TheOPINIONATOR

Muslim Major Shouts 'Allahu Akbar' as he Massacres 13 soldiers Injures 38

*****UPDATE -11/7/09 -  The media and muslim apologists continue to dance around the truth of the Ft. Hood massacre. Many rushing to blame the military or Hasan's co-workers for his state of mind and subsequent murderous rampage.  Lame excuses such as Hasan was supposedly "harassed" by other military personnel don't hold water. Hasan was an officer - and anyone who had been in the military KNOWS that particularly officers do NOT get harassed. To do so would be the end of the offenders military career.

News comes that the man responsible for the massacre of 13 US Army soldiers, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, was shouting "Allahu Akbar"  as he opened fire on the unsuspecting men and women:

"Soldiers who witnessed the shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas that left 13 people dead reported that the gunman shouted "Allahu Akbar!" before opening fire, the base commander said Friday." SOURCE

Recall Allahu Akbar was also screamed by the 9/11 Al Qaeda terrorists as they plunged their airplanes into the twin towers of the World Trade Center killing 2993 innocent people.

This "devout muslim" was also under investigation by the FBI for statements made supporting muslims killing US soldiers:

"The army psychiatrist who shot dead 13 people in murderous rampage at America's biggest military base was facing an FBI investigation for expressing sympathy with suicide bombers....Hasan posted a series of comments on a website which drew parallels between terrorists and a US soldier who sacrificed himself to save his comrades. Investigators were tipped off six months ago by the devout Muslim's worried colleagues."SOURCE

Also extremely disturbing is a video, from the morning of the massacre, showing Hasan wearing a muslim white robe and cap:

"In the video, the individual believed to be Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan appears wearing clothes that would be abnormal for someone of Palestinian descent - Hasan's family is from Jordan. CBS News correspondent Sheila MacVicarreports that the man is wearing a shalwar kameez - long robes far more common in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

He is also wearing white, which in Islam is associated with death or mourning. The prayer cap on his head is also more closely associated with Southeast Asia than with the Arab world." SOURCE

Major Nidal Malik at a local Texas 7 Eleven Store the morning of the massacre

Does the above look like an Army major to you??

LINK TO VIDEO

This "devout muslim" - earned a six figure income after receiving his "free" psychologist's degree courtesy the USA taxpayers via the US Army:

Hasan, graduated from Virginia Tech in 1997 and earned a doctorate in psychiatry from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda. He spent at least six years at Walter Reed before moving to Fort Hood.  SOURCE

Has repaid those same taxpayers by killing and injuring their sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers.

More on Hasan:

On his blog is a link to an article "Martyrdom in Islam vs Suicide Bombing"

He was happy about the Muslim solider who shot and killed a soldier and wounded another at a Little Rock Military recruiting station. Hasan said Muslims should rise up against the aggressors. Maybe we should have more of these.....strapping bombs on and going into Times Square".

The officials had access to Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan's military record. They said he received a poor performance evaluation while at Walter Reed. SOURCE

One has to wonder what psychological damage he has done while counseling soldiers returning from active duty in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The glaring question is why wasn't Hasan booted out of the Army - and instead was promoted and assigned to Fort Hood?  Was it due to the insidious Political Correctness and fear of the Army being labeled "Islamophobic"? The ongoing investigation will shed light on this - but sadly far too late for those who had their lives snuffed out by a supposedly "Lone Wolf"  terrorist.

This cold blooded military Jihadist needs to face severe punishment for his heinous mass murders - let's hope it is death............and he's shouted his last "Allahu Akbar".

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

************UPDATE -11/7/09 -  Muslim apologists and the lefty mainstream media continue to try to spin Islam out of and dance around the truth of the Ft. Hood massacre. Many are rushing to blame the military or Hasan's co-workers for his state of mind and subsequent murderous rampage.  Lame excuses such as Hasan was supposedly "harassed" by other military personnel don't hold water. Hasan was an officer - and anyone who had been in the military KNOWS that particularly officers do NOT get harassed. To do so would be the end of the offenders military career.

Another hyped up explanation for Hasan is that he feared going to Afghanistan and being in active combat with fellow muslims - again the ludicrousness is obvious. Medical officers - particularly psychiatrists - are not and do not get sent into battle thus Hasan's supposed worries were unfounded. 

 

As shown above -Hasan is not the victim -  outrageous behaviors were primarily one way - inflicted by Hasan onto the soldiers around him. Since I wrote this blog other information has been revealed such as Army Major Hasan stating he viewed himself as "a Muslim first and an American second." and got into frequent arguments with fellow soldiers "who supported the (Iraq & Afghanistan) wars". A recent classmate said Hasan once gave a jarring presentation to students in which he argued the war on terrorism was a war against Islam, and “made himself a lightning rod” when he felt his religious beliefs were challenged". 

 

Hasan also "attended the controversial Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Great Falls, in 2001 at the same time as two of the September 11 terrorists.....His mother's funeral was held there in May that year. The preacher at the time was Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born Yemeni scholar who was banned from addressing a meeting in London by video link in August because he is accused of supporting attacks on British troops and backing terrorist organisations.

