TheOPINIONATOR

UK Labour Government To Make British Tax Law ---> Sharia compliant

Clearly the dhimmified Labour government will not be content until all the British people are living under sharia law. How can anyone feel anything but contempt for these traitors?  Supposedly a 'snap' election is coming -none too soon: 

"While May 6 remains the likely general election date, Labour’s recent bounce in the polls has meant that party chiefs are now preparing for an early March 25 poll.>....Labour headquarters are accelerating the process of selecting parliamentary candidates, with bosses set to take new powers in the new year to parachute party loyalists into winnable seats."     SOURCE

I have a better idea = anyone who is stupid enough to vote Labour should be promptly boarded on a plane and air dropped into Saudi Arabia - parachutes optional.

Fans of PM Gordon Brown?

SHARIA LAW SNEAKED INTO LABOUR BUDGET

THE Treasury plans to rewrite Britain’s tax rules to usher in a new wave of Sharia law for the country’s financial system.

The one-line revelation is buried in the 212-page pre-Budget report.

It is among a string of startling details which barely merit a mention in Alistair Darling’s controversial mini-Budget – prompting fresh accusations that Labour is “burying bad news”.

The Government wants to tap into the fast-growing Sharia finance market, set to top £205billion a year, and turn London into the “global gateway for Islamic finance”.

Many conventional financial products are not Sharia compliant because Muslim clerics view conventional loans, which involve interest payments, as sinful.

The UK Government was one of the first Western countries to issue a state-backed sukuk, an Islamic bond. It now wants to rewrite tax laws to stop Muslim businessmen being unfairly taxed when they try to raise money on their companies.

Conventional loans allow them to take equity out of their business, using the property as collateral, but to be Sharia compliant a Muslim “sells” the business to the bank and then rents it back. That leaves the businessman facing a bill for capital gains tax and the Treasury wants to level the tax playing field.

Mohammed Amin, head of Islamic finance at PricewaterhouseCoopers, said: “The UK has become the leading Western country in Islamic finance by taking a series of measures to ensure that Islamic finance is taxed no worse and no better than conventional finance.

“The pre-Budget report continues this progress by including measures to equalise the tax treatment of property refinancing transactions.” Ministers are also considering issuing Government bonds to Islamic banks to help them comply with new financial regulations.

With three independent Islamic banks and high street names at the forefront of compliant accounts, London is one of the world’s largest centres for Islamic finance.

Sharia-compliant mortgages, car insurance and even baby bonds are available for Muslims wanting to avoid “riba” – interest payments.

Supporters say the Government is wisely getting in on the ground floor of a market which could net the City billions in the future.

Critics warn Labour is rushing into a financial system it does not fully understand and question how far laws should be rewritten to accommodate Islamic practices. The Financial Services Authority says its policy is one of “no obstacles, no special favours” for Islamic finance.

Last week’s pre-Budget report includes the revelation that bankers will still net £4.5billion in bonuses this year despite the so-called super-tax on the City.

Ministers also used the cover of the report to admit the Homeowner Mortgage Support Scheme, permitting deferment of interest payments, has been an abject failure.

Shadow Housing Minister Grant Shapps said: “It’s gone the way of many other Brown initiatives. We’ve stumped up for the expensive consultancy bills but the actual scheme has failed to help more than a handful of hard-pressed families.”

A Communities and Local Government spokeswoman said: “The Government has widely publicised that fortunately only 15 families have so far needed the backstop help of the Homeowner Mortgage Support Scheme.”

Muslim Pedophile Rape Gang Arrested in Rotherham

The despicable muslim Rape Jihad continues in Britain.  Once again young, vulnerable white British girls are plundered like war booty by muslim men. For that is just what this girls are = war booty = as muslims continue their invasion and colonisation of Great Britain bringing with them their contempt for the Western world and it's indigenous people, culture and customs - particularly women and girls.

The government and social policies of multiculturalism and appeasement have given muslims a sense of entitlement to all things British - from sponging off taxpayer paid benefits to establishing no-go areas for white British to the rampant raping and beating of British women and children. Meanwhile the police and courts continue to coddle muslims whilst the media keeps muslim criminals identities frequently out of the front pages of national newspapers. Search for muslim rape or rape jihad in the blogosphere - and the truth about muslim crime quickly becomes glaringly evident.

I (and many other bloggers) have written extensively about the muslim rape of British women and children - and yes - even men.

A small sampling:

THE MUSLIM RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE OF BRITISH GIRLS

WORSE than a "pack of animals" - 3 Muslim Men Jailed for Rape of 16 yr old British girl

Muslim Millionaire Pedophiles Buying British Little Girls for Sex

MUSLIM MEN RAPE FOUR BRITISH SCHOOLGIRLS AT AMUSEMENT PARK

UK EPIDEMIC - MUSLIM TAXI DRIVERS RAPING BRITISH GIRLS & WOMEN

MUSLIM MAN KIDNAPS 14 YR OLD BRITISH GIRL FOR SEX

THE BEAT GOES ON ----- MUSLIM ATTACKS ON BRITISH WOMEN

JAILED PEDOPHILE CONVERTS TO ISLAM

MUSLIM PEDOPHILES RAPE UK TAXPAYERS

Once again:

Whilst dhimmi judges act the role of apologists for muslim criminals

MUSLIM MEN ARE RAPING OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN 

Whilst dhimmi police play hijab dress-up and coddle muslims

MUSLIM MEN ARE RAPING OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN

Whilst politicians are cajoling and paying for muslim votes

MUSLIM MEN ARE RAPING OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN

Whilst the media continues to hide muslim crime/criminals (see below)

MUSLIM MEN ARE RAPING OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN

Whilst church leaders embrace the muslim invasion and exploitation of the British people

MUSLIM MEN ARE RAPING OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN

Obviously the feckless British police - as shown by their persistent refusal to publicly condemn & swiftly deal with such actions, are happy to continue to keep quiet about (gangs of) muslim pedophile's exploitation and rape of young girls - under the guise of "community cohesiveness".

