July 20, 2008

ROAD RAGE/SUDDEN JIHAD LEAVES BRIT WITH MANGLED LEG

What the below article describes as "road rage" could more accurately be described as another incident of muslim rage -called Sudden Jihad Syndrome- against the Kaffir. Sudden Jihad Syndrome is when a normal appearing muslim suddenly erupts into violence (against the kuffar).

In the UK, a muslim man, along with his burka enveloped female companion, left a supermarket and began to leave in a car -only to nearly rear end the car belonging to 55 yr old Keith Fielding. Mr. Fielding courteously pulled over to let the man pass then stopped & exited his car to question the other driver. Fielding was then attacked by the t-shirt wearing bearded muslim man who took a 2 ft long knife and repeatedly slashed Mr. Fielding so many times that the cricketeer's leg needed hours of surgical reconstruction. Whether or not this vicious act of muslim violence against a British man is an example of Sudden Jihad remains to be verified but it does bring up the subject - one that is important for us to review.

The blog - Freedom's Enterprises - has a long list of incidents of Sudden Jihad . Other reputable publications such as the newspaper The Washington Times or Investor's Business Daily have also written about Sudden Jihad. Whereas many examples are from the USA it is clear that this savage behavior is found in all Western Nations.

Thus it appears that the muslim perpetrator is yet another "victim" of the Religion of Peace - a relgion that manages to keep its ardent followers constantly whipped up in a frenzied rage ready to attack, maim or kill the "infidel". Unfortunately muslim apologists prefer to rely upon the "mental illness" excuse for Sudden Jihad which makes one wonder if mental health professionals really believe that followers of the Quran (or Islamic Jihad) are to be considered suffering from a legitimate mental illness and if so why hasn't this position been publicized?

Curiously the apologists (and frequently the media) reaction to incidents of muslim Sudden Jihad have four key elements:

1. Denial that the attack is motivated by Islam;
2. Strong hint that the attacker is insane;
3. Assurance that the attacker(s) acted alone, and that there is no al-Qaeda link;
4. Prominent publicity to the Muslim “community’s” expressions of shock & horror.
Claim that—if the attacker is a Bosnian Muslim—his behavior was caused by the trauma of the 1990s war in which his people were supposedly the victims. (The O -rationalization)

How many times have we seen the above list of rationalizations used to explain or justify muslim violence? Or does the truth lie more in line with Michelle Malkin's post titled "A Random Gallery of 'Lone' Shooters------------------ "IT'S THE JIHAD STUPID!"

entire article:

Man recovers from surgery after road rage horror

by Mark Cowan

A MAN stabbed with a 2ft long knife in a supermarket car park road rage clash was today recovering from surgery to re-construct his leg.

Retired company boss Keith Fielding suffered a deep wound after being slashed in a row on the car park of Asda, Small Heath, at 9.10am yesterday.

Relatives of the avid cricketer, a senior member of Castle Bromwich Cricket Club, said he was attacked after he remonstrated with a man who had roared up behind him on the car park.

The 55-year-old was recovering in hospital as police continued a hunt for his attacker.

His brother-in-law Terry Coton said: “He’d just gone there to do a bit of shopping. He’s always first in the store.

“He was pulling out of a parking bay when this guy came up behind him flashing his lights. As Keith pulled over in the taxi bay to let him past this guy came up behind him.

“Keith got out to ask ‘what’s going on?’ when this man jumped out of the car and hit him with a knife.

“Its hard to take in really. You go down to do a peaceful bit of shopping and this sort of thing happens. It was over something trivial.

“He was in a lot of pain in hospital obviously.

“He has come through the operation all right but he is still heavily sedated. We’re still waiting to hear what they had to do.”

Mr Coton said that Keith had been able to speak to police.

Police said initial witness reports suggested the stabbing followed a row in the car park over the manner of driving but police said they are keeping an open mind over the motive for the attack.

The offender, an Asian man in his late 30s or early 40s, was thought to have been shopping in the store minutes before the incident.

Det Insp Simon Vowles, from Stechford CID, said: “I’d appeal to anyone who witnessed the incident or who has any information to come forward and make contact with us.”

The offender was short and stocky with a full beard and wearing a T-shirt. He was with a woman dressed in a full burka. They are believed to have sped off in a silver saloon car.

