April 2009, Sitara Achakzai, a leading women’s rights activist in Afghanistan, was murdered by the Taliban because she supported rights for women. 3 days later, Naomi Wolf did not write about her. Instead she wrote an article claiming that the American people had “blood on their hands” over Gitmo and demanded that we hold Nuremberg Trials to determine who gave the order to “torture” captured Al Queda and Taliban terrorists in order to gain information about future attacks against America.

Unfortunately Naomi Wolf, like most modern liberal feminists had no interest in defending those women, only in defending their abusers. While women were being murdered by the Taliban, she sweated blood and tears to defend members of the Taliban. Finally in August, Naomi Wolf went to a Muslim country, put on a headscarf and described how it made her feel free. That seems like a reasonable preparation for the sort of environment that Naomi Wolf and much of the feminist movement are helping to create for women in the West.

In 1984 the Party’s slogan is “Slavery is Freedom.” The political use of such an idea is that it is easier to enslave people, if they believe that being enslaved makes them free. It is why every one party Communist dictatorship made sure to call themselves a “Democratic People’s Republic”. It is why the Muslim Brotherhood fronts understand that it will be easier to sell Westerners on subjugation to Islam, if they believe that this subjugation makes them free.

For almost a decade, Wolf and those like her, have been assailing the brave men and women who helped liberate women from the Taliban… while fighting for the Taliban. In the name of freedom of course. The freedom of those who shot up girls’ schools, who threw teachers down staircases and beat women in the streets. Now the Muslim wolf has its snout thrust into half of Europe, into Australia, Canada and America. The honor killings continue to rise. Bodies continue to show up in hospitals and morgues. The bodies of the victims of Islam.

POPULATION JIHAD - The Video

Population Jihad = NO guns needed just the ongoing rampant immigration of muslims into Western nations with their subsequent high birth rates - coupled with low birth rates of the indigenous population = islamisation in OUR lifetime:

Here's an incovenient truth: the Islamisation of Europe

Excellent opinion piece taken from the online UK Telegraph.  I'm posting it in full as it is well worth the read. I do agree with most - but not all of it.

Also you may also want to read: British Women Pay High Price for Multiculturalism  and/or Non Compatible Muslim Immigration and "Racism"

Article in full:

Here's an inconvenient truth: the Islamisation of Europe

Posted By: Ed West at May 6, 2009

 

For years the world ignored climate change. As the evidence for man-made environmental disaster built up, the majority of people took part in a passive conspiracy of silence, like there was a nutter in the carriage and no one wanted to acknowledge the fact.

Many did so out of ignorance, others out of bigotry against environmentalists who, they thought, wanted us all to live in huts, or worshipped the earth, or at the very least didn't use deodorant. Still others purposefully ignored it because they had a vested economic interest in doing so. Some simply couldn't believe something so awful could happen, some believed it but were fearful of the terrible consequences of acting – economic unrest, war, perhaps mass murder. Still others believed it but thought it was inevitable and so pointless worrying about.

I interviewed a storm chaser back in 2004 for Nuts magazine. I just wanted tales of derring-do, but his tone was so downbeat I wanted to chop my own head off. He was in despair at humanity's refusal to face this disaster that engulfed us all. 

"I hate to say it, I really do, but it will take a catastrophe on American soil, and many dead, before something happens". I think they took that bit out of the interview – people buy Nuts to think about sex, not death.

But the following summer Hurricane Katrina did happen, and, very quickly, man-made climate change become almost universally accepted. In fact no one talks about anything else.

Climate change denial was, and still is, an overwhelmingly conservative vice, and it's a historical black mark against the Right (and, ahem, we have a few). But there is a corresponding liberal conspiracy over an issue that is as important to our society, if not to our planet.

Ten or even five years ago few people were prepared to say in public that, whatever the media consensus, mass immigration didn't in fact benefit our economy, but placed a strain on services, damaged the social fabric of society, and made England more violent and unequal and unhappy, and even threatened our very democracy. Anyone who dared to say so was presented as the sort of man who ran an army surplus shop and collected old SS daggers and empty cans of Zyklon B.

But while sociology is not a hard science, the evidence has been mounting up - and ignored. Some chose to ignore it because of their bigotry against "Colonel Blimps", "Daily Mail readers" and "racist Little Englanders". Some - such as the many employees in the enormous race relations industry - had a vested interest in denial. Many others thought it true but that to admit it would unleash man's worst trait - racial hatred - and result in murder and violence against black and Asian Britons, and their friends and loved ones – British people born here – being shipped off somewhere. Better just to leave London and choose the quiet life or sing the benefits of immigration from your Dorset country home.