The media are also consistently to blame as this current story - below - is allowed to remain (hidden) local news rather than national. I addressed this national cover-up of muslim rapes in my blog British women pay high price for multiculturalism.

It is time for this insanity to STOP and for the British people to protect their own as clearly they cannot rely upon the 'powers that be' to do so for them.

Article in full:

Eight men charged with sexual offences

 

Eight men are due in court this morning, charged in connection with a police investigation into alleged serious sexual offences in Rotherham.

 

The men were all arrested in March this year and had been on police bail until yesterday.

Following consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service, all eight were charged yesterday with a total of 18 sexual offences against four girls aged 13 to 17 years, and remanded in custody.

The men due before Rotherham magistrates this morning are:

Shazad Akbar, aged 22, of Shirecliffe Lane, Shirecliffe, Sheffield, charged with raping a woman aged over 16;

Adil Hussain, 20, of Nelson Street, Rotherham town centre, charged with raping a girl aged 13 to 15;

Saeed Hussain, 28, of Hatherley Road, Eastwood, Rotherham, charged with inciting a girl aged 13 to 15 to engage in sexual activity;

Shaizaad Hussain, 21, of Clough Road, Masborough, Rotherham, charged with two offences of raping a girl aged 13 to 15;

Mohsin Khan, 21, of Haworth Crescent, Moorgate, Rotherham, charged with four offences of raping a girl aged 13 to 15, and one offence of rape of a woman aged over 16;

Zafran Ramzan, 21, of Broom Grove, Broom, Rotherham, charged with three offences of rape of a woman aged over 16, and one offence of raping a girl aged 13 to 15;

Razwan Razaq, 29, of Oxford Street, Clifton, Rotherham, charged with two offences of rape of a girl aged 13 to 15;

Umar Razaq, 23, of Oxford Street, Clifton, Rotherham, charged with raping a woman aged over 16 and engaging in sexual activity with a girl aged 13 to 15.

A ninth man arrested was subsequently released without charge.

 

Colorado Sheriff's Joke Causes Muslim Woman's 'hurt feelings'

Some quick comments:

Oh here we go again - a poor muslim suffering from hurt feelings - oh the inhumanity of it all!!!!!  Now a voluntary Christmas tree trimming party is "politically incorrect" and Larimer County Sheriff Jim Alderden's joke has caused hurt feelings to a muslim woman who chooses to remain unnamed!

You know what I think is politically incorrect? - having people come into or live in the USA (or Great Britain or any other Christian nation) and tell us our Judeo/Christian traditions are 'politically incorrect' then go on to force our public schools and buildings to be rebuilt to accomodate their medieval religion/customs with footbaths, special toilets they can squat on, separate swimming/pool times for boys/men and girls/women, halal meals, and prayer rooms that are quickly turned into mosques thus no other faith can use it - otherwise the room are defiled- etc etc/ 

Then this woman goes on to spout the typical, over-used twaddle:

"We can't let our religion be hijacked by extremists," she said.

Oh really??

Why there are 1.5 BILLION  muslims in the world  including the supposedly small number of extremists - so the extremists are clearly outnumbered by moderate muslims therefore why don't the moderates eradicate those who do not represent them and threaten their countries and people? - those who cause bloodshed and terrorism?  Instead these "mainstream" muslims trot out the above statement (or facsimile) as some kind of shield that protects them from the truth & reality.  Ask a muslim man or woman the above question and don't hold your breath waiting for an answer.

Especially when the true feelings of many muslims is voiced again by this unnamed 'volunteer" who also suffers from unverified "threats" (from who??) :

 "an elected official jesting about the killing of Muslims goes beyond politically incorrect."

Surely US Marines helping to eliminate the "muslim extremists" would be welcome by 'moderate' muslims who are angry these 'extremists' are "hyjacking their religion & killing their people". 

But no - they/she view them as one of her own = muslim............

So which one is it?

Hear the doublespeak?

Sheriff's Muslim jokes draw concerns

Article:

A volunteer for the nonprofit Muslims Against Hunger group is not upset Larimer County Sheriff Jim Alderden plans to hold a Christmas tree-trimming party - an event Alderden proudly calls politically incorrect.

But the woman, a Muslim who lives in Northern Colorado, is concerned about a comment Alderden made while giving a speech at a Marine Corps Ball last month. The sheriff briefly posted a transcript of the speech on his Web site.

In the speech, Alderden joked about bumper stickers and highlighted one which read, "U.S. Marines: Travel agents to Allah."

The speech has been removed from the sheriff's Web site, and he declined to comment about the speech.

9NEWS also asked a dozen former Marines who heard his speech for their thoughts. None of them wanted to be quoted.

The woman, whose name is not being published because she has received threats, said an elected official jesting about the killing of Muslims goes beyond politically incorrect.

"Anytime you put someone down, whether it's for religion or race or anything, it doesn't just hurt the individual, it actually hurts the community where we live, and it's really not time to start doing things like this," she said.

The Muslim-American community contributes much to society, she said, and she also pointed out Muslim-American soldiers have died in the current wars while fighting for the United States.

"We're proud to be in this country," she said.

Cases like that of Nidal Malik Hasan, the man accused of shooting fellow soldiers at Fort Hood, are the exception rather than the rule, she said.

"We can't let our religion be hijacked by extremists," she said.

UK Muslim Benefit Scrounger - Milked over £70,000 in Benefits - spared jail

The below article is another example of the ever increasing and on-going benefit fraud conducted by many recent (and some not so recent-see below) immigrants and asylum seekers (many of whom just so happen to be muslim.  They not only seek the generosity of their new hosts - the British people - but also - these greedy, selfish, lazy people seek to illegally and legally plunder the pockets of those same taxpayers.