Hasan's eyes "lit up" when he mentioned his deep respect for al-Awlaki's teachings, according to a fellow Muslim officer at the Fort Hood base in Texas, the scene of Thursday's horrific shooting spree. As investigators look at Hasan's motives and mindset, his attendance at the mosque could be an important piece of the 'jigsaw'" SOURCE

 

Recent records also show Hasan privately bought the FN 5.7  (aka 'Cop Killer") gun along with an older model Smith & Wesson .357-caliber revolver, at store called "Guns Galore" in Killeen, Texas. The morning of the massacre he gave away many of his possessions to his neighbors- including passing out copies of the Qu'ran.

 

Clearly Hasan agreed with the statements of a muslim man identified only as Mustafa - interviewed Friday at one of London's largest mosques: "Asked his views on the killings at Fort Hood, he said: “Killing military members is all right. If you are killing people who are fighting against Muslims then that’s okay.”  SOURCE

 

Hasan's cowardly, murderous attack on his unsuspecting fellow soldiers was planned & calculated in advance.

 

Time to stop the dhimwitted excuses and call this horror what it is - Islamic Terror.

*******************ADDENDUM***********************

Hassan also served on President Barack Obama's White House transition team:

NEW YORK - Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the alleged shooter in yesterday's massacre at Fort Hood, played a homeland security advisory role in President Barack Obama's transition into the White House according to a key university policy institute document...... Hasan is listed on page 29 of the document as a Task Force Event Participant   SOURCE

 

 

 

UK - Muslim Rapist Used Social Networking Site to find Victim

Below is a prime example of how the use of the word 'racist'  has entered the realm of absurdity AND how many muslim men seem to believe their claims of racism will relieve them of being punished for the most heinous illegal behaviours.

Father-of-one Abdelali Nachet, 34, subjected a woman who had travelled from Hong Kong, to a degrading and humiliating sex ordeal after he offered his flat as a place to sleep for travelers on the internet.

Nachet had used the website courchsurfing.com to "meet new people" and he advertised he "wanted to offer the best of me and Moroccan hospitality." The Couchsurfing site is a social networking site which allows travelers to find willing hosts in various countries -- hosts who offer up sleeping accomodations at no cost. The site touts the "safety" of their hosts yet to me their verification, etc is minimal at best.

Along comes a 29 year old woman from Hong Kong who had apparently used the Couchsurfing site successfully throughout her European travels. That is until she opted to partake of Nachet's advertised "Moroccan hospitality".

In a premeditated manner, Nachet lured the woman into his bedroom where he repeatedly raped and sexually assaulted her. Before the rapes began Nachet proclaimed that he 'wanted to marry' the woman - one wonders if he was really contemplating using a  muslim 'temporary marriage' which is nothing more than an Islamic loophole that allows muslim men to partake of prostitutes, (or in Nachet's case - rape) etc with a clear conscience.

Nachet also threatened to murder the woman and made sure any rape evidence was removed from her body:

"During her ordeal Mr Phillips said Nachet told her "if you try to run away I will kill you and after that I will kill myself." It is claimed that Nachet forced the woman to have a bath after the alleged rapes to get rid of incriminating forensic evidence. Mr Phillips said the morning after Nachet did some vacuuming before leaving the flat with the woman."

It is concerning that after his arrest and first trial the jury was unable to come to a verdict. But, the second trial quickly produced a guilty verdict............and here is where "racism" claims come to play.

The cowardly Mr Nachet who had overpowered, humiliated, threatened and raped a lone, young woman - upon hearing his guilty verdicts:

"dramatically collapsed in the dock and began wailing hysterically. Security guards were forced to drag him away to the cells where he repeatedly banged his head on the floor."

This is when Nachet also believed that playing the racist card would somehow change or halt his prison destination.

"As he was taken away to serve his sentence Nachet screamed: "I want to go back to my country. I want to go back to Morocco. This is not right. I want to be sentenced in Morocco. This is racist."

Who can blame him? Crying and begging has indeed worked for muslim criminals in the past . And clearly Nachet has seen what you and I see on a near daily basis: Muslims in Britain have sucessfully and repeatedly used the racism taunt to quell the media and to access all sorts of condecensions and special treatment from the British politicians,  lawmakers,  judges,  quangos,  jails  etc. etc.

Let's hope that after his jail time is served that indeed authorities send this sorry excuse for a man packing back to Morocco. Unfortunately for the British people, based on past cases, human rights laws and the inane immigration courts & judges will see to it that Mr. Nachet will be inflicted upon the British people in perpetuity. 

Article in full:

Leeds couchsurfing.com rapist jailed

Published Date: 29 October 2009

A Moroccan national who raped and threatened to murder a woman in his flat after meeting her on the popular global website couchsurfing.com has been jailed for 10 years.

Father-of-one Abdelali Nachet, 34, allegedly subjected the woman who had travelled from Hong Kong, to a degrading and humiliating sex ordeal after he offered his flat as a place to sleep for travellers on the website.

