TheOPINIONATOR

UK Denounced as Security Menace to Outside World

Some sad truths - truths discussed in this blog for years now - are highlighted in the below article. There is NO doubt that the UK has been incessantly far TOO soft on radical Islam to the extent it is protected and thriving in the UK.  Multicultural worshipping dhimmi bureaucrats, educators and judicial muslim apologists have figuratively paved the streets of Great Britain with Islamic cobblestones as they forced muslim colonisation  upon the British people. The British people are treated like second class citizens in their own Country.

"Thus the Quranic inspired desire for muslim domination or Global Caliphate has flown into the UK on a multicultural magic carpet as multiculturalism and Islamisation have become virtually synonymous. The muslim colonization of Britain is encouraged and viewed with delight by drooling, pandering, vote whoring, social engineering, lefty politicians and open border globalizers. While disingenuously waving the multicultural banner, muslims have availed themselves of hundreds of years of British civilization/benefits/ social housing and health care, etc.  In other words, they have cherry picked all the good that Britain has to offer but, like true invaders, they have thumbed their noses at assimilation and set up no go areas where they can continue to live their Sharia Law ruled lives, embrace the ideology of Islam, show preference for muslims - and let the millions of non muslim British taxpaying "slaves" fund muslims new "western lifestyles". Including financing the  importing of multiple wives,  and the exploding muslim birth population- both of which allows muslims to partake of even more lucrative, financial benefits and frees many of them up to spend full time running their own anti-British political agendas all while providing others with extra time to rant against the "infidels" - the same infidels that pay for their every need and  mega-family's existence.  Ludicrously but not surprisingly, even Osama Bin Laden's Right Hand Man and his family are "set for life" on British benefits." SOURCE

The below article does contain some erroneous accusations - such as the British people forcing muslims to live in ghettos as well as well as preventing muslims from assimilating. In fact there is plenty of evidence to the contrary.  Would seem to me that both are conscious choices of muslims to not live amongst the infidels.

Nevertheless if the rest of the world recognizes Britain for aiding  and abetting radical Islam thus becoming a threat to primarily the Western world - it is past time for British government to take off their rose-colored glasses and do so. This is not about politics - it is about survival.

Otherwise Great Britain is doomed to be crushed under Islamic bulldozers - just like this Church of England church and the tombstones in it's Christian graveyard-  and become one massive Islamic Centre.

See also Mark Steyn post: "I said a few years back that Britain had been so hollowed out by Islamic radicals that it was becoming Somalia with chip shops"
 

YOU ARE TOO SOFT ON THE FANATICS, US TELLS BRITAIN

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab prompted warnings

Friday January 1,2010

By Padraic Flanagan

BRITAIN was yesterday accused of being “a menace to the outside world” for failing to tackle Islamic extremism.

American anger over the attempted suicide bomb attack by former student Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab prompted warnings that the biggest threat to US security came from Britain.

The 23-year-old Nigerian is thought to have embraced radical views while studying in London.

Daniel Pipes, a former adviser to Rudolph Giuliani during his presidential campaign and an expert on radical Islam, said: “The UK is a menace to the outside world. It’s been a problem for years now. This is just one more example.”

US policy makers also attacked the way British Muslims are pushed into “ghettoes”, which they say compares badly with their assimilation in America.

Pentagon aide Marc Thiessen said Muslim immigrants in the US were much better integrated and considered themselves American within a generation thanks to the US “melting pot” approach.

The former chief speechwriter to President George W Bush added: “That doesn’t exist in Europe in the same way and particularly in Britain, which is more socially stratified than the US.

“They live in Muslim ghettoes and feel alienated from the larger society and not accepted.”

Abdulmutallab, a mechanical engineering student at University College London, was president of the college’s Islamic Society between 2006 and 2007.

Like many British universities, it has been accused of failing to stop radical preachers from spreading an extremist message on campus for fear of being accused of religious hatred.

Mr Thiessen blamed liberal attitudes for allowing Islamic extremism to spread.

We are in grave danger by doing away with vital tools in the war on terror – all in response to the hue and cry from the European Left and to appease European opinion,” he said.

“There is no shame in aggressively interrogating terrorists or treating them as enemy combatants as opposed to criminals. What was attempted in Detroit, what was done to you on the London Underground, these were not crimes – they were acts of war.”