The below muslim woman, Leyla Yusuf, knowing and intentionally lied and committed fraud so her greedy paws could latch on to British taxpayer money.  But after her "fiddling the taxpayer for seven years "the judge spared her a prison term because she has children. To give her this pass has less to do with the fact she has children (many men and women service jailtime have children) and much to do with the fact that she is a MUSLIM woman with children - and we all know - based on the plethora of past blogs I have written - that the dhimmified British judges/courts repeatedly give 'a pass' to muslim crooks, rapists, paedophiles, etc.

Another ludicrous example is muslim Afghani Toorpakai Saiedi, 36, and her seven children who receive a staggering £170,000 a year in benefits and who live in luxury in the seven-bedroom home in Acton, West London at a cost - to British taxpayers of £12,458 a month. Designer clothes and brand new cars decorate this family as well as their smug knowledge that "'No one is going to throw us out of this house. We're here to stay.' As infuritating as it is - it appears they are right.  SOURCE

In yesterday's front page news: a muslim Somali family are living in a luxury £1.8million five- story house in central London funded by the taxpayer. Nasra Warsame, 40, has lived with seven of her children and her elderly mother in the six-bedroom house since October. Westminster council pays the £1,600-a-week rent for the former asylum seeker.... The fully-furnished house, within walking distance of the West End, has three sitting rooms and four bathrooms. The main lounge has two leather sofas, a flat-screen television and a glass coffee table. Annual rent for the house would cost £83,200.  Meanwhile, Mrs Warsame's husband Bashir Aden, 50, and another of their children are living in a separate property in nearby Camden. Yes, TWO homes and living in the lap of luxury - with no bother to work - but plenty of time to continue to have additional children- courtesy of the working British. - And - by the way - this family has been living in the UK since 1991. SOURCE

It is no secret in order for the Labour government to continue fund the lavish benefits on this coddled group of benefit scroungers the government has cut many benefits to the British people - the most recent finds millions of British elderly pensioners in danger of losing thousands of pounds in benefits under Gordon Brown's flagship plan for home care (or lack thereof) for the neediest elderly.

Disgusting!!

£70k benefits cheat had property in Dubai

A MUM who created a false identity to milk over £70,000 from the benefits system has been spared jail.

Leyla Yusuf, 31, of Garthorne Close, Moss Side, posed as a penniless asylum seeker from Somalia in a scam to double the amount she received in state handouts.

In reality, the mother-of-five has Dutch nationality and enjoyed a comfortable lifestyle with property in Dubai.

Yusuf had been fiddling the taxpayer for seven years when she was caught by a sting earlier this year.

Suspicious officials at Manchester council's benefit department set up simultaneous appointments for Leyla Yusuf and her fraudster alter ego, 'Leyla Hassan'.

When the same woman turned up for both appointments the department's suspicions were confirmed and in October Yusuf was arrested.

But when Yusuf appeared at Manchester Crown Court a judge spared her a prison term for the sake of her children – the youngest of whom is just six weeks old.

She was handed a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for two years with supervision, plus 300 hours unpaid work.

Soon after arriving in Britain on a Dutch passport in 2002 with her husband and two of her children, Yusuf invented 'Leyla Hassan'. She gave her persona the same year of birth, telephone numbers, and even some of her own children.

Once she had immigration status under the false name she was able to get a national insurance number and make claims for child benefit, housing, council tax, income support, tax credits and community care grants, while claiming an empty property at Rosebery Street, Moss Side as her address.

Yusuf was sentenced to a 12-month jail sentence suspended for two years after admitting six counts of false accounting and one charge of failing to declare.

A further four counts relating to an extra £30,000 she fiddled by claiming she was living apart from her taxi driver husband were left to lie on file.

Sentencing, Judge Anthony Hammond said Yusuf had perpetrated a 'cynical milking of the system' which was 'well-executed to say the least'.

Ian Birch, defending, said that Yusuf had paid £1,500 to a 'Somali lawyer' who told her she could not claim benefits as a Dutch citizen and advised her to create another identity.

On hearing this His Hon. Judge Hammond said: "There are one or two dubious practitioners in that area making an awful lot of money from legal aid."

Yusuf is currently making repayments to Manchester City Council and it is understood that Department of Work and Pensions investigators may try to recoup some of the cash by going after her property in Dubai.

Passing sentence, His Hon. Judge Hammond said: "You have defrauded this country of over £70,000 by a deliberate and cynical manipulation of the benefits system 'you richly deserve to go to prison and your husband is lucky he's not in the dock with you.'

He added: "As it is you have five children, the youngest of them is only six weeks of age and the next youngest is two years of age. Were I to be sending you to prison it's going to be very difficult for someone to look after the two-year-old, the youngest child would go with you into the prison."

Britian - Muslim Social Networking Sexual Predator Texted Apology to Victim

Clearly social networking sites are becoming the latest place for muslim (and other) sexual predators to meet their victims.

This past October I wrote about Abdelali Nachet, 34. Nachet subjected a woman who had travelled from Hong Kong, to a degrading and humiliating sex ordeal after he offered his flat as a place to sleep for travelers on the internet. In a premeditated manner, Nachet lured the woman into his bedroom where he repeatedly raped and sexually assaulted her. Nachet also threatened to murder the woman and made sure any rape evidence was removed from her body. .....upon hearing his guilty verdicts: "dramatically collapsed in the dock and began wailing hysterically. Security guards were forced to drag him away to the cells where he repeatedly banged his head on the floor." SOURCE

After he recovered from his hissy fit he proceeded to condemn the jury as "racists".  Apparently, to Nachet, his correctly being found guilty violent rape is a clearcut sign of (the Myth of)Islamophobia.

Along comes Pakistani, Farhan Hussain, 21- who recently used the internet to worm his way into the life of a young woman and then use that friendship as an opportunity to rape her sleeping friend.  Another indication that Hussain 'set up' both women with the intent of his future crime is that he used an alias, Steven Johnson, rather than his real name.

To show the depraved opinion that Hussain (an many other muslim men) have of women - 5 days after committing the sexual assault he sent a text message to the woman he had attacked, saying:

“I raped my girlfriends mate shame!! I do apologise for dat and Im saying sory 4rm my heart. Please 4giv me.”