A jury had previously failed to reach a verdict but following a retrial another jury yesterday found him guilty of two counts of rape and one of sexual assault.

As the foreman read out the majority verdicts Nachet dramatically collapsed in the dock and began wailing hysterically. Security guards were forced to drag him away to the cells where he repeatedly banged his head on the floor.

During the trial the court heard that volatile Nachet, of Leeds, had an entry on the legitimate site where he said he liked to meet new people
and offer them hospitality.

The court heard that he "wanted to offer the best of me and Moroccan
hospitality."

Prosecutor Simon Phillips said his 29-year-old victim was from Hong Kong and was travelling in Europe when she got in touch with Nachet, looking for a place to stay.

The jury heard that throughout her travels she had been using the website couchsurfing.com.

Mr Phillips said: "This is a site that enables travellers to find free
accommodation with like-minded individuals to stay the night.

"Amongst the travelling community it is well known on an international basis.

"She trusted the website and had previously stayed with other people, including single men, without incident."

She wanted to visit Leeds and contacted Nachet after spotting his entry on the website.

After exchanging e-mails the woman travelled from the West Midlands to Leeds on March 5 and met Nachet before going back to his flat with him.

Prosecutors claim once there Nachet raped her twice and sexually assaulted her in an ordeal that lasted throughout the night.

Mr Phillips told the court that Nachet had started making sexual advances after putting some music on and asking the woman to dance.

The jury heard that at that point she decided to go to bed but as she was getting ready Nachet asked her to come into his bedroom so he could show her some family photos.

Shortly after this the defendant shut the door, dimmed the lights and pushed her on to his bed.

He then told her that he wanted to get married and wanted to make love to her, telling the woman that if she let him make love to her it would be over very quickly.

The court heard that the woman told Nachet that he shouldn't do this and that she didn't want to make love to him.

During her ordeal Mr Phillips said Nachet told her "if you try to run away I will kill you and after that I will kill myself."

It is claimed that Nachet forced the woman to have a bath after the alleged rapes to get rid of incriminating forensic evidence.

Mr Phillips said the morning after Nachet did some vacuuming before leaving the flat with the woman.

She got on a bus back to the West Midlands and alerted police after telling a male friend she had met on couchsurfing.com what had happened.

The jury heard the night after the alleged rape, three people Nachet had met on the same website had travelled to Leeds to stay at his flat.

Sentencing him to 10 years in prison Recorder of Leeds Peter Collier QC said: "When your partner left you, you intentionally used the couchsurfing website to attract women to your home.

"Having observed you during the course of this trial I'm satisfied you believe that you are irresistible to women."

He added that Nachet had subjected his victim to a "long and persistent
physical assault", used "emotional blackmail" and put her "through indignity after indignity violating her again and again."

He said that the sustained attack was an "abuse of trust of those who sign up to the social networking site to come and stay in your home."

As he was taken away to serve his sentence Nachet screamed: "I want to go back to my country. I want to go back to Morocco. This is not right. I want to be sentenced in Morocco. This is racist."

 

 

Time to call a spade a spade - OR - a crime a crime

Once again we have muslim (aided and abeted by the mainstream media) peverting our English words into contranyms ( A contranym is word that has two opposing meanings) 

First was the word honour/honor (honesty, fairness, or integrity) - a word with a plethora of positive meanings and connotations. But with the muslim we have seen the word honor twisted into a bizarre interpretation as it is (mis)used to describe  the murder of innocents - usually women. Murdered because a muslim man or family has designated themselves God and decided thatthe woman has disgraced her family and must be killed.  More often than not her 'sin' against the family is becoming 'too Westernized'.  Apparently Papa or Husband and the rest of the family partaking of taxpayer paid benefits provided by these Western nations - does not fall into the same offensive 'Westernization'.

Now we have another formerly respected (esteem, veneration) word (pun intended) being misused ---RESPECT. Under the title - "Islamic scholar 'stabbed his father-in-law in respect row'".  In this case we have Islamic scholar, Mohammed Saghir, 33 attempting to murder his father-in-law, 55-year-old Mohammed Zaman, by stabbing him in the stomach.  Why? Because Mr Zaman went to the defense of his daughter - and to broaden his statements- the defense of many muslim women living in Britain:

"Mr Zaman said his son-in-law had become 'abusive' towards him and his daughter and Saghir's wife, Shasta Kausir, 30.

Mr Zaman said: "I said to him when you bring husbands over to this country, as soon as they get their British citizenship they become disrespectful.

"They don't respect their wives, they don't respect their mother-in-laws, they don't respect anyone.

"They call our daughters bitches and they call themselves religious.

"He is a religious person and he is the one who stabbed me.

"He is a scholar of his religion and he should have known, 'my father-in-law is like my father, I must respect him.'

"I gave my daughter to him in marriage and he gets the British citizenship and he starts stabbing me."

The above statement speaks loudly about the abuse that British muslim women receive at the hands of their imported muslim husbands. Abuse ranging from being seen as a easy passport to British citizenship (and benefits) to being at the receiving end of physical and mental injury. Mr. Zaman was upset that Mohammed Saghir was disrespecting his wife; Mr Zaman's beloved daughter.

