Straightforward talk along with unabashed and uncowed commentary on Worldwide News, radical Islam, Islamisation, Immigration, and current events with special attention given to USA and UK topics.
DOZENS of Muslim graves have been vandalised in what police believe is a racist attack in a Southall graveyard. Several headstones were pushed over at the cemetery in Bridge Road, and flower pots and fencing around graves were also damaged on around 40 plots at the site. Some damage was also done to Christian graves at the site. Police say they are treating the damage, which was reported at around midday yesterday, as racially motivated.
Clearly the newpaper headline omitted the fact that Christian graves were also vandalized. Of course this doesn't stop the police from their usual MO of immediately jumping to the conclusion that this was a "racially motivated" attack against muslims -( ignoring the fact that Islam is a religion/politicial ideology rather than a race).
True to form a muslim expresses outrage & fans the flames:
A LOCAL Muslim man has condemned the vandals who smashed dozens of graves in a Southall cemetery over the weekend. More than 40 graves of Muslims were wrecked on Saturday night when vandals pulled out headstones and smashed vases and gates around various grave sites. Dalawar Chaudrey, whose father is buried in the cemetery on Bridge Road, said the damage was a “callous calculated act”. He said: “I was there yesterday and it was just a callous calculated attack to coincide with the very holy month of Ramadan when everybody’s fasting. “This is an outrageous and unacceptable attack on our community. People have paid a lot of money to have their relatives buried there, and this is not acceptable.” The restaurateur, who owns Chaudrey’s TKC in Southall Broadway, said there had been a campaign going on for three years to get Ealing Council to clean up the area. He said: “We have been on to them about problems of prostitution and drug use and drinking down there. But nothing has been done. “We need regular patrols, CCTV and they need to replace the wall there with a metal fence so people can see into the graveyard. This attack just adds insult to injury.”
It should come as no surprise that Mr. Dalawar Chaudrey and the author of the article, Alex Hayes, both neglect to mention the vandalised Christian headstones. Doing so would throw a "monkey wrench" into the premise that the vandalism was a plot specifically against muslims "calculated" to target the end of Ramadan. It is also interesting that Mr. Chaudrey goes on to complain about problems of prostitution and drug use near and in the cemetary but fails to connect the same to the vandalism - again to do so contravenes Islamophobia.
Mr Chaudrey is not alone as the leader of the Ealing Council - Councillor Jason Stacey also jumps onboard the Islamophobia and Racism Express to reap some political capital from the incident by issuing his own statement :
THE leader of Ealing Council has slammed vandals who targeted a series of Muslim graves at a Southall cemetery over the weekend. Councillor Jason Stacey has described the attack on Saturday evening, which saw 40 graves in the Muslim section of the Bridge Road cemetery wrecked, as “utterly despicable”. He said: “It is utterly despicable that someone should break into a cemetery and desecrate graves. This incident has caused great upset, not only for the relatives of people buried there, but also for the wider community. “Grave markers and commemorative vases in the Muslim area of the cemetery were vandalised and we are assisting police in their investigation into the incident. “Council officers will be on site all day today clearing up the damage and returning all grave markers to their rightful place as quickly as possible.”
Search as you might - readers will not find any mention of the vandalised Christian headstones. Clearly that fact is unimportant and again doesn't feed into the newspaper's stories proclaiming racism/Islamophobia. The idea that the vandalism may have been directed against Christians or both religions is never considered nor is the OBVIOUS - that the headstones fell prey to a random act of vandalism with no particular intent other than to do damage.
..."Each one hopes that if he feeds the crocodile enough, the crocodile will eat him last. All of them hope that the storm will pass before their turn comes to be devoured. But I fear-I fear greatly-the storm will not pass. It will rage and it will roar, ever more loudly, ever more widely. It will spread to the South; it will spread to the North. There is no chance of a speedy end except through united action...." Quote from - WINSTON CHURCHILL - HOUSE OF MANY MANSIONS SPEECH 20 January 1940.
I seached for a quote from Winston Churchill to help calm the anger and disgust felt upon reading the following headline and article from the The Press newspaper.
Gangs of Asian youths are tormenting elderly and disabled people in Staincliffe, Yorkshire, with foul-mouthed racist abuse, according to local newspaper The Press.
Residents living in a cul-de-sac on the edge of Staincliffe Estate say they are at the end of their tether after months of abuse.
The youths, aged from about 15 upwards, start congregating in Manor Way, close to Manorfields Infants School, from 4.10pm and hang around for hours on end, often up to midnight.
The yobs hurl abuse at passers-by, spitting racist comments at the elderly residents — all of whom are in their 70s and 80s.
The gang also makes lewd suggestions to girls and young women and on Saturday mocked a disabled man and threatened to tip him out of his wheelchair. In the past, street signs have been pulled down and bins overturned. Cars have also been vandalised.
Police have been repeatedly called out but residents say nothing gets done. Now the residents, most of whom are too afraid to speak out publicly, are fighting back.
Residents’ spokesman Tony Gott, 71, said old people shouldn’t have to put up with the abuse.