No particular event changed broke the taboo - not 7/7, which I think had the opposite effect of showing just how amazing London is as an experiment and how tolerant Londoners are at getting along. The Danish cartoon protests certainly opened a lot of eyes and had unlikely people talking about "Islamicisation". Most likely there was not any particular event; it was simply that the increasing popularity of blogs broke the mainstream media's silence on the issue.

But all over Europe people have had their Katrina moment. As the respected American journalist Bruce Bawer writes in this devastating piece, in Norway, Denmark and Holland voters are turning to parties that openly oppose mass immigration. These are ordinary people who work regular jobs and travel abroad and have friends of every race and creed, but who do not want to be a minority in their own country or capital, just as no Indian or Ugandan or Moroccan would want to be a minority in his.

The media tried to paint these parties as racist and fascist. Never mind that Pim Fortuyn's party was led by an openly gay man and an openly, er, black woman.

What has prompted this rightward shift? Bawer points to several factors. One is the prosaic one of numbers:

One source estimates that Britain’s Muslim population rose from about 82,000 in 1961 to 553,000 in 1981 to 2 million in 2000—a demographic change roughly representative of Western Europe as a whole during that period. According to the London Times, the number of Muslims in the U.K. climbed by half a million between 2004 and 2008 alone—a rate of growth ten times that of the rest of that country’s population.

Secondly, there is the financial impact of a immigration, a taboo within a taboo in Left-wing circles, a sub-taboo.

For while some immigrant groups in Europe, such as Hindus and East Asians, enjoy relatively low unemployment rates and healthy incomes, the largest immigrant group, Muslims, has become such a burden that governments have made extensive cutbacks in public services in order to keep up with welfare payments—closing clinics and emergency rooms, reducing staff in hospitals, cutting police and military spending, eliminating course offerings at public universities, and so on. According to a report issued last year by the think tank Contribuables Associés, immigration reduces France’s economic growth by two-thirds. In 2002, economist Lars Jansson estimated that immigration cost Swedish taxpayers about $27 billion annually and that fully 74 percent of immigrant-group members in Sweden lived off the taxpayers. And in 2006, the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise warned that Norway’s petroleum fund—which contains the massive profits from North Sea oil that have made the nation rich—could wind up drained to cover outlays to immigrants. (This in a country whose roads, as a report last year indicated, are in worse shape than Albania’s.)

But perhaps most importantly is the growing realisation among some European liberals that continued immigration, predominantly from the reactionary Muslim world, is destroying liberalism. One of the most striking signs of this is the collapse of the Rainbow Alliance, so that Bawer (who is himself gay) writes:

Owing to the rise in gay-bashings by Muslim youths, Dutch gays—who ten years ago constituted a reliable left-wing voting bloc—now support conservative parties by a nearly two-to-one margin.

The same could also be said about European Jews, who have traditionally voted for Left-wing parties because of the Right's bigotry. Last year the Conservatives won the Jewish vote in the London elections, the first time in history that the capital's Jews had voted for a Right-wing party (it didn't help that Ken had a fondness for barking mad Islamists and making concentration camp gags to Jewish journalists).

And, as David Goodhart first pointed out in Prospect magazine four years ago, the welfare state and mass immigration are mutually exclusive, or at the very least the welfare state works best in small, homogenous societies. Yet the same people who would want us to be more like Sweden in our social model are pushing our demographics in the direction of vibrant and exciting but also violent and brutally unequal multi-racial countries like the United States, Brazil or South Africa.

First, social-democratic welfare systems work best, to the extent they do work, in ethnically and culturally homogeneous (and preferably small) nations whose citizens, viewing one another as members of an extended family, are loath to exploit government provisions for the needy. Second, the best way to destroy such welfare systems is to take in large numbers of immigrants from poor, oppressive, and corruption-ridden societies, whose rule of the road is to grab everything you can get your hands on. And third, the system will be wiped out even faster if many of those immigrants are fundamentalist Muslims who view bankrupting the West as a contribution to jihad. Add to all this the growing power of an unelected European Union bureaucracy that has encouraged Muslim immigration and taken steps to punish criticism of it—criminalizing “incitement of racism, xenophobia, or hatred against a racial, ethnic, or religious group” in 2007, for example—and you can start to understand why Western Europeans who prize their freedoms are resisting the so-called leadership of their see-no-evil elites.