Why then was Mr. Zaman stabbed by his daughter's spouse?- why because Mohammed clearly felt his father-in-law was guilty of not respecting Mohammed - more so than Mohammed was guilty of DISrespecting his wife thru abuse. Thus Mohammed saw himself as the REAL victim and proceeded to show his own Islamic 'self-respect' by displaying a murderous lack of respect for his elder father-in-law.  There you have it - another mangled interpretation of a word and another faux reason for a muslim  'Islamic scholar'  to pull out a knife and try to commit murder.

I admire Mr. Zaman for coming to the defense of his daughter and speaking the words  muslim apologists and enablers refuse to acknowledge.

Now if we could just stop the media from the misuse of our English language - in media headlines - in order to obfuscate,  excuse or mitigate muslim illegal behaviors and demand the media start accurately describing these acts for they truly are = VIOLENT CRIMES.

'Respect' and 'stabbed' have no more business being in the same sentence then 'honor' and 'killing'.

Article in full:

Islamic scholar 'stabbed his father-in-law in respect row'

October 23, 2009

AN Islamic scholar tried to kill his father-in-law in a row about Pakistani men who marry British brides, a court heard.

Mohammed Saghir, 33, is accused of attempting to stab 55-year-old Mohammed Zaman to death.

Saghir denies attempted murder.

Manchester Crown Court heard that on April 14 an argument flared up between the two men at Saghir's home in Chesham Street, Oldham.

Mr Zaman said his son-in-law had become 'abusive' towards him and his daughter and Saghir's wife, Shasta Kausir, 30.

Mr Zaman said: "I said to him when you bring husbands over to this country, as soon as they get their British citizenship they become disrespectful.

"They don't respect their wives, they don't respect their mother-in-laws, they don't respect anyone.

"They call our daughters bitches and they call themselves religious.

"He is a religious person and he is the one who stabbed me.

"He is a scholar of his religion and he should have known, 'my father-in-law is like my father, I must respect him.'

"I gave my daughter to him in marriage and he gets the British citizenship and he starts stabbing me."

Defending, Tahir Khan claimed Mr Zaman had punched Saghir on April 14.

On April 19, the family had celebrated Shasta Kausir's birthday.

Saghir bought her a £600 Gucci bag.

But later that day, Saghir burst into Mr Zaman's Oldham house.

Mr Zaman then claimed to have heard Shasta shout: 'Dad he's got a knife, he's going to kill you,' before hearing Saghir shout, 'I'll kill you.'

Saghir was said to have jabbed towards his father-in-law with a knife causing an injury to the stomach before bursting into tears.

Mr Zaman also claimed that religious and family elders had urged him to write a letter and forgive Saghir.

Mr Zaman said: "The elders got involved and I was advised only criminals go to court and we don't wish to go to the courts.

"I do forgive but am not sure whether the law of this land will forgive him."

Muslim 'cleric' sent hate mail to Australian war widows

One of the most reprehensible acts by a supposed "cleric" or "spiritual leader" would be to stir up hatred and cause more pain to families already grieving the deaths of their husbands/sons.  Well that didn't stop muslim Sheik Haron from sending hate mail to SEVEN Australian war widows and parents mourning the deaths of their loved ones. (See article below)

Guess the British won't be too surprised seeing they had their own recent show of soldier hate by a group of mocking muslim cowards in Luton. Led by no other than the odious hate mongerer, Adjem Choudary; (see prior blog) these muslims mocked the deaths of British soldiers killed in Afghanistan.

"The families of soldiers killed by friendly fire in Iraq have reacted with fury after a firebrand preacher taunted them over the deaths of their loved ones. Anjem Chourdary added insult to the injury caused by Islamic extremists' hate-filled protest against soldiers returning home from the war-torn region by saying they were 'not heroes but closer to coweards who cannot fight, as their uncanny knack for death by friendly fire illustrates'.....'They are terrorists, and cannot be excused for simply "carrying out their duty", which incidentally (and vividly) was also used by Nazi soldiers in Germany to justify their notorious and bloody campaigns in the early 20th century."SOURCE


 

FINALLY the Aussies have the guts to file charges against their Choudary-wannabe - Sheik Haron. Let's hope the authorities prosecute him to the fullest and that he gets a judge unlike far too many found in Britain.

Muslim 'cleric' Sheik Haron allegedly sent hate mail to Australian war widows

By Kara Lawrence, Tim Vollmer and Janet Fife-Yeomans

• Muslim 'cleric' delivers letters to widows
• Arrested for using mail service to harrass
• Allegedly called soldiers "murderers"

THEY are young Australians who paid the ultimate price, losing their lives at war - but now their families have allegedly been targeted by self-styled Muslim cleric Sheik Haron in an anti-war campaign.

Finally, after an alleged two-year letter-writing spree that has devastated the families of seven Diggers who died in Afghanistan, Haron faces criminal charges, The Daily Telegraph reports.