“It has gone too far,” he said. “People are at the end of their tether and don’t know where to turn.”
“No one should have to live their lives in fear like this and when we go out to ask these youths to move on all we get is abuse.”
“They called me a ‘fat, white bastard’ and the other day I was showered with a pile of bricks.”
“We had the police up here the other day and they spoke to this gang but they denied everything and the police said there was nothing they could do.”
“The police say ‘we’ve taken their names’ but all that is a slap on the wrist. It doesn’t stop them.”
Retired builder Mr Gott, who has four sons, 11 grandchildren and five great-grandchildren, has lived in the street for almost 15 years.
On Saturday during teatime Mr Gott heard the youths hurling abuse at a disabled man in a wheelchair who lives further down the estate.
“They were wanting to have a fight with him so I went out and told them to stop picking on people in wheelchairs.”
“All I got was abuse and that it was nothing to do with me. They threatened to turn the wheelchair over.”
“The police think we are exaggerating but we are not. We are all poorly people up here and two of the residents have cancer. We just can’t go to bed and have a good night’s sleep anymore.”
The cul-de-sac is also a magnet for drug dealers and users who lurk in dark corners behind Manorfields school but it is the gangs that make residents most afraid.
“I think there should be a curfew to get them off the streets,” said Mr Gott. “Something has to be done.”
Insp Neil Money, of the Batley Neighbourhood Policing Team, said “We are working very closely with local schools, mosques, shopkeepers and our partner agencies in order to ensure that the quality of life for residents is improved.”
This an other blogs have regularly chronicled the muslim colonisation of the UK and the violence that muslims consistently inflict upon the British people with little or no recourse from our police service or judicial system. (References backing up any of these statements and questions can be found amongst my past writings.) We have had our taxpayer coffers plundered and have been spit upon, jeered, insulted, vandalised, attacked, beaten, raped, murdered and bombed - yet virtually nothing has changed except for an rampant increase in the numbers of muslims entering the UK to permanently live and the overt and covert Islamization of Britain (and Europe).
What is wrong with us that we are allowing muslim thugs (or anyone for that matter) to spit on, torment and terrorise our elderly and disabled?? Should we tolerate living in a place where young girls and women are regularly insulted and spoken to with with disgusting lewd comments and are afraid to walk alone? A place where fear is keeping so many of our citizens indoors because inaction has left them feeling they have NO where or NO one to turn to for help?
How far has the mental disease of political correctness warped the way we think and our long held values? --So much so that we fear being called a "racist" more than stopping violence against our people? How long will we all allow the altar of failed multiculturalism to be a funeral pyre on which our British customs, traditions, culture and society are tossed and slowly burn to ashes? How long will we allow slick tongued dhimmi politicians and self serving bureaucrats to sell out OUR country and people under the guise of the EU? How long will we allow our dhimmified police force to be crippled by politically correctness and treat the native population with disregard? How long will we allow ourselves to be victimised by those who are appointed and elected to serve the will of the people yet really serve their own agendas and wallets? Aren't we delusional to believe that waiting for the next election and the inevitable revolving Labour/Conservative door will change anything?
Why are so many silent when we should be shouting out that the current state of Islamisation of the UK is abhorrently WRONG, unacceptable and must cease?
How long will mosques be allowed to flourish as grotesque examples of the victory of Islam over the Western world with minarets piercing our skies and the hearts of those of us who are proud to be the indigenous British? Even having to use the word "indigenous" to describe ourselves sticks in one's throat - isn't it like saying we are the anomaly and heading for placement on the "Endangered Species List"? Are we?
The call for answers and action is boldfaced infront of us all. So I will end as I began - with a quote - this one is from Shakespeare's Henry V :
And you, good yeomen,
Whose limbs were made in England, show us here
The mettle of your pasture. Let us swear
That you are worth your breeding; which I doubt not,
I don't often post another's blog in its entirety - but this one found on FrontPage Magazine web site, by well known author Brigitte Gabriel, is excellent & well worth the read!!
By Brigitte Gabriel FrontPageMagazine.com | Friday, September 26, 2008
For the past five years, I’ve been traveling the world in an effort to inform people about the threat of radical Islam. I have often been accused of “hate speech” and “Islamophobia.” The latest was in an article in the New York Times, where I was described not just as an “Islamophobe,” but a “radical Islamophobe.” This made me questionwhat those terms really mean. What is the difference between “hate speech” and “free speech”? What is “Islamophobia” and who are the true “Islamophobes?”
“Hate speech” verses “free speech” is easy to define. All over the United States, so-called “progressive” individuals and groups berate the USA and Israel and in the process tell outrageous lies about both countries. That’s called “free speech.” When others, including me, tell the truth about the threat of radical Islam, that’s labeled “hate speech” by many of these “progressives.”
But what is “hate speech” and what is “Islamophobia”? When I describe the threat presented by radical Islam, I quote chapter and verse from the Koran and authoritative classical Islamic sources. When I describe the worldwide campaign of Islamist hate indoctrination against the West, and the mind-numbing mass violence committed and glorified by radical Islamists, I am relaying facts that have been published by print and electronic media outlets all over the world. Do some of the facts about Islamist supremism manifest “hatefulness?” Certainly.
