TheOPINIONATOR

Police Ignore MORE Muslim Race Hate Attacks in No-Go Area in Dewsbury England

Another week in Dewsbury, England and more reports of muslim violence (aka Street Jihad)- each - to no surprise - has been minimized by the dhimmified British police and ignored for what they really are = MUSLIM RACE HATE CRIMES.

FIRST - ANOTHER horiffic race hate attack against a 14 year old white British lad who was set upon and brutally stabbed with a screwdriver and savagely beated by 15 "Asian" gang thugs - then "left for dead":

"The gang hurled racist abuse at him, constantly referring to the colour of his skin, yet police refused to classify the attack as racially-motivated.

Joseph’s dad Jonathan, 42, of Thornhill, said: “It was a racist attack.

“They were calling him ‘white trash’ and white this, that and the other.

“This is why people are angry about what is happening in this country.

“If it had been an attack by whites on an Asian lad it would have been a definite race attack. When it’s the other way round they don’t want to know.”

.....Joseph was off school all week and tensions were said to be running high at Thornhill Community Science College.

....Mr Haigh said: “They went to stab him in the face and it was only because he had his hands up that they missed.

“He was stabbed in one hand, his other hand was broken and a cut on his forehead was down to the bone.

“If they had hit him a bit harder with the house brick they could have killed him.

“They just left him for dead.”

....A police spokesman said the initial police report had not classified the attack as racially-motivated but inquiries were continuing. Insp Jenny Thompson, of Dewsbury police, said: “This was a vicious, unprovoked attack on a young boy which left him with some serious injuries." SOURCE

SECOND finds the police denying that the 'muslim enriched' Savile Town area of Dewsbury has become a no-go area for white people - even in light of a string of brutal assaults:

"On Saturday night a white teenage boy was attacked and beaten (knocked to the ground and kicked) by a gang of Asians some wearing masks. The victim, thought to be about 18, was walking in Savile Road, near the old cricket ground, when he was followed by a gang of about 10 Asian youths, all wearing hoodies. Fortunately a couple came along and forced the attackers to run off.

The woman, who lives in Thornhill Lees, said the boy told them the gang had followed him and told him to “run”.

When he tried to ignore them they came after him and one said: “No one walks through Savile Town.”"

ONE day later a man called to report 'Asians" were throwing stones at cars passing on Savile Road - cars being driven by WHITE drivers.

They were just targeting white drivers,” said Mr Cutler. “As far as I’m concerned it’s racist and it needs to be reported - while he was calling police another WHITE British man pulled up to complain of the same.

Just last week Robert Dyson was walking home on Savile Road and was attacked by an "Asian" gang - he required medical treatment for his head and face injuries.

What a surprise! ONCE AGAIN WE FIND MUSLIM APOLOGIST -Insp Jenny Thompson, of the Dewsbury police force, making a statement...."Savile Town is not a ‘no-go’ area and it would be unhelpful to label it in this way." SOURCE

So there you have it -'multicultural worshipping police - telling the British people "Move along now - Nothing to see here" -- when in reality these muslim perpetrated race hate crimes against the white British people are as clear as the nose on this inspector's face -or maybe I should say the hijab on her head.?

Perhaps if the perpetrators were not muslims but rather a 6 year old girl OR a mentally challenged boy - the police would take note and immediately act to quell the "racism".

Would seem the most glaring absence in muslim 'no-go areas' is police honesty!

The British Police Have Been Destroyed by Multiculturalism

Cross post from the Gates of Vienna blog. The below tell of gross decline the once well respected British Police Service - after Multiculturalism was inflicted upon and infested it's ranks. 

See also:

Islamization on STEROIDS - Non-Muslim Female British Police Issued Hijabs -- Veils

It Gets Worse! British Non-Muslim Police Parade in Full Islamic Dress

British Women Pay High Price for Multiculturalism 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Multiculturalism Has Destroyed the British Police
by Paul Weston

Might you be one of those ambitious, clean-limbed, stout-hearted chaps who wish to combine a healthy outdoor career with genuine social do-goodery? You are? My dear fellow! Have you perchance considered the Police Service? It could be just the place for you!

Are you 5 feet 8 inches or longer and aged between 19 and 30? Do you hold at least five “O”-levels including maths and English? Are you the possessor of all your own teeth but not a criminal record? If so, you are qualified to attend an interview for potential recruitment to the… Royal St Vincent and the Grenadines Police Force.

What’s that you say? You’re only 4 feet 9 inches, and more than a little rotund? No problem old chap, jump on this here aeroplane, if indeed you can actually jump of course, and we’ll take you somewhere with less exacting requirements; a place where you can swap sunshine and samba for drizzle and depression; a place where discrimination toward the vertically challenged is looked down on from the lofty heights of tolerance and diversity; an egalitarian place where the inability to peer atop the sergeant’s desk is no impediment to becoming a boy in blue. Let us go to Britain, the founder of an empire where once the sun never set, latterly reduced to a little Socialist Island where now the sun rarely rises.

You would like to come, but feel your possession of a criminal record might hold you back? Fiddlesticks and piffle dear boy, fiddlesticks and piffle. The British Police Service will not allow such a trifling matter to stand in your way. You are 53 years old? Good Lord, you look barely a day over 40, but inconsequential, dear boy, inconsequential. We Brits are very keen on diversity, even of the ageist variety. The London Metropolitan Police will recruit almost up to state retirement age, and especially so, if I may mention it, when dignified age is carried off with such wonderful aplomb by a… you know… a black person!

No academic qualifications either? Not a problem in the slightest old boy! In modern, caring, socialist Britain such elitist and bourgeois statements of a privileged upbringing carry very little weight. Lookee here my good man, swing this club at that passing pedestrian over there. Yes, the aristocratic looking one. No no, not the young one. The elderly petite lady, that’s the one, the grey old bird who looks as though she may have ridden to hounds in her youth… the slow mover… look sharpish laddie, she’s spotted you… GOT HER BY JOVE!

My dear chap that’s some arm on you! Perhaps you were an opening batsman in your youth, what what? No? You surprise me! Ah, quite, quite, cricket not allowed in prison, of course not, remiss of me old boy, remiss of me. Never mind my dear chap, never mind. I assume you have all your own teeth, the only essential requirement we ask of prospective British policemen these days? You do? Excellent, excellent, sign here, here and here. A thumbprint? Of course dear boy, a thumbprint is fine! And welcome to Britain… Constable Kaunda!

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Ha ha, but the depth of depravity to which the British Police Service has been politically driven is of tremendous concern to all but our ruling elites. Whilst St Vincent is an admirable nation, it is nonetheless one which owes its living to the nurturing and selling of bananas. Britain is supposed to exist on a higher plane than such states, yet the majority of British policemen could never qualify for the Royal St Vincent and the Grenadines Police Force.

It really is true that St Vincent has exacting requirements for its police recruits, and it really is true that the British police require next to nothing. And the reason for this is staggeringly ironic — Britain has drastically lowered its police entry requirements, even to the point of overlooking criminal records, in order to recruit a higher proportion of ethnic minorities. The British police now recruit immigrants who are not even British citizens, provided they have indefinite leave to remain in the UK.

We do check whether a newly arrived immigrant from Somalia or the Sudan has a criminal record relating to rape, murder or genocide, but the reality is we have absolutely no idea as to the true identity of the man in question. With our home-grown ethnic minorities, it is important that certain criminal records are overlooked because despite making up only a purported 10% of Britain’s population, they punch well above their proportional weight when it comes to criminality, thus ensuring their admittance as 25-30% (pdf) of the prison population, whilst a full 77% of young black males have been arrested for suspected criminal offences and entered into the police database.

The irony of course is that the St Vincent Police Force, with all its stringent character requirements, recruits only nationals from St Vincent, who are, quite naturally, black. If Britain had not allowed the liberal/left to destroy its educational system, religion, morality, the family, and most importantly, the economically poor, fatherhood-poor black family, perhaps we could emulate the noble St Vincentonians, but alas we lost the war against the progressive policies of the liberal/left some years ago and must now recruit from a far less qualified ethnic minority base.

There was a time when the British police entry standards were as high as those of St Vincent. There was a minimum height requirement, 5 “O”-levels were needed, criminal records were not overlooked and physical fitness was a pre-requisite. But multiculturalism and socialism have turned the traditional and decent Britain of the recent past on its head.

A quick glance at the Metropolitan Police Authority recruitment targets for 2009-10 reveals the liberal insanity that has taken over this pitiful Island. 27% of all new police recruits must be “black and minority ethnic” (BME) and 41% must be female.

