TheOPINIONATOR

Muslims are ringleaders of 98% of Dogfighting in UK

When it comes to the evil and ultimate cruel "sport" of dogfighting the USA has professional football player, Michael Vick and his despicable ilk -

and the UK has their ever growing muslim community.

There has been a huge increase in the numbers of dog fighting rings in Britain - a country well known for it's love of their dogs. But since the Labour government foisted rampant legal and illegal muslim immigration upon the British people - under the guise of multiculturalism - the prevalence of dogfigting has mushroomed. Primarily bull breed dogs are being used for this blood sport but even cats are abused for "fun".

"David Grant, of the RSPCA's Harmsworth animal hospital in north London said the capital was a hotspot for dog fighting in the streets. Merseyside, West Yorkshire and the West Midlands have also been identified by the RSPCA as areas with a similar problem.  LINK

2004: 24

2005: 36

2006: 137

2007: 358 (132 street fighting)

2008: 284 (188 street fighting)

Source: RSPCA. Figures for England and Wales"

Of course - no surprise - all of the above mentioned cities are hot beds of the Religion of Peace.

You can 'bet on' some addle-headed multicultural worshipping morons doing their typical muslim apologising routine and stating that dog fighting is part of the muslim "culture" - you know the "culture" that these same multiculti idiots are trying to convince us is on a par with thousands of years of British civilisation?!  I find it is particularly ironic that muslims insist the Qur'an dictates that they not let dogs, even service dogs in their taxicabs or homes - as dogs are "unclean" - yet clearly MANY muslim men have NO problem exploiting dogs for barbaric dogfighting AND obviously use this blood sport to gamble. Isn't gambling forbidden in the Qur'an? - why yes it is!  Guess this is just another instance of muslims disregarding the Qur'an when it suits them. 

There is also a proven, direct relationship between belly-draggers who abuse animals and the scum who abuse children:

"More than two decades of psychological and sociological research reveals that barbarous acts toward animals often lead to brutality toward humans.  Such violence has been observed in serial killers, who often began their sprees of violence by practicing on animals, but is well-documented in cases of domestic violence and child abuse as well." LINK

I guess the below  "Asian" men can be proud that their disgusting behaviours place them in the company of serial killers such as the cannibalistic Jeffrey Dahmerand Boston Strangler - Albert DeSalvo.

As far as I am concerned there is little more despicable than dog fighting and the miscreants who force dogs to fight to the death.  These useless occupiers of space who abuse dogs and then use them as entertainment should be sent to jail and the key thrown away (-well to be quite honest I think they deserve a bit more "punishment" than just a cushy jail cell with curries on demand).  I have no sympathy and will make no excuses for the heinous activity of dog fighting. I own two English bull terriers and needless to say if someone tried to steal or hurt my beloved dogs -  they'd not leave walking. And that's not a threat - but a reality!

We must demand the rescued dogs will be rehabilitated as with the "Vick Dogs" rather then be doomed to death for the "crime" of living an tortured and abused exisitence - a life they never chose - but was forced upon them - in this case - by gangs of cheering "Asians".

Article in full:

Inside the world of dog-fighting

It was the sound of dogs barking and whimpering that first attracted PC Paul Foster to the back of an old kitchen showroom in inner city Birmingham.

PC Paul Foster of West Midlands Police describes the moment he witnessed a dog-fight

As he got closer he heard voices and men cheering.

What police found in Alum Rock a mainly Pakistani inner-city suburb, was an unexpected and disturbing crime scene.

"The first thing I notice was the black pit bull terrier, little fur, covered in blood in a bad way," PC Rogers told BBC Radio 4's The Report.

Twenty-six men were eventually convicted two years ago for taking part in the largest illegal dog-fight uncovered in the UK.

The RSPCA had long regarded dog-fighting as the preserve of white working class men attending fights in the countryside.

What the fight in Alum Rock revealed was the first glimpse of organised dog fighting in the Asian community taking place in urban surroundings and tens of thousands of pounds gambled on the result.