However, it’s not my fault that the truth about Islamist supremacist teachings and edicts is that they promote hate. I wish they didn’t. But wishing doesn’t make it so (contrary to the belief of the New York Times). The Koran explicitly tells Muslims to hate (terrorize, subdue, oppress, and slaughter) the unbeliever until Islam is supreme in the world: "Your Lord inspired the angels with the message: ‘I am with you. Give firmness to the Believers. I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes.’" (Koran 8:12)
The Koran explicitly preaches that Christians and Jews are descended from monkeys and apes. In the more than 13 centuries since the emergence of Islam, this strict Islamic dogma has never been abrogated, amended or ameliorated. It is the Koran that is guilty of “hate speech.”I merely am the messenger exposing this hate.
Which brings us to “Islamophobia” and “radical Islamophobes.” According to the dictionary, the suffix “-phobe” comes from the Latin phobos, which means“fearing.” Do I fear radical Islam? You bet. Do any of these locales ring a bell? London subways. Madrid train stations. Bali night clubs. Beslan elementary school. They are all locations of horrendous terrorist atrocities committed by radical Islamists, with scores of civilian fatalities and hundreds maimed. I can name hundreds of other locales, from all over the world. If fearing radical Islamist terror makes me an “Islamophobe,” then I am an “Islamophobe” in its healthiest manifestation. In light of recent history, I submit that it would be (at best) foolhardy to be otherwise.
Things get a little more complicated when we get to “Islamophobia.” The dictionary defines a “phobia” as “an exaggerated, usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation.” Anyone who thinks that my fear of radical Islam is “exaggerated,” “inexplicable” and/or “illogical” is invited to take the world terrorism tour referred to in the preceding paragraph, or read my two books, which I submit as evidence from a personal and factual level. If exaggeration or illogic are required elements in the definition, then my fear of radical Islam is NOT “Islamophobia.”
If that was not sufficiently complicated, when used as a suffix “-phobia” can include “intolerance or aversion for” the object of the phobia.Am I intolerant of mass murder, justified and glorified in the name of Allah? Yes, I am. Do I have an aversion to subway and train bombings? Yes, I do. According to that definition, my fear of radical Islam would be “Islamophobia.” However, if my intolerance of mass murder and my aversion to nightclub bombings makes me a “Islamophobe,” then I submit that my so-called “Islamophobia” is fully justified and logical and therefore not a phobia in the usual sense of the word.
The next question must be: what distinguishes a “radical” Islamophobe from a run-of-the-mill Islamophobe? Perhaps they should be distinguished by how their Islamphobia affects their behavior. My “Islamophobia” motivates me to stand up and speak out about the threat of radical Islam. My “Islamophobia” motivates me to tell-the-truth. This definitely makes me a “radical.” Examples of conventional Islamophobes abound. Their fear of Islam motivates them to censor themselves in the face of Muslim threats and intimidation.
The best-known example is the craven failure of the major American media to stand up for freedom of the press during the Muhammad cartoon controversy. Anyone who will read this will be familiar with the details. There was much hand wringing in the media about freedom of speech, but only three newspapers in the United States had the journalistic integrity to print the cartoons in solidarity with the Danish newspaper which originally printed them.[1] Only one newspaper in the United States actually had the integrity to admit that they were not printing the cartoons because of “fear of retaliation from . . . bloodthirsty Islamists who seek to impose their will on those who do not believe as they do….”[2] The rest declined to do so, usually offering as their rationale that the cartoons were “offensive,” and they were being “respectful” of Muslim “sensitivity.” Approximately two dozen periodicals in 13 European countries ran the Muhammad cartoons, “insisting that they will not allow thugs to decide what a free press can publish.”[3]
The New York Times itself dutifully reported on various European newspapers printing the Muhammad cartoons in solidarity with and support of the Danish newspaper.[4] The Times could have taken the hint and printed the cartoons, but was apparently oblivious to the irony of being taught a lesson in freedom of the press by a bunch of Europeans. Instead, the Times’fear of Islam, its Islamophobia, caused the great Grey Lady of the Fourth Estate, the most respected voice in American print media, to roll over and play dead. This is dangerous, craven Islamophobia.
And the Times is still playing dead. It has failed to report adequately on an even more egregious and harmful example of Islamophobia afflicting the American publishing industry. Random House has just cancelled the publication of a book about one of Muhammad’s wives explicitly because of fear of a violent Muslim reaction.[5] The major American media outlets, both print and electronic, have absorbed the lessons of the Muhammad cartoon riots, and the Salman Rushdie affair, and the slaughter of Theo Van Gogh, etc., etc. They are intimidated into silence by their Islamophobia. They’ve become like slaves, so accustomed to the feel of the lash that they flinch at the mere thought of their master raising his hand. No one rings the alarm at the Times when a major American publishing house cancels publication of a book because they fear Muslim rioting.