In the letters he allegedly wrote to grieving parents and wives of the Diggers - one addressed to a widow, care of a funeral home - he apparently accused some of the dead Australian soldiers of being "criminals", "killers" and "murderers" fighting a war of invasion.

Haron has penned letters to the families of Michael Fussell, Gregory Sher, Mathew Hopkins, Brett Till, Jason Marks, Luke Worsley and Benjamin Ranaudo.

One of Haron's letters was allegedly hand-delivered to Brett Till's widow Breeanna at his funeral.

Counter-terrorism police arrested Haron, 45, - an Iranian-born immigrant who claims to be a Muslim spiritual leader - at his Croydon Park home on Tuesday.

Sydney's Joint Counter Terrorism Team, comprising Australian Federal Police and NSW Police, also visited two other addresses, at Campsie and Green Valley.

Haron was charged on Tuesday night with seven counts of "using a postal service or similar service to menace, harass, or cause offence" and was granted bail to appear in court next month.

Yesterday, he told The Daily Telegraph he would fight the charges and was seeking legal advice.

"I was in the custody of the AFP for a while, a few hours ... then I was released. I believed that I am innocent, of course. Later I can explain everything."

Haron has posted the letters he allegedly sent on a website attributed to him.

In a letter to Gregory Sher's family, he allegedly wrote: "I feel bad that you have lost your son but I don't feel bad that a murderer of innocent civilians has lost his life."

Sher family friend Ben Hirsh said he was aware a number of grieving families had allegedly received anti-war letters.

"Getting any anti-war letters is disgusting," he said.

Private Luke Worsley's father John said: "You have just got the news of the loss of your son and then this happens."

Obama Wins Nobel Peace Price - For What?

"OSLO (AP) - President Barack Obama won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," the Norwegian Nobel Committee said, citing his outreach to the Muslim world and attempts to curb nuclear proliferation.

The stunning choice made Obama the third sitting U.S. president to win the Nobel Peace Prize and shocked Nobel observers because Obama took office less than two weeks before the Feb. 1 nomination deadline. Obama's name had been mentioned in speculation before the award but many Nobel watchers believed it was too early to award the president" SOURCE

When I saw the above news - at first glance I thought it was a joke - and when I realized it was for real my next thought was:

 

FOR WHAT??

 

Clearly the neophyte President Obama and his untested international policies have produced NOTHING - no substantive results upon which they can be judged. So now the Nobel Peace Prize is given for fledgling ideas? 

 

But there are things about Obama that would appeal to these European elites:

 

1 He bashes America - so do they - including American writers competing for the Nobel Prize for Literature

 

2  He apologized for America's supposed "past sins" and arrogance - that's what they want to hear - He apologized AGAIN and AGAIN so much so that the British media begged him to stop as they feared in his doing so Obama was weakening America.  But he didn't and when he and his wife Michelle flew to Copenhagen, Denmark to try and talk the Olympic Committee into awarding the 2016 Summer Olympics to Chicago...........he bashed America again.

 

3  He praises Islam - and their despots - and he grossly overrated muslims numbers and importance in American life -so do they.

 

4  He bowed and showed subservience to the Saudi King/Islam even as the Saudis are funding the worldwide Global Caliphate  and terrorism

 

5  He refuses to point the finger directly at Islamics for causing terrorism worldwide -  in fact the elites along with some European leaders think one musn't even put Islam and terrorism in the same sentence (sound familiar)

 

6  He bashes Israel and makes them the 'bad guy' in the Middle East - so do they

 

Thus Obama talked the RIGHT talk and bowed the RIGHT bow----------------and has been prematurely awarded with a prize that should be given for results not lofty rhetoric.

 

I'm sure the Obama's are ecstatic and will be opening a celebratory bottle of champagne - perhaps in doing so they should ponder that  -for most -  one needs to first grow and pick the grapes then make the wine and let it age to perfection before being rewarded with the bubbly results.

 

 

Looking for 2,000+ British Men & Women for 13/12/09 SIOE Stop Mosque Building Demonstration in Harrow

Now is the time for action - blogs such as this one along with many others have chronicled the ongoing,  rampant Muslim Colonisation and subsequent Islamisation of Great Britain.

Now is the time for action and I highly urge British men and women to join the SIOE group in this peaceable demonstration.

Be prepared to be labelled "the far right" by muslims and their apologists, vote pandering politicians, multiculturalism obsessed elites and the sycophantic news media - but we all know who you are - you are pro British activists - people who love your Country and your heritage and want to preserve both -- nothing far right about that!

In fact sounds just about perfect to me!

So on 13th of December - Grab your flag or placard and get to Harrow!

Harrow stop mosque building demo 13th December

Posted by Sitemaster on October 7, 2009

 

The Prime Minister of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan, publicly read an Islamic poem including the lines: “The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and Muslims our soldiers…”

HAMMER THEIR HELMETS! BLUNT THEIR BAYONETS! (metaphorical reference to no more mosques).