Charles Allen, intelligence chief at the Department of Homeland Security under Mr Bush, said: “There are more challenges in Muslim immigrants integrating into British society than there is in America – a lack of assimilation, a great deal of alienation.”

He said that as a result Al Qaeda had worked much harder to recruit people who lived in the West.

British-based experts point out that radicals have flocked to the UK, attracted by lax immigration controls, generous benefits and the ability to spread their views through respect for free speech.

Despite the 2005 London attacks and other Islamist plots, they say extremist networks are still allowed to flourish here, blaming a Government obsession with multiculturalism and “human rights”.

Commenting on the American criticism, Robin Simcox, a research fellow at the Centre for Social Cohesion think-tank, said: “The British Government has to be a better ally to the United States.

“It’s appalling that a nation that should be one of the US’s closest partners is providing a significant amount of its enemies.”

Happy New Year 2010

Happy New Year 2010 from TheOPINIONATOR

Happy New Year Glitter

My New Year's Resolution - courtesy of Winston Churchill:

"Never give in - never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy."

UK - Muslim Chef Gets A £76,000 'Kick' in his Bacon Butt-ie

Halleluiah!

Below is a follow up story to my prior post :

MUSLIM POLICE CHEF SUES OVER TRADITIONAL ENGLISH BREAKFAST

"...(a)  muslim police chef suing for having to cook meals for the police men and women for which it is his JOB to cook.

"Hasanali Khoja is accusing the force of religious discrimination after it refused to guarantee in his contract that he would be excused from handling pork products."

For once I am actually pleased to be able to state that Mr. Khoja has been handed his lying bacon butt-ie on a platter by Judge Michael Southam:

"Hasanali Khoja accused the Metropolitan Police of failing to consider his Islamic beliefs when he was asked to handle pork products as a catering manager at a police station.  The £23,000-a-year chef claimed suggestions by his bosses that he should wear gloves and use tongs left him 'stressed and humiliated'. Muslims are banned from eating pork under Islamic law.

But Mr Khoja, 62, lost his claim in May after a police employee told an employment tribunal how she saw Mr Khoja eat bacon rolls and sausages. The Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) has now won a ruling ordering Mr Khoja to pay its costs, which total at least £76,200. In its costs claim, the Met said Mr Khoja 'knew that he had asked for a bacon roll two or three times for personal consumption before bringing his claim and throughout the conduct of his claim'.

'The fact that he had knowingly come into contact with pork products before bringing the claim shows that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success from the outset.'

Mr Khoja gave further insight into his greed when he was caught telling more lies:

Mr Khoja, from Edgware, North London, who is still employed by the Met, claimed at a hearing in Watford that he could afford to pay only £80 a week as he has little income, lives in rented property and is struggling with £30,000 legal bills of his own. But the court discovered he had sold another home last year, splitting profits of almost £200,000 with his wife and two sons.

I'd like to think that this ruling will deter future "nice little earner" seekers - but as such lawsuits - by muslims - have frequently produced lucrative results in the past I doubt that they will cease padding their pockets with the proceeds from such 'trauma's' as "hurt feelings over head scarf"  -

And let's not forget muslim Fatah Lemes who took a job as a cocktail waitress then sued saying the red dress she was "forced to wear hurt her feelings'.  A dhimmified tribunal awarded her £2,919.95 for those hurt feelings and loss of earnings" - Of course no one on the tribunal saw the Facebook pictures of a smiling Miss Lemes flaunting her two "hurt feelings" in a far more revealing dress.

One needs no better example - than Ms Lemes -  as to why so many muslims have turned British employers - via the soft headed, muslim pandering British judicial system -into "hurt feelings" cash cows. 

But at least for today...........there is a glimmer of hope.

Article in full:

Muslim police chef defeated in 'bacon roll' tribunal faces £75,000 legal bill

By Tom Harper
Last updated at 10:02 PM on 19th December 2009

Costly case: A caterer told the court that Hasanali Khoja ate pork

A Muslim chef who lost a claim of religious discrimination against Scotland Yard after complaining he was forced to cook sausages and bacon faces a legal bill of more than £75,000.

Hasanali Khoja accused the Metropolitan Police of failing to consider his Islamic beliefs when he was asked to handle pork products as a catering manager at a police station.  

The £23,000-a-year chef claimed suggestions by his bosses that he should wear gloves and use tongs left him 'stressed and humiliated'. Muslims are banned from eating pork under Islamic law.