July 18, 2008

MUSLIM ARTIST'S VIDEO GAME CHALLENGES PLAYERS TO KILL PRESIDENT BUSH

While the continuous drumbeat of muslim claims regarding the myth of Islamophobia resound in Europe, UK & USA and while cartoons are enough to provoke muslim demonstrations and even killing - we now find a former Iraqi, Wafaa Bilel, who is now a US citizen, producing a video game -under the guise of art - that allows the player to stalk and kill US President George W. Bush. In fact, Mr Bilel appears in the video as a suicide bomber.

Mr. Bilel considers himself a political artist who's subject matter usually deals with political oppression, war and what he calls the "Iraqi experience". He was angered when he was viewed as a victim/spy, post first Gulf War, yet still looked to the USA as the place he aspired to live.  He received entry into the US and began his new life. Thus, this so -called computer based art is developed by a muslim man, who has utilized all the advantages that the USA offers new immigrants to obtain a bachelor's degree from the University of New Mexico and and MFA (Master of Fine Arts) from the School of the Art Institute in Chicago - where he currently resides as a Professor - a Country that clearly has greatly facilitated Bilel's success.

One has to wonder where and how much Wafaa Bilel touts the many liberties he has found in the USA - freedoms that allow him to produce such political "works of art" that would find him maimed or killed in any muslim nation. (also see here) In fact, Bilel had previously been arrested for his artwork by Sadaam Hussein's enforcers.

Or, as it appears, is he twisting the First Amendment to the US Constitution, under the guise of art, to further terrorism, violence and hatred toward the President of the United States and in turn the American people?

For article go to:

ARTIST'S VIDEO GAME CHALLENGES PLAYER TO KILL PRESIDENT

July 13, 2008

MUSLIM TERRORISTS TAKE TOP PRIORITY OVER 7/7 BOMBINGS SURVIVORS

A disturbing story from the British newspapers exposes the fact that 72 survivors of the 7/7 muslim terrorist bombings have, some three years after the bloodbath, still not received the compensation promised them by the NuLabour government. One Labour MP, David Winnick. understates the obvious - that the failure of the NuLabour government to proved the promised compensation to these innocent victims is "unacceptable".

One questions why the government is so slow at helping these people who are casualties of four muslim suicide bombings. Especially as it is clear that the victims suffered severe emotional and physical trauma.

So what has the British government been spending taxpayer's money on - if not on settling its obligation to the victims of the 7/7 bombings? What are the top priorities of the government?  Let's list just a few of the more recent expenditures that the government deemed MORE "important":

UK TAXPAYERS PROVIDE THE "GOOD LIFE" FOR CONVICTED TERRORIST

UK GOVERNMENT GIVES GRANT TO MUSLIM HATE BLOGGERS

BROTHER OF 7/7 BOMBER GETS FREE TRIP TO PAKISTAN (Note that this trip to Pakistan happened just in time for him to attend the July 7, 2008 BIG party celebrating his suicide bombing brother, Shehzad Tanweer, as a martyr - coincidence???)

AL QAEDA "PIPELINE" SUSPECT LIVED ON THE DOLE

BIN LADEN'S "RIGHT HAND MAN" SET FOR LIFE ON BRITISH BENEFITS

CONVICTED TERRORIST FINDS TAXPAYER PAID SAFETY IN THE UK

TERRORISTS NEED THERAPY NOT INCARCERATION

So while the living victims of the 7/7 bombings continue to wait and wait - the NuLabour government's priorities lie with swiftly attending to the needs of muslims hate mongerers and to improving the lives of muslim terrorists.

IT'S ALL A MATTER OF PRIORITIES.

Article in full:

72 Victims Still Waiting for London Bombings Payout

Paul Waugh, Deputy Political Editor
11.07.08

More than 70 victims of the 7/7 bombings are still awaiting full compensation, government figures revealed today.

Labour MP David Winnick branded the failure to sort out the payments more than three years after the atrocities in London as "unacceptable".

His outburst came after he received a Parliamentary answer from Justice Minister Maria Eagle which said that, as of 8 July, the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority still has to finalise compensation to 72 of those injured in the bus and Tube blasts.

A final offer of cash to 18 of the cases has been made and of the remaining 54 active cases, 37 people have either received or been offered only an interim payment, four have been offered final awards but have rejected them, four are suspended and nine are subject to " continuing inquiries", Miss Eagle said.

Mr Winnick told the Evening Standard: "This is totally unacceptable."