NO MORE MOSQUE BUILDING DEMONSTRATION

Location:  Square in front of Harrow Civic Centre, Station Road/Milton Road junction.

Date:   13th December 2009

Time:   14.00 – 16.00 (2pm – 4pm)

APPROVED FOR PROTEST

1. Approved anti-sharia and anti-Islamisation chants, banners and placards will be permitted.

Official chants:-

Hammer their helmets! Blunt their bayonets! (this is a metaphorical reference to no more mosques).
No more mosques!
Stop kuffarphobia!

2. English, Welsh, Scottish, N. Irish, national flags,  national flags of other countries, certain other national flags will be permitted and encouraged.

Some flags already known to be represented are:-

Bulgaria
Denmark
Serbia
Israel

Let us know which flag you’ll be flying!

3. Certain other flags representing communities struggling against Islamic colonisation such as Papua New Guinea and Biafra will be permitted.

4. Certain civil rights flags, banners and placards will be encouraged provided they are displayed within the no-sharia context of the demonstration.

5. ALL MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ORGANISERS BEFORE THE PROTEST

Speakers using hand held megaphones will address the gathering. Names of speakers will be provided to the police prior to the demonstration. Speeches must be approved by the organisers.

WANTED

Speakers to explain Muslim persecution in Islamic countries.

Copts in Egypt
Hindus in Bangladesh
Hindus in Malayasia
Christians in Indonesia
Christians in Pakistan
Papuans in Indonesia
Jews everywhere

BANNED FROM PROTEST

1. As with previous SIOE demonstrations, political parties are banned.

2. Any racist chanting, banners and placards will result in immediate ejection of the perpetrators from the demo as will nazi salutes.

3. Totalitarian symbols such as nazi swastikas, communist hammer and sickles, Islamic star and crescent, UNLESS CLEARLY CROSSED OUT OR DEFACED WITH A STOP SIGN.

Banners, placards and speeches will be shown to the police prior to the protest starting if requested.

For Map and more information go to:

http://sioe.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/harrow-stop-mosque-buiding-demo-13th-december/

 

PORTRAIT OF A BRITISH WAR HERO - BRAVERY FAR FEW OF US POSSESS

Brave British soldier immortalised in painting depicting the moment he was gunned down in a hail of bullets

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 8:39 AM on 29th September 2009

Bursting out of a cornfield with his rifle blazing the paratrooper charges towards an enemy position. The insurgents fall in the hail of gunfire but one manages to raise a rifle towards the lone soldier hinting that it is about to unleash a fatal burst of gunfire.

Celebrating the heroism of the soldier in unabashed style, the painting shows the courage of Corporal Bryan Budd as he stormed a Taliban position in Afghanistan.

Cpl Budd was hit by a stray bullet during hand-to-hand fighting with the insurgents in Helmand province three years ago after he had killed three of the enemy.

A member of 3rd Battalion the Parachute Regiment, 29-year-old Cpl Budd was awarded the first posthumous Victoria Cross since the Falklands War.

Honour: A painting of Corporal Bryan Budd, 29, was commissioned by The 3rd Battalion Parachute Regiment after he was killed in Afghanistan storming a Taliban position in 2006

His widow Lorena collected the medal from Buckingham Palace two years ago with the couple's two children, the youngest born after Cpl Budd was killed in action.

To honour his bravery officers at the regiment's HQ, in Colchester, commissioned the oil painting.

 

More...

• British soldier dies in Afghan blast as death toll hits 218

It was painted by military artist Stuart Brown, who interviewed fellow soldiers who had been on Cpl Brown's last mission near Sangin.

During the battle with the Taliban, he led his section of men around a cornfield to cut them off but they were spotted and came under heavy fire.

Two of his men were injured, and realising their position was perilous and they were likely to be captured or killed, Cpl Budd ran through the corn firing his rifle.

Brave: Cpl Budd, who was attempting to protect men in his section, was awarded the first posthumous Victoria Cross since the Falklands War. The soldier, who had two children, was killed when a stray bullet hit him during hand-to-hand fighting

The oil painting depicts him bursting out of the cornfield and killing three armed insurgents.

But seconds later he was to be hit and killed himself.

Mr Brown, from Southampton, said: 'Cpl Budd was obviously an exceptional soldier and I wanted to depict him in that light.

'I knew what the scene was and it was up to me to capture the spirit and courage of the man moments before he died.'

The type of heroics shown by Cpl Budd are thought to be some of the reasons behind a surge in new recruits to the British armed forces.

Young people inspired by patriotism and the threat of joblessness  have lead to a 25 per cent jump in Army applications this year, with more signing up now than at any time since 2005.

Colonel Jonathan Calder-Smith, who helps run the army unit responsible for recruitment, told the Guardian many young recruits have been inspired to join the armed forces, despite casualties continuing to rise in Afghanistan: 'We are seeing gatekeepers – teachers and parents, mothers particularly – who are less keen to see their sons and daughters joining the army and that is understandable'.

>Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1216591/Brave-British-soldier-immortalised-painting-depicting-moment-gunned-hail-bullets.html#ixzz0SUsJaJXK

Adding Insult to Injury - Freed "death bed" Lockerbie Bomber to pen tell all book

I thought this bastard Megrahi was supposed to be on his "death bed"? 

Someone needs to ask that question to muslim apologists and enablers, Gordon Brown-istan and Kenny MacASSkill.

Doesn't sound like it to me:

Book will proclaim Meghrahi's innocence

Lockerbie bomber plans tell-all book: report

The book would detail al- Meghrabi's life behind bars and reveal all he knows about the 1988 bombing (File)

LONDON (AFP)

The Lockerbie bomber is planning to write an auto-biography to "proclaim his innocence" by disclosing new information behind Britain's deadliest terrorist attack, a report said Monday.

Abdelbaset Ali Mohmet al-Megrahi was working on the book that would detail his life behind bars and reveal all he knows about the 1988 bombing that killed 270 people, the Times said.

"He'll be writing a book to proclaim his innocence," said Libya's official envoy to Scotland, Abdurrhman Swessi.

The newspaper said Megrahi's lawyers had collected information for an appeal in the Scottish courts before his release on compassionate grounds last week.

The book is expected to be used as Megrahi's platform to argue that he was framed for the crime.

Scotland's justice minister decided to release ailing Megrahi from prison on compassionate grounds last Thursday, sparking a furious reaction from the United States.

Megrahi is the only person convicted over the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over the Scottish town of Lockerbie. The majority of the victims were American.

Megrahi, who returned to his family in Libya, has terminal prostate cancer and doctors have said he has only about three months to live.

Lloyd's TSB conducting Sharia law religious discrimination against non-muslims

Too gobsmacked for too many comments - trying to keep my head from exploding --- you truly couldn't make this crap up! Bank dhimmis think the British people will put up with this? 

Time to withdraw your money and boycott Lloyds but make sure you check to see if any other banks are conducting this Sharia Law based anti-muslim discrimination.

Article in full:

An overdraft? That'll be £200 at Lloyds TSB (but only £15 if you're a Muslim)

Many Lloyds TSB customers are being hit with charges of up £200 a month if they go into the red - while Muslims who use the bank are only being charged £15.

The part-nationalised bank has been accused of religious discrimination over the disparity between overdraft charges on its standard current account and its Islamic account.

The Islamic account was set up by the high street bank to attract Muslim customers by allowing them to keep faithful to their religion.

Sharia law does not permit the payment of interest so the 'typical' Islamic account at Lloyds TSB has been set up without an overdraft facility.

If a Muslim customer who has insufficient funds in the account tries to make a payment, it is blocked and a 'return item fee' is charged.

However, on some Islamic accounts such a payment is authorised and an 'unplanned overdraft fee' of £15 is then levied.

The bank says this is a management fee, not a payment of interest, so does not contradict Sharia law.

Meanwhile, customers with standard current accounts who go into the red by at least £100 without authorisation are hit with an 'unplanned overdraft fee' of £20 a day for a maximum of ten days. This could mean a customer has to pay £200 in one month.

The Islamic account is available to all customers at Lloyds TSB. In theory, anyone who does not need a permanent overdraft facility could switch to this account to avoid being hit by interest charges for going into the red.

The disparity between the two accounts emerged after the bank sent its customers a booklet this month explaining its charges.

Graham Milne, a customer and chartered accountant from Norham, Northumberland, said difference in fees was tantamount to 'religious discrimination'.

He added: 'This means that all the non-Islamic account holders are subsidising those with such an account. It strikes me as something which is bordering on illegal.

'One cannot help feeling the organisation is bending over backwards to help Muslims to the detriment of everybody else.

'The man in the street would say this is a form of theft. Whether you call it a management fee or an interest fee, it makes no odds because they mean the same thing.'

In the past few years, millions of customers at all the major high street banks have demanded the return of money which has been taken from their account in various forms of bank charges.

Many got their money, or the majority of it, back. A test case - designed to rule if such charges are illegal - is going through the House of Lords.

Until it is resolved, the subject continues to remain hotly contested. A Lloyds TSB spokesman said: 'The Islamic current account is for customers who cannot receive credit or debit interest due to their religious beliefs.

'All of our Islamic accounts comply with Islamic law and are available to anyone regardless of background or faith.

'These accounts are structured differently to our traditional accounts and are designed to help prevent a customer slipping into the red. A comparison with the overdraft charging structure on other accounts is meaningless.'

Earlier this month, it emerged that losses at Lloyds had escalated to £13.4billion - largely due to the reckless lending of Halifax Bank of Scotland, which it bought for £9.6billion in January.

The disastrous merger led to a £17billion taxpayer bail-out. The newly-formed Lloyds Banking Group is 43 per cent owned by the taxpayer

 

 

BRITISH MAN STABBED IN "No Go Area" - ANOTHER MEDIA IGNORED MUSLIM HATE CRIME

If you want to know what is really going on with muslims in Britain - don't rely upon the mainstream media to give you an accurate depiction. Nope - you must search the internet blogs (see blog list) and local newspapers as there is one thing you can be sure  - when it comes to muslim crime - particularly muslim hate crime - it WILL consistently be ignored or downplayed by the British top newspapers and their web sites.

