Hiring muslim women (and men for that matter) should come with a giant WARNING notice to all potential UK employers. In fact - in light of this most recent case of a muslim woman's shakedown of an employer for CASH makes one wonder why anyone would bother hiring a muslim at all - especially when it may leave the employer and his/her business financially destroyed.
33 yr old Fata Lemes willingly took a job as a COCKTAIL WAITRESS - note we did not say a job at a day care center for babies, or bookkeeper in a office or as a hairdresser (oops! last one is a BAD example!! That has proved to be a lucrative lawsuit for another muslim woman) Nope - Ms Lemes chose to work in a bar - a bar that clearly serves alcoholic beverages and where she would serve alcohol - which surprisingly didn't enter into her lawsuit - maybe because it didn't prove profitable for this fellow muslim.
No it wasn't the alcohol that offended Fata - it was the dress - a dress that was considered the summer uniform for the cocktail waitresses. (See picture below)Yep - Ms Lemes found a nice little earner for her "hurt feelings"..............in a dress.
So as she tossed the"alcohol is haraam" offense under the bus Ms Lemes pulled out her muslim modesty and declared the " short, low-cut dress was "disgusting" and made her look "like a prostitute". " One wonders how she didn't notice the sleeveless RED DRESS being worn by other cocktail waitress when she applied to work at the bar?
That aside Fata told the employment tribunal hearing her reasons why she should receive compensation for being asked to wear what all the other cocktail waitresses wear:
"Miss Lemes told the tribunal that she "might as well be naked" in the dress, adding: "I was brought up a Muslim and am not used to wearing sexually attractive clothes."
Guess her muslim parents must have skipped over the no alcohol and working in a bar Quran lessons.
But here is the greater travesty - Despite the panel at Central London Employment Tribunal making these determinations :
1) It accepted that Miss Lemes genuinely believed that the short, low-cut dress was "disgusting" and made her look "like a prostitute". -------Even though a photo of Miss Lemes on Facebook, however, showed her wearing a low cut T-shirt revealing her cleavage.----(Guess patrons in a bar seeing her in a red dress is worse than millions of internet users seeing Fata with her breasts bulging out of her low cut T-shirt. But then again - Facebook isn't worth some easy money.)
Revealing: Fata Lemes on Facebook
2) It found Miss Lemes "overstated" her trauma (No?!? Really??) at being asked to wear the sleeveless dress that was open at the back.
3) It rejected Miss Lemes' claim that she was left with no choice but to walk out of her job after just eight days. (Bet the employers were real unhappy to have her go??)
4) It branded her compensation claim of £20,000 including £17,500 for hurt feelings - as "manifestly absurd". (and a bold sign of her greediness - wouldn't you say?)
And -- here comes the BIG BUT-----Despite ALL of the above -- in its final ruling the Tribunal panel says:
""In our judgment, the effect of requiring her to wear the dress was to violate her dignity. We further consider that it created for her an environment which was degrading, humiliating and offensive." It pointed out that a summer uniform of "brightly coloured, figure-hugging garb" had not been introduced for male waiting staff."
Thus it awarded her £2,919.95 for hurt feelings and loss of earnings"
In other words -the panel contradicted its prior rulings in order to justify handing a financial payout to a muslim woman -- even after deciding the other "offenses" against her amounted to naught.
Just when I thought there was a glimmer of hope --- muslim pandering and dhimmitude again rears their ugly heads.
One needs no better example - than Ms Lemes - as to why so many muslims have turned British employers - via the soft headed, muslim pandering British judicial system -into "hurt feelings" cash cows.
For article go to:
Muslim waitress wins nearly £3,000 for hurt feelings over skimpy dress
Fata, you are a sickening piece of shit. Just absolutely disgusting. I would rather kiss a piece of dog shit than to kiss a horrible piece of crap like you. I hope some day you are wrongfully sued for all you have in your pathetic life.