Did he really think that his apology would make up for the trauma suffered by his victim and undoubtedly the guilt and distrust now felt by the woman he initially met online?

Clearly so. Recall that Islam/sharia law has gone high-tech - on other male/female matters - as now it as simple as a few finger taps on a cellphone for men to divorce their wives:

A Saudi man has divorced his wife by text message, a newspaper said on Thursday.The man was in Iraq when he sent the SMS informing her she was no longer his spouse. He followed up with a telephone call to two of his relatives, the daily Arab News reported. A court in the Red Sea city of Jeddah finalised the split -- the first known divorce in Saudi Arabia by text message -- after summoning the two relatives to check they had received word of the husband's intention, the paper said. Saudi Arabia practises a strict form of Islamic Sharia law, and clerics preside over Sharia courts as judges.

Under the law a man can divorce his wife by saying  ""Inti talaq -"I divorce you" three times. SOURCE

In fact, Sharia law considers the uttered fatwa to be valid even if it was typed or uttered whilst the man/husband is drunk. Hmmm..... Isn't drinking alcohol haraam = against sharia law???

Thus it's not so farfetched for Farhan Hussein (aka Steven Johnson) to think his quick text apology would suffice.  Still at least he could have done is gone to the 'inconvenience' of texting the message three times as in the text-divorce Islamic rules.

Unfortunately for the -not the brightest bulb on the tree- Hussein -(FYI -a muslim being associated with Christmas in any way is also haraam) the police used his texted message to track him down and arrest him. Farhan is currently serving four years in jail and will supposedly be deported back to Pakistan when he is released. (But don't count on it)

Article in full:

Jail for sex attacker who said sorry by text

November 27, 2009

Farhan Hussain, 21, of London, was jailed for four years after he admitted attempted rape

-----A SEXUAL predator who used the internet to meet women tried to rape a victim - then apologised by text.

Farhan Hussain, 21, texted his victim five days after the attack, saying: “Please 4giv me.”

But the message proved his downfall as police traced his mobile and arrested him.

Now he has been jailed for four years after he admitted attempted rape.

Asleep

A court heard Hussain used the internet to befriend women and he had met a woman from Stockport at the end of 2007, using the name Steven Johnson.

He went to her flat in March 2008 and spent the day drinking before going to sleep on the floor of the apartment while she slept in the bedroom.

But we woke during the night and went into the front room where he tried to rape the woman's friend, who was asleep on a couch.

The other woman woke up and noticed Hussain was no longer on the bedroom floor and discovered him attempting to commit the rape.

She confronted Hussain and he left the flat. Five days later he sent a text to the woman he had attacked, saying: “I raped my girlfriends mate shame!! I do apologise for dat and Im saying sory 4rm my heart. Please 4giv me.”

Visit

Police traced the phone that sent the message and Hussain was arrested.

Hussain, of Green Lane, London, was jailed for four years after he admitted attempted rape at Minshull Street Crown Court.

He was also ordered to sign the sex offenders' register for life.

He will be deported to Bangladesh when he has served his sentence.

Internet

After the hearing, Det Con James Campbell said: “Hussain was an active internet user who contacted many women.

“He befriended the victim's friend, wormed his way into their lives and attempted to rape one of the women who was drunk and totally unaware of what he was doing.

“He is a danger to women and has rightly been jailed where he no longer poses a threat.”

Obama tosses US citizens Under the ICC Bus while giving Muslim Terrorists USA Constitutional Rights

Recently President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder made the controversial decision to bring 9/11 Islamic terrorist Khalid Sheik Mohammed along with four other muslim terrorists (currently held at Guantanamo Bay) to New York City to face civilian trial. The decision is seen, by many, as pandering to the Democratic Party's lefty leaners by a President whose once phenomenal popularity is sinking faster than the Titanic.

Many Americans believe that this will only place the safety of the residents of New York City in jeopardy as well as cause the survivors and family members of the victims of 9/11 to face years of 'in your face' memories and testimony while the trials slowly progress through the US judicial system. Then there are at least three other problems:

* Military commissions are the appropriate venue for trials of unlawful combatant. The US military seized these terrorists on foreign battlefields -- and so didn't read them Miranda rights. The evidence against them was collected by soldiers under war-fighting conditions -- not with sterile gloves and clear plastic bags. And much of the best evidence against them is classified, because making it public would compromise the sources and methods of US intelligence gathering.  In short, these cases do not fit the mold of a typical murder trial in a civilian court.

* The administration is again blurring the line between ordinary crimes and acts of war. Likening terrorists at war with the United States to common shoplifters is wrongheaded. These are not members of our society who refuse to obey our laws: They are enemies of the United States, engaged in war against America and all that it stands for.

* The administration has offered no clear criteria for deciding which terrorists will be charged as criminals in federal court and which ones will face military commissions. Attorney General Holder, in announcing the decision, suggested that the five cases were appropriate for civilian trial simply because the evidence against the terrorists is so strong that they'll surely be found guilty. SOURCE

Despite the above concerns Obama and Holder are insisting upon giving foreign Islamic terrorists the Constitutional rights of United States citizens.

Now comes the news that Pres. Obama is not so interested in the reverse - in preserving the Constitutional rights of US citizens in other countries. In fact he is in the process of negotiating a treaty with the International Criminal Court  (ICC) to give the Court jurisdiction over American citizens who commit certain crimes by 2010:

"President Obama has dispatched a delegation this week to The Hague to explore issues involving the United States' possible participation in the International Criminal Court, an organization critics charge could be used to prosecute Americans under international legal standards for actions that are not crimes in the U.S. 

Additional explanation of how this could affect Americans:

"Supposing the U.S. engages in a military action and that action results in civilian casualties. We do an investigation of the matter and find no guilty party. If we are a member of the court, if we are a party to the Rome Statute, the ICC at that point has the opportunity to second-guess us," he said. "They may be able to use evidence and they may be able to pursue routes of trial that would not be portable in the U.S. because of the different standards established in the U.S. legal system and the rules set forth in the Rome Statute."