On Monday, Mayor Boris Johnson and London Minister Tessa Jowell stood with survivors and victims' families to remember the 52 people killed.

Mr Johnson has written to Ms Jowell asking the Government to ensure the backlog is dealt with immediately.

CICA says £7.5 million has been paid to victims and relatives.

July 06, 2008

POLICE DOGS TO WEAR BOOTIES TO APPEASE MUSLIMS

Well well another ludicrous example of just how far the British government and/or police will stoop in order to pander to muslims.  This latest show of dhimmitude was most likely prompted by muslims declaring that airport police "sniffer" dogs are unclean and demanding that the dogs must not touch the robes of muslims - as described in a recent TheO post "Muslims Offended by Sniffer Dogs". - as well as the even more absurd muslim outrage over a police placard advertising a new non-emergency phone number - muslims were angry that an adorable German Shepherd puppy, a police dog in training, was pictured - the police response was an instant "dhimmi-apology"-of course. (TheO post explains all in Another Case of the Tail Wagging the Dog)

Now looks like the police have at least a semi-solution in their quest to appease muslim dog outrage. Police dogs are now being fitted with booties so those muslim perceived "unclean" police dogs will not leave dog footprints and scent when used to check for bombs, etc in mosques and muslim homes. 

Get that?? Dogs checking for BOMBS (one would believe that there has to be at least a suspicion that bombs are present) - and our police's top concern is all about appeasing muslims. To think that highly trained dogs, risking their lives to save people from being blown apart are "offensive" -as muslims do - is an insult to not only these hardworking animals but also against the majority of British people who reside in the most "dog friendly" country in the world - or at least it USED to be before muslim "offense" and appeasement became top priority.

Oh - by the way- looks like muslims, as with so many other "offenses", also pick and choose on the dog issue --- predominately muslim Egypt uses police sniffer dogs at their Cairo airport (presumably without booties) - recently one of these dogs sniffed out snakes and reptiles being illegally smuggled out of the country by--guess who. Read story here.

Entire article:

SNIFFER DOGS TO WEAR MUSLIM "BOOTIES"

BY STUART MacDonald

Police sniffer dogs will have to wear bootees when searching the homes of Muslims so as not to cause offence.

Guidelines being drawn up by the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) urge awareness of religious sensitivities when using dogs to search for drugs and explosives. The guidelines, to be published this year, were designed to cover mosques but have been extended to include other buildings.

Where Muslims object, officers will be obliged to use sniffer dogs only in exceptional cases. Where dogs are used, they will have to wear bootees with rubber soles. “We are trying to ensure that police forces are aware of sensitivities that people can have with the dogs to make sure they are not going against any religious or cultural element within people’s homes. It is being addressed and forces are working towards doing it,” Acpo said.

Problems faced by the use of sniffer dogs were highlighted last week when Tayside police were forced to apologise for a crime prevention poster featuring a german shepherd puppy, in response to a complaint by a Muslim councillor.

Islamic injunctions warn Muslims against contact with dogs, which are regarded as “unclean”.

Police dogs at present are issued with footwear only at scenes of explosions to prevent them injuring their paws on broken glass.

Ibrahim Mogra, one of Britain’s leading imams, said the measures were unnecessary: “In Islamic law the dog is not regarded as impure, only its saliva is. Most Islamic schools of law agree on that. If security measures require to send a dog into a house, then it has to be done. I think Acpo needs to consult better and more widely.

“I know in the Muslim community there is a hang-up against dogs, but this is cultural. Also, we know the British like dogs; we Muslims should do our bit to change our attitudes.”

John Midgley, co-founder of the Campaign Against Political Correctness, said: “The police are in effect being overly sensitive to potential criminals and not being sensitive enough to the public at large who need to be protected. These sort of things have a counter-productive effect because they cause huge friction between different communities.”

Caroline Kisko, of the Kennel Club, said: “We would not condone any attempt to make search dogs wear special clothing, which could cause them distress.”