Posted by: Mark | June 15, 2009 at 10:05 PM
All the "rights" tribunals including the employment ones along with most civic employees have no common sense.Which is why certain people get away with this kind of thing. their culture tells them that this is a wonderful thing to do and the politically correct dhimmies go along with it ,increasing the chances that it will happen again.
Posted by: Jay | June 15, 2009 at 11:55 PM
Incidents like this just make it easier for an employer not to hire a moslem in the first place. She is proving that moslem employees are more trouble than they are worth.
It's a shame that it's come to this, but can anyone deny it?
This only makes it more difficult for the "good moslems" (I keep on hearing they're out there...) to gain employment.
Posted by: Devlin | June 16, 2009 at 02:40 PM
This is disgraceful, no wonder racial tension is on the increase in this county and the BNP are gaining a foothold. This is political madness gone over the edge. In muslim countries you try anything out of what they consider correct and you end up in prison. A few week in prison this woman should have, and perhaps then she may learn her lesson, but somehow I doubt it.
Posted by: Roy Tomkinson | June 18, 2009 at 09:24 AM
Ok, let me compose my thoughts. Ok, here goes. What a fucking Muslim fuckwad!! There, I feel slightly better...
Posted by: Thorum | June 18, 2009 at 07:17 PM
What a hypocrite and liar - oh, wait, I forgot; it's OK for Moslems to lie to the rest of us according to the Koran and Hadith (taqqiya). What I meant to say was: "What a fine, honest, upstanding, moral and decent example of Islamic Womanhood she is."
(Funny thing is I'm probably right in that!)
I wonder if the Tribunal was shown the Facebook photo?
I also wonder if it would have made a difference - nope, I bet she'd have got the payout just the same!
On a more serious note - Muslims often claim they are discriminated against and don't get a fair chance. What do they expect when they try SO hard to make themselves:
a) unemployable.
b) expensive to employ(lawsuits).
c) damaging to business.
Posted by: Jon C | June 19, 2009 at 05:31 PM
Oops - forgot to add
I agree with Roy. This sort of claim and payment is PC madness.
It clearly shows "one rule for them and one for us" and it is the sort of thing that does build resentment and provide openings for extremists like the BNP, who do not, IMHO, represent the decent majority of British folk (of all colours and creeds).
Posted by: Jon C | June 19, 2009 at 05:35 PM
Who are the morons who gave her the money, they should be exposed and fired. What idiots.
Posted by: PNUT | June 23, 2009 at 12:41 AM
The morons who gave her the money were the Industrial Tribunal, Pnut.
You definitely have a point.
However, to be fair to them (and assuming that the tribunal members were not muslims in which case we need say no more), they were probably worried about being labelled "Islamophobes" and losing their jobs if the bosses thought that they were not being "culturally sensitive" etc (or whatever the latest PC term is) for why the establishment bends over backwards to appease Moslems. I presume this happens on the grounds that if you don't, the next time you them they're wearing suicide vests - or at least, that is the fear.
The problem with that is that the more we appease the more they will demand.
It never ceases to amaze me how Britain seems to have totally forgotten the lessons of appeasement from the 1930's. It is not as if this bit of history were not graven on our society's (yes, I do mean the singular here) conscience -not to mention all the war memorials.
Why, oh why, do people think that appeasement will work this time??
Posted by: jonc | June 23, 2009 at 04:05 PM
She looks Britborn and raised to me. Is she supposed to be a lifelong muslim, not a convert? I mean,it's BS enough for a lifelong muslim to pull this, but a red-haired, freckled convert must have worn more revealing clothes than that modest dress in her life.
Posted by: Conservababe in the U.S. | June 28, 2009 at 12:00 AM
She doesn't look like a prostitute to me but I respect the points and views of the owner of this blog. Each one of us have our own beliefs of course.
Posted by: beige suit | June 24, 2011 at 01:12 AM