His warning is that the ICC could, "in essence … come and prosecute U.S. citizens, U.S. soldiers, U.S. officials for actions the U.S. deems entirely lawful." SOURCE

Yes the is the exact same treaty which former US President George W. Bush refused to sign - or in essence unsigned - for obvious reasons.

So there you have it - President Barack Hussein Obama is more than willing to toss US citizens under the ICC "bus" by placing Americans under the jurisdiction of the international court and thus preventing these citizens from accessing their Constitutional rights. 

But sitting securely on the top of the bus we find Obama - in full dhimmi mode and twisting himself in judicial pretzel knots - to ensure NON US citizens/ confessed muslim terrorists will be imported into the United States and given Constitutional rights and defenses even though doing so places actual US citizens lives at risk and will cost - the already financially strapped US taxpayers ---multi millions of dollars.

You couldn't make this up - nor would you want to. Sure as hell infuriates me!
 

In Britian - When is a weapon NON Offensive? Hint = Muslim

Does the below look like it could be used as an "offensive weapon" to you?

Looks to me like it could do some serious damage -but I'm wrong according to a jury in London's Southwark Crown Court. Background:

"Mohsin Khan, 21, who said he had been beating himself regularly with them since the age of six, had been driving to a West End nightclub with a friend when he was pulled over as part of a routine police check in London's Charing Cross Road.  His car was searched and the flagellator - a handle with five metal chains each tipped with a sharp 10in blade - was found under his seat.....he was subsequently charged with two counts of possessing an offensive weapon "

Of course then comes the muslim excuses - which are normally eaten like candy by British judges.....and now juries.

(Khan) He explained it was used by Shia Muslims to whip themselves during Muharram, the month of mourning - something he had been doing ''since I was six''.

Interesting that in a Country whose Health & Safety hawks virtually force children to be wrapped in cotton wool and have banned playground games on the grounds they could cause injury would not be appalled and think it abusive/criminal that a six year old would have been allowed to self flagellate himself and/or considered the child as having mental illness. Of course he may have been encouraged to do so by his "devout muslim" child abusive father. 

Furthermore Khan produced pictures of his bloodied back as proof that his he carried his portable Zanjeer as a spare - just in case the got the urge for more sadistic, self mutilation during the (now past) month of Muharram, the Shia branch of Islam month of mourning.

"The jury, which was shown two photographs of his bloodied and scarred back following a previous self-beating session, decided he was telling the truth and cleared him of possessing the Zanjeer as an offensive weapon. "

Of course one would think that a man who touts himself as a "devout" muslim wouldn't be driving himself to an alcohol imbued "West End nightclub"..........would he?

Which brings us to the next interesting observation. Note the type of flagellator used by Shia's in Iraq:

Now compare the above picture to the weapon (aka flagellator) used by Mohsin Khan. Big difference isn't there?  And wouldn't you have thought that the jury or at least the judge would have noticed or questioned this? Clearly they didn't.

Add the above to other evidence found in Khan's auto - a knuckleduster (brass knuckles) in his door pocket:

Of course Khan had his excuse all ready - the above isn't a knuckle duster but rather a belt buckle. A belt buckle he removed because it "dug into his stomach" - something tells me it wasn't HIS stomach that got the injury. Unfortunately for Khan the jury didn't buy these lies and FINALLY convicted him of carrying an offensive weapon.

The moral of the story:

If you are going to carry an offensive weapon in Britain - make sure it resembles some type of tortuous "religious" implement.....and..... make sure you're a muslim.

Should offer the British people some 'comfort' to know that Moshin Khan is currently a second year law student and could soon be representing clients in a courtroom near you.

Article in full:

Student's flagellator was not an offensive weapon, court rules

A Muslim student caught with a bladed flagellator used by Shias to ritually scourge themselves was cleared of possessing it as an offensive weapon.

Published: 1:43PM GMT 19 Nov 2009

Shia Muslims whip themselves during Muharram, the month of mourning Photo: GETTY

Mohsin Khan, 21, who said he had been beating himself regularly with them since the age of six, had been driving to a West End nightclub with a friend when he was pulled over as part of a routine police check in London's Charing Cross Road.

His car was searched and the flagellator - a handle with five metal chains each tipped with a sharp 10in blade - was found under his seat.

Officers also discovered a knuckle-duster in a door pocket.

The second-year law student, from Birmingham, was subsequently charged with two counts of possessing an offensive weapon on January 30 last year.

But he told those trying him at London's Southwark Crown Court that the flagellator was a ''sacred implement'' called a Zanjeer.

He explained it was used by Shia Muslims to whip themselves during Muharram, the month of mourning - something he had been doing ''since I was six''.

Khan, a former pupil at one of Birmingham's King Edward VI Grammar Schools, and currently studying at Queen Mary College, London, told jurors he had put the flagellator in the car with the intention of using it on himself 11 days before he was stopped.

But he ended up using another one instead and forgot his was still under the driver's seat.

The jury, which was shown two photographs of his bloodied and scarred back following a previous self-beating session, decided he was telling the truth and cleared him of possessing the Zanjeer as an offensive weapon.

However, they convicted him of a mirror-image count involving the knuckle-duster, after rejecting his defence that it doubled as a belt-buckle which he had taken off because it was digging into his stomach.

Khan, who insisted he was not a violent person and avoided physical confrontations, showed no reaction as the verdicts were returned.

But his mother, who was sitting in the public gallery, burst into tears.

Adjourning the case to December 22 for pre-sentence reports, Judge Peter Testar told the student that while he could remain on bail in the meantime ''you must not think I am making any promises''.