West Midlands Police Authority has seized upon such directives with glee. What would once have been called racial and sexual discrimination against white males is now called Positive Action, which is why the police are able to recruit black and ethnic minorities in far higher percentage terms than their population warrants.

White males will account for a mere 30% of new Metropolitan Police recruits over the next three years, but unfortunately for the powers that be, it is still white males who overwhelmingly apply to join. The result is that they are simply turned away, and the reason given, with no hint of hypocrisy or shame, is because they are white. In 2006, two thirds of white males were turned down for interview by Gloucester Police, whilst every single ethnic minority and female was accepted (for interview).
- - - - - - - - -
Looking at the police recruitment site today is profoundly depressing. The fact that no academic qualifications are needed becomes apparent when we are told that 60% of applicants fail at the first hurdle. Such large numbers suggest perhaps that the applicants were unable to translate Homer’s Iliad into modern Greek, but this, alas, is not quite the case. The 60% of aspiring plods weeded out at stage one are discarded because they lack the ability… to fill out the application form correctly!

This most extraordinary admission becomes even more appalling when one discovers the police recruitment department will sell you a DVD full of useful tips on becoming a police officer, including a section on How-To-Fill-Out-The-Application-Form-Correctly.

Should you manage to gouge out your name, address, and conviction date correctly, you may be asked to progress to the next level, where your physical fitness will be evaluated. Gone are the days of running a mile in seven minutes and doing 50 push-ups. Today you need only be “reasonably fit and able to run short distances fairly quickly.” I assume this requirement is more geared toward escape than pursuit.

The next stage is whether or not you can actually speak the language of the people you wish to police. The only requirement here is that you have mastered enough English to “Write short reports and potentially give evidence in court.”

The London Metropolitan Police do not beat around the bush in terms of identifying potential recruits. They are not looking for burly yeomen who can face up to crowds of baying, drunken youths on Saturday nights, but people who display the correct political attitudes. Providing one is aged between 18 and 57 — yes, you read 57 correctly — then the Met Police’s number one priority in personal qualities is Respect For Diversity.

This perverse pandering to ethnic minorities does not just stop there; it continues out into the streets where ethnic criminals are given the old softly-softly approach. Stop and Search is one of those thorny ethnic issues which so excite the liberal/left, who think it racist to disproportionately stop young black males in order to frisk them for knives. Black parents on the other hand are all in favour of it, not wishing their sons to be stabbed to death in the epidemic of knife crime UK that is overwhelmingly black on black.

The police have an intriguing way to get around this. They simply stop white youths, in the full knowledge they are innocent, to thus provide a racial balance. They also take instruction from young “streetwise” ethnic gang members, who despite a history of carrying weapons and assaulting police officers, tell the self-same police what street slang and behaviour they should adopt in order to be as inoffensive as possible whilst searching them for weapons they use to kill one another with. The police do this in order to “Command Respect.”

But blacks do not sit at the top of the grievance tree in Britain. For such an elevated position at the peak of the racial/religious ziggurat we must turn to Islam. It is proposed that British police officers should learn about Sharia law and the Koran, in order to better police the Islamic community.

The reason for this is because it is incumbent upon the police to further the relationship with those who wish to blow us up and take us over. Particularly with regard to “moderate Muslims” who have such a hard time living in democratic Britain they are apparently forced to think of the police as their enemy. In the words of Shipley Conservative MP, Philip Davies:

“Research last year revealed that the police service would be very low on the list of agencies that the Muslim community would turn to if they had concerns about a member of their community who embraced violent extremism. The police service has a long way to go in building a relationship of trust around these issues.”

Really? If the Muslim community suspected one of their neighbours intended to massacre hundreds of innocent people on the tube, then the police would be just about the last people they would tell? And it is up to the police to build a relationship of trust with these moderate people?

Well yes, as it happens. West Yorkshire Chief Constable Norman Bettison couched it thus:

“We work closely with communities and the majority of police training at the moment in this area is done in partnership with Muslim organisations.”

Can it get any worse? Of course it can! How about dressing up English policewomen in full-on Muslim garb to better understand the utter hell that is the life of Muslim women living in intolerant Britain? Called operation In Your Shoes Day, white policewomen wandered around Sheffield looking like mini Darth Vaders sans light sabres, at the behest of South Yorkshire Police, where they were variously stared at by security guards hoping to Allah they were not shoplifters in need of a good old frisking, not to mention nervous bus drivers.

A police spokesman (how terribly sexist is that in Britain’s modern, go ahead police service) defended this exercise in liberal lunacy as:

“Just one of many activities South Yorkshire Police have planned with communities and ethnic minority leaders, to secure strong relationships, celebrate diversity and encourage integration (whose, I wonder?) working towards a safer, closer society.”

I am not too sure about the safer bit though. Muslim women are desperately sought after as Police Community Support Officers, but Muslim women hardly have an international reputation as surfer/swimmer babes, what with their apparel being more conducive to sinking than floating. Members of a police force who could not swim would have been unthinkable a few years ago, but not so today, where it is easier to drop the swimming requirement from police training rather than appear discriminatory toward swathed sinkers.

As always though, there are consequences to such liberal perversities — witness the death by drowning of ten-year-old Jordan Lyon in 2007, whilst a police community support officer observed from the banks of the pond as he/she consulted his/her health and safety pamphlet whilst a colleague ran to summon help.

They were defended by their superiors who claimed: “It would have been inappropriate for PCSOs, who are not trained in water rescue, to enter the pond.“ Tell that to the mother of Jordan Lyon, a mere boy who had entered the pond to save his sister and sacrificed his own life in the attempt, whilst two adults could not be held to the same standard. In the subsequent inquest they were not even required to attend the court. One wonders why, especially as their names and photographs have never been made public. Or perhaps one doesn’t wonder at all.

Another consequence unforeseen only by the liberal/left is not just the sheer uselessness of people recruited from the bottom of the barrel, but also their slightly less than honest attitudes. In 2006, the Guardian reported on an internal London Metropolitan Police report which found complaints of corruption aimed at “Asian” officers to be ten times higher than complaints against their white colleagues.

Amongst the PCSOs, who were introduced to tackle anti-social crime whilst bolstering the recruitment rates of Blacks, Muslims, women and the transgendered, gross misconduct cases account for 50% all cases within the forces, despite their making up only one fifth of the recruits. They are employed ONLY to make up ethnic and minority numbers. In terms of crime fighting they solve only one crime every four years and issue fines for anti-social behaviour at the rate of 1.5 per year.

And while the British police self-destruct in order to prove their non-racist credentials, their entire institution is awash with cries of “racism” and “prejudice.” Take the case of Assistant Chief Constable Anil Patani for example. When he was overlooked for promotion back in his sergeant days, he sued for racial discrimination. When he was promoted later in his career, he sued again, this time because he had been over-promoted because of his race, and was thus viewed with some bitterness by his colleagues who of course no longer liked him, indeed hated him. Anil Patani’s finest moment came when he tried to prosecute Channel Four for inciting racial hatred by daring to produce and broadcast the “Undercover Mosques” programme.

Commander Ali Dizaei was once destined for the very top. Today he is suspended under an impending charge of Perverting the Course of Justice. Dizaei’s whole career has been built around race. He was President of the National Black Police Association and race advisor to the Home Secretary (does not race advisor to Adolf Hitler sound more appropriate?) before his life became embroiled around corruption charges.

In 2008 Britain’s most senior Muslim officer, Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur, sued his boss and Britain’s most senior police officer, Commissioner Ian Blair, over racism charges. Ghaffur was paid out and Sir Ian Blair resigned shortly afterwards. In the fallout that followed, the National Black Police Association took out full page adverts in newspapers, asking that ethnic minorities cease applying to join the police.

What total, utter, multicultural madness. But the biggest tragedy is what now happens on Britain’s streets as our police services sue and counter sue; attend race and diversity workshops, gender swap awareness courses and fill out 50 page racial incident documents in triplicate as to why they stopped and searched known black murderer Delroy Shanker in the early hours of May 15th.

The result of such insanity is that the police now manage a mere 6 hours a week actually out on the beat. They have effectively withdrawn from the streets, which have been taken over by lawless feral youths. They make fleeting appearances in order to arrest members of the general public who have the temerity to retaliate against their persecutors, but by and large the streets are now ruled by the underclass. Britain is not a country to be weak in.

The tragic case of Fiona Pilkington is the saddest story I have read in many years. A slightly backward mother, with variously backward children, poor Mrs Pilkington lacked the financial resources to live where liberal progressives live, and so was forced to share her life with the welfare-benefit classes whose morality has been destroyed by years of liberal progressive destruction. Stones and bricks were thrown through her windows and fireworks pushed through her letter box. Her young son was locked in a garden shed and threatened at knife-point, her daughter subjected to verbal and physical abuse.