Am I afraid of those Muslims who do not use the Koran as justification for murder and terrorism? No. Do I fear radical Islam? I already admitted that I did. Maybe that makes me a “radical Islamophobe.” But am I cowed by my fear of radical Islamists? Absolutely not. I will continue to stand up and tell the truth. Will anyone on the staff of the New York Times admit that they fear radical Islam, and they are cowed by their fear? Almost certainly not. On the contrary, they would probably protest loudly that the opposite is true. But their actions, and their editorial policy, speak louder than their protestations. They are also Islamophobes, but of a different stripe.
If I were a New York Times Islamophobe instead of a Brigitte Gabriel Islamophobe, I could no longer say I come from the land of the free and the home of the brave.
Once again muslims in Great Britain are given a pass when the average British non-muslin would be punished with jail time. For example - a 28 year old man was sentenced to three months in jail for spanking his two sons - no weapons or "implements" involved. Now I certainly don't condone any type of child abuse but surely British laws should be equitably enforced.
Yet muslim, Syad Mustafa Zaida, was just given a suspended sentence for "encouraging" his sons, ages 13 & 15, to flog themselves with a zanjeer zani (an implement with a wooden handle and chains with five sharp blades attached) - even though the one of the boys said that their father forced them to flog themselves until they bled.
In typical British judicial fashion, the dhimmi British judge made excuses for the muslim father's bad judgement, "abetted" child abuse and clearly illegal behavior. "Judge Robert Atherton, at Manchester Crown Court, told him "I reject the suggestion that they were forced to participate, although I consider it likely that the fervour of events is also likely to have affected their wish to participate." Thus the judge chose to ignore the testimony of one of the victims - and in essence - accuses the boy of being a liar.(For entire article - see below)
Historically the police have "treaded lightly" when it comes to muslim child abuse. Even when multiple cases of child abuse at a mosque were brought to the attention of the authorities -
"Police and child protection officials have launched an investigation into allegations of child abuse at two mosques in the West Midlands. Around 40 schoolchildren are to be interviewed over claims that they have been subjected to violence and punishment by elders at the mosques, which are on adjoining roads.
The investigation was sparked last month when the mother of an eight-year-old boy complained to the police that a mullah [teacher] had slapped her son on the back and made him lie face down before putting his right foot on the boy's back, leaving him with chest pains for more than 24 hours.
As word spread that an official complaint had been made, more children from the area came forward to report beatings and abuse which, the youths say, include being hit, slapped and even beaten with a hockey stick." LINK to this article HERE
The result? - The police copied the British judicial system and made excuses for the "cultural problem" and stated that they should "...tread lightly as elders and mullahs at mosques are among the most respected and influential people in the community."
Clearly being a muslim mullah or elder or PARENT gives you a pass, in the UK, to beat children.
A devout Muslim convicted of child cruelty for encouraging two boys to beat themselves in a religious ceremony has walked free from court.
Syed Mustafa Zaidi was given a 26-week prison sentence, suspended for 12 months.
The 44-year-old was also prohibited from allowing or encouraging anyone under the age of 16 to beat themselves during the next 12 months.
Judge Robert Atherton, at Manchester Crown Court, told him "I reject the suggestion that they were forced to participate, although I consider it likely the fervour of events is also likely to have affected their wish to participate."
Zaidi was found guilty last month of two counts of child cruelty. He admitted during his trial that he asked the boys, aged 13 and 15, if they wanted to use his zanjeer zani to beat themselves.
The zanjeer zani, a five-bladed implement, is used during the Ashura ceremony, which commemorates the death of Husayn, the grandson of the Prophet Mohammed and a central figure in the Shia faith.
It is held during Muharram, the first month of the Islamic calendar.
Judge Atherton said: "It should be clearly understood by everyone that the jury's verdict was not a comment upon that ceremony and no-one should misinterpret it as being such."
He added: "You must realise that the law recognises that children and young persons may wish to take part in some activities which it considers they should not. It is sometimes expressed as protecting themselves from themselves. Your wrongful act was providing the means by which they were able to participate."
He said Zaidi also ignored a decision by elders of the mosque that under-16s could not participate in the ceremony at a community centre in Levenshulme, Manchester, on January 19.
Judge Atherton told Zaidi the Probation Service felt he had failed "to demonstrate any understanding of the approach of the law to this situation or accept any culpability or failure on your part".
He said: "I hope, if you do not yet understand, that with reflection you will come to do so."
The boys suffered superficial cuts.
Superintendent Paul Savill, of Greater Manchester Police, said: "This man not only abused the vulnerability of these children but also went against the wishes of his own community, as well as knowingly breaking the law.
"The sensitivities this case raised are significant and we have been working closely with community leaders throughout.
"Our emphasis now is on the future, and how we can develop our already good working relationship with our local Shia community."
Just in case readers think that I and others overstate the rampant Islamization of Great Britain I thought that it is time to do a quick run down of how Islam now affects the life of the average non-muslim British person in the UK. Granted the instances listed below are far from being 100% complete - This is just the "tip of the iceberg" and MANY more could be added - but you should see for yourself that Islam invades your life from birth to death in the UK.