Muslim Major Shouts 'Allahu Akbar' as he Massacres 13 soldiers Injures 38

*****UPDATE -11/7/09 -  The media and muslim apologists continue to dance around the truth of the Ft. Hood massacre. Many rushing to blame the military or Hasan's co-workers for his state of mind and subsequent murderous rampage.  Lame excuses such as Hasan was supposedly "harassed" by other military personnel don't hold water. Hasan was an officer - and anyone who had been in the military KNOWS that particularly officers do NOT get harassed. To do so would be the end of the offenders military career.

News comes that the man responsible for the massacre of 13 US Army soldiers, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, was shouting "Allahu Akbar"  as he opened fire on the unsuspecting men and women:

"Soldiers who witnessed the shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas that left 13 people dead reported that the gunman shouted "Allahu Akbar!" before opening fire, the base commander said Friday." SOURCE

Recall Allahu Akbar was also screamed by the 9/11 Al Qaeda terrorists as they plunged their airplanes into the twin towers of the World Trade Center killing 2993 innocent people.

This "devout muslim" was also under investigation by the FBI for statements made supporting muslims killing US soldiers:

"The army psychiatrist who shot dead 13 people in murderous rampage at America's biggest military base was facing an FBI investigation for expressing sympathy with suicide bombers....Hasan posted a series of comments on a website which drew parallels between terrorists and a US soldier who sacrificed himself to save his comrades. Investigators were tipped off six months ago by the devout Muslim's worried colleagues."SOURCE

Also extremely disturbing is a video, from the morning of the massacre, showing Hasan wearing a muslim white robe and cap:

"In the video, the individual believed to be Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan appears wearing clothes that would be abnormal for someone of Palestinian descent - Hasan's family is from Jordan. CBS News correspondent Sheila MacVicarreports that the man is wearing a shalwar kameez - long robes far more common in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

He is also wearing white, which in Islam is associated with death or mourning. The prayer cap on his head is also more closely associated with Southeast Asia than with the Arab world." SOURCE

Major Nidal Malik at a local Texas 7 Eleven Store the morning of the massacre

Does the above look like an Army major to you??

LINK TO VIDEO

This "devout muslim" - earned a six figure income after receiving his "free" psychologist's degree courtesy the USA taxpayers via the US Army:

Hasan, graduated from Virginia Tech in 1997 and earned a doctorate in psychiatry from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda. He spent at least six years at Walter Reed before moving to Fort Hood.  SOURCE

Has repaid those same taxpayers by killing and injuring their sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers.

More on Hasan:

On his blog is a link to an article "Martyrdom in Islam vs Suicide Bombing"

He was happy about the Muslim solider who shot and killed a soldier and wounded another at a Little Rock Military recruiting station. Hasan said Muslims should rise up against the aggressors. Maybe we should have more of these.....strapping bombs on and going into Times Square".

The officials had access to Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan's military record. They said he received a poor performance evaluation while at Walter Reed. SOURCE

One has to wonder what psychological damage he has done while counseling soldiers returning from active duty in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The glaring question is why wasn't Hasan booted out of the Army - and instead was promoted and assigned to Fort Hood?  Was it due to the insidious Political Correctness and fear of the Army being labeled "Islamophobic"? The ongoing investigation will shed light on this - but sadly far too late for those who had their lives snuffed out by a supposedly "Lone Wolf"  terrorist.

This cold blooded military Jihadist needs to face severe punishment for his heinous mass murders - let's hope it is death............and he's shouted his last "Allahu Akbar".

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

************UPDATE -11/7/09 -  Muslim apologists and the lefty mainstream media continue to try to spin Islam out of and dance around the truth of the Ft. Hood massacre. Many are rushing to blame the military or Hasan's co-workers for his state of mind and subsequent murderous rampage.  Lame excuses such as Hasan was supposedly "harassed" by other military personnel don't hold water. Hasan was an officer - and anyone who had been in the military KNOWS that particularly officers do NOT get harassed. To do so would be the end of the offenders military career.

Another hyped up explanation for Hasan is that he feared going to Afghanistan and being in active combat with fellow muslims - again the ludicrousness is obvious. Medical officers - particularly psychiatrists - are not and do not get sent into battle thus Hasan's supposed worries were unfounded. 

 

As shown above -Hasan is not the victim -  outrageous behaviors were primarily one way - inflicted by Hasan onto the soldiers around him. Since I wrote this blog other information has been revealed such as Army Major Hasan stating he viewed himself as "a Muslim first and an American second." and got into frequent arguments with fellow soldiers "who supported the (Iraq & Afghanistan) wars". A recent classmate said Hasan once gave a jarring presentation to students in which he argued the war on terrorism was a war against Islam, and “made himself a lightning rod” when he felt his religious beliefs were challenged". 

 

Hasan also "attended the controversial Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Great Falls, in 2001 at the same time as two of the September 11 terrorists.....His mother's funeral was held there in May that year. The preacher at the time was Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born Yemeni scholar who was banned from addressing a meeting in London by video link in August because he is accused of supporting attacks on British troops and backing terrorist organisations.

Hasan's eyes "lit up" when he mentioned his deep respect for al-Awlaki's teachings, according to a fellow Muslim officer at the Fort Hood base in Texas, the scene of Thursday's horrific shooting spree. As investigators look at Hasan's motives and mindset, his attendance at the mosque could be an important piece of the 'jigsaw'" SOURCE

 

Recent records also show Hasan privately bought the FN 5.7  (aka 'Cop Killer") gun along with an older model Smith & Wesson .357-caliber revolver, at store called "Guns Galore" in Killeen, Texas. The morning of the massacre he gave away many of his possessions to his neighbors- including passing out copies of the Qu'ran.

 

Clearly Hasan agreed with the statements of a muslim man identified only as Mustafa - interviewed Friday at one of London's largest mosques: "Asked his views on the killings at Fort Hood, he said: “Killing military members is all right. If you are killing people who are fighting against Muslims then that’s okay.”  SOURCE

 

Hasan's cowardly, murderous attack on his unsuspecting fellow soldiers was planned & calculated in advance.