Since then subsequent raids have revealed that dog-fighting has become a problem in some sections of the Asian community.

Increasing problem

Ian Briggs, chief inspector of the RSPCA's Special Operations Unit said dog-fighting is up 400% in the past three years in the UK.

"Out of all the work we do 98% is Asian".

Mr Briggs said the organisation believes there is a dog fight nearly every week nationally from a small fight in the park to the bigger organised events such as that uncovered at Alum Rock.

"Information about one fight we uncover leads to another but certainly we are scratching the surface."

What has also surprised RSPCA officials is the attention to detail that accompanies the fights.

They're looking for a more exotic dog, more jaw pressure, one whose got more stamina, the drive just to kill, that's what they are looking for, them characteristics people will pay money for Youth worker, Handsworth

During raids in the West Midlands, RSPCA officers have uncovered detailed training logs which would not be out of place in a professional athlete's routine.

One log listed a nine-week plan including putting the dog on a treadmill for 30 minutes, three times a day and listing what drugs should be administered and the diet regime.

A youth worker from Handsworth said the goal is to create a perfect specimen.

"They're looking for a more exotic dog, more jaw pressure, one which has got more stamina, the drive just to kill, that's what they are looking for, them characteristics people will pay money for. That's where the money's at," he said.

Yet it would be wrong to think this is a covert world.

Foreign fights

Young men openly parade their illegal pit bull terriers saying how police cannot tell the difference - while the police with stretched resources can only play a limited role in tackling the problem.

Meanwhile there is evidence that young British Asians are having an impact on dog fighting back in Pakistan.

Basharat Najiba, a youth worker in Birmingham, said that a sizeable number of spectators make the trip from the UK with some even owning the fighting dogs and paying money to locals to look after them.

He said: "I think British Asians are big players because of the financial attachments that they can bring from here."

Cruelty threshold

Dog fighting is part of life in rural Punjab and Kashmir and there are fears that its acceptability could be increasing among a new generation of young Asians in the UK aware of fathers, uncles and cousins attending dog fights in Pakistan.

But forensic psychologist Dr Vince Egan, of the University of Leicester, believes this creates real dangers of a tolerance of cruelty and of lowering ideas of "what is acceptable" and creating greater cruelty.

The RSPCA says it is keen on tackling this problem in the British Pakistani community but is finding it hard to penetrate the gangs.

And while the majority of the community find the fights abhorrent, there is among others, as one Asian youth worker explained, certain apathy.

"People say 'the dog wants to fight' and I don't believe that at all because it's the human being that's taking the dog to fight. They haven't got a choice about being in that ring," he said.

"It's the same like drugs - it's always going to happen. It's the same like prostitution it will always happen, it's like one of them kind of things where it's being abused to bad limits behind closed doors and people need to know about it because it does happen."

HORSES FIGHTING TO THE DEATH IS MUSLIM FESTIVAL TRADITION

Last February I wrote a post titled Muslim Run Dogfighting Becoming Rampant in the UK - I began the blog with the statement:

"As far as I am concerned there is little more despicable than dog fighting."

Well horse fighting to the death - conducted on the Phillipine Island of Mindanao - by muslims in the name of "fun" & also as a source of gambling -is equally if not more despicable.

"Mindanao is the second-largest and the most southerly island, with a very different feel from the rest of the country. A variety of Muslim ethnic groups live here......The flea market sells Muslim pottery, clothes and brassware."

 

Interesting but not surprising that you won't find this clear muslim association to the Island population as well as to the festival/horse fighting mentioned in the article below.

 

Let's hope that Mindanao does indeed have "a very different feel from the rest of the country (Phillipines) because what you read & see below will undoubtedly make your stomach churn with repulsion.

 

It is past time for this muslim tradition to be stopped - permanently!

 

article in full:

 

Stallions forced to fight to the death....

by Samantha Wostear

Published 23 Oct 2008

FAMILIES gather in their thousands and children climb trees for a better view of the festival taking place below.