Poor, tormented, mentally tortured Fiona Pilkington called the Leicestershire Police 33 times over a ten year period, but they never helped her. Not once. Eventually she bundled her daughter and herself into the vandalised family car, set fire to it, and departed to a place where one can only hope her tacit murderers will never gain admission via its pearly gates.

The police blamed the council, the council blamed the police. The chief of police did not resign. Imagine though, if the Pilkingtons had been black? I know this is a tired old cliché, but it is important to point out that since the Macpherson report the most important thing on the minds of coppers from Constables to Commissioners is to never, ever fail to give your undivided attention to a perceived racial incident. It is a career and pension killer, unlike the failure to take seriously the decade long persecution of a weak and vulnerable white woman and her children.

Leicestershire Constabulary (motto: Providing a second to none police service) takes its diversity guidelines very seriously. Commanded by temporary Chief Constable Chris Eyre who represented the East Midlands ACPO Asylum and Immigration Group, their National Disabled Police Association blurb informs us that one of their aims is to “Build trust and confidence between disabled people and the police service to improve community cohesion.” They also tell us they work to “Best Practice.” I don’t think so, Chief Constable Eyre.

The Guardian agonised as to why disability hate crimes were not taken as seriously as racial or gender based hate crimes, never pausing to think that Mrs Pilkington did not need to be a member of a politically designated oppressed minority to qualify for police help. Memo to Guardian readers, police officers heading up diversity divisions, and other such liberal/leftists who appear utterly devoid of the smallest scrap of human decency — Mrs Pilkington was a cruelly tortured and suffering Human Being in desperate need of help. Capiche?

Contrast this with another story published the same week. 71-year-old, disabled, German born pensioner Renate Bowling was arrested, thrown into the back of a police van and prosecuted for assault. Why? Because she had prodded a 17-year-old youth in the chest after he and his gang had thrown stones at her windows. When she caught him hiding behind a wall he called her a “f***ing German” which one would have thought constituted a racial offence, and certainly would if Germans were not quite so annoyingly white and Aryan. He was not arrested, of course.

Or what about the pensioner arrested for shouting at yobs who were stoning ducks on a canal, or the retired military police officer who has erected an electrified fence around his home after police ignored his 999 calls as paving slabs were hurled into his garden, or the woman advised by the police not to call them again as it would only escalate the problem despite the fact she had been punched to the floor of her own home by a gang of youths?

And on and on and on. It is unusual to get to the end of one day, let alone an entire week, without reading reports of women being assaulted, men being beaten to death by packs of liberally educated youths, and innocents of the wrong race, religion or class being arrested by the police on matters of utter inconsequence.

And these are only the stories that make the news. Every Brit today will tell you it is unsafe to go out in town centres after dark, and that the local police are worse than useless. Have you had much contact with Britain’s modern policemen? If you live in a town it is likely you never see them anymore, and even more likely that the local police station is not open in the evenings or weekends, or has been sold off and converted into a trendy urban live/work space. Over 500 police stations have been lost since 1992.

The reason for the decline of the British copper is very simple. Britain’s socialist government has converted — under the cover of multicultural compassion — what was once the Great British Police Force into one that is useless when it comes to protecting law abiding tax-payers, but highly efficient as the virtual paramilitary wing of a political movement which has ordained whites and middle-classes to be the enemies of the socialist state.

If you think that such a statement is paranoid, ask yourself why the police will not get involved in cases such as Fiona Pilkington’s, but speed to cases on full blues and twos when a religious, racial, gender, or class crime has been committed. Ask yourself why the police only seem to take the type of crime seriously that the socialist government promotes as serious, and why so many of the Chief Constables (all of whom owe their positions to a slavish devotion to the Labour Party) have degrees in criminology and sociology which promote criminals as victims of social injustice.

Take a look at this video of police “officers” retreating under a hail of sticks and traffic cones before a gang of Muslims shouting “This is war, Kuffar,” and then watch what happens when the white middle classes peacefully demonstrate in favour of fox hunting. Look at the bloodied faces and broken heads and consider why not one, not one policeman, was subsequently found guilty of police brutality.

The much-traduced British police are now protectors of the multicultural/socialist state rather than the protectors of the law-abiding general public. If you are a member of the ruling elite, the police are not only your political servants but also your personal bodyguards. If, on the other hand, you are a member of the increasingly persecuted class, by which I mean traditionally British, irrelevant of income or education, then the police have at best abandoned you, or at worst become your enemy.

British Taxpayers Forced to Pay for More New Muslim Specific Social Housing

The dhimmis in the British government, in their endless quest to pander to muslims, have spent £1.3 million on a development of nine family properties designed to meet the needs of the muslim community.

The brand spanking new apartment complex has six, 3-bed, five person homes and three 4-bed, eight person homes which have been built to meet current Homes & Communities Agency Standards and constructed in line with Rochdale’s Asian Housing Strategy.  Undoubtedly,  the new homes are constructed to be like other "Asian" housing built to facilitate the Islamic lifestyle with such amenities as toilets that do not face Mecca and with beds that can easily be turned to face the southeast, more cabinets and ventilation to aid in "steamy" muslim cooking and shower heads, on the toilet bowl.

This exposes the statement - by Prime Minister Gordon Brown - that there would be "British homes for British people" - as a bold faced lie alongside his "British jobs for British workers" promise:

"On another level the Government’s new rhetoric exposes the bare­faced lies that have envel­oped state housing policy since 1997. For years, contrary to all evidence, minsters have arro­gantly dismissed accusations that the allocation of housing was biased towards migrants.

Indeed they went so far as to pretend that mass immigration has had no impact at all on housing. Such charges, they said, were racist myths conjured up by Right­wing extremists.

Yet the truth is of course that under Brown and Blair, British­ born families have been ruth­ lessly marginalised by a housing system that is loaded against them.   SOURCE

The facts are:

"Only last year research by Channel 4 – hardly a reactionary outfit – found that 80 per cent of Somalis live in social housing, 49 per cent of turks and 41 of Bangladeshis, compared to just 17 per cent of British­born people." SOURCE

This isn't the first time that taxpayers have paid for muslim specific housing. Recently Bristol opened the SEVENTH - VSH or Very Sheltered Housing:

"The Muslim-friendly Very Sheltered Housing (VSH) scheme in Lincoln Street, Lawrence Hill, also includes beds that allow a tenant's feet to point in the right direction. Lincoln Gardens cost more than £6 million, has 55 bedrooms and was put up by the city council and the Guinness Trust on the site of the former Wainbrook elderly persons' home.

It includes 19 flats suitable for "tenants from the Muslim community" following local consultation." SOURCE

Alarmingly:

"The Muslim population in Britain has grown by more than 500,000 to 2.4 million in just four years, according to official research collated for The Times.

The population multiplied 10 times faster than the rest of society, the research by the Office for National Statistics reveals. In the same period the number of Christians in the country fell by more than 2 million." SOURCE

So whilst new apartments are built for muslims, the British people will continue to find themselves homeless or forced to live in sheds or cars as taxpayers work to fund social housing and other welfare programs for the ever growing throngs of muslims residing in Britain.

Pregnant Laura Whitney and Royal Mail driver, Richard Webster, are living in their car (along with children - seven yr. old Jessica and two yr old Jack) - 'They don't want to help us when we need it most. We are not scroungers. We've always worked, we don't smoke, we have only been out twice in the last year and we don't want anything for nothing." SOURCE

The travesty -in essence- is the British workers/taxpayers are being manipulated into funding and facilitating the Islamisation of their Country.

Article in full:

Family homes developed to meet local demand

Contour Homes has demolished a low demand sheltered scheme in Deeplish, Rochdale and replaced it with a development of nine family properties designed to meet the needs of the Asian community.

Working closely with Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council who identified a high demand for this type of property, Contour Homes secured just under £600,00 from the Homes and Communities Agency for this £1.3 million scheme.

Six, 3-bed, five person homes and three 4-bed, eight person homes have been built to meet current Homes & Communities Agency Standards and constructed in line with Rochdale’s Asian Housing Strategy. The properties also meet the Secured by Design criteria and achieve Code for Sustainable Homes Level III.

Designed by Michael Hyde Associates and developed by Richardson Projects (part of RoK Group) on behalf of Contour Homes the scheme was developed in just over a year.

Contour Homes Project Manager Andrea Swanwick said: “A change in the demographics in this area meant that the former bedsit and flats on the site were no longer in demand.

“In order to respond to local housing need we worked closely with the council to provide new quality homes which have been very well received by the local community.”