 

Time to stop the dhimwitted excuses and call this horror what it is - Islamic Terror.

*******************ADDENDUM***********************

Hassan also served on President Barack Obama's White House transition team:

NEW YORK - Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the alleged shooter in yesterday's massacre at Fort Hood, played a homeland security advisory role in President Barack Obama's transition into the White House according to a key university policy institute document...... Hasan is listed on page 29 of the document as a Task Force Event Participant   SOURCE

 

 

 

UK - Muslim Rapist Used Social Networking Site to find Victim

Below is a prime example of how the use of the word 'racist'  has entered the realm of absurdity AND how many muslim men seem to believe their claims of racism will relieve them of being punished for the most heinous illegal behaviours.

Father-of-one Abdelali Nachet, 34, subjected a woman who had travelled from Hong Kong, to a degrading and humiliating sex ordeal after he offered his flat as a place to sleep for travelers on the internet.

Nachet had used the website courchsurfing.com to "meet new people" and he advertised he "wanted to offer the best of me and Moroccan hospitality." The Couchsurfing site is a social networking site which allows travelers to find willing hosts in various countries -- hosts who offer up sleeping accomodations at no cost. The site touts the "safety" of their hosts yet to me their verification, etc is minimal at best.

Along comes a 29 year old woman from Hong Kong who had apparently used the Couchsurfing site successfully throughout her European travels. That is until she opted to partake of Nachet's advertised "Moroccan hospitality".

In a premeditated manner, Nachet lured the woman into his bedroom where he repeatedly raped and sexually assaulted her. Before the rapes began Nachet proclaimed that he 'wanted to marry' the woman - one wonders if he was really contemplating using a  muslim 'temporary marriage' which is nothing more than an Islamic loophole that allows muslim men to partake of prostitutes, (or in Nachet's case - rape) etc with a clear conscience.

Nachet also threatened to murder the woman and made sure any rape evidence was removed from her body:

"During her ordeal Mr Phillips said Nachet told her "if you try to run away I will kill you and after that I will kill myself." It is claimed that Nachet forced the woman to have a bath after the alleged rapes to get rid of incriminating forensic evidence. Mr Phillips said the morning after Nachet did some vacuuming before leaving the flat with the woman."

It is concerning that after his arrest and first trial the jury was unable to come to a verdict. But, the second trial quickly produced a guilty verdict............and here is where "racism" claims come to play.

The cowardly Mr Nachet who had overpowered, humiliated, threatened and raped a lone, young woman - upon hearing his guilty verdicts:

"dramatically collapsed in the dock and began wailing hysterically. Security guards were forced to drag him away to the cells where he repeatedly banged his head on the floor."

This is when Nachet also believed that playing the racist card would somehow change or halt his prison destination.

"As he was taken away to serve his sentence Nachet screamed: "I want to go back to my country. I want to go back to Morocco. This is not right. I want to be sentenced in Morocco. This is racist."

Who can blame him? Crying and begging has indeed worked for muslim criminals in the past . And clearly Nachet has seen what you and I see on a near daily basis: Muslims in Britain have sucessfully and repeatedly used the racism taunt to quell the media and to access all sorts of condecensions and special treatment from the British politicians,  lawmakers,  judges,  quangos,  jails  etc. etc.

Let's hope that after his jail time is served that indeed authorities send this sorry excuse for a man packing back to Morocco. Unfortunately for the British people, based on past cases, human rights laws and the inane immigration courts & judges will see to it that Mr. Nachet will be inflicted upon the British people in perpetuity. 

Article in full:

Leeds couchsurfing.com rapist jailed

Published Date: 29 October 2009

A Moroccan national who raped and threatened to murder a woman in his flat after meeting her on the popular global website couchsurfing.com has been jailed for 10 years.

Father-of-one Abdelali Nachet, 34, allegedly subjected the woman who had travelled from Hong Kong, to a degrading and humiliating sex ordeal after he offered his flat as a place to sleep for travellers on the website.

A jury had previously failed to reach a verdict but following a retrial another jury yesterday found him guilty of two counts of rape and one of sexual assault.

As the foreman read out the majority verdicts Nachet dramatically collapsed in the dock and began wailing hysterically. Security guards were forced to drag him away to the cells where he repeatedly banged his head on the floor.

During the trial the court heard that volatile Nachet, of Leeds, had an entry on the legitimate site where he said he liked to meet new people
and offer them hospitality.

The court heard that he "wanted to offer the best of me and Moroccan
hospitality."

Prosecutor Simon Phillips said his 29-year-old victim was from Hong Kong and was travelling in Europe when she got in touch with Nachet, looking for a place to stay.

The jury heard that throughout her travels she had been using the website couchsurfing.com.

Mr Phillips said: "This is a site that enables travellers to find free
accommodation with like-minded individuals to stay the night.

"Amongst the travelling community it is well known on an international basis.

"She trusted the website and had previously stayed with other people, including single men, without incident."

She wanted to visit Leeds and contacted Nachet after spotting his entry on the website.

After exchanging e-mails the woman travelled from the West Midlands to Leeds on March 5 and met Nachet before going back to his flat with him.

Prosecutors claim once there Nachet raped her twice and sexually assaulted her in an ordeal that lasted throughout the night.

Mr Phillips told the court that Nachet had started making sexual advances after putting some music on and asking the woman to dance.

The jury heard that at that point she decided to go to bed but as she was getting ready Nachet asked her to come into his bedroom so he could show her some family photos.

Shortly after this the defendant shut the door, dimmed the lights and pushed her on to his bed.

He then told her that he wanted to get married and wanted to make love to her, telling the woman that if she let him make love to her it would be over very quickly.

The court heard that the woman told Nachet that he shouldn't do this and that she didn't want to make love to him.

During her ordeal Mr Phillips said Nachet told her "if you try to run away I will kill you and after that I will kill myself."

It is claimed that Nachet forced the woman to have a bath after the alleged rapes to get rid of incriminating forensic evidence.