BIRTH:
Britains population to grow by nearly 50 million people by 2050. The overall UK average is 1.84 babies. The average for British-born women is 1.6 and for foreign-born women 2.2.The highest birthrate in the UK is among Pakistani-born women, who have an average of 4.7 children each. Last year, 22 per cent of births in the UK were to foreign-born women. You will soon be a minority in your own country and muslims are well on their way to becoming a majority. Plus you will be subsidizing your own descent into minority status as the British goverment decided that you as a taxpayer must pay for a muslim man, his four wives, and their flock of children. Yes, polygamy is OK (only for muslims) in the UK.
You may not even be born in a UK hospital as the high birth rate has caused hospital maternity ward to overfill and women in labour are being turned away.
As an infant you may receive less care and as a student you may receive less attention as personnel try to deal with the plethora of babies born with severe disabilites due to the penchant for arranged muslim marriages to first cousins most frequently found in muslims from Pakistan. Of course as you mature into a taxpayer - you will be paying for such "cultural Islamophobia" --- "But the experience of researchers at Bradford Teaching Hospital... which serves a community with a large Pakistani population, reports an unusually high rate of inherited gene disorders. Researchers estimate the rate of birth defects is 10 times higher than in the general population, spokeswoman Leanne Wilson said in a statement.High rates of deafness, degenerative nerve disorders and children born with small heads and learning disabilities have been found, she said. The statement said marriage patterns among Pakistanis are “likely to be a major factor” in the rate."
Or maybe the swimming pool staff will allow you to go into YOUR local pool - but first you must adhere to muslim rules for swim clothes - If you're a man: "Non-Muslims may swim during this time but only if they follow the strict dress code of swimming shorts that hide the navel and extend below the knee." ----If you are a woman - forget it - you are forced to attend women only sessions with muslim women.
If you find yourself sick and in need of being in hospital - you can be sure that you will have plenty of time to wait around for nursing care - as the nurses will be busy turning beds so muslims can face Mecca at prayer time.
While thousands of British people wait for needed surgeries & other hospital procedures, including wounded veterans of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the NHS has decided replacing muslim womens' virginity is a higher priority - and YOU get to pay for this "re-veiling".
So - you're now out of the hospital but still too sick to go to your local pub (if it still exists) so you send your partner to a Tesco Express to buy some beer. You both find out that particular Tesco is unable to sell beer because the Borough Council received muslim signed petitions demanding the council deny the alcoholic license to Tescos --muslims say they find the idea of alcohol being sold offensive. It's coming! (See also things that offend muslims).
The number of instances I could cite in the "life" category are endless and encompass food, work, leisure, etc. - so to conserve space let's go forward to.........Death.
DEATH:
Let's say your untimely death takes place during the early week. Your grieving relatives want to have your body buried on a Saturday in the city where (you and) they live. A simple, reasonable request that would allow time for them to make arrangements and for relatives to travel to the funeral from their out of town locations. "But when the funeral director called City Road Cemetery to arrange a memorial service in the chapel followed by burial, he was told the funeral would not be allowed on a Saturday - because the family was not Muslim. The dhimmi Sheffield Council confirmed it does not offer funerals at the weekend except to Muslims, in line with the rules of the Islamic faith that the dead must be buried as soon as possible." THUS NO SATURDAY BURIAL BECAUSE YOU AND YOUR FAMILY ARE NOT MUSLIM!!!
If you are a Christian or a member of any non-muslim faith - or atheist - you will find that in Bullwell cemetary your body will be buried, facing mecca, according to Islamic rules. "But all headstones at the new £2.5m High Wood Cemetery in Bulwell will be plotted to face north-east, in line with Islamic faith." The dhimmis in charge of the cemetary decided (for you) that your faith means less to you than the Religion of Peace means to muslims - so muslims must be appeased. Oh! you can get a stone facing a different direction but only upon a "special request".
There you have it - a much abbreviated description of how Islam affects the lives of the British people from birth to death - does or could anyone still question whether or not Islamization is taking place in Great Britain?
Who would ever believe that a street sweeper's job would be a high risk profession? - well it is - at least for a white British man - performing his tasks - cleaning a Westhulme subway.
"The 48-year-old was cleaning the Featherstall Road subway close to the Martha Street entrance at 9.20am on Tuesday when a gang of six Asian youths smashed a wooden post through the side window. They then rained blows on the sweeper with clubs, posts and bats and hit the victim’s leg as he tried to get out of the vehicle."
The consistent pattern of menacing "Asian" (media-speak for muslim) gangs who walk the streets of England purposely looking for lone victims (frequently the elderly or young boys ) to physically and racially assault is growing. These muslim thugs then pounce on the victim and proceed to use weapons to violently batter the man. Baseball bats seem to be their weapons of choice. The poor lone victim has no chance against the vicious mob - that of course being the purpose - and is why such muslim gangs are the epitome of cowardice.
"As the attack took place, the gang shouted, “Asians rule supreme” and “get out of our area white scum”. They ran away when the victim called the police."
The muslim thugs screamed their taunts and told the indigenous British people what muslims feel is their entitlement to "own" the streets of Britain - they do so emboldened by decades of the UK government, politicians, churches and other groups relentless pandering to muslims - even going so far as to recognize and have taxpayers subsidize muslim polygamous marriages and even more insanely allowing Sharia Law to be accepted legal practice in the UK.