The crowd cheer and laugh — the object of their excitement a bloodied stallion kicked so brutally by another that its eyeballs have been dislodged from their sockets.

Welcome to the vile spectator sport of HORSE-FIGHTING.

The nation reeled in horror yesterday when Sky TV broadcast stomach-churning fight images from the Philippines.

Sick ... horses bite

The savagery was BANNED there ten years ago but is still sickeningly rife deep in the jungles.

These shocking pictures from a three-day fight festival held on Mindanao Island, in the eastern Philippines, show the “sport” in all its barbarity.

Normally placid stallions are whipped up into violent frenzies by sick organisers desperate to put on a show and make money from betting.

Captive ... helpless nag

A mare in season is tethered to the side of a filthy, makeshift pen to ignite sexual rivalry among the stallions and guns are fired into the air to panic them into violence.

In the wild, the gentle giants never fight to the death. Males clash over mates, as well as leadership rights, but the weaker ones give in to the stronger ones before they are seriously injured or killed.

Yet in the depraved, man-made heat of the fight ring, they are not allowed to back down and thousands of stallions are maimed, crippled or killed each year.

Crazed ... horses are trained to fight

And it isn’t over quickly.

These frequently ill-matched fights are drawn out for up to 45 minutes before a victor is declared.

Last night a spokesman for Canadian welfare group Network for Animals, who are campaigning to end the contests, urged Brits to add their voice.

He said: “If people want to help stop these tournaments they should write to the Philippine Embassy in London and tell them they will not visit their country unless urgent action is taken.

“The threat of a loss of tourism money will help to bring this despicable blood sport to an end.”

Thousands of eager spectators travel long distances to see the beautiful animals pitched against each other in contests fixed by criminal gangs and corrupt cops.

Trainers teach the horses how to fight and the nightmarish spectacles are big business in poor communities where thousands of pounds are wagered on fights.

Crime syndicates have taken over the gambling and rake in huge profits.

Campaigning veterinary surgeon Dino Yebron, who attends tournaments in the hope of saving as many horses as he can, says: “This is obscene.

Injured ... horses are crippled and killed

“The horses are trained to fight, trained to bite and trained to kick — and all this is manipulated by the trainers so they can win.”

Kerstin Alford, of animal welfare charity The Blue Cross, adds: “In the wild, it is normal for stallions to fight for the right to rule a herd but nature takes its course when the stronger animal emerges and the other retreats.

“These fighting rings, however, force the horses together in an artificial situation where they don’t have the option of backing down and literally have to fight for their lives.

“It’s truly appalling that this inhumane practice is allowed to continue and that anyone could find it entertaining.”

***********UPDATE*********** - Muslim Mindanao is also known for CHILD TRAFFICKING

IS THIS WHAT DOGS MUST WEAR TO NOT OFFEND MUSLIMS

A bit of humour here - but maybe not.

Is the below picture where our "best friends" are heading? -- so that they will not be "offensive" to muslims. If so - you can be sure the British/EU government will rush to pass laws demanding that all dogs wear booties and all bitches must also wear the niqab. Undoubtedly there will be stiff fines and jailtime for those kaffir who don't follow the NuLaw.

Hat tip to The Battle for Britain :

POLICE DOGS TO WEAR BOOTIES TO APPEASE MUSLIMS

Well well another ludicrous example of just how far the British government and/or police will stoop in order to pander to muslims.  This latest show of dhimmitude was most likely prompted by muslims declaring that airport police "sniffer" dogs are unclean and demanding that the dogs must not touch the robes of muslims - as described in a recent TheO post "Muslims Offended by Sniffer Dogs". - as well as the even more absurd muslim outrage over a police placard advertising a new non-emergency phone number - muslims were angry that an adorable German Shepherd puppy, a police dog in training, was pictured - the police response was an instant "dhimmi-apology"-of course. (TheO post explains all in Another Case of the Tail Wagging the Dog)

Now looks like the police have at least a semi-solution in their quest to appease muslim dog outrage. Police dogs are now being fitted with booties so those muslim perceived "unclean" police dogs will not leave dog footprints and scent when used to check for bombs, etc in mosques and muslim homes. 