June 30, 2008

MUSLIM DOCTORS BETRAY FORCED MARRAIGE VICTIMS

The NuLabour governments has actively recruited many muslims to fill National Health Service (particularly medical doctors) and other goverment jobs. All this is occurring despite continual instances of national safety & health concerns regarding muslims - showing that such policies should be implemented with great care - Such as (to cite a few examples):

45 UK doctors plot terror attacks against USA

UK Muslim Doctor's Association Exposes They Only Care About Muslims

Doctor pleads guilty in Glasgow Airport attack

UK Muslim medical workers refuse to follow hygiene rules causing Superbug threat to patients

Now comes proof that muslim medical doctors along with other members of the hospital and medical staff and people in other goverment postitions such as Job Centers are betraying muslim women hiding from abusive families and forced marriages. These employees are breaching confidentiality rules by using the central computer information to give address and other information to the families and people these women are hiding from. Doctors have given birth control information over to the muslim women's male relatives knowing she will be punished. Thus these unethical government employees are purposely "outing" women who are hiding, often in fear of their lives/"honour" killings. This collusion has place many muslim women in serious harm's way and shows that muslim allegiances more often than not lies in Sharia Law NOT in the British institutions where they work or in British law.

"Doctors and Job Centre workers are breaching confidentiality rules and passing on vital information to families, allowing them to trace and punish Asian women who are attempting to escape coerced marriages and "honour"-based domestic violence. ......Doctors and Job Centre workers are breaching confidentiality rules and passing on vital information to families, allowing them to trace and punish Asian women who are attempting to escape coerced marriages and "honour"-based domestic violence.

As the police, in many British cities and towns, are actively recruiting more and more muslims to become police officers saying this will help combat the (myth of) Islamophobia and better represent the community - we find that muslim girl's, hiding and living in fear of their families, avoid telling the police of their plight as so often the women have been brought back to the abusive families by - the police!

"Shahien Taj, director of the Cardiff-based women's group The Henna Foundation, said: "Recently I had a case in Birmingham of a woman who said she can't trust the police because nine times she had run away and nine times the police returned her to her family where she got abused. Fortunately ACPO are now addressing this kind of problem openly and trying to do something about it.In another case, reported to a women's group, a Chief Inspector offered to help a family track down a girl who fled a forced marriage. Zalikha Ahmed, director of the South Yorkshire based women's refuge Apna Haq, said: "We have to be careful with the police, especially the Asian ones. We don't visit the station where certain Asian officers are on because some of them are perpetrators and one of them on the record said he would not arrest someone who used force on his wife."

Indeed the National Health Service and ALL jobs with access to personal information and public safety must immediately fire ANY employee who misuses their job or data to aid and abet Sharia Law in the UK. Steps must be taken to insure future hirees do not misuse their positions. It is a matter of life and death.

full article:

FORCED MARRIAGE VICTIMS BEING BETRAYED BY DOCTORS

By Patrick Sawer

Young women fleeing forced marriages are being betrayed by GPs and benefits staff who "collude" with families to return them against their will, a senior police officer police has revealed.

Doctors and Job Centre workers are breaching confidentiality rules and passing on vital information to families, allowing them to trace and punish Asian women who are attempting to escape coerced marriages and "honour"-based domestic violence.

Commander Steve Allen, who is the spokesman on forced marriages for Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), revealed that some doctors have informed girls' families that they have asked for the contraceptive pill, placing them at risk from fathers or brothers who believe this means the family's honour has been besmirched.

Cmdr Allen also told The Sunday Telegraph that Job Centre workers have accessed the National Insurance details of women who flee violent husbands, tracing where they collect benefits and passing the details on to their families so they can be found and forced back to their marital home.

In one case the family of an 18-year-old Pakistani woman attempted to kidnap her from a south London Job Centre after being tipped off by a member of staff. The plot was only foiled because her boyfriend intervened.

Cmdr Allen, of the Metropolitan Police, said: "GPs will tell fathers their daughter has seen them and is on the pill. That can get a girl killed. Public sector employees will pass on to a family member an individual's National Insurance number knowing it can be used to trace their new whereabouts around the country.

"There is collusion by certain public servants and people in a position of authority, such as doctors, which supports these offences. It means many victims don't have the faith or the trust to be able to report their situation."

Cmdr Allen revealed the problem is compounded by some police offices treating women fleeing a forced marriage as 'teenage runaways' and returning them to their families – unwittingly placing them in danger. This has led to a breakdown of trust in some areas, with young Asian girls scared to tell the police of their plight for fear their families will be told.

He also said that in some Asian communities women do not trust the police because they suspect local officers will inform their families if they attempt to flee a forced marriage. ACPO is now taking urgent steps to address the problem by increased training for officers in how to deal with cases.

Cmdr Allen's warnings come in advance of a European-wide campaign against forced marriages and honour-violence being launched tomorrow (Mon).