Yet the violent beating and racial assault of a non-muslim British man whose job was to clean those same streets will elicit nary a yawn in the mainstream media and from muslim community. This article is found in a local newspaper - you can be sure if the sitution were reversed - all the mainstream media newspapers and television news would be all over the story - condemning the perpetrators. Local and national politicians would be tripping over each other running to pontificate and show support with the aggrieved (muslim) victim by joining parades of outraged muslims who take to the streets of England protesting the attack and the (myth) of Islamophobia in the UK. (And once again the only changes made are to disrupt the victim's (and other street cleaner's) work routine rather than focus on and address the UK's escalating muslim gang problem.)
Despite the facts to the opposite the British government (and nearly worldwide consensus) is that white people cannot be victims of racism - they can only BE racist. (Including toddlers who dislike spicy foods) It is past time for muslim apologists, enablers and others to stop perpetrating the sterotype of the racist white (British) male & the Islamophiobia lies to rationalize muslim violence - and start seeing reality.
I'm sure that the 48 year old street sweeper would agree that clearly the reverse is the truth.
A COUNCIL street sweeper was racially assaulted as he cleaned a Westhulme subway.
The 48-year-old was cleaning the Featherstall Road subway close to the Martha Street entrance at 9.20am on Tuesday when a gang of six Asian youths smashed a wooden post through the side window.
They then rained blows on the sweeper with clubs, posts and bats and hit the victim’s leg as he tried to get out of the vehicle.
As the attack took place, the gang shouted, “Asians rule supreme” and “get out of our area white scum”. They ran away when the victim called the police.
The victim, who has worked for the council for four years, was left shaken and had to take the rest of the day off work.
Oldham Council’s service director for Streetscene. Mark Odell. confirmed that a member of the road sweeping team was involved in an incident while cleaning the subway at Featherstall Road roundabout.
He added: “The worker reported the incident to the police who attended the scene and took a statement.
“As a result of the incident we have reviewed our risk assessments and made some changes to the way our road sweeping staff operate in future.
“Thankfully incidents where our staff are abused or worse by members of the public are rare.”
Police say they are treating the matter as a racially aggravated incident and are investigating.
Rarely does a week go by where there is not another incident of a muslim man raping or attempting to rape a British girl or woman. I have documented many of these attacks - see THE MUSLIM RAPE RAPE RAPE OF BRITISH GIRLS for a recent blog on the subject.
Now comes another report of a Manchester woman minding her own business and walking along the once safe streets in Britain being kidnapped and attacked by a muslim man with intent to rape.
"She noticed someone was close behind her and when she turned around it was the same man she had passed on the road. He grabbed her shoulders and then picked her up, carrying her towards the park. She struggled and screamed and he dropped her near the entrance of the park and she ran off along Birchfield's Road towards Manchester. The man chased her and grabbed her waist. He tried to cover her mouth with his right hand and in an attempt to get away she bit his stomach."
Fortunately for this woman a motorist passing by stopped to help and her attacker ran away. (Lucky for the Good Samaritan that he wasn't savagely beaten as has happened in similar situations) Thus the female victim was left traumatized with abrasions and bruises rather than in far worse physical and mental condition.
So what do the police do knowing that many of the nighttime streets of England are swiftly becoming "no-go" areas for British women (and men - particularly young men) walking alone? Is any onus placed on the muslim perpetrators? Of course not - the responsibility is placed on the law abiding citizens - Detective Inspector Terry Crompton advises:
"I would advise people not to walk on their own late at night but if there is no other choice, walk in the middle of the pavement and keep to well lit areas. If you think you are being followed, cross the street several times and if you still think you are being followed, walk to the busiest area you can find or knock on someone's door. There are various help points in Manchester city centre linked to CCTV operators."
So as the police close their eyes to the well worn pattern of muslim attacks on and rape of British women - prefering instead to let women pay the price for "keeping the peace" -and the judiciary make apologies and excuses for muslim rapists - British women continue to be weekly victims of the Religion of Peace.
Article quoted above:
Woman attacked in Longsight
19/9/2008
A WOMAN was attacked while out walking in Manchester. At about 11pmon Tuesday 16 September, a 19-year-old woman was walking along Birchfield's Road and she noticed a man walking towards her.
After they had passed each other near to the junction of Birch Hall Lane, she crossed the road to walk around the outside of Birchfield's Park. She noticed someone was close behind her and when she turned around it was the same man she had passed on the road.
I have frequently cited and written about the ever growing incidences of Street Jihad in the UK (ie: muslim gangs, quickly gathered together via cell phone calls, brutally beating - often a lone - victim). Several recent blogs are:
Any concerted police or law enforcement action directed at muslim gangs is lacking. In fact, the reverse is happening -law enforcement has allowed no go areas to develop throughout Britain -police are more afraid of being called a racist than stopping muslim gangs & protecting British people - muslim gangs are even taking over British prisons.
