One must comment on how low the once fine British police have sunk when they choose to apologise to muslims for security cameras. After all it's not like British citizens haven't been blown to smithereens by muslim bombers:

or that groups of muslims regularly stomp through the streets of England yelling threats and insulting British soldiers.

Or that it is estimated that more than 2,000 muslims in the country ‘pose a terrorist threat’ and there are an estimated 200 trained al-Qaida operatives.
The British police, along with so many other government agencies, have been sandbagged by multiculturalism and political correctness. There is NO doubt that the minority of muslims are considered more important and thus receive far more concern and respect, from both the police and our government, than the indigenous British people.
The police are fretting over rebuilding the trust with muslims after the installation of "offensive" security cameras yet the British people were suppose to immediately forgive and forget the 7/7 bombings and embrace all (unapologetic) muslims all while the police and government worried about the backlash against muslims after the deaths of 52 innocents. Worries that proved totally unfounded. Another indication of the 'low man on the ladder' status of the British victim of muslim violence is the fact that seven of the 7/7 victims have still not yet received compensation for the injuries - five years after the fact. Have apologies will be issued to them? One wonders if complaints from non muslims would have seen the police apoligise for and immediately remove "offensive" security cameras. In fact according to Jackie Russell from the Safer Birmingham Partnership:
“Some people are not saying take them down. Crimes do exist in these communities.”
How many of those people who objected to the removal of the cameras were muslims?? What do you think?
The only way for the British people to regain their rightful place is to eradicate the cancer of multiculturalism and it's metasticized political correctness as well as stop the importation of a parasitic population that is hellbent on overwhelming its' host. The clock is ticking.
Until then they will be forced to watch and endure more of this:

And this:
Police apologise for Birmingham spy camera outrage
ANGRY residents have demanded the removal of 218 controversial “Big Brother” surveillance cameras that were installed in mainly Muslim areas of Birmingham without consultation.
The scheme sparked widespread public outrage and claims that the cameras were being used to spy on residents in Washwood Heath, Sparkbrook, Sparkhill and Moseley.
The cameras – installed in April – were put up by the Safer Birmingham Partnership after West Midlands Police received £3 million from an anti-terror fund controlled by the Association of Chief Police Officers.
Campaigners received assurances last night from West Midlands Police that 72 covert cameras will also be switched off (like the overt cameras) and that there will be no future involvement of the counter-terrorism unit (CTU).
Hundreds of residents, politicians and protesters crammed into the Bordesley Centre, in Stratford Road, to hear Assistant Chief Constable Sharon Rowe vow that West Midland Police would take total responsibility for the project.
Booed by some sections of the crowd, she said: “I recognise that mistakes have been made by West Midlands Police.
“I am truly sorry. The police are going to have to work hard to rebuild the trust. I will take total responsibility from now and I can give you some assurances.
“There will be no involvement of the counter-terrorism unit, there will be no covert cameras in your neighbourhoods and consultation will continue.
“After the consultation, if we think that it is appropriate and proportionate to continue using them then we will. But we will include members of the community in monitoring and scrutinising their use.
“The cameras are off and we will try to get them covered with bags as soon as possible.
Jackie Russell, from the Safer Birmingham Partnership, also spoke. She said: “We did get it wrong and I apologise for that.
“Some people are not saying take them down. Crimes do exist in these communities.”
A host of speakers, including Lord Nazir Ahmed, attacked the scheme. He said it was a “wholesale demonisation of the Muslim community”.
There were also angry attacks and claims that elected politicians were misled by police from former Labour MP Lynne Jones, and Springfield’s Lib Dem councillor’s Jerry Evans and Tanveer Choudray.
Director of Big Brother Watch, Alex Deane, received the first big round of applause for saying: “They suspended this scheme because you made them. It cannot be right that you are treated as a suspect simply because of where you live. The only answer is to take the cameras down.”
Salma Yaqoob, Respect councillor for Sparkbrook, said: “This is not acceptable in a free society.
“We are saying no, no, no. Retrospective consultation is meaningless. We want them redistributed in Birmingham or dismantled. If they do not remove them, will you join me this summer to take every single one down?”
Shami Chakrabarti, director of human rights organisation Liberty, was also a guest speaker at the rally.
She said: “This scheme is not just dangerous and divisive, it’s unlawful. It is intrusive, disproportionate and blatantly discriminatory. You have rumbled something here in Birmingham. They are beginning to listen and you have a chance to set an example for the rest of Britain.’’
Highly-respected human rights lawyer Gareth Peirce who represented the Birmingham Six, the Guildford Four, and a former Guantanamo Bay detainee Moazzam Begg, also spoke at the rally.
Activist Steve Jolly, of Birmingham Against Spy Cameras, also spoke. He said: “The only satisfactory conclusion to this affair is the wholesale removal of the cameras. There is a real risk of creating a police state.”
A resolution to engage in consultation on the terms outlined by ACC Rowe was rejected by the audience.
A second proposition, calling for the removal of the cameras before any further consultation received overwhelming support.
Okay, these are "mainly muslim" areas; but, as the picture shows, there are non-moslems living their too.
Why do the muslims assume that the cameras are targetted at them and thus (in the words of Lord Nazir Ahmed)a "wholesale demonisation of the Muslim community”?
Did it never enter the minds of this 'peace-loving' community that the cameras could have been put there to protect muslims from the 'violent Islamophobic' non-muslims who presumably surround them and live amongst them?
Posted by: jonc | July 06, 2010 at 11:55 AM
haha, yeah, there's a genuine threat from all those violent Islamophobes who are everywhere
lucky we have Respect and the UAF really
Posted by: Pyrus | July 06, 2010 at 05:01 PM
give me a break. these savages are committing violent acts and now they are upset the authorities want to use survaliance to catch the perps. Tell the muzzies to go fuck themselves. if you don't like the cameras go back to pakistan or what ever hellhole you came from. they want to bring British society down to thier level of backward thinking and the government is capitualating. you are all doomed, motherfucking doomed. Glad i live here in the USA. And yes i know about the muzzie cultural center 600 ft from The world trade center site. See how long it stands. two can play at that game and who ya gonna get to build it. the Unions are not going to help these people build thier little F U center.
Posted by: jrsaint | July 06, 2010 at 06:11 PM
Of course LARD Nazir Ahmed had to try to blame the great job that mahoundians do of demonizing themselves on somoene else. Nothing more typical of such muslim scum. Always blaming others and not taking responsibility for anything THEY do...
Posted by: Proud_Kafir7908 | July 07, 2010 at 07:26 AM
Yup, I REALLY admire UAF.
They protest against anti Islamic-extremist group EDL all the time.
That makes them anti-(anti Islamic-extremist)s.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't two negatives make a positive?
On that basis we can safely conclude that UAF are PRO Islamic-extremism.
I wonder how many of them are aware of their curious philosophical position?
Posted by: jonc | July 07, 2010 at 11:57 AM
I would say if ever there is any kind of crime in their area ,the police should say they don't have any footage to identify the culprit so they[police] can't do any thing. Period. But knowing the police ,they will be bending backward to appease muslims. see www.thereligionofpeace.com
www.islam-watch.org
Posted by: skai | August 23, 2010 at 01:56 PM
china dont change their rules for no one they stick to their beliefs, nor russia, nor the middle easterners. but us and europe are ^&*(%$_____ for getting intimidated by others. why cant they just have balls enuff to not let imigrants tell them whats right or wrong.
Posted by: Peter Garcia | June 25, 2011 at 11:43 PM
The world trade center site. See how long it stands. two can play at that game and who ya gonna get to build it.identified based on security camera footage..
Posted by: cctv security camera | October 22, 2011 at 09:17 AM
In my view I can safely conclude that UAF are PRO Islamic-extremism.
I wonder how many of them are aware of their curious philosophical position?
Posted by: webwinkel | November 19, 2011 at 06:11 AM