Get that?? Dogs checking for BOMBS (one would believe that there has to be at least a suspicion that bombs are present) - and our police's top concern is all about appeasing muslims. To think that highly trained dogs, risking their lives to save people from being blown apart are "offensive" -as muslims do - is an insult to not only these hardworking animals but also against the majority of British people who reside in the most "dog friendly" country in the world - or at least it USED to be before muslim "offense" and appeasement became top priority.

Oh - by the way- looks like muslims, as with so many other "offenses", also pick and choose on the dog issue --- predominately muslim Egypt uses police sniffer dogs at their Cairo airport (presumably without booties) - recently one of these dogs sniffed out snakes and reptiles being illegally smuggled out of the country by--guess who. Read story here.

Entire article:

SNIFFER DOGS TO WEAR MUSLIM "BOOTIES"

BY STUART MacDonald

Police sniffer dogs will have to wear bootees when searching the homes of Muslims so as not to cause offence.

Guidelines being drawn up by the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) urge awareness of religious sensitivities when using dogs to search for drugs and explosives. The guidelines, to be published this year, were designed to cover mosques but have been extended to include other buildings.

Where Muslims object, officers will be obliged to use sniffer dogs only in exceptional cases. Where dogs are used, they will have to wear bootees with rubber soles. “We are trying to ensure that police forces are aware of sensitivities that people can have with the dogs to make sure they are not going against any religious or cultural element within people’s homes. It is being addressed and forces are working towards doing it,” Acpo said.

Problems faced by the use of sniffer dogs were highlighted last week when Tayside police were forced to apologise for a crime prevention poster featuring a german shepherd puppy, in response to a complaint by a Muslim councillor.

Islamic injunctions warn Muslims against contact with dogs, which are regarded as “unclean”.

Police dogs at present are issued with footwear only at scenes of explosions to prevent them injuring their paws on broken glass.

Ibrahim Mogra, one of Britain’s leading imams, said the measures were unnecessary: “In Islamic law the dog is not regarded as impure, only its saliva is. Most Islamic schools of law agree on that. If security measures require to send a dog into a house, then it has to be done. I think Acpo needs to consult better and more widely.

“I know in the Muslim community there is a hang-up against dogs, but this is cultural. Also, we know the British like dogs; we Muslims should do our bit to change our attitudes.”

John Midgley, co-founder of the Campaign Against Political Correctness, said: “The police are in effect being overly sensitive to potential criminals and not being sensitive enough to the public at large who need to be protected. These sort of things have a counter-productive effect because they cause huge friction between different communities.”

Caroline Kisko, of the Kennel Club, said: “We would not condone any attempt to make search dogs wear special clothing, which could cause them distress.”

ANOTHER CASE OF THE TAIL WAGGING THE DOG

Undoubtedly I am far from the only one who is absoutely SICK & TIRED of the muslim minority, in the UK, thinking that every bit of their culture should be implemented in Great Britain with NO regard to the thousands year old culture that the British people themselves have achieved and lived for millenia. (We could take this worldwide - but that is for a future blog) Let's face it - no one dragged these muslims, kicking and screaming into the UK. No one is forcing them to stay. Even more sickening is the British police and government who (for what appears to be on a daily basis) twist and turn themselves into apologetic dhimmi pretzels (let's emphasize that to DHIMMI PRETZELS) trying to appease bleating, whining and constantly "offended" muslims - offended by the same culture that THEY have chosen avail themselves - the same country that provides so many of those generous financial and physical benefits.  This isn't just insidious multiculturalism -  this is British cultural apartheid.