Don't expect Polly Toynbee et al to admit this any time soon – the Left is paralysed by its fear of racism, which is why Europe will continue rightwards.

However, while Holland and the Nordic countries have built up a decent, anti-Islamist right, in other countries the void left by mainstream conservatism's cowardice has been filled with neo-fascists – Austria's Freedom Party, the Flemish Vlaams Blok and our very own British National Party. If the Conservative Party fails to take up its position as Fortuyn's heirs, then the vacuum will only get bigger. The space is open for either dissident Conservatives, UKIP or some other non-fascist party to take up that mantle.

I hope they will, for as Bawer warns: "Who will win the war for the soul of Western Europe? The Islamofascists and their multiculturalist appeasers, many of whom seem to believe that their job is not to defend democracy but to help make the transition to sharia as smooth as possible? The nativist cryptofascists? Or Pim Fortuyn’s freedom-loving heirs?"

Sweden Tops Europe for Number of Rapes = Muslim Rape Jihad

Sweden is now experiencing the results of multiculturalism and and its facilitating of Islamization. Now Sweden leads Europe in the number of reported rapes - more specifically Rape Jihad.

 "Sweden, 46 incidents of rape are reported per 100,000 residents. This figure is double as many as in the UK which reports 23 cases, and four times that of the other Nordic countries, Germany and France. The figure is up to 20 times the figure for certain countries in southern and eastern Europe......Over 5,000 rapes are reported in Sweden per annum while reports in other countries of a comparable size amounted to only a few hundred." see below article

Way back in July of 2005, well known blogger Fjordman warned of Sweden's escalating rape crisis but unlike the below article - which tries to cover up the real facts and blame the increase in rapes to "party lifestyles" - the evidence clearly shows that the rape crisis is directly due to MUSLIM immigration into the Country:

"According to a new study from the Crime Prevention Council, Brå, it is four times more likely that a known rapist is born abroad, compared to persons born in Sweden. Resident aliens from Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia dominate the group of rape suspects. According to these statistics, almost half of all perpetrators are immigrants.

".......Sweden has a larger immigrant, including Muslim, population than any other country in northern Europe. The numbers there are likely to be at least as bad as with its Scandinavian neighbors. The actual number is thus probably even higher than what the authorities are reporting now, as it doesn't include second generation immigrants. Lawyer Ann Christine Hjelm, who has investigated violent crimes in Svea high court, found that 85 per cent of the convicted rapists were born on foreign soil or by foreign parents."  LINK

The Local news report, posted in article below, also does not mention the number of rapes against Swedish children is also on the rise:

According to Swedish Radio on Tuesday, statistics from Sweden’s National Council for Crime Prevention (Brottsförebyggande rådet) show that the number of reported paedophile rapes against children is on the rise. The figures have nearly doubled in the last ten years: 467 rapes against children under the age of 15 were reported in 2004 compared with 258 in 1995. LINK
 

Now what does the Quran/Islam tell us about muslim men raping kafir or non-muslim girls?:

"Islam gives an open license to Muslim men to have sexual intercourse with women as long as these women are not Muslims and/or when these Muslim men are living in an infidel country." Link

and in regards to paedophilia --This is what Imam Khomeini, the top shia authority says:

“A Muslim man can have sexual pleasure with a little girl as young as a baby. But he should not penetrate her vaginally, however he can sodomize her”. (Tehriro vasyleh, fourth edition, Qom, Iran, 1990) Link

And even more disgusting and representative of the muslim attitude towards Western women comes this:

Some Muslim immigrants admit their bias quite openly. An Islamic Mufti in Copenhagen sparked a political outcry after publicly declaring that women who refuse to wear headscarves are "asking for rape." Apparently, he's not the only one thinking this way. “It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,” says Hamid. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably fucked before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity until she marries.” It was no coincidence that it was a Swedish girl that was gang raped in Rissne – this becomes obvious from the discussion with Ali, Hamid, Abdallah and Richard. All four have disparaging views on Swedish girls, and think this attitude is common among young men with immigrant background. “It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore…… girl, I mean;” says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. “Many immigrant boys have Swedish girlfriends when they are teenagers. But when they get married, they get a proper woman from their own culture who has never been with a boy. That’s what I am going to do. I don’t have too much respect for Swedish girls. I guess you can say they get fucked to pieces.” LINK