Ludicrous Human Rights Act Allows Muslim Serial Rapist to Remain in Britain

Once again we find another egregious example of British INjustice - this time the British people (especially the victim) are to have muslim serial rapist, Mohammed Kendeh, 22, inflicted upon them because deporting the scum would be against HIS human rights.

Kendeh has used the Human Rights Act to resist all attempts to deport him back to his native Sierra Leone – despite admitting responsibility for at least 11 sexual assaults as well as a number of street robberies. Even though Kendeh was refused British citizenship - because of his appalling criminal record - he has been granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK. He has no family in Sierra Leone and nobody to stay with there. BOO-HOO (see article below)

Clearly British/EU laws, particularly the inane Human Rights laws, are backwards as they places the rights of criminals over and above the safety and rights of the British people.

Aside from the laws there is also a definite pattern of British judges going easy on muslim criminals. Some other recent examples of this:

Shazad Rahman, 33, gets suspended sentence after sexually molesting 17 year old girl.

Judge rules illegal alien pedophile, Nural Islam, 35, "not a threat to society" after Islam admitted 10 counts of committing a sex act on a 12 yr old girl over three years. Islam allowed to remain (illegally) in England.

Political asylum seekers & pedophiles:Juma Saleh, 19, Mohamud Jimale, 20, Dawt Kefle, 18, and Mahder Zeregergis, 19, found guilty of sexually attacking 2 - 13 yr. old girls. Cost the British taxpayers £25,000 in legal aid and £125,000 for the interpreters. "The gang now await sentencing and could face deportation once they are released from prison, though Judge Joy said it would be difficult to find a country that would welcome them." Translation = chance of deportation = ZERO.

Mahmoud Miah, 28, found guilty of abducting 15 yr old girl. He later went kneebent begging to the girl to drop charges - tried to bribe her with money.  Shouldn't have bothered: " Judge Mushtaq Khokar, sentencing, called the matter a "very serious offence", and said that normally a custodial sentence would be given.  He told Miah he would spare him jail and added: "I am sure that these proceedings would be difficult for your family."

Restaurant owner, Rafiqul Islam, 26, pleaded guilty to sex act on a customer's 9 yr old son by putting his hand inside the front of the boy's pants. Judge Michael Mott told Islam "When families take their children out to a restaurant they do not expect them to be assaulted by a member of staff." Nevertheless - NO jail time-only a suspended sentence.

Failed asylum seeker, Aso Mohammed Ibrahim, 31,who left a young girl dying under the wheels of his car after a hit-and-run accident has been freed to the disgust of her family. Aso Mohammed Ibrahim was due to be deported after his applications for asylum and citizenship were kicked out. The 31-year-old Iraqi Kurd has been released on bail from custody while he makes yet another appeal to stay in the UK. He says it is too dangerous for him to return to his homeland.

All of the above are sickening and incredibly outrageous - but what do you expect in a Country where distraught mothers had to beg police to stop muslim pedophiles from preying on their young daughters.? 

Human rights laws are also used - time and time again - to protect Islamic terrorists, living in Britain. Causing many to believe the these laws are a positive invitation and incentive to foreign terrorists to flock to Britain — the one country in the world from where they know they won’t be sent back.
 

The British government & judiciary have been dhimmified with a capital D. British judges have become muslim apologists as they continuously treat muslim perverts and criminals with kid gloves. In doing so, these judges repeatedly prove that they place a greater value on multiculturalism and political correctness and place little to no importance on protecting the British people - especially the women and children. Couple this with the idiotic Human Rights Act and you have a clear disaster for the British people as their own legal system has placed them in danger.

Isn't it time to stop this insanity?

Article in full:

Victims anger at sex attacker we can't deport

Gabrielle Brown, the victim of a terrifying sexual assault by a foreign criminal, has spoken of her anger at how he has used the Human Rights Act to remain in Britain

Gabrielle Browne, the victim of a terrifying sexual assault by a foreign criminal, has spoken of her anger at how he has used the Human Rights Act to remain in Britain. Photo: PAUL GROVER

Running along a canal towpath in preparation for the London marathon, Mrs Browne, a mother-of-two, was dragged off the path and into the undergrowth by a teenager who grabbed her around the throat, struck her in the face, forced her to the ground and then sexually assaulted her.

Convinced she would be raped, Mrs Browne, fought back, kicking her attacker hard and as a stranger approached, the youth ran off."I was in fear of my life. I thought he was going to kill me. I was sure he was going to rape me," she says, as the memories come flooding back.

"I remember running along this canal path where I always ran. I just remember this man approaching me from behind a blind corner. He stepped out in front of me, blocking my path and asking me the time.

"And then he just grinned at me and I remembered thinking 'oh no'. I took one more step but his right arm came out around my throat. I can still feel his arm coming around my neck but then I don't have any recollection of what happened next but I must have been dragged 100 to 150 metres.

"I don't know if my mind went blank or I lost consciousness for a few minutes but the next thing I was aware of him shoving me up against a wall with his head braced against my chest and his body at 90 degrees.

"His whole focus was on removing my lower clothing. I realised I had my hands free and I hit him hard. He then hit me in the mouth – I don't know whether that was with his fist or his head. But then he threw me to the ground and pulled down my clothes.

"He started sexually assaulting me but finally I just got my legs free and I started kicking him as hard as I could. Then I heard somebody approaching and he just ran off."

Her assailant was caught by police later that day – but rather than being the end of her ordeal, it was just the beginning. Mohammed Kendeh, now aged 22, has used the Human Rights Act to resist all attempts to deport him back to his native Sierra Leone – despite admitting responsibility for at least 11 sexual assaults as well as a number of street robberies.

It leaves Mrs Browne distraught to know Kendeh is still in Britain when – but for the Human Rights Act – he should be thousands of miles away languishing in west Africa – and no longer a danger to her or other women.

"It makes my blood boil," says Mrs Browne, who has waived her right to anonymity as the victim of a sexual assault to speak out against Kendeh.

"He is allowed to stay here because to send him home would breach his human rights. But nobody seems to care about my rights when he tried to rape me. Nobody cares about the other women he has attacked."

Six years on from the assault, Mrs Browne, now aged 44, remains deeply upset. She has had to move house and refuses to enter parks alone.

"Kendeh has dramatically altered my life. Prior to him attacking me although I lived in a fairly rough area of London, I felt comfortable with my life and my surroundings," explains Mrs Browne.

"Now I still suffer from a fear of being alone and at the same time I also fear being in a crowd of people because I never know who is quite there."

Every time Kendeh nears release – he has been in prison for most of his adult life – she suffers panic attacks, unable to sleep at night and gripped by terror.

Kendeh first went to prison aged 15 and has been barely out of jail since, often being caught within weeks of release.

This Friday he is due to be sentenced for his latest crime, having pleaded guilty last month to robbery during a short hearing at Croydon Crown Court. Kendeh robbed his victim in Bromley in south east London on July 17 having walked out of High Down prison in Sutton in Surrey exactly three weeks earlier where he was completing his sentence for the sex attack on Mrs Browne, an IT worker in the City.

The Home Office tried to deport Kendeh in 2007 for the sex attack on Mrs Browne but Sir Henry Hodge, then the country's top immigration judge, who has since died, ruled that deportation breached the offender's right to a family life under article eight of the Human Rights Act – even though he agreed that Kendeh's conduct was 'most revolting'.

Kendeh had come to Britain at the age of seven and had been brought up by his parents in south London. His lawyers successfully argued Kendeh should not be sent back to Africa.

Kendeh, who was refused British citizenship because of his appalling criminal record, has been granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK. He has no family in Sierra Leone and nobody to stay with there.

09/25/09 2nd ADDENDUM - Islamic Call to Prayer to be Broadcast at the USA National Mall - Sept 25

Now is the time for USA's citizens to question the President of the United States and his overt affinity for Islam. Now is the time to call your Representatives and Senators and the White House ask them WHY Islam is being allowed to subjugate a large portion of the 146 acres of the United States in an area that is the location of the USA's most patriotic monuments along with the Nations Capitol Building and White House.

"The Muslim Athan (Call to Prayer) will be broadcast from the United States Capital to the Lincoln Memorial, from the Smithsonian to the White House on Sept. 25 while an estimated 50,000 Muslims converge on the West Steps and lawn of the United States Capital." 