The campaign, backed by ACPO, will work with women and young people in Asian communities to highlight the problem and produce information material for victims who need help.

Shahien Taj, director of the Cardiff-based women's group The Henna Foundation, said: "Recently I had a case in Birmingham of a woman who said she can't trust the police because nine times she had run away and nine times the police returned her to her family where she got abused. Fortunately ACPO are now addressing this kind of problem openly and trying to do something about it."

In another case, reported to a women's group, a Chief Inspector offered to help a family track down a girl who fled a forced marriage.

Zalikha Ahmed, director of the South Yorkshire based women's refuge Apna Haq, said: "We have to be careful with the police, especially the Asian ones. We don't visit the station where certain Asian officers are on because some of them are perpetrators and one of them on the record said he would not arrest someone who used force on his wife."

The 500 cases of forced marriage currently known to the authorities are only a tiny proportion of the numbers of young girls and even men suspected of being forced to marry against their will.

Every week one British citizen has to be rescued from Pakistan alone by the Foreign and Commonwealth's Forced Marriages Unit.

Cmdr Allen said such marriages result in years of assault and rape, psychological and emotional abuse for the victim, sometimes culminating in kidnapping and even murder when they try to flee.

Citing the case of 19-year-old Rukhsana Naz, a 19-year-old Derby girl killed by her mother and brother after she became pregnant from her childhood sweetheart, he said: "I would never have believed that a mother could hold down her pregnant daughter while her brother strangled her because she was carrying the child of a man she should not have been seeing."

But senior officers admit that despite the horror of such cases they face widespread complacency over the issue among certain police forces.

Cmdr Allen said: "We have too many areas where people don't believe this is an issue for them. But we are seeing situations across the country where victims, who are at extreme risk, are being moved to another part of the country, away from their home towns, by their families.

"We also are talking here about bounty hunters and professional killers being used to track down relatives and these people are going to be killed. This is about child protection, human rights and young people having their lives destroyed and all too often being murdered because they dared to love with their heart."

June 29, 2008

ST GEORGE'S DAY PARADE AXED FOR SECOND TIME

It should come as no surprise that after previously dashing months of preparation and disappointing hundreds of local children and adults who had prepared to be in the "first" planned St George's Day Parade, axed last April by the city council- that the post-dated parade has also been cancelled. The first parade, scheduled to appropriately occur on St George's Day, was stopped by hugely suspicious "official" excuses of "health and safety" concerns when in actuality it was concern for the muslim community that was placed at a higher priority, by Bradford city officials, than the traditional English parade.  But an even more precise reason was soon apparent = muslim violence = " because the authorities fear it could spark race riots...... council bosses in Bradford, West Yorks, have ditched the event over concerns it could upset the Asian community, many of them Muslim."

I wrote about this travesty - you can read it here: UK ST GEORGE PARADE SCRAPPED

So why is the 2nd promised post-dated parade now defunct? According to the article:

"The announcement was met with anger and disbelief, and in a bid to pour oil over troubled waters an alternate date of July 1 was proposed. Now this second choice has also been pulled.

Vicar of Girlington, Reverend Tony Tooby, said: “They told us they were going to hold it on July 1 instead, but they have cancelled that.

“I thought they would cancel it, they just held it out as an olive branch to try and shut us up. The reality is the support for the event had gone because the sponsors lost interest.”

Guess the "powers that be" think that having a St. George's Day Parade on a date other than St. George's Day is rather silly - but wasn't that the point of moving the date -to begin with? Regardless of the latest faux reason yet another show of English pride has been banned from the streets of Great Britain. Guess dhimmi officials feel far safer with the March for Mohammed.

Notice how latest story has "rewritten history" - go to NOW SECOND PARADE IS ABANDONED

June 27, 2008

MUSLIMS OFFENDED BY SNIFFER DOGS

Looks like we now have another item to add to our ever growing LONG list of THINGS THAT OFFEND MUSLIMS.

Muslims, in Great Britain, are complaining that police "sniffer" dogs - used to detect bombs, drugs and.....terrorists are against Islam. That these valued members of the police and military - who undoubtedly have saved thousands of lives through their training - are considered "dirty" by muslims. (Let's not profile here but just who have been the terrorists of late?) So these "British" muslims do not want these filthy police dogs sniffing their sacred muslim robes. Yes - NO touching of muslims by dogs is the demand. Of course to abide by this demand would adversely affect the highly trained dogs from doing their jobs. Muslims say dogs sniffing their luggage is fine but absolutely no smelling the muslim passengers/people.