Clearly the above Islamic rationalizations for rape do not fit into Western laws or civilization yet our daughters, mothers, wives, sisters, aunts, friends, etc, on a near daily basis, pay a violent, humiliating and unacceptable high price for the muslim colonisation of Europe and the ludicrous pandering that the governments, religious leaders, police and liberals have given to the ever growing muslim population. What is also clear is that political leaders do not want to admit their failed ideology of multiculturalism regardless of who pays the price for their stubborness. Political correctness more often than not gags the media from accurately reporting muslim crime statistics. Thus, non-muslim victims of muslim violence, particularly rape, are not being acknowledged and reported for what they obviously are: - VICTIMS OF MUSLIM HATE CRIME (OR RAPE JIHAD).

article in full:

Sweden Tops European Rape League 

Sweden has the highest incidence of reported rapes in Europe - twice as many as "runner up" the UK, a new study shows.

Researchers behind the EU study, which will be presented on Tuesday, conclude that rape appears to be a more common occurrence in Sweden than in continental European countries.

In Sweden, 46 incidents of rape are reported per 100,000 residents.

This figure is double as many as in the UK which reports 23 cases, and four times that of the other Nordic countries, Germany and France. The figure is up to 20 times the figure for certain countries in southern and eastern Europe.

The study, which is financed by the Brussels-based EU fund Daphne II, compared how the respective judicial systems managed rape cases across eleven EU countries. Sweden is shown in an unfavourable light, according to the study.

The high figures in Sweden are not only due to an increased tendency to report rapes, and even other more minor sexual offences.

The opposite is in fact the case, the researchers argue; rape simply appears to be a more common occurrence in Sweden than in the other EU countries studied.

Over 5,000 rapes are reported in Sweden per annum while reports in other countries of a comparable size amounted to only a few hundred.

The figures can however be somewhat distorted as it is often only assault rapes by strangers and aggravated acquaintance rapes that are reported in many of these countries - as was the case in Sweden 40 years ago.

The high incidence of rape in Sweden has a strong connection to nightlife and partying, specifically after-club parties in private homes.

Early sexual debuts, high alcohol consumption, "free sexuality" and the "right to say no" quite simply results in more rapes, the study concludes.

The Daphne II fund ran from 2004-2008 and was set up by the European Parliament as a specific programme to prevent and combat violence against children, young people and women and to protect victims and groups at risk.

In 2007 Daphne III was launched to continue the work and is funded up to 2013.

MUSLIM INBREEDING CAUSING SURGE IN BIRTH DEFECTS

Denmark is once AGAIN considering banning cousin marriages due to the prevalence of serious and rare birth defects found in the children born to these muslim couples.

 "Cousin marriages is most common in families with Pakistani and Turkish roots. A Norwegian study from 2007 shows that a third of Pakistanis and a tenth of Turks are married with a cousin......According to Sygeplejersken (Nurse) journal, the risk for cousin couples to have children with a handicap or genetic disease is double the average."

There are even instances, cited, of muslim parents importing brides to marry off and consequently provide a permanent caretaker for their developmentally disabled sons. "many problems with retarded boys are solved with import brides, who are brought to the Netherlands to serve a sort of life imprisonment as a carer/spouse.   LINK to above quotes (One wonders how many of these disabled sons were themselves the products of inbreeding)

Thus one glaring fact has emerged from the "culture" of Islam - an egregiously and sickening high rate of birth defects caused by muslim inbreeding. Muslims from Pakistan being the biggest offenders.

The same evidence of high levels of birth defects in muslim cousing marriages is apparent in Great Britain. So whilst in Britian the NHS is trying to  prevent smokers,  the obese  and  the elderly from receiving medical treatment - citing their lifestyles or age as justification to deny surgery, organ transplant, etc -- even though the vast majority of these people are long time British taxpayers --  there continues to be virtual silence on the choice of Pakistani muslims (often at least one partner is a recent immigrant) to marry their first cousins.  The union of which is guaranteed to produce a high risk of major congenital birth defects amongst their progeny. A BBC report found :

Pakistanis in Britain, 55% of whom marry a first cousin, are 13 times more likely than the general population to produce children with genetic disorders, and that one in ten children of cousin marriages either dies in infancy or develops a serious disability. Thus Pakistani-Britons, who account for some 3% of all births in the UK, produce "just under a third of all British children with genetic illnesses."---- LINK

According to a past article in the Sunday Times:  "the minister, who represents Oldham East and Saddleworth said: "If you talk to any primary care worker they will tell you that levels of disability among the . . . Pakistani population are higher than the general population. And everybody knows it's caused by first cousin marriage. "That's a cultural thing rather than a religious thing. It is not illegal in this country. "The problem is that many of the parents themselves and many of the public spokespeople are themselves products of first cousin marriages."