So this brings us to what I call - Stage II - in the absence of any competence shown by law enforcement in tackling these muslims gangs (in fact government, politicians and law enforcement have spit in the face of the general public by increasing the pandering to muslims) inevitably comes non-police backlash(es) to these escalating violent attacks.Note that such a backlash would most certainly be deemed vigilantism by the police who would undoubtedly deal with such people in a far harsher manner than they have the "politically correctness & apologist" protected muslim gangs --- even though such citizen actions could be seen as self preservation by the victims-in-waiting.
This brings us to Denmark - another country that is under the onslaught of Islamization and who has also dealt with rampant violence, rape,murder, vandalism, assault and other atrocities committed by members of the Religion of Peace. Dhimmified police and politicians, in Denmark, have also played a large role in the escalating of the "kid glove treated" violent muslim gangs who are reeking havoc on the nation. Clearly what I call Stage II has begun there and it is only a matter of time before more such warfare dominates the streets of Denmark. Is Britain next?
For an excellent and comprehensive blog on the situation in Denmark go to - HERE
Hell’s Angels applications increase tenfold in connection with immigrant showdown.
The Hell’s Angels biker group is experiencing a flood of new applications for membership, in particular for its support group AK81. The group normally receives only few enquiries in its web-based guest book, but the past week alone has seen 250 queries.
Seventy-five of those enquiring have asked to become members of the AK81 group, or to be invited to Hell’s Angels parties in order to gain affiliation.
AK81 is a support group for the Hell’s Angels. The acronym stands for the Danish words Altid Klar (Always Ready), while 81 are the alphabet numbers for H and A.
Showdown The increase in membership enquiries comes in connection with a showdown in recent weeks between immigrant groups and the Hell’s Angels as well as shows of strength by Hell’s Angels members who have walked the streets of Copenhagen and Århus en masse.
The Hell’s Angels home page has introduced a special AK81 page providing direct mail to the group, thus preventing police from being able to track approaches.
Going fast A concerned police force has, however, registered the flood of interest in being recruited to what is termed the Hell’s Angels ‘mini-army’.
“We are worried that this is escalating and involving more and more people,” says Deputy Chief Superintendant Jørgen Isalin of the National Investigation Support Centre.
“It’s all going very fast now and there is no doubt that more and more people are joining. This is also happening on the other side too where large numbers of anti-social youths are supporting criminal immigrant groups who cause trouble in the streets and are provoking the Hell’s Angels,” he says.
HA no comment Last month the conflict between the two groups cost the life of a young man. Since then the showdown has become more open, with shots being fired, hand grenades lobbed and marches in which the gangs show their strength.
“First of all it was the other groups that bothered the Hell’s Angels. Then they started AK81, and now they feel strong enough to arrive at parties, pubs and techno parties to show off their insignia. That is something the other groups won’t accept,” says Isalin.
It has not been possible to get a comment from the Hell’s Angels.
Well .... here we go again. Another professional woman shocked and appalled at the way she has been treated by muslim MEN...when are these dhimwits going to learn?
This latest incident of "reverse Islamophobia" finds veteran TV journalist, Jo Burgin, stunned at the Arabic station Al Jazeera (abbreviated as AJ) network's treatment of her and has filed a £1million ($1.9 million)compensation claim for race, sex and religious discrimination. But first some history on the situation.
Back in the Spring of 2005, Miss Burgin and many other British journalists flocked to AJ's base in Doha, Qatar in order to assume positions in AJ's English speaking division - they all planned on elevating their careers and the TV station to a level that would rival CNN. Jo Burgin apparently was performing well enought that she was elevated to the position of the most senior level woman working for AJ where she headed planning at the service's 24-hour English language. But the honeymoon period would not be long.
Despite being promised "Western style working condition" what Miss Burgin experienced was "her Arab bosses had 'publicly humiliated' her and eventually sacked her for being a 'white, Christian, British female'.........."Miss Burgin said the station's deputy managing director Ibrahim Helal 'harboured anti-Western sentiment', could not relate to women and rolled his eyes whenever she spoke.....he shouted her down in meetings and ignored her in favour of her male deputies. ...While a blind eye was turned to Muslim couples working together, Miss Burgin claimed her relationship with director of news Steve Clark - now her husband - was given as the reason for her sacking in April last year."
Miss Burgin complained "'It left me publicly humiliated, deeply hurt and professionally smeared,' she said."
Perhaps Miss Burgin should have done a little less listening to her multicultural, Islam pandering liberal media co-horts and politicians and done alot more background reading on the subject of treatment of women in Islam. If she had done so at the least she would have perhaps shown more caution in laying years of her career and life into the hands of those who believe:
MEN ARE SUPERIOR TO WOMEN : Sura (4:34) - "Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them."
A WOMAN IS WORTH LESS THAN A MAN : Sura (4:11) - (Inheritance) "The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females" (see also Sura (4:176)).
