Please take the time to read the PDF report linked below.
I have frequently pointed out how the British mainstream media either ignores incidences of muslim violence and/or hate crimes or obfuscates the identities of the muslim perpetrators. Here is a report that clarifies why the media has been so dhimmified and why the indigenous white British are continutally attacked and 'named and shamed' - even when undeserved - whilst the muslim and other minority criminals get a 'pass'. Muslims and other minorities are constantly portrayed as the overwhelmingly the victims even when the facts state that half of all victims of racially motivated murders in the last decade have been white.
The below is further evidence that the media is voluntarily complicit with the LaBour govenment's demands to hide how rampant illegal and legal immigration coupled with multiculturalism, political correctness and the myth of Islamophobia has grossly harmed Great Britain and its culture and freedoms.
"We are not content with negative obedience, nor even with the most abject submission. When finally you surrender to us, it must be of your own free will. We do not destroy the heretic because he resists us; so long as he resists us we never destroy him. We convert him, we capture his inner mind, we reshape him. We burn all evil and all illusion out of him; we bring him over to our side, not in appearance, but genuinely, heart and soul. We make him one of ourselves before we kill him. It is intolerable to us that an erroneous thought should exist anywhere in the world, however secret and powerless it may be. Even in the instance of death we cannot permit any deviation . . . we make the brain perfect before we blow it out." 1984 - George Orwell
The question looms -will the British people fight back against this latest attack on their freedoms and Country?
The British government published a new set of guidelines for newspapers calling for a voluntary ban on certain words and the suppression of stories about non-white crimes! While the guidelines are not a legal requirement, Britain has already prosecuted political figures for so-called “hate speech” for speaking out against Islamic immigration.
This Draconian document, published by unelected government bureaucrats, can be viewed here in PDF form. Click Here.
The guidelines call on newspapers and media to voluntarily cease using the following words:
“immigrant,” “illegal immigrant,” “illegal asylum seeker,” “bogus asylum seeker,” “non-white,” “non-Christian,” “mixed race,” “half-caste,” “mulatto.”
Never identify people by race or religion.
The media is told to give racial minorities preferential treatment in hiring to have a more “multi-racial” staff.
The media is told to portray ethnic minorities in a more positive light.
When discussing public opinion always use or include quotes from ethnic minorities.
Pander to the taboos of ethnic minorities. Learn what local ethnic minorities don’t like and then omit these things from your paper.
Encourage whites to embrace elements of 3rd world immigrant cultures. Promote and glorify the holidays, customs, and religious beliefs of non-white immigrant cultures.
Also expose “racists.”
The government document explicitly tells those in the media to portray minorities in a more positive light while holding white “racists” up to ridicule.
I have actually read the pdf document and I cannot agree with sentiments like "this draconian document" and the list of what is banned is not a black-and-white (you should pardon the pun) as implied above.
Whilst (for instance) you should "not identify people by race or religion" this is unless such ID is integral to the story.
However I do find two things worrying:
Fistly, the implementation of the guidance. It may well be such that (despite the document's warning against this) "timidity" in reporting "ethnic" stories takes place and the document is used by those frightened of "upsetting" minority groups (except working class whites of course) as a cover for failure to report accurately.
Second:the exposure "racists". My worry here is that it will be only white racists who are exposed due to the illogical underlying assumption that only whites can be racist.
So for instance: If I call a muslim a "pig" I'm being racist, but if he calls me "Lower than a pig or dog" then that's religious freedom (since I'm of white European Jewish descent).
Posted by: jonc | January 20, 2010 at 06:48 AM