For more information go to:

http://islamoncapitolhill.com/Home_Page.html

"The National Mall is an open-area national park in downtown Washington, D.C., the capital of the United States. The National Mall is a unit of the National Park Service, and is administered by the National Mall and Memorial Parks unit.^[2] The term "National Mall" commonly includes areas that are officially part of West Potomac Park and Constitution Gardens to the west, and often is taken to refer to the entire area between the Lincoln Memorial and the Capitol, with the Washington Monument providing a division slightly west of the center. The National Mall receives approximately 24 million visitors each year."  LINK

Let's remember that Obama not only studied the Qu'ran but also stated the call to prayer is "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset" and he then went on the recite it with an 'first rate' accent. NYTimes LINK

So, on September 25th, visitors and residents of Washington will hear"Allahu Akbar" just like the 9/11 muslim hijackers screamed before killing over 3,000 people. 

Outrageous?? - you bet!

************************ADDENDUM  09/22/09***********************

In response to Thorum's below comment:

First - Barack Hussein Obama, who quickly squelched anyone referring to him as a muslim during this Presidential election campaign and avowed he is a Christian -- has 'sort of' decided upon a Christian church to attend whilst he is living in Washington, DC.  We all know that he, and his wife Michelle, for 20+ years attended the Trinity United Church of Christ - in Chicago. Its' pastor of over 20 years,the racist, anti-American Reverend Jeremiah Wright, is well known for his recorded rants against white people and America.  Barack Obama wants us to believe that he never heard his "spiritual advisor's" rants.  Wright inspired Obama's 'The Audacity of Hope' book as well as advocates muslim leader and racist Louis Farrakhan even as far as to give Farrakhan an award.

I find it also peculiar and telling that the President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, recent minimal observation of the US National Day of Prayer.  (Christianity based)

"President Obama is distancing himself from the National Day of Prayer by nixing a formal early morning service and not attending a large Catholic prayer breakfast the next morning. All Mr. Obama will do for the National Day of Prayer, which is Thursday, is sign a proclamation honoring the day, which originated in 1952 when Congress set aside the first Thursday in May for the observance. LINK

Add the above to the recent Obama administration, via the Pentagon, decision to deny the Blue Angels flyover at the patriotic God & Country Rally:

This marks the first time in the 42 year history of the event that a flyover request was denied by the Pentagon. The event is held ever year to honor the spiritual foundations of our country with a special emphasis on the men and women who serve in the armed forces.

In past years, the "God and Country Rally" has focused on honoring and paying tribute to those veterans who have served our nation in the past and those who are currently on active duty. At the rally this year, all five branches of the armed services were featured with over 60 new recruits sworn into the military at the event.

After a phone conversation and an e-mail response from the Pentagon, Rally Director Patti Syme says they were denied the request for a flyover this year because of the "Christian" nature of the event. "LINK

So whether you think Obama is a muslim - or not. Clearly the man has a problem with the Christian foundations of the United States of America along with Christianity in general. And clearly he does NOT have issues with the religion (aka political ideology) of Islam.

There is little doubt that Barack Obama would not allow a Christian group to put on an overt display of faith at the nation's Capitol and National Mall -- like the muslims will do on September 25th.

**********************ADDENDUM  09/25/09********************************

For update and more information - from the excellent Atlas Shrugs web site - go to

Islam In the Capital, the Culture, Colonization

Excerpt:

"Those of us, through reason and tremendous act of will, who have freed ourselves from the enslaving yoke of Islam placed around our necks from birth, know about all the heinous inside dirt of this plague of humanity. We hardly need to call a toll-free number to hear a phony canned message of deceptions and lies.

We have experienced Islam first-hand and up close from the inside. We have studied the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sunna. We have seen Islam in action where it wields sway. Some of us even tried desperately to cling to this security blanket that was wrapped around us from birth. Yet, the more we studied and the more we experienced Islam, the more our effort to remain in the fold became untenable.

We broke away from Islamic slavery and found it to be our solemn duty to expose this fraud of a religion, help other Muslims to free themselves from it, and warn the good-hearted and gullible non-Muslims against falling prey to it.

The Muslim organizations in America, generously financed by the oil-rich Muslim government and sheikhs, are directed to sell Islam Lite for long enough until the cult runs deep roots and the Real Islam is introduced. One can see how the scheme played out in Europe. Much of Europe is already past the stage of Islam Lite and knee deep into the quagmire of Real Islam. And that’s exactly where things are headed in America."

Dhimmi School Sued for Savage Claw Hammer Attack by Racist Muslim Gang Against Lone British Boy

The scenario is all too familiar to readers of TheOpinionator as well as the Religion of Peace.  A lone boy/man/woman/girl or a couple is set upon by a gang of racist muslims with the clear attempt to cause harm to the indigenous British. The scenario continues with the police and media obfuscating the identities of the muslim perpetrators and minimizing the incident as a "one off".  Thus an atmosphere, in Britain, of endemic dhimmitude continues to aid and abet muslim violence which gives muslims the idea that they can continue such hate crimes, at will, with little or no recourse.  Fatuous judges also play their role of seeing these muslims as "victims" and giving them lenient sentences for egregious crimes.

The victim's family is stepping up and is suing the institution/school where muslim gangs, for far too long, were allowed to run amok with no penalties.  The school's lax or absent response to muslim violence set up the situation where muslim aggressors felt they could conduct their vicious bullying and attacks - unhindered there.

In this instance, 16 year old ginger haired schoolboy, Henry Webster, made the big mistake of answering a challenge to fight by a muslim man, 19 yr. old Amjad Qazi. Teenagers have no doubt been fighting since the beginning of time - it may not be right - fortunately these fights are rarely as horrific as this one.  Henry's only request was that it be a fair fight - one against one.......or so he thought. Henry believed his sense of fairness was on a par with his muslim opponent......no surprise to us......Henry was wrong. His cowardly challenger quickly used his cell phone to text and call his "Asian Invasion" gang cohorts (typical Modus Operandi of muslim gangs) so when Henry arrived, as he had stated he would - ALONE - the following is what he endured - in Henry's own words:

"I stood around for a bit, then these men came through the gate and looked around," he said.

"[The 15-year-old] was pointing at me and saying "He's the one, he's the one". A man in a black jacket pushed me and, as I walked away, he started punching me.

"I heard screams, then I was punched in the back of my head. I was curled up on the floor but they repeatedly kept hitting me.

"Then I felt the hammer hit the back of my head. I know it was a hammer because if it was a punch, your vision does not change.

"As I got hit, my vision turned to stars - it all separated, what I could see, because it was so powerful."

Mr Patrick said: "Amazingly, Henry remained conscious throughout but his injuries were described by paramedics as lifethreatening."

Witnesses to the assault saw his attackers run off, punching the air and shouting: "We've done it."

Doctors have told Henry he will never recover from the attack

Henry said: "The hammer had gone through my head, through my skull and into the fluid in my brain.

"I have been told I will never recover because the brain cells will not reform."  LINK

-----A note on the above link -which told the fight story and how Henry was to be alone, etc - yet the author/Daily Mail still had the audacity and downright gall to place this caption under the last picture :

 "The attack happened after Henry 'barged' into the group of boys in a corridor at the Ridgeway School in Wroughton."

Henry "barged into" NO ONE - he was set up for this beating by Amjad Qazi and cold-cocked with a claw hammer by Qazi's 'pals' - just another glaring example of the pro muslim media bias and a stance consistently against the non-muslim British.-----

Mr Webster suffered brain injury in the attack

"Henry was repeatedly kicked, punched and battered before being beaten on the head with a claw hammer, fracturing his skull in three places and leaving him with permanent brain damage."

 From Henry's mother:

''You can't imagine how it feels to see your son soaked in blood,'' Mrs Webster said, tears threatening.

''I just couldn't believe that no one from the school had called me to say there had been trouble earlier. All the pupils knew something was going on.

"When I was with Henry at the local hospital's accident and emergency unit one of Henry's friends telephoned me to say the same thing had happened to him some time before but he had managed to get away.

"All the children knew that these 'Asian invaders' were terrorising white pupils.'' LINK

Two trials at Bristol Crown Court were conducted last year and thirteen men and boys were sentenced for their parts in the incident:

Wasif Khan, 18, Amjad Qazi, 19, Nazrul Amin, 19 and four younger teenagers, all from Swindon, were all convicted of GBH. Khan was sentenced to eight years in prison, and Qazi to a year. Amin was sentenced to 18 months. Four defendants from Swindon, who cannot be named because of their ages, were given 18-month, 12-month and eight-month detention and training orders. Aqduss Rauf, 20; Bilal Yakub, 18; Roubel Meah, 20; Mahbub Ali, 19; and Kamran Khan, 24; all fromSwindon, were all given sentences ranging from 12 months to two-and-a-half years. Another unnamed teenager was given eight months after admitting violent disorder. LINK

Thus we have a traumatised young Henry having to go through the rest of his life with significant, irreparable brain damage. It took his mother FOURTEEN MONTHS to get an inquiry into the school's pattern of allowing muslim gangs to terrorize others there.  (Do you really think - if the tables were turned - and a muslim boy had been beaten by a white gang that there wouldn't have been an instantaneous HUGE outcry by "all the usuals"= politicians, muslims, police, etc blaming [the Myth of] Islamophobia? We all know they would have been tripping over each other to denounce such an incident as they ignore the pattern of Islamic violence in Britain)

Henry's mother goes on to state:

''I've fought hard to find out all the facts,'' said Mrs Webster... ''And it's been an excruciating wait.