Doesn't matter if a murder or assault occurs when the innocent victim is a police officer or elderly man or young boy or young couple or gay man -or if you're a member of the"wrong" political party or if it is a ever growing pattern of rape jihad  (see also here)and faith hate attacks- the only breath of muslim hate crime news that has been and is elicited from the mainstream national media will be the breeze you feel from their collective gape-mouthed yawn.

Even after the7/7 muslim bombing attacks in Britain - the media made muslims out to be the real victims - which was later debunked as the much touted retaliatory hate attacks against muslims never materialised.  In fact - there is evidence that the exact opposite happened.

Only when a muslim hate crime is as egregious as Scotland's horrific Kriss Donald torture and murder does it merit national coverage - 15 year old schoolboy, Kriss Donald - was tortured and killed by muslim gang/men for no other reason than the young lad was white:

"The court had heard that Kriss was jumped on as he walked down a street near his home with a friend. As he was bundled into a car, he screamed: "Why me? I'm only 15." ....His mutilated body was found the next day on a walkway in the east end of the city. The slightly built boy had been beaten, held down and stabbed 13 times, then set on fire while he was still alive. Bleeding to death and burning, he tried to crawl towards the river Clyde but died in a ditch.

A passerby who found his body the following day thought he had stumbled across the carcass of a dead animal. "   LINK

And so it should receive the attention and disgust of all.

But what about the tens - if not hundreds - of other incidents of muslim hate crime that are becoming a routine occurrence in multicuturally enriched Britain? - many chronicled in this blog-

It appears the British government politicians dhimmis along with the increasingly muslimized British police and the compliant media are all in collusion or living in fear of being bludgeoned by the "racist club" thus muslim hate crime is purposely and maliciously kept out of media public view.

Clearly if the situations were reversed, as in the Amar Aslam case - even if the immediate evidence pointed otherwise - the British media (and police) would jump to their preconceived conclusions and portray the beating as a racist "hate" crime by a gang of white men.

Perhaps the entire subject of the publicity and indeed of the muslim hate crime itself is now a moot point as with new jelly-spined Britainistan guidelines - muslims are now given an official pass  - when it comes to being guilty of hate crimes. 

Nevertheless here is another tale of clear muslim hate against the kaffir - and the kaffir pays the price of repeated stab wounds and slashed hands.

Why?

Because he dared to venture into a non-muslim 'no go' zone =  “Manningham belongs to Muslims. We don’t want whites. We rule Bradford. We are going to get you out.”.

Below story found in the local news - of course:

Manningham man shouted racial abuse before attack

9:03am Thursday 20th August 2009

By Steve Wright »

A teenager who stabbed and slashed a passer-by in a racially motivated attack has been locked up for five years.

Amir Rehman, 18, shouted racial abuse as 51-year-old Ronald O’Connor walked to a shop for a loaf of bread, near the gates of Lister Park, Manning-ham, last December.

Leeds Crown Court was told Rehman shouted out: “Manningham belongs to Muslims. We don’t want whites. We rule Bradford. We are going to get you out.”

His frightened victim, Ronald O’Connor, tried to get in the shop, but Rehman ran up and stabbed him twice in the upper arm with a four to five-inch bladed knife.

The court heard that Rehman, of Lumb Lane, Manningham, was describ-ed as in a frenzy, “like a crazy man, out of control,” as he tried to slash Mr O’Connor’s face. The palms of Mr O’Connor’s hands were slashed as he tried to defend himself.

Prosecutor Richard Gioserano said: “Rehman was swinging at him over and over again with the knife. Mr O’Connor was in great pain and in fear, literally, of his life.”

Mr O’Connor ran into the shop. Police were called and Rehman was arrested outside.

Mr O’Connor had surgery at Bradford Royal Infirmary for a deep laceration to his palm. He also suffered lacerations to his fingers and two incisions to his upper arm with apparent nerve damage.

Mr Gioserano said Rehman attended Bradford Crown Court for a preliminary hearing of the case in March, but went straight from court to Pudsey, with two other men, Amar Farooq and Tanveer Hussain, where, later in the day, they committed a series of robberies on children on their way home from school.

During the street muggings some of the youngsters were threatened with being stabbed, though no knife was seen. The court heard that the defendants were clearly drunk.

Jonathan Devlin, for Rehman, said there were no explanations or excuses for the offences other than drink.

All three pleaded guilty to three robberies. Rehman pleaded guilty to wounding with intent in connection with the Manningham incident.

Hussain, 23, of Lumb Lane, Manning-ham, and Farooq, 25, of Agar Street, Girlington, were jailed for 30 months.

Rehman was sent to youth custody for a total of five years.

The judge, Recorder David Bradshaw, told Rehman he had committed an unprovoked attack on an innocent man causing “horrendous” injuries.

He said: “I am satisfied it was accompanied by racial abuse and seemed to have a racial motive.”