Another softheaded order from the EU Court of Human Rights - this time the court has ordered Britain to delay extraditing four terrorists to the USA because US prisons might be too harsh for these sensitive criminals.
Clearly the speculation that those who plan or help the assassins who plan mass murder might have to experience the horrors of "concrete furniture, timed showers, tiny cell windows and no communications with the outside world" causes the Court far more consternation that the image of innocent people watching arms, legs and bowels go flying by after they are targeted by a terrorist bomb.
Thus, isn't the EU Court of Human Rights declaring the faultless victims of heinous acts of terrorism have less human rights than terrorists?
Article in full:
BRUSSELS (AP) - An international court on Thursday ordered Britain to hold off on extraditing four terrorism suspects to the United States, saying it must show that life terms without parole in maximum security prisons would not violate Europe's human rights charter.
The suspects include three Britons and the Egyptian-born radical cleric Mustafa Kamal Mustafa—also known as Abu Hamza al-Masri, the one-eyed, hook-handed hardliner accused of setting up a terrorist training camp in rural Oregon.
The European Court of Human Rights gave Britain until Sept. 2 to respond to questions about the punishment they will face.
If convicted of charges filed between 2004 and 2006, they could get lifelong jail terms without parole in maximum security conditions, including concrete furniture, timed showers, tiny cell windows and no communications with the outside world.
Al-Masri claims he has lost his Egyptian nationality, but Britain considers him an Egyptian citizen. He has also been linked to the taking of 16 hostages in Yemen in 1998 and to preaching jihad in Afghanistan.
The other suspects are al-Masri's alleged coconspirator, Haroon Rashid Aswat, and Babar Ahmad and Syed Talha Ahsan. Ahmad is accused of running websites to raise money, appeal for fighters and provide equipment such as gas masks and night vision goggles for terrorists. Ahsan is charged with conspiring to support terrorists via the Internet.
Europe and the United States have long disagreed on the merit of the death penalty. Thursday's ruling opens a new front, this one over the U.S. practice of putting convicted criminals in spartan, maximum security prisons for the rest of their lives.
It is now up to Britain, presumably in collaboration with U.S. legal experts, to show it is not cruel or degrading.
After the four exhausted their appeals against extradition in British courts, they turned to the Strasbourg, France-based court.
They argued incarceration in the U.S. will be so long and harsh it would amount to a violation of article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights of 1950. The article says, "No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."
The court dismissed the four suspects' argument that as non-U.S. citizens their trial would be "a flagrant denial of justice." It also dismissed their fear they would become "enemy combatants" or sent to a third country—past practices that have been abandoned.
It asked Britain if decades in maximum security was not inhumane, if the four suspects can ever expect "transfer to a normal prison" or see their sentences reduced.
The 70-page ruling cites the harsh conditions at a maximum security prison in Florence, Colorado, where the suspects will likely be sent, if convicted. Human Rights Watch, the New York-based rights group, has said the prison's conditions violate U.S. international treaty obligations.
Britain is holding several convicted terrorists in high-security prisons, including in the notorious Belmarsh prison in London.
Separately, the European Parliament approved a long-awaited deal to share financial data with the U.S. in suspected terrorist cases, after Washington agreed to major concessions to allay concerns over privacy.
The agreement was adopted Thursday with 484 votes to 109 with 12 abstentions and will take effect Aug. 1.
It allows U.S. officials to request financial data from European banks if they suspect accounts are being used by people with terrorist links. Officials must provide European authorities with reasons for their suspicions, rectify inaccurate data and grant legal redress in U.S. courts if information is abused.
"The threat of terrorism faced by the United States and the European Union continues and, with this agreement, all of our citizens will be safer," President Obama said in a statement in Washington. He said the U.S. program of tracking terrorists' funds has since 2001 yielded critical leads.