"The school might say otherwise but the fact is that the attack on my son was a racial one. The school knew there were tensions – there have been numerous similar attacks before but nothing was ever done.

"Everything was swept under the carpet. Neither Henry or I am racist. But I feel my son was badly failed by a school that believes racism is only ever something that is carried out by white pupils."

Amen Mrs Webster!  Unfortunately for the white British people - it is not just this lone school that thinks only whites can be racists - even when the facts point to the exact opposite:

“Nearly half of all victims of racially motivated murders in the last decade have been white, according to official figures released by the Home Office. …. The disclosure will add to the intense debate over multiculturalism in British society. The figures also overturn the assumption that almost all racial murders are committed against ethnic minority victims.”

……Senior police officers have admitted that ‘political correctness’ and the fear of discussing the issue have meant that race crime against white people goes under-reported. One chief constable has claimed that white, working-class men are more alienated than the Muslim community.” LINK

So finally an "inquiry" was conducted and the judge hearing the lawsuit case was told:

A “culture of racist bullying and harassment” that infected a secondary school led to a bloody hammer attack which wrecked a pupil’s life, a top judge has been told.

“Undue indulgence and leniency” towards disaffected Asian pupils at the 1,400-pupil Ridgeway Foundation School, in Wroughton, created an “obvious risk of racial violence” for which 15-year-old Henry Webster paid a terrible price, said his barrister, Robert Glancy QC.  LINK

The school denies any culpability. The judge ruled the Webster's lawsuit can proceed to a higher court.

I honestly hope that more victims of muslim crimes sue for retribution for being the victims of ever escalating muslim violence against the non-muslim (kuffar or kufir) British people.  The British government and politicians are responsible for the immigration atrocity that has turned into a plague of muslim colonisation of Great Britain and destruction of British heritage. It is high time not only the perpetrators of the physical crime paid with serious jail time but also the muslim 'aiders and abettors'  should- at least financially -pay as for the atmosphere of acceptance of muslim violence they have allowed to fester in Britain.

We should all demand the Webster family gets just compensation for the unjustifiable savage beating and subsequent permanent injuries to Henry.

Article in full:

School sued by hammer attack victim

9:00am Saturday 15th August 2009

A “culture of racist bullying and harassment” that infected a secondary school led to a bloody hammer attack which wrecked a pupil’s life, a top judge has been told.

“Undue indulgence and leniency” towards disaffected Asian pupils at the 1,400-pupil Ridgeway Foundation School, in Wroughton, created an “obvious risk of racial violence” for which 15-year-old Henry Webster paid a terrible price, said his barrister, Robert Glancy QC.

Members of a schoolyard gang known as ‘Asian Invasion’ – along with young men from outside the school thought to have been summoned by mobile phone – savagely beat bullying victim Henry near the school’s tennis courts in January 2007, London’s High Court heard.

One of the outsiders laid into him with a claw hammer, fracturing his skull and causing devastating brain damage. Now the teenager, of Wroughton, is mounting a unique bid for massive compensation from the school.

Thirteen young men and boys were sentenced for their parts in the incident following two trials at Bristol Crown Court last year.

Setting out his case, Mr Glancy told Mr Justice Holroyde: “We say there was a failure to provide security at the school and to prevent intrusion by trespassers. There was also a failure to supervise the tennis courts exit from the school and a failure to impose and maintain adequate disciplinary standards, including control of the group of pupils known as ‘Asian Invasion’.

“There was a failure to deal with racial tensions and incidents, or to promote good relations between different racial groups. The pattern of events over several years led to the inhuman and degrading treatment of Henry and a breach of his human rights.

“They should at least have put up a security fence, as they did almost immediately after the attack on Henry. We say that the net effect of all this led to the incident in January 2007.”

However, Ronald Walker QC, for the school, pointed out that the attack on Henry took place after school hours and insisted that, short of stopping and searching every visitor, nothing could have been done to prevent what happened.

The school’s duty was to discipline pupils, not outside adults, and arguments that laxity in enforcing school rules contributed to the attack on Henry were described by Mr Walker as “fanciful” and “implausible”.

Denying the school has any liability to compensate Henry, the QC added: “The idea that some sort of disciplinary system would have been effective in preventing an Asian pupil contacting his brother on his mobile phone is, again, fanciful”.

Henry’s compensation bid will now go ahead for a full High Court hearing which is expected to start on October 19 and which is due to last five weeks.

If Henry, now 18, wins his case, he could be in line for seven-figure compensation. His younger brother, Joseph, his mother Elizabeth, and his stepfather, Roger Durnford, who all say they were left deeply traumatised by witnessing Henry fighting for his life, are also seeking damages payouts.

The Muslim Wolf at Feminism's Door

Excellent post from the Canada Free Press web site:

Honor killing spreads when those whose who practice it emigrate to Western countries

The Muslim Wolf at Feminism’s Door

By Daniel Greenfield  Sunday, September 6, 2009

More than 5,000 women are victims of honor killings each year. Most of those women are Muslim, and while most of them are killed in Muslim countries—more and more of them are being killed in Europe, Canada and America. A 2007 study by Dr. Amin Muhammad and Dr. Sujay Patel in Canada’s Memorial Hospital observed that honor killing spreads when those whose who practice it emigrate to Western countries.

Honor killings however are only the final act in the drama of a Muslim woman’s life. Before that she is expected to walk behind a man, to be a second class citizen, to cover herself as much as possible in order to deflect male desire and to take the blame for the sexual intentions that men have toward her. She knows that if she fails to deflect male desire, she may suffer a variety of penalties from imprisonment to death. In countries like Saudi Arabia or Iran, those penalties are imposed by courts. In countries like Afghanistan or Pakistan, they are imposed by rough tribal justice. In the West, where there is no Islamic court system or tribal courts, they are imposed by the family.

The burka, the chador, the hijab or any of the other covering garments are assigned to Muslim women to “protect” them from men, and to protect men from them. These garments are meant to cover their “Awrah”, which in Arabic means nakedness, fault or defect. While for a Muslim man “Awrah” is only the swimsuit region, a Muslim woman is entirely “Awrah”.

Al-Qadhi Ibn-Al-Arabi Maliki states: “And all of a woman is ‘awrah; her body, her voice, and it is not permissible for her to uncover that unless out of necessity, or need such as witnessing in court, or a disease that is affecting her body…” [Ahkam Al Quran 3/1579]

Imam Al-Qurtubi stated went even further stating; “It is forbidden for a woman to speak when non-related men are present and it is forbidden for men to hear the voice of a non-mahram woman as long as there is no need for that.”

What that means is that all of a woman is “a zone of shame” and obscene. Even the sound of her voice is a form of “nakedness” or “lewdness”. Various Muslim authorities claim that this applies to even a woman’s fingernails and eyes. A woman who fails to dress this way is behaving obscenely and is open to being assaulted, as the Koranic verse which orders Muslim women to cover themselves makes clear.

“O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested.” -Al-Ahzab:59 (Qur’an)

The key word here of course is “that they shall be known as such and not molested”. Conversely the failure to fully cover up (a covering that Mohammed demonstrated by cloaking himself and leaving only one eye uncovered in order to see) leaves them open to being molested under the code of “she was asking for it.”

In the wake of the brutal Sydney gang rapes in which the perpetrators told the victims and exchanged messages among themselves making it clear that the attacks were motivated by the girls being Australian and Christian, Australia’s top Muslim cleric, the infamous Sheikh Hilaly delivered a sermon stating;

“When it comes to rape, it’s 90 percent the woman’s responsibility. Why? Because a woman owns the weapon of seduction. It’s she who takes off her clothes, shortens them, flirts, puts on make-up and powder and takes to the streets, God protect us, dallying. It’s she who shortens, raises and lowers. Then, it’s a look, a smile, a conversation, a greeting, a talk, a date, a meeting, a crime, then Long Bay jail. Then you get a judge, who has no mercy, and he gives you 65 years.”