But it would appear that muslims have a habit of "picking and choosing" just what "unclean" dogs they will or won't let defile their muslim bodies (& cars). For instance, service dogs used as guides for the blind and many other life saving reasons - are too unclean to sit in muslim taxis - in fact muslim taxi drivers have been know to leave blind passengers stranded because they had a guide dog. At least, for now in the UK, disability seems to trump muslims distaste for service dogs and the law has been changed accordingly.

Whereas helpful dogs seem haram to muslims -the heinous act of dogfighting  has become rampant in England - with the majority of perpetrators being muslim. Helpless dogs, often puppies, have been seized upon by vile dogfighting muslim groups and raised to be forced into excessive breeding, fighting and eventual death. Clearly these despicable, barbaric acts involve muslims touching their four legged victims - but apparently it is OK to touch dogs as long as the dogs are being tortured, maimed and killed - all for "sport".  Says alot doesn't it? For recent instances of muslim individuals and group involvement in dogfighting go here  and here  and here.

Of course - to add to what is obviously a confusing relationship of muslims and dogs we also had the recent example of a dead dog being worth 15 child brides. Does this tell us that muslim little girls are even lower, on the muslim caste scale, than dogs? I'll leave the answer to that question up to the reader.

Getting back to muslims considering themselves "no sniff" zones when it comes to police dogs, I agree with the critics who say this is yet another example of muslims using their religion to force Islam into British laws and culture. Let's hope that the often softheaded dhimmi British judges, who will likely be called upon to rule on some future lawsuit regarding this issue, agree with Tory MP Philip Davies:

“As far as I am concerned, everyone should be treated equally in the face of the law and we cannot have people of different religious groups laying the law down. I hope the police will go about their business as they would do normally.”

Article in full:

SNIFFER DOGS OFFEND MUSLIMS

POLICE sniffer dogs trained to spot terrorists at railway stations may no longer come into contact with Muslim passengers – after complaints that it is against the suspects’ religion.

A report for the Transport Department has raised the prospect that the animals should only touch passengers’ luggage because it is considered “more acceptable”.

In the Muslim faith, dogs are deemed to be spiritually “unclean”. But banning them from touching passengers would severely restrict their ability to do their job.

The report follows trials of station security measures in the wake of the 2005 London suicide bomb attacks. In one trial, some female Muslims said the use of a body scanner was also unacceptable because it was tantamount to being forced to strip.

British Transport Police last night insisted it would still use sniffer dogs – which are trained to detect explosives – with any passengers regardless of faith, but handlers would remain aware of “cultural sensitivities”.

Critics said the complaints were just the latest example of minority religions trying to force their rules and morals on British society.

Tory MP Philip Davies said: “As far as I am concerned, everyone should be treated equally in the face of the law and we cannot have people of different religious groups laying the law down. I hope the police will go about their business as they would do normally.”

News of the security setback came as the Government yesterday admitted that installing 100 per cent airport-style screening at rail and Tube stations was “not feasible”.

June 25, 2008

ISLAM & THE MYTH OF MULTICULTURALISM

Clearly the European Union and more specifically the UK government have for decades proceeded on a course of social engineering and indigenous cultural suicide through multiculturalism. This has been done through no democratic vote of the British people but by the stealth elitists changing laws, discouraging British ethic pride,  encouraging rampant immigration into and across UK/European countries and by embellishing the immigrant cultures. Also used as a tool is vehemently enforced political correctness which greatly punishes anyone who voices or writes their disagreement with multiculturalism OR expressed overt pride in their British history and culture. The anti-thesis of multiculturalism is moral, religous and cultural solidarity.

It is hard to say if multiculturalism is the tool that has caused the imposition of the muslim culture on the British people OR if the proponents of Islam played a major role in the root cause or impetus of and behind the derisive multiculturalism - regardless the end effect has often proven deleterious to the British people and culture. One only has to read their daily newspaper to see constant changes in British society to embrace - in fact - to embellish the muslim culture over that of the British heritage. Yet, though said with bold "forked tongue" the UK politicians still tell us that they want enculturation or assimilation of the muslim population into the Western world. They spout rhetoric telling us that second and third generations will become more British and less "muslim" citing "Britishness" is to be re-emphasized to fit the Nu Great Britain. Yet the exact opposite is occurring.  Islam refuses to change and its youth often face death for turning to western ways. The government in turn have chosen to act more like dhimmis.