Ann Cryer MP, whose constituency has a large Pakistani population, has observed and stated that much of the Pakistani community is in denial about the problem. LINK It is clear that the majority of politicians, civic leaders and many health professionals are also wearing politically-correct blinders when it comes to confronting muslim intermarriage.

There is absolutely NO doubt that politicians and social leaders need to arise from worshipping at the altar of multiculturalism, dust off their knees, and make marriage between first cousins illegal and a reason to deny immigration into the UK.  (and EU, USA, etc) This would not only help to relieve the enormous financial strain such marriages have brought to the British healthcare system but also would help to prevent another helpless child, who had no say in their origins, from undue suffering from multiple and often painful deformities and birth defects.

Bosnian Serbs ordered to pay $41.8 million to rebuild mosques

The Bosnian Serb government, sued by the "Bosnian Islamic Community" has been ordered to pay multi millions to rebuild mosques:

"BANJA LUKA, Bosnia-Herzegovina-A court has ordered the Bosnian Serb government to pay €33 million ($41.8 million) compensation to the organization representing Bosnia's Muslims for the wartime destruction of Islamic shrines in Banja Luka." LINK

Not surprisingly, I could find NO evidence of Albania muslims being order to rebuild 112  Serbian Orthodox Christian Churches they systemically ransacked and decimated or the 10 defiled Orthodox cemeteries .

"...the number of Orthodox Churches destroyed or damaged since NATO and the UN occupied Kosovo to 112. This has been an unprecedented act of genocide. The planned and systematic destruction of the Christian history of Kosovo-Metohija under US/NATO/EU sponsorship. Churches that had survived for over 500 years under Ottoman Turkish rule were reduced to rubble under the protection of 30,000 NATO troops."

OR

"Not even the innocent dead are immune from Albanian "revenge". ...50-60 Orthodox tombstones were desecrated and vandalized. Bishop Artemius/Artemije reported that the Albanians had exhumed human remains and had scattered them around the graves in Siga and Brestovik Orthodox churchyards near Pec in Metohija. Bishop Artemius stated that over 10 cemeteries and over 100 Orthodox churches had been ransacked and destroyed. Human rights groups such as Human Rights Watch (HRW), Amnesty International (AI), and the Helsinki Human Rights Group have ignored these acts of genocide. KFOR and UNMIK have done nothing to prevent this vandalism. Bishop Artemije was incredulous how NATO/KFOR/UNMIK could not prevent the destruction of 110 Orthodox churches and 10 Orthodox cemeteries

"On December 2, 2002, 46 tombstones at the Orthodox cemetery in Kosovo Polje and Decani were destroyed following celebrations of Albanian Flag Day held on November 28 near the Visoki Decani Monastery'

For excellent article on this & link to above quotes/information - go to :  The Systemic Destruction of Orthodox Christian Churches in Kosovo - Erasing the History of Christianity in Kosovo by Carl K. Savich

Guess this is all more evidence of  (the myth of) "Islamophobia".

 

UK Bans Wilders LATEST UPDATE Wilders Detained At Heathrow & Booted out!

02/12/09 Discouraging new about the MIStreatment of Dutch politician - Geert Wilders

".....Dutch politician banned from entering Great Britain says he has been detained upon arrival at Heathrow Airport and will be returned home."

For complete story go HERE  for video (until the BBC takes it down) go HERE

 

02/12/09  Reports are that Geert Wilders is defying the British government's ban on him and "has got a boarding card for his flight to the UK" - Will update more as the day progresses.

___________________________________________________

More sickening news of dhimmitude from Great Britain. As this blog (and many others) have chronicled - apparently it continues to be OK for muslim terrorists to enter and live in the UK - just a few examples: 

UK TAXPAYERS PROVIDE THE "GOOD LIFE" FOR CONVICTED TERRORIST

AL QAEDA "PIPELINE" SUSPECT LIVED ON THE DOLE

BIN LADEN'S "RIGHT HAND MAN" SET FOR LIFE ON BRITISH BENEFITS

CONVICTED TERRORIST FINDS TAXPAYER PAID SAFETY IN THE UK

TERRORIST DEMANDS BRITISH TAXPAYERS PAY FOR HIS PORN-IN-LOO LAWSUIT

Yet a Dutch politician is banned.

I am absolutely disgusted!