“But when it comes to this disaster, who started it? In his literature, writer al-Rafee says, if I came across a rape crime, I would discipline the man and order that the woman be jailed for life. Why would you do this, Rafee? He said because if she had not left the meat uncovered, the cat wouldn’t have snatched it.”

The “uncovered meat” were girls as young as 14, whom the attackers brutalized for hours. Their crime was that they were meat, and they had left themselves uncovered by failing to wear Chadours or Hijabs to prevent themselves from being “molested”.

This is the Muslim wolf that now stands growling outside the feminist door. The wolf dictates that women in any country with a sizable Muslim population have two choices, to cover up or be assaulted. By covering up the woman accepts her inferiority to the male. Refusing to do that could get her raped or killed. There is no third option within Islam. In Iraq, in Kashmir, in Pakistan; women have had acid thrown in their faces for not wearing the appropriate Muslim garb.

But why speak of countries under medieval Islamic laws, when you can speak of the “Free West”. A French survey found that 77 percent of the women who wear Hijabs did so because of threats by Islamist groups. 77 percent. France. We are not speaking about some backward little Third World nation where the tribal elders decide what goes. We are speaking of Paris, the glittering city of lights, the capital of art and music. The birthplace of Republican Europe.

This is what Hijab feminism looks like in France,

More often the girls were under orders from their fathers and uncles and brothers, and even their male classmates. For the boys, transforming a bluejeaned teen-age sister into a docile and observant “Muslim” virgin was a rite de passage into authority, the fast track to becoming a man, and more important, a Muslim man…. it was also a license for violence.

Girls who did not conform were excoriated, or chased, or beaten by fanatical young men meting out “Islamic justice.” Sometimes the girls were gang-raped. In 2002, an unveiled Muslim girl in the cite of Vitry-sur-Seine was burned alive by a boy she turned down.

Jane Kramer, Taking the Veil, New Yorker

Despite that 77 percent number, American feminists insist on fighting for “the right” of Muslim women in France and America to wear the veil. They might as well be fighting for the right of women to be barefoot and pregnant, since they are one and the same.

Much as they might eagerly parrot the propaganda of the Muslim Student Association, itself an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, regarding the veil being liberating, the veil is a statement of female submission and degradation. There is nothing feminist about being inferior. The hijab is part of a larger agenda to force Muslims in the West, and even non-Muslims to live under Islamic law. A law which states that women are inferior to men.

In the process apologists for Islam like Karen Armstrong or Noah Feldman misrepresent key Arabic words, for example defining “Awrah” as beauty, or “Zina” as meaning only adultery, or seizing on whatever property Sharia law allowed women to hold as feminist, while completely ignoring the larger issue that women were considered inferior by Mohammed and his men, and are considered inferior under Islamic law today. Not simply in theory, but in fact. A fact that expresses itself in the rapes, beatings and murders of women, both Muslim and non-Muslim, by Muslim men on a regular basis.

Rather than confront the threat to women posed by Islamic law, feminist authors like Naomi Wolf are instead claiming that the wolf is really a misunderstood poodle. They have tried to transform the Hijab into a statement of Muslim feminism, while completing ignoring the fact that the Hijab only exists because Islamic law views all of a woman as obscene and treats the woman’s presence in the public sphere as a source of Fitna and Zina, Discord and Immorality, that incites men to do immoral things, including rape her. Under Islam the woman is a threat to men that can only be rendered safe for men by fully covering her up and keeping her apart from men as much as possible.

Unfortunately Naomi Wolf, like most modern liberal feminists had no interest in defending those women

What does Naomi Wolf think is an urgent issue? Based on her blog, it isn’t women, but Muslim men. Specifically defending the sort of Muslim men who kill women who don’t wear the veil. Wolf’s blog is filled with posts fulminating against Guantanamo Bay and the plight of the Taliban and assorted other Islamists imprisoned there. The same men who if given a chance would have a knife to her neck in minutes.

This spring in Pakistan’s Sindh province alone, 40 honor killings took place. One woman took refuge in a police station, only to be handed over to her brother who killed her. A 14 year old girl was burned to death. Two women had acid poured on them after being raped. Two women had their noses chopped off for violating family honor. The Sindh province had been overrun by the Taliban.

Rather than writing about any of these women, Naomi Wolf instead wrote demanding to know “What Happened to Mohamed al-Hanashi?” Her article describes Mohamed al-Hanashi as “a young man” who could shed light on many crimes. Not the crimes of Islamist terrorists, but the crimes of the US in detaining in Islamist terrorists. At no point in time throughout the article does Naomi Wolf mention that Mohamed al-Hanashi was a member of the Taliban. The same Taliban which mandated complete covering for women, forbade women to be treated by male doctors or to get an education.

In April 2009, Sitara Achakzai, a leading women’s rights activist in Afghanistan, was murdered by the Taliban because she supported rights for women. 3 days later, Naomi Wolf did not write about her. Instead she wrote an article claiming that the American people had “blood on their hands” over Gitmo and demanded that we hold Nuremberg Trials to determine who gave the order to “torture” captured Al Queda and Taliban terrorists in order to gain information about future attacks against America.

Unfortunately Naomi Wolf, like most modern liberal feminists had no interest in defending those women, only in defending their abusers. While women were being murdered by the Taliban, she sweated blood and tears to defend members of the Taliban. Finally in August, Naomi Wolf went to a Muslim country, put on a headscarf and described how it made her feel free. That seems like a reasonable preparation for the sort of environment that Naomi Wolf and much of the feminist movement are helping to create for women in the West.

In 1984 the Party’s slogan is “Slavery is Freedom.” The political use of such an idea is that it is easier to enslave people, if they believe that being enslaved makes them free. It is why every one party Communist dictatorship made sure to call themselves a “Democratic People’s Republic”. It is why the Muslim Brotherhood fronts understand that it will be easier to sell Westerners on subjugation to Islam, if they believe that this subjugation makes them free.

For almost a decade, Wolf and those like her, have been assailing the brave men and women who helped liberate women from the Taliban… while fighting for the Taliban. In the name of freedom of course. The freedom of those who shot up girls’ schools, who threw teachers down staircases and beat women in the streets. Now the Muslim wolf has its snout thrust into half of Europe, into Australia, Canada and America. The honor killings continue to rise. Bodies continue to show up in hospitals and morgues. The bodies of the victims of Islam.

Dhimmicrat Doofuses Head Two Major British Cities

Looks like I've come up with a new term = Dhimmicrat

A Dhimmicrat is a bureaucrat and/or politician that will sell his/her soul and his/her Country for muslim votes/approval. Anyone can be a Dhimwit - but a Dhimmicrat has to belong to one of the preceding groups.

The first person to earn the new title of Dhimmicrat is Doncaster Mayor, Peter Davies, who thinks that we all can learn a thing or two about 'family values' from the Taliban.

"Mr Davies claimed that under the Taliban, Afghanistan had an 'ordered system of family life'.

He said: 'The one thing that can be said about the Taliban is that they do have an ordered society of some sort and that they don't have hundreds of cases of children under threat of abuse from violent parents as we do in Doncaster.'" LINK

First after establishing that this man does indeed live on planet Earth one can only find his lack of knowledge and understanding of the Taliban to be appalling.

I guess he missed the numerous examples of the "ordered family system" like the Taliban intentionally killing schoolchildren riding on a schoolbus, or buying children to turn them into suicide bombers, or spraying girl's faces with acid for their 'crime' of attending school or teaching a boy how to carry out his first beheading (Note: LINK HAS GRAPHIC VIDEO).

I could go on and on but you get the picture = Some of Peter Davies' Taliban family values pictured below:

Also achieving the Dhimmicrat title is London Mayor Boris Johnson:

"London Mayor Boris Johnson today encouraged people to undergo a day of fasting to help understand their 'Muslim neighbour'. He said Muslims in the capital were 'challenging traditional stereotypes' to show they wanted to be part of the mainstream during a visit to the East London Mosque and London Muslim Centre."  LINK

So to follow Boris' logic - we should all become muslims - for a day - because muslims want to become "mainstream" 

What????????!!!!!!! 

How is our fasting and becoming a stereotypical muslim for ONE minute - nevermind longer- helping muslims assimilate or become mainstream??  Isn't his suggestion obviously creating the exact opposite - Islamisation? Yep - Boris is a Dhimmicrat

No wonder British cities are in such trouble  (undoubtedly these are only two of innumerable British dhimmicrats) and no wonder the British people are getting FED UP!

BRITISH MAN STABBED IN "No Go Area" - ANOTHER MEDIA IGNORED MUSLIM HATE CRIME

If you want to know what is really going on with muslims in Britain - don't rely upon the mainstream media to give you an accurate depiction. Nope - you must search the internet blogs (see blog list) and local newspapers as there is one thing you can be sure  - when it comes to muslim crime - particularly muslim hate crime - it WILL consistently be ignored or downplayed by the British top newspapers and their web sites.