Now comes yet another of what is really going on in the muslim community. Muslims imams are adding roadblocks to the westernization of muslim women. These women are now being told that they must NOT marry non-muslim Western men. Obviously the imams want to keep their women for muslim-only procreation and thus the progeny of these marriages will remain under the control of Islam and Sharia law not western/British governments. Yet another fact showing us that what is occurring in Great Britain and Europe is muslim colonization NOT the assimilation of the rapidly growing muslim population.

For article go to here

June 18, 2008

DISABLED ELDERLY MAN LATEST VICTIM OF BRITAIN'S "STREET JIHAD"

A 73 year old disabled pensioner was brutally attacked, outside his own home, and beaten by a young muslim man. The plucky Ray Mills had gone outside to see why a group of 10 teens were throwing stones at his home  (clearly provoking him to do so) and to tell them to stop.  Undoubtedly he is from a former British mindset where such requests might be met with a few retorts from the youths but not a life threatening beating.

Mr Mills, who normally uses crutches, was coldcocked from behind by one of the teens thus leaving him vulnerable to the heinous actions of a cowardly muslim youth who proceeded to beat the elderly man with a brick. Mr. Mills was beaten unconscious and was hospitalized for two days where he received brain scans. He suffered numerous contusions and abrasions and may also have damage to his vision from the merciless beating.   All the youths fled when neighbours came to the elderly man's assistance.

One cannot help but compare this incident to that of a 67 yr old man in Bradford who died  (note the BBC's typical "extensive coverage of the death) from injuries received also at the hand of muslim "youths". Police believe "the pensioner became involved in a confrontation with a group of Asian youths and was then assaulted". (Undoubtedly there are more such incidences of elderly being assaulted and harmed by muslim gangs or individuals but more often then not the media appear to purposely obscure the assailants identity - see above BBC for typical example.) At even more risk are British youngsters who also seem to be purposely marked for violence by muslim gangs. See herehere - here and here for a few recent examples.

Well, welcome to Jolly NU England where the elderly and young are seen as vulnerable prime prey for mounting muslim violence - what I refer to as Street Jihad. This predatory behaviour, clearly a form of hate crimes and elder abuse   must be stopped and stopped NOW - otherwise the British elderly and youngsters face the continuing threat of being seen as little more than an avenue for vile, hate-filled acts by cowardly muslim thugs.

As an aside - look what this elderly ex-British cop, who worked with Oldham's Bangladeshi community as a police officer patrolling Westwood and Coldhurst for 15 years, is doing for the Bangladeshi muslim community - one wonders if he would be safe cycling in Great Britain.....

entire article - for pictures go to link in title:

Have A Go OAP Beaten by Gang

A DISABLED pensioner was battered unconscious with a brick after he went to confront a gang of stone-throwing teenagers.

Ray Mills, aged 73, took on the 10-strong crowd outside his Birmingham home and was knocked to the floor by one of them.

The retired welder, who walks on crutches, is waiting for tests on his eye to see whether his sight has been damaged and has undergone brain scans in hospital.

As he recovered at his Stechford Road home today, he condemned the thugs and said: “I’m in terrible pain.”

He hoped that the shocking pictures of his injuries would strike the conscience of the hooligans – understood to include both boys and girls – and result in them contacting police.

“I can’t believe what they did to me – it’s like a bad dream,” said Mr Mills.

“All I did was ask them why they had been throwing stones and one of them went for me.

“If I’d had my crutches with me and I knew it was coming, I’d have defended myself but one of them whacked me without any warning and the next thing I remember is waking up in the house.

“I’m pretty sure he had something like a brick in his hand.

“I’m in terrible pain and I’ll have to go back to the hospital for more scans and X-rays, but I’m most worried about my sight because I rely on my car to get about.”

The attack happened at about 3pm on Friday.

Mr Mills, said he had been upstairs when he spotted the gang hurling rocks and stones at the house where he has lived with his wife, Enid, aged 73, for 51 years.

After shouting from the window, he went to the front of the house where he came face to face with the teenagers and asked: “Why?”

The thug who attacked the pensioner is described as being Asian and 14-16. He was wearing a black baseball cap and a black jacket with white piping on the chest.