Mr Phillips said the morning after Nachet did some vacuuming before leaving the flat with the woman.

She got on a bus back to the West Midlands and alerted police after telling a male friend she had met on couchsurfing.com what had happened.

The jury heard the night after the alleged rape, three people Nachet had met on the same website had travelled to Leeds to stay at his flat.

Sentencing him to 10 years in prison Recorder of Leeds Peter Collier QC said: "When your partner left you, you intentionally used the couchsurfing website to attract women to your home.

"Having observed you during the course of this trial I'm satisfied you believe that you are irresistible to women."

He added that Nachet had subjected his victim to a "long and persistent
physical assault", used "emotional blackmail" and put her "through indignity after indignity violating her again and again."

He said that the sustained attack was an "abuse of trust of those who sign up to the social networking site to come and stay in your home."

As he was taken away to serve his sentence Nachet screamed: "I want to go back to my country. I want to go back to Morocco. This is not right. I want to be sentenced in Morocco. This is racist."

 

 

Time to call a spade a spade - OR - a crime a crime

Once again we have muslim (aided and abeted by the mainstream media) peverting our English words into contranyms ( A contranym is word that has two opposing meanings) 

First was the word honour/honor (honesty, fairness, or integrity) - a word with a plethora of positive meanings and connotations. But with the muslim we have seen the word honor twisted into a bizarre interpretation as it is (mis)used to describe  the murder of innocents - usually women. Murdered because a muslim man or family has designated themselves God and decided thatthe woman has disgraced her family and must be killed.  More often than not her 'sin' against the family is becoming 'too Westernized'.  Apparently Papa or Husband and the rest of the family partaking of taxpayer paid benefits provided by these Western nations - does not fall into the same offensive 'Westernization'.

Now we have another formerly respected (esteem, veneration) word (pun intended) being misused ---RESPECT. Under the title - "Islamic scholar 'stabbed his father-in-law in respect row'".  In this case we have Islamic scholar, Mohammed Saghir, 33 attempting to murder his father-in-law, 55-year-old Mohammed Zaman, by stabbing him in the stomach.  Why? Because Mr Zaman went to the defense of his daughter - and to broaden his statements- the defense of many muslim women living in Britain:

"Mr Zaman said his son-in-law had become 'abusive' towards him and his daughter and Saghir's wife, Shasta Kausir, 30.

Mr Zaman said: "I said to him when you bring husbands over to this country, as soon as they get their British citizenship they become disrespectful.

"They don't respect their wives, they don't respect their mother-in-laws, they don't respect anyone.

"They call our daughters bitches and they call themselves religious.

"He is a religious person and he is the one who stabbed me.

"He is a scholar of his religion and he should have known, 'my father-in-law is like my father, I must respect him.'

"I gave my daughter to him in marriage and he gets the British citizenship and he starts stabbing me."

The above statement speaks loudly about the abuse that British muslim women receive at the hands of their imported muslim husbands. Abuse ranging from being seen as a easy passport to British citizenship (and benefits) to being at the receiving end of physical and mental injury. Mr. Zaman was upset that Mohammed Saghir was disrespecting his wife; Mr Zaman's beloved daughter.

Why then was Mr. Zaman stabbed by his daughter's spouse?- why because Mohammed clearly felt his father-in-law was guilty of not respecting Mohammed - more so than Mohammed was guilty of DISrespecting his wife thru abuse. Thus Mohammed saw himself as the REAL victim and proceeded to show his own Islamic 'self-respect' by displaying a murderous lack of respect for his elder father-in-law.  There you have it - another mangled interpretation of a word and another faux reason for a muslim  'Islamic scholar'  to pull out a knife and try to commit murder.

I admire Mr. Zaman for coming to the defense of his daughter and speaking the words  muslim apologists and enablers refuse to acknowledge.

Now if we could just stop the media from the misuse of our English language - in media headlines - in order to obfuscate,  excuse or mitigate muslim illegal behaviors and demand the media start accurately describing these acts for they truly are = VIOLENT CRIMES.

'Respect' and 'stabbed' have no more business being in the same sentence then 'honor' and 'killing'.

Article in full:

Islamic scholar 'stabbed his father-in-law in respect row'

October 23, 2009

AN Islamic scholar tried to kill his father-in-law in a row about Pakistani men who marry British brides, a court heard.

Mohammed Saghir, 33, is accused of attempting to stab 55-year-old Mohammed Zaman to death.

Saghir denies attempted murder.

Manchester Crown Court heard that on April 14 an argument flared up between the two men at Saghir's home in Chesham Street, Oldham.

Mr Zaman said his son-in-law had become 'abusive' towards him and his daughter and Saghir's wife, Shasta Kausir, 30.

Mr Zaman said: "I said to him when you bring husbands over to this country, as soon as they get their British citizenship they become disrespectful.

"They don't respect their wives, they don't respect their mother-in-laws, they don't respect anyone.

"They call our daughters bitches and they call themselves religious.

"He is a religious person and he is the one who stabbed me.

"He is a scholar of his religion and he should have known, 'my father-in-law is like my father, I must respect him.'

"I gave my daughter to him in marriage and he gets the British citizenship and he starts stabbing me."

Defending, Tahir Khan claimed Mr Zaman had punched Saghir on April 14.

On April 19, the family had celebrated Shasta Kausir's birthday.

Saghir bought her a £600 Gucci bag.

But later that day, Saghir burst into Mr Zaman's Oldham house.

Mr Zaman then claimed to have heard Shasta shout: 'Dad he's got a knife, he's going to kill you,' before hearing Saghir shout, 'I'll kill you.'

Saghir was said to have jabbed towards his father-in-law with a knife causing an injury to the stomach before bursting into tears.

Mr Zaman also claimed that religious and family elders had urged him to write a letter and forgive Saghir.

Mr Zaman said: "The elders got involved and I was advised only criminals go to court and we don't wish to go to the courts.

"I do forgive but am not sure whether the law of this land will forgive him."