Article in full

Britain refuses entry to 'extremist' Wilders

Tuesday 10 February 2009

The Netherlands has protested to the British government about its refusal to allow the Dutch anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders to enter the country.

A spokesman for the Dutch foreign affairs ministry told DutchNews.nl that Britain has banned Wilders ‘in the interests of public order and security’.

Wilders was due to go to London for a screening of his short anti-Islam film Fitna on February 12. The showing of the film by the upper house of the British parliament was postponed last month following opposition from British Muslim community leaders.

Extremism

A spokeswoman for the British home office told DutchNews.nl she could not comment on individual cases but that the British government 'opposes extremism in all its forms'.

The British government 'will stop those who want to spread extremism, hatred and violent messages in our communities from coming to our country,' a home office statement said. Britain introduced tighter rules on exclusions for unacceptable behaviour last year.

On his website Wilders says that he received a letter from the British embassy on Tuesday in which he was informed that he would not be allowed to enter Britain.

'Great Britain is sacrificing freedom of speech,' said Wilders. 'You would expect something like this to happen in countries like Saudi Arabia but not in Great Britain. This cowardly act by the British government is a disgrace.'

The Netherlands is ‘extremely disappointed at the British government's decision' to ban Wilders from entering Britain, says the Dutch foreign affairs ministry in a statement on its website on Tuesday.

Statement

Dutch foreign affairs minister Maxime Verhagen has phoned his British counterpart David Miliband to express his displeasure that a Dutch member of parliament was blocked from travelling to another European Union country, the statement says.

Wilders is head of the right-wing anti-immigration PVV party which has nine seats in parliament.

Film screening

‘Whether that’s possible [the screening] is a decision for the British upper house [of parliament],’ said Verhagen. ‘But refusing entry to a Dutch parliamentarian to another EU country is regretful,’ says Verhagen in Tuesday’s statement.

Verhagen initially put pressure on the British ambassador in The Hague to reconsider the decision to ban Wilders on Monday, the foreign affairs department says.

As the decision was made by the British home secretary Jacqui Smith, the affair will be now be discussed between her and the Dutch justice minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin.

In January, the Amsterdam appeal court said that Wilders should be prosecuted for inciting hatred and discrimination against Muslims.

DOES ISLAM CAUSE OBESITY? -- REDUX

This is a blog I wrote back in October 2007:

DOES ISLAM CAUSE OBESITY?

Well looks like devotion to Islam is bad for the waistline.  The "obesity epidemic" studied in Australia notes that the AU group that has the largest numbers of overweight children is Middle Easterners/muslims.  (17% vs 5.7% of Anglo-Australian children)

One would have to extrapolate that the same group is also a large part (pun intended) of the British obesity problem- both children and adults. If you review the many UK studies of obesity you will find all sorts of reasons and excuses for its occurrence in the UK, lack of exercise, bad choices, etc - but you will not find anyone mentioning the clear relationship between Islamic ideology and obesity.  I did find one US medical research study that did affirm the premise that muslims (in this case muslim women) are heavier than most.- read PDF format study here - see particularly page 11. Apparently wearing burkas is not too conducive to exercising but clearly they do not inhibit eating.

Perhaps muslim men too much time is spent sitting on the floor discussing plans to bomb the infidels & other terrorist acts. (too many examples to link) And for all their posturing about not eating a study found that Gulf muslims actually gain weight during the "fasting" of Ramadan. I wonder if all those non-muslim doctors, nurses and hospital staffs in Scotland actually lost weight during their forced Ramadan fast?

Perhaps a woman, encased in a black shroud, feels little impetus to move especially when her husband or father has so many reasons from the Quran as to why her existence  or actions could cause a beating. Even the nondescript thug has a right to beat a muslim woman.  Jail is safer than freedom for many muslim women. (TOO many examples to link)

So with the cost of obesity & its usual accompanying health problems of heart disease and diabetes, etc. estimated to cost British taxpayers over 45 billion pounds, perhaps this is yet another (of the long, long list) reason that muslims should not be allowed to immigrate into the UK.  Maybe instead of banning vending machines  - we should be more concerned with banning muslims? Maybe this is even a reason some of the faux health conscious looney left might even consider?

I know I'm overreaching.

For article go to:   Childhood obesity 'grossly overstated'

*****Now comes more confirmation showing the link between diabetes and Islam: 

-from the Islam in Europe website:

Belgium: Immigrants more susceptible to diabetes

People of other origins run 2-6 times more of a risk of developing type 2 diabetes than ethnics.  Type 2 diabetes is a disease closely tied to obesity, but bad eating habits are not the only causes.  The risk of diabetes type 2 is also determined by genes.