Sura (2:282) - (Court testimony) "And call to witness, from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not found then a man and two women"
Sura (2:228) - "and the men are a degree above them [women]"
Sura (24:31) - Women are to lower their gaze around men, so they do not look them in the eye
Let's see Miss Burgin is upset that she was " publicly humiliated, deeply hurt and professionally smeared"....now where have we heard that before -- from other British women who blithely pandered to muslims and believed in muslim integration and Westernization? -- only to have both thrown back into their face? How about:
Former Mayor of Kirklees, Jean Calvert, who was shocked that the same muslim men she has so handily pandered to for years - refuse to have their picture taken with her or to shake her hand -while they all were gathered at a "community cohesion" get together. For story go HERE
OR even
Grandmother of three and local Liberal Democrat (political group known for its pandering to muslims) Councillor, Jo Calvert-Mindell, weary from months of sleeplessness caused by drunken, noisy college students finally decided to complain to the students who (unfortunately for her) contained two male "Asian" (aka muslim) students. Thus immediately the racism bomb was lobbed by the muslim students at Cllr. Calvert-Mindell so she was carted off by the UK police. Racism charges against (the outraged) Miss Calvert were dropped but only AFTER she made an embarrassing appearance in Court. The students were never charged. For story go HERE
The names and places may change but the results will continue to be the same. Let's face it - women in the UK can't even trust many of their muslim doctor's nevermind most other muslim males. Were these three women so naive, conceited or stupid to honestly believe that muslim men would treat them any differently?
This is another instance from the plethora of stories from Great Britain where muslims are given lesser sentences for serious crimes - there can be no doubt that these reduced sentences are because the perpetrator is muslim and the British Judicial system is dhimmified.
For two examples see - My prior post - about a muslim would-be rapist who was given a less jailtime because he was described as a "nice guy". In another recent incident a Waqas Shah not only racially abused a British white man and two white girls - he then called his gang pals so they could stalk them - Shah later cold-cocked David Cotterril after David extended his hand in peace. The brutal assault knocked out the victim and left him with a smashed jaw. Shah received a suspended sentence for this race hate attack because -- had just married and, if he was sent to prison, his wife would not be able to come over from Pakistan. There are far to many examples to list them all - but you "get the idea".
Now we have an episode of "road rage" or more aptly named Street Jihad where a muslim cab driver, Mohammed Rashel, got into a fare dispute with one of three passengers. (He had given the trio the wrong fixed price fare and when he later realized his error he demaded the corrected fare amount - when the passengers refused he immediately tossed them out of his cab) All passengers left the cab and were walking away. The out-of-control cabbie intentionally did a U-turn to turn the car around and purposely smashed headlong into the man with whom there was the dispute. The impact flung David Seymour up into the air and fell ontop of another car.
"Mr Seymour tried to jump out of the way but was struck and flung into the air, hitting another car on the way down. He suffered two fractures to his pelvis, two suspected broken ribs, cartilage damage, a laceration to his head and bruising and grazing as well as tenderness and swelling to his right leg and back."
So did Mr. Rashel come to his senses and see the bodily harm he had done to Christopher Seymour and immediately call for medical help? NO! "Rashel did not stop and drove off in his damaged cab but was later arrested."
It would seem that Mr Rashel should be charged with using a weapon to inflict bodily harm, attempted murder and leaving the scene of an accident where bodily harm occurred. All very serious offences and all should bring considerable jail time.
So what happened to the Street Jihadist?
Well the Liverpool Crown Court was told that Mr Rashel is small in stature (implying he might not do well in a hand to hand fight) - so that explains his using a heavy automobile to smash into Mr. Seymour - and that "He is a hard working family man who will lose his job and is unlikely to be licensed as a taxi driver again"
One would think that the Court would have taken apart such ludicrous excuses and punished Rashel according . But NO -
"It was an incident of using your car as a weapon and a custodial sentence is inevitable," said Judge Brian Lewis. He told Mohammed Rashel that he was very fortunate he had not been charged with causing grievous bodily harm. .....You quite deliberately drove your taxi across the road towards them, whether to scare them or deliberately injure, it was a terribly dangerous thing to do, particularly from a professional driver," said Judge Lewis.
"I am prepared to accept there may have been a degree of frustration or even provocation but nothing can possibly excuse what you did," he added. "
A degree of frustration? The dolt gives a wrong fare quote to passengers and when he later realized his error he told the passengers to ante up the new higher amount. When they legitimately refused - he bungs them out on the roadside. Does Rashel then take responsibility for HIS error? NO - he goes bezerk, blames the passengers and there is NO question that he intentionally tries to kill one of them.
The sentence handed down:
"29-year-old Rashel, of Hale Road, Widnes, had been convicted of dangerous driving after a trial. He was today jailed for 15 months and banned from driving for two years and ordered to take a re-test before he can drive again.
The moral is - if you are a muslim - particularly a small muslim man - you can intentionally use your car to run over an assumedly larger man, cause him grevious bodily harm and leave the scene of an accident and all you will be convicted of is "dangerous driving". Placing the multiple offenses on the same level of talking on a cellphone or applying make-up whilst driving.
The people of Liverpool can look forward to this Street Jihadist to being back driving around the streets of Liverpool within the next year and one half. I wonder if Mr. Seymour will have fully recovered from his injuries in the same amount of time?
Recent Comments