The muslim daily whinge and moan today - is none other than a picture of an adorable puppy sitting inside a police hat to advertise a new police non-emergency phone number. (I have written extensively about muslims & dogs - to read a few go here and here.) You would think, based on the muslim indignation, granted it is far short of that shown regarding the Danish MO-Cartoons or the Teddy Bear Teacher, but nevertheless defiant in its demands that the puppy poster not be used and vowing that, regardless of its importance, it will not be displayed in muslim businesses, etc.

Of course, based on past acrobatics used by politicians and police to instantly react to publicly appease the muslim community - local Dundee councillor Mohammed Asif immediatly contacted Tayside Police Chief Constable John Vine to discuss the "offence".  Asif said: 'My concern was that it's not welcomed by all communities, with the dog on the cards. It was probably a waste of resources going to these communities....'People who have shops just won't put up the postcard. Apparently the "expected" apologetic statement, from the Chief Constable came forthwith: 'This was an oversight and did not seek to offend or upset.'

Oversight? Why is it that the muslims think that every niche and cranny of British life, culture, mores, etc must first be approved by muslims? (Is it because the constant drumbeat of government and police appeasement?) Yet when it comes to muslims and the stealth implementation of Sharia Law into the UK or its customs -some of which are untenable and barbaric -- the British people (and everyone else) are immediately labeled as Islamophobic if great respect and subservience is not immediately shown. This is exactly what muslims want, expect and unfortunately have so far succeeded in establishing not only in the UK but most of Europe.

I'd like to think that the "Puppy Incident" will help to wake up the nation that has always loved it's dogs. In fact a huge number of dog breeds originated in the British Isles - more than anywhere else in the world.  Are we going to let the Islamic spurred hatred and disgust of our cherished "best friends" dictate to us? It is time to stop letting the tail wag the dog - and high time for the dog to start biting back-

WHAT DO YOU FIND OFFENSIVE?

Article in full:

MUSLIMS OUTRAGED AT POLICE ADVERT FEATURING CUTE PUPPY SITTING IN A POLICEMAN'S HAT

A postcard featuring a cute puppy sitting in a policeman's hat advertising a Scottish police force's new telephone number has sparked outrage from Muslims.   

Tayside Police's new non-emergency phone number has prompted complaints from members of the Islamic community.

The choice of image on the Tayside Police cards - a black dog sitting in a police officer's hat - has now been raised with Chief Constable John Vine.

The advert has upset Muslims because dogs are considered ritually unclean and has sparked such anger that some shopkeepers in Dundee have refused to display the advert.

Dundee councillor Mohammed Asif said: 'My concern was that it's not welcomed by all communities, with the dog on the cards.

'It was probably a waste of resources going to these communities.

'They (the police) should have understood. Since then, the police have explained that it was an oversight on their part, and that if they'd seen it was going to cause upset they wouldn't have done it.' 

Councillor Asif, who is a member of the Tayside Joint Police Board, said that the force had a diversity adviser and was generally very aware of such issues.

He raised the matter with Mr Vine at a meeting of the board.   

Tayside Police Chief Constable John Vine said the advert was not intended to cause any offence

The chief constable said he was unaware of the concerns and that the force had not sought to cause any upset but added he would look into the matter.

Councillor Asif said: 'People who have shops just won't put up the postcard. But the police have said to me that it was simply an oversight and they did not seek to offend or upset.'

Cards featuring police dog-in-training Rebel have been distributed to communities throughout the area to advertise the single number point of contact for non-emergency calls to the police.

Rebel has proved a popular recruit for Tayside Police after coming through the very first Lothian and Borders Police dog-breeding programme in February.   

One of seven German Shepherd pups born in early December, he has now completed his course of inoculations, and is free to venture out onto the streets of Tayside.

A spokesman for Tayside Police said: 'Trainee police dog Rebel has proved extremely popular with children and adults since being introduced to the public, aged six weeks old, as Tayside Police's newest canine recruit.

'His incredible world-wide popularity - he has attracted record visitor numbers to our website - led us to believe Rebel could play a starring role in the promotion of our non-emergency number.