Doesn't matter if a murder or assault occurs when the innocent victim is a police officer or elderly man or young boy or young couple or gay man -or if you're a member of the"wrong" political party or if it is a ever growing pattern of rape jihad  (see also here)and faith hate attacks- the only breath of muslim hate crime news that has been and is elicited from the mainstream national media will be the breeze you feel from their collective gape-mouthed yawn.

Even after the7/7 muslim bombing attacks in Britain - the media made muslims out to be the real victims - which was later debunked as the much touted retaliatory hate attacks against muslims never materialised.  In fact - there is evidence that the exact opposite happened.

Only when a muslim hate crime is as egregious as Scotland's horrific Kriss Donald torture and murder does it merit national coverage - 15 year old schoolboy, Kriss Donald - was tortured and killed by muslim gang/men for no other reason than the young lad was white:

"The court had heard that Kriss was jumped on as he walked down a street near his home with a friend. As he was bundled into a car, he screamed: "Why me? I'm only 15." ....His mutilated body was found the next day on a walkway in the east end of the city. The slightly built boy had been beaten, held down and stabbed 13 times, then set on fire while he was still alive. Bleeding to death and burning, he tried to crawl towards the river Clyde but died in a ditch.

A passerby who found his body the following day thought he had stumbled across the carcass of a dead animal. "   LINK

And so it should receive the attention and disgust of all.

But what about the tens - if not hundreds - of other incidents of muslim hate crime that are becoming a routine occurrence in multicuturally enriched Britain? - many chronicled in this blog-

It appears the British government politicians dhimmis along with the increasingly muslimized British police and the compliant media are all in collusion or living in fear of being bludgeoned by the "racist club" thus muslim hate crime is purposely and maliciously kept out of media public view.

Clearly if the situations were reversed, as in the Amar Aslam case - even if the immediate evidence pointed otherwise - the British media (and police) would jump to their preconceived conclusions and portray the beating as a racist "hate" crime by a gang of white men.

Perhaps the entire subject of the publicity and indeed of the muslim hate crime itself is now a moot point as with new jelly-spined Britainistan guidelines - muslims are now given an official pass  - when it comes to being guilty of hate crimes. 

Nevertheless here is another tale of clear muslim hate against the kaffir - and the kaffir pays the price of repeated stab wounds and slashed hands.

Why?

Because he dared to venture into a non-muslim 'no go' zone =  “Manningham belongs to Muslims. We don’t want whites. We rule Bradford. We are going to get you out.”.

Below story found in the local news - of course:

Manningham man shouted racial abuse before attack

9:03am Thursday 20th August 2009

By Steve Wright »

A teenager who stabbed and slashed a passer-by in a racially motivated attack has been locked up for five years.

Amir Rehman, 18, shouted racial abuse as 51-year-old Ronald O’Connor walked to a shop for a loaf of bread, near the gates of Lister Park, Manning-ham, last December.

Leeds Crown Court was told Rehman shouted out: “Manningham belongs to Muslims. We don’t want whites. We rule Bradford. We are going to get you out.”

His frightened victim, Ronald O’Connor, tried to get in the shop, but Rehman ran up and stabbed him twice in the upper arm with a four to five-inch bladed knife.

The court heard that Rehman, of Lumb Lane, Manningham, was describ-ed as in a frenzy, “like a crazy man, out of control,” as he tried to slash Mr O’Connor’s face. The palms of Mr O’Connor’s hands were slashed as he tried to defend himself.

Prosecutor Richard Gioserano said: “Rehman was swinging at him over and over again with the knife. Mr O’Connor was in great pain and in fear, literally, of his life.”

Mr O’Connor ran into the shop. Police were called and Rehman was arrested outside.

Mr O’Connor had surgery at Bradford Royal Infirmary for a deep laceration to his palm. He also suffered lacerations to his fingers and two incisions to his upper arm with apparent nerve damage.

Mr Gioserano said Rehman attended Bradford Crown Court for a preliminary hearing of the case in March, but went straight from court to Pudsey, with two other men, Amar Farooq and Tanveer Hussain, where, later in the day, they committed a series of robberies on children on their way home from school.

During the street muggings some of the youngsters were threatened with being stabbed, though no knife was seen. The court heard that the defendants were clearly drunk.

Jonathan Devlin, for Rehman, said there were no explanations or excuses for the offences other than drink.

All three pleaded guilty to three robberies. Rehman pleaded guilty to wounding with intent in connection with the Manningham incident.

Hussain, 23, of Lumb Lane, Manning-ham, and Farooq, 25, of Agar Street, Girlington, were jailed for 30 months.

Rehman was sent to youth custody for a total of five years.

The judge, Recorder David Bradshaw, told Rehman he had committed an unprovoked attack on an innocent man causing “horrendous” injuries.

He said: “I am satisfied it was accompanied by racial abuse and seemed to have a racial motive.”

Great Britain's NuExtremists = White British People

The NuLabour government proves on a daily basis that they are an  abject failure - their latest descent into absurdity has these idiots now announcing they will no longer look at the exploding  (in every sense of the word)  muslim "community" as the source of extremism within the borders of Britain. Why? - because it "upsets muslims".

NuLabour politicians and policies have pandered, aided and abeted  muslims to such an extent that now muslims "rule the roost" -- so to hide their failure -- Labour is going after the "soft target" of white British people -- the only ones left in the Country that can be insulted, villified, attacked, raped, assaulted killed  and tortured without cries of "racism" emanating from politicos, police, quango-ites, EU syncophants, media, many Christian religious leaders-----and of course muslims. Yep NuLabour is now tracking down the indigenous British ready to bludgeon them will the well worn "'racist' club". Thus the enemy is now anyone who voices disagreement with the NuLabour's infliction of political correctness and even more so their (failed) multicultural policies- brought through unmitigated immigration primarily from muslim countries - upon a populace that neither voted for the mass transformation of their country and/or in most instances - didn't want it.

No-no-no we musn't upset the muslims so the British government has decided to declare war on  those recalcitrant and pesky "terrorists" =  the WHITE BRITISH PEOPLE --  whom I will now refer to as the:

                                               NuExtremists

NuLABOUR GOVERNMENT HAS DEEMED THE ABOVE PEOPLE ARE LIKELY GUILTY OF EXTREMIST BEHAVIOURS

So now British muslims, further emboldened by boot-licking dhimwits, are REFUSING to participate in government programs aimed at tackling muslim extremism!

"Community groups in Bradford have refused to join a Government-funded scheme to prevent violent Islamic extremism because it “victimises” Muslims, it has been claimed.

...According to Nazim Ali" I think the Preventing Violent Extremism agenda was a failure from the start because of the sole focus on Islamic extremism. It is a loaded phrase, and people in Muslim communities recognise that, so there is always going to be a lack of support.” LINK

Victimises??  Tell that to these innocent people - all REAL VICTIMS of muslim- NOT the MYTH of 'NuExtremist' - terrorism.

Article in Full:

We'll ease up on Muslim fanatics

LABOUR slammed the brakes on its war against violent extremism yesterday - amid fears it had upset Muslim voters.

Millions spent preventing Asian kids becoming terrorists will now be used to tackle right-wing racists in WHITE areas.

Community cohesion minister Shahid Malik admitted he was softening his stance because Muslims felt stigmatised.

But a former Labour aide called the move a "dangerous dilution" of the Government's counter-terrorism strategy

Tories branded it a shameless bid to win back Muslim voters who deserted Labour over Iraq and Afghanistan.

More than £45million a year has been spent on measures to prevent Al-Qaeda recruiting young Muslims in the UK.

It included action to break up Islamic ghettos and stop university hate preachers.

But Mr Malik, the first British-born Muslim MP, yesterday unveiled plans to broaden the scope of the campaign.

He announced: "We shall be putting a renewed focus on resisting right-wing racist extremism. We cannot dismiss or underestimate the threat."

Mr Malik told Sky News: "You speak to any  Muslim (any muslim???? like this guy??  added by TheOpinionator)in this country and they are as opposed as you and I are to extremism and terrorism.

"The frustration is they are constantly linked with terrorism as a community as a whole."

His action contrasts with the tough stance of ex-minister Hazel Blears. She broke links with Muslim groups that failed to denounce extremists.

Her adviser Paul Richards said: "The good work by Hazel is being undone in the name of political correctness."

Former shadow home secretary David Davis said: "This has been watered down for purely political reasons. Labour has always seen Muslim voters as its own property."