Antwerp doctor Güven Yildiz is researching diabetes among immigrants.  She says that in Belgium only an estimate can be made regarding the higher susceptibility of immigrants for diabetes, but she turns to data from the Netherlands.  Also according to the Flemish Diabetes Associations (VDV), this data can be extrapolated to Belgium.  In particular Surinamese, Hindus, Turks and Moroccans appear susceptible to the disease.

According to the VDV ethnicity is thus a risk factor.  But the hereditary tendency decides the risk for obesity and type 2 diabetes and the age in which it develops.  Part of the explanation might be found in the difference in the habits with those in the land of origin: metabolism adapts to the surroundings.  In another surroundings it leads to problems.  Moreover, among people of other origin, diabetes develop several years earlier on the average than among ethnics.

Immigrants therefore also need precise information about this disease.  Muslims who have diabetes, for example, should not take part in Ramadan.  "Ramadan is a risk period," says the VDV.  "By suddenly dropping the normal treatment rhythm, there is more of a risk to increase or lower the blood sugar levels."  Also insufficient liquid intake is very important.  Fasting from sunrise to sunset and afterward eating a lot of fat and sugar-rich food, is bad for diabetes treatment.

 

---for rest of article go to link in title---

Well looks like devotion to Islam is bad for the waistline.  The "obesity epidemic" studied in Australia notes that the AU group that has the largest numbers of overweight children is Middle Easterners/muslims.  (17% vs 5.7% of Anglo-Australian children)

One would have to extrapolate that the same group is also a large part (pun intended) of the British obesity problem- both children and adults. If you review the many UK studies of obesity you will find all sorts of reasons and excuses for its occurrence in the UK, lack of exercise, bad choices, etc - but you will not find anyone mentioning the clear relationship between Islamic ideology and obesity.  I did find one US medical research study that did affirm the premise that muslims (in this case muslim women) are heavier than most.- read PDF format study here - see particularly page 11. Apparently wearing burkas is not too conducive to exercising but clearly they do not inhibit eating.

Perhaps muslim men too much time is spent sitting on the floor discussing plans to bomb the infidels & other terrorist acts. (too many examples to link) And for all their posturing about not eating a study found that Gulf muslims actually gain weight during the "fasting" of Ramadan. I wonder if all those non-muslim doctors, nurses and hospital staffs in Scotland actually lost weight during their forced Ramadan fast?

Perhaps a woman, encased in a black shroud, feels little impetus to move especially when her husband or father has so many reasons from the Quran as to why her existence  or actions could cause a beating. Even the nondescript thug has a right to beat a muslim woman.  Jail is safer than freedom for many muslim women. (TOO many examples to link)

So with the cost of obesity & its usual accompanying health problems of heart disease and diabetes, etc. estimated to cost British taxpayers over 45 billion pounds, perhaps this is yet another (of the long, long list) reason that muslims should not be allowed to immigrate into the UK.  Maybe instead of banning vending machines  - we should be more concerned with banning muslims? Maybe this is even a reason some of the faux health conscious looney left might even consider?

I know I'm overreaching.

For article go to:   Childhood obesity 'grossly overstated'

*****Now comes more confirmation showing the link between diabetes and Islam: 

-from the Islam in Europe website:

Belgium: Immigrants more susceptible to diabetes

People of other origins run 2-6 times more of a risk of developing type 2 diabetes than ethnics.  Type 2 diabetes is a disease closely tied to obesity, but bad eating habits are not the only causes.  The risk of diabetes type 2 is also determined by genes.

Antwerp doctor Güven Yildiz is researching diabetes among immigrants.  She says that in Belgium only an estimate can be made regarding the higher susceptibility of immigrants for diabetes, but she turns to data from the Netherlands.  Also according to the Flemish Diabetes Associations (VDV), this data can be extrapolated to Belgium.  In particular Surinamese, Hindus, Turks and Moroccans appear susceptible to the disease.

According to the VDV ethnicity is thus a risk factor.  But the hereditary tendency decides the risk for obesity and type 2 diabetes and the age in which it develops.  Part of the explanation might be found in the difference in the habits with those in the land of origin: metabolism adapts to the surroundings.  In another surroundings it leads to problems.  Moreover, among people of other origin, diabetes develop several years earlier on the average than among ethnics.