'We did not seek advice from the force's diversity adviser prior to publishing and distributing the postcards. That was an oversight and we apologise for any offence caused.'

MUSLIMS OFFENDED BY SNIFFER DOGS

Looks like we now have another item to add to our ever growing LONG list of THINGS THAT OFFEND MUSLIMS.

Muslims, in Great Britain, are complaining that police "sniffer" dogs - used to detect bombs, drugs and.....terrorists are against Islam. That these valued members of the police and military - who undoubtedly have saved thousands of lives through their training - are considered "dirty" by muslims. (Let's not profile here but just who have been the terrorists of late?) So these "British" muslims do not want these filthy police dogs sniffing their sacred muslim robes. Yes - NO touching of muslims by dogs is the demand. Of course to abide by this demand would adversely affect the highly trained dogs from doing their jobs. Muslims say dogs sniffing their luggage is fine but absolutely no smelling the muslim passengers/people.

But it would appear that muslims have a habit of "picking and choosing" just what "unclean" dogs they will or won't let defile their muslim bodies (& cars). For instance, service dogs used as guides for the blind and many other life saving reasons - are too unclean to sit in muslim taxis - in fact muslim taxi drivers have been know to leave blind passengers stranded because they had a guide dog. At least, for now in the UK, disability seems to trump muslims distaste for service dogs and the law has been changed accordingly.

Whereas helpful dogs seem haram to muslims -the heinous act of dogfighting  has become rampant in England - with the majority of perpetrators being muslim. Helpless dogs, often puppies, have been seized upon by vile dogfighting muslim groups and raised to be forced into excessive breeding, fighting and eventual death. Clearly these despicable, barbaric acts involve muslims touching their four legged victims - but apparently it is OK to touch dogs as long as the dogs are being tortured, maimed and killed - all for "sport".  Says alot doesn't it? For recent instances of muslim individuals and group involvement in dogfighting go here  and here  and here.

Of course - to add to what is obviously a confusing relationship of muslims and dogs we also had the recent example of a dead dog being worth 15 child brides. Does this tell us that muslim little girls are even lower, on the muslim caste scale, than dogs? I'll leave the answer to that question up to the reader.

Getting back to muslims considering themselves "no sniff" zones when it comes to police dogs, I agree with the critics who say this is yet another example of muslims using their religion to force Islam into British laws and culture. Let's hope that the often softheaded dhimmi British judges, who will likely be called upon to rule on some future lawsuit regarding this issue, agree with Tory MP Philip Davies:

“As far as I am concerned, everyone should be treated equally in the face of the law and we cannot have people of different religious groups laying the law down. I hope the police will go about their business as they would do normally.”

Article in full:

SNIFFER DOGS OFFEND MUSLIMS

POLICE sniffer dogs trained to spot terrorists at railway stations may no longer come into contact with Muslim passengers – after complaints that it is against the suspects’ religion.

A report for the Transport Department has raised the prospect that the animals should only touch passengers’ luggage because it is considered “more acceptable”.

In the Muslim faith, dogs are deemed to be spiritually “unclean”. But banning them from touching passengers would severely restrict their ability to do their job.

The report follows trials of station security measures in the wake of the 2005 London suicide bomb attacks. In one trial, some female Muslims said the use of a body scanner was also unacceptable because it was tantamount to being forced to strip.

British Transport Police last night insisted it would still use sniffer dogs – which are trained to detect explosives – with any passengers regardless of faith, but handlers would remain aware of “cultural sensitivities”.

Critics said the complaints were just the latest example of minority religions trying to force their rules and morals on British society.

Tory MP Philip Davies said: “As far as I am concerned, everyone should be treated equally in the face of the law and we cannot have people of different religious groups laying the law down. I hope the police will go about their business as they would do normally.”

News of the security setback came as the Government yesterday admitted that installing 100 per cent airport-style screening at rail and Tube stations was “not feasible”.