Mr Mills was hit to the left side of his face and fell against a neighbour’s garden wall before the mob of seven boys and three girls fled towards Washwood Heath Technology College, chased away by neighbours.

The pensioner was taken to Heartlands Hospital where he spent two days before being released.

Mr Mills, who has one daughter, Julie, aged 40, said: “I did the same as anybody else would do if someone was throwing stones at their house.

“There’s nothing I can say about the person who did this to me that would be fit to print but I can’t believe that people act in this way.

“I’ve been punched a couple of times in my life and the injury was nothing like this.”

Julie, from Polesworth, Staffordshire, added: “I shouldn’t have to see my dad like this and if anybody has got a conscience they will come forward.”

Police said they will interview neighbours in a bid to catch the attacker.

Insp Dale Speed from Stechford Police Station said: “This was an alarming attack, regardless of the motive but it is not part of a pattern of crime in the area.”

Anybody with information is asked to contact police on 0845 113 5000.

MUSLIM "LYRICAL TERRORIST" GOES FREE - WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO STAY CONVICTED IN THE UK?

One has to wonder just what DOES it take to qualify to be considered a terrorist and stay convicted under Britain's Terrorism Act. The "Lyrical Terrorist" Samina Malik had previously been convicted, under the act, having been found with materials that could be used in the conducting or planning of an act of terrorism. Yesterday under appeal - her conviction was overturned.

So clearly what the court is now saying is that the below acts, committed by Ms Malik, do not constitute "collecting information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.":

-Malik wrote extremist poems praising Osama Bin Laden on the back of till receipts while working at W H Smith at Heathrow Airport. In one poem, called The Living Martyrs, she called for Muslims to rise up against the infidels and she wrote and "instructional poem" How To Behead where she warned that the victim should be bound and blindfolded.

-Malik possessed a number of documents related to terrorism including the al Qaida Manual, the Terrorist's Handbook and the Mujahideen Poisons Handbook.

-Malik was a member of an extremist group linked to Omar Bakri Mohammed, a UK muslim preacher who spouted hate of non-muslims and fled to Lebanon from Britain three years ago.

-Malik had a profile on the social networking website Hi-5, where she called for the execution of 'depraved' Westerners.

-Malik, a British-born Muslim, listed her interests as helping the Mujahideen 'in any way I can'.

It would seem to me that surely the above list would be legitimate reasons to consider that Ms. Malik was undoubtedly acting in a manner and collecting information that would be used in inciting/preparing and committing an act of terrorism.

It should also be noted that "Earlier this year five Muslim men had their convictions quashed after the Appeal Court ruled that possessing Islamist videos and downloading jihadi propaganda did not constitute terrorist offences."

According to the article Ms Malik " was not in court yesterday when the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, sitting in the Court of Appeal with Mr Justice Goldring and Mr Justice Plender, said: 'We consider that there is a very real danger that the (previous) jury became confused and that the prosecution have rightly conceded that this conviction is unsafe.'

Thus - like the 5 muslims men mentioned above - Ms Malik's prior conviction was overturned.  The Appeals Court use of the term "the conviction is unsafe" is particularly ironic as those who are now really unsafe are the British people whose judicial system clearly refuses to convict terrorists & keep them convicted. Thus these courts refuse to keep the British people out of harm's way.

Partial article below - link to article in title:

First woman to be found guilty under Terrorism Act has her conviction quashed

By Lucy Ballinger
Last updated at 11:24 PM on 17th June 2008

Samina Malik

Samina Malik, who called herself the 'Lyrical Terrorist', won her appeal against conviction

An airport  worker who wrote poems about beheadings and dubbed herself a 'lyrical terrorist' had her conviction for terrorist crimes quashed yesterday.

Samina Malik was the first woman to be convicted under the Terrorism Act after she was found guilty of collecting information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.

The 24-year-old's successful appeal is another severe blow to the government's anti-terror legislation.

Earlier this year five Muslims had their convictions quashed after the Appeal Court ruled that possessing Islamist videos and downloading jihadi propaganda did not constitute terrorist offences.

Malik's case was one reviewed after the hearing.

She wrote extremist poems praising Osama Bin Laden on the back of till receipts while working at W H Smith at Heathrow Airport, and possessed a number of documents related to terrorism including the al Qaida Manual, the Terrorist's Handbook and the Mujahideen Poisons Handbook.

The Crown Prosecution Service conceded the conviction was unsafe and last night said it would not seek a retrial.