Immigrants therefore also need precise information about this disease.  Muslims who have diabetes, for example, should not take part in Ramadan.  "Ramadan is a risk period," says the VDV.  "By suddenly dropping the normal treatment rhythm, there is more of a risk to increase or lower the blood sugar levels."  Also insufficient liquid intake is very important.  Fasting from sunrise to sunset and afterward eating a lot of fat and sugar-rich food, is bad for diabetes treatment.

 

---for rest of article go to link in title---

The Mystery of the Disappearing Somalis - Where might they be??

Recently the USA taxpayers got to pay the bill for the return trip of various body parts left over after a 29 year old muslim suicide bomber, Shirwa Ahmed, blew himself up- along with 29 other people. The family of the naturalized American citizen wanted him to have a "decent burial". So the FBI flew his "remains" back to "his home" - Minnesota - for the traditional muslim burial. Makes you wonder how many other families of Americans, who died abroad, find the  FBI doling out taxpayers cash to fly their bodies home?- I don't imagine too many - but then again they quite likely aren't Islamist suicide bombers. Guess Shirwa didn't have traveler's insurance.

This brought up the nagging question as to the whereabouts of some 20 +/- (likely a BIG plus)"missing" Somalian young men who have disappeared from the streets of Minnesota. It comes as no surprise that these "American" men may not really be missing - just "away" -- training to become suicide bombers.

Of course there is always the possibility that those "missing Twin city boys are "learning about government as they help to reclaim the Somalian capitol - Mogadishu

The militant wing, Shabab, which claims affiliation to Al Qaeda, now controls 90% of southern Somalia, including parts of the capital, Mogadishu.........

or 

they are practicing their aim ---stoning a 13 year old girl - who had been raped:

"As they have recaptured southern cities, some Shabableaders have imposed Taliban-style rules, killed humanitarian workers and terrorized women. In Kismayo, a 13-year-old rape victim was stoned to death after being accused of adultery. 

We call that sexual assault of a child and the pedophile would be punished -- but even he wouldn't be stoned - (tho' there are some who might like to do so.)

 Or they could be off the coast of Somalia "working" as pirates-in-training: 

• Hardliners, known as the Shabab, now have a degree of control over several pirate groups and provide operating funds and specialist weapons in return for a share of the ransoms being paid to free the ships and crew
• As many as 2,500 young Somalis have been trained by the Shabab at points all along the Somali coast
• The Islamists are using the pirates to train their own forces in naval tactics so that they can provide protection for arms being smuggled in Somalia from Eritrea.

Or - they could be kidnapping journalists:

"British reporter Colin Freeman and Spanish photographer José Cendón were kidnappedin the commercial city of Bossasso, in the Puntland province, northeastern Somalia.Both were gathering news for the Daily Telegraph of London about the recent cases of pirate attacks off the Somali coast when they were kidnapped as they were leaving their hotel."

It's a tad late that the USA State Department has FINALLY caught on to the fact that the majority of the flood of "reunified" muslim African families, in Minnesota, weren't really family at all.

"The Twin Cities is among the largest centers of Somali and Liberian resettlement in the nation, many of them arriving on Priority Three (P-3) visas, part of a humanitarian program to reunify families.

But recent DNA pilot tests conducted in Nairobi, Kenya, show that as many as 80 percent of applicants under the program could not confirm their family status -- either they refused the tests, or the test results were negative for any biological relationship.

"Most of the fraud involved falsely claimed parent-child relationships," said Bill Wright, a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security.

What that means for the tens of thousands of African immigrants who have already settled in Minnesota under the P-3 program is unclear.

"We're still considering how to deal with them," Wright said. "But I can say this: We can't assume that the refugees we've admitted committed fraud, just based on the pilot test results alone."

36,000 have been admitted!!!"

Guess better late than never...as the saying goes. It does make you wonder whether or not Shirwa Ahmed's family - was actually his family. 

But all those fraudsters needn't worry  - they undoubtedly will be reprieved under President Elect Barack Obama's "comprehensive" amnesty plan.

Now comes the news that Somalian residents of Denmark are also returning to their homeland for "training":

"More and more Somalis with a residence permit in Denmark are going to back their former homeland to get military training and religious school at the al-Qaeda related terror group al-Shabab.  This has gotten the Danish intelligence service to pay more attention to Somalis living in Denmark, reports Politiken."

Makes you wonder why these muslims bothered to immigrate in the first place - Hmmm does GLOBAL CALIPHATE ring a bell?