But Mr Khoja, 62, lost his claim in May after a police employee told an employment tribunal how she saw Mr Khoja eat bacon rolls and sausages.

The Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) has now won a ruling ordering Mr Khoja to pay its costs, which total at least £76,200. In its costs claim, the Met said Mr Khoja 'knew that he had asked for a bacon roll two or three times for personal consumption before bringing his claim and throughout the conduct of his claim'.

'The fact that he had knowingly come into contact with pork products before bringing the claim shows that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success from the outset.'

Judge Michael Southam agreed and ruled Mr Khoja should pay costs, though these would be determined at a later date at a county court.

Mr Khoja, from Edgware, North London, who is still employed by the Met, claimed at a hearing in Watford that he could afford to pay only £80 a week as he has little income, lives in rented property and is struggling with £30,000 legal bills of his own.

But the court discovered he had sold another home last year, splitting profits of almost £200,000 with his wife and two sons.

The decision is another setback for the police chef, who believed he was on course for a large settlement when he launched his case in 2007.

Mr Khoja, who sits on a Foods Standards Agency advisory committee on Muslim issues, decided to take action after Scotland Yard chiefs placed him on unpaid leave for a year after his refusal to work with pork.

He said he was then given work in a different building but his role was downgraded.

But his case fell apart when another caterer, Mary Boakye, told the court she served him bacon rolls 'two or three' times at the Met canteen at Heathrow in West London.

When she told him she was surprised because his religion banned him from eating pork, Mr Khoja allegedly replied: 'I eat them once in a while.'

Another chef said he saw Mr Khoja once happily eat a sausage dish and told the court 'he was not as strict as some Muslims'.

Judge Southam also heard how Mr Khoja had made 'wild and baseless' allegations about a human resource manager, allegedly making racial facial gestures.

Mr Khoja is one of several ethnic minority staff to launch racial discrimination claims against Scotland Yard. The most high-profile was former Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur, who last year accused Sir Ian Blair of excluding him from the upper echelons of the force because of his skin colour.

Mr Ghaffur retired after receiving an out-of-court settlement and dropped the allegations.

Muslim Gang Attacks - Punches - Spits on Lone British Woman

The below news article (of course not found in the mainstream press)  is a prime example of how the vast amount of muslim "men" feel about women - particularly white infidel women.

A lone British young woman was in her car stopped at a stop light. She was minding her own business and had her driver side window rolled down. A gang of cowardly muslim thugs seized the opportunity to attack this vulnerable lone woman. Bad enough this poor woman was physically attacked and punched but she had to endure the vile racist, anti-white filth spewing from their mouths and the humiliation of having globs of their slimy spit in her face.

Below are some of the facts regarding what Islam teaches men about women (Source = The Religion of Peace) - thus should it be any surprise to realize as the muslim population of Britain - currently estimated at 2.4 million ---- continues to skyrocket that crimes against British women will also skyrocket? Or shall we keep our eyes and minds closed and continue to spout multicultural lies and allow  British women to pay a high price for multiculturalism?

Where is the outrage???? Where are the politicians rushing to the microphones condemning such a violent racist act????? Where are the in-depth news articles in the mainstream media?????  Why do we let the dhimmified police get away with once again telling us that such muslim crimes are a "one off" - when the facts tell us otherwise?????

Even more concerning = Why aren't the British people - marching in droves - demanding justice for British people and an end to muslim colonization???

Qur'an (4:11) - (Inheritance) "The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females" (see also verse 4:176).

Qur'an (2:282) - (Court testimony) "And call to witness, from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not found then a man and two women."  Muslim apologists have sometimes creatively tried to explain why a woman's testimony is worth half that of a man's under Islamic law (based on this verse) while still attempting to maintain the semblance of equality.  Unfortunately for them, studies consistently show that women are less likely to tell lies than men, meaning that they would make more reliable witnesses in any court - were it not for Islam's obvious sexism.

Qur'an (2:228) - "and the men are a degree above them [women]"

Qur'an (5:6) - "And if ye are unclean, purify yourselves. And if ye are sick or on a journey, or one of you cometh from the closet, or ye have had contact with women, and ye find not water, then go to clean, high ground and rub your faces and your hands with some of it"  Men are to rub dirt on their hands if there is no water to purify them following casual contact with a woman (such as shaking hands).

Qur'an (24:31) - Women are to lower their gaze around men, so they do not look them in the eye.

Qur'an (2:223) - "Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will..."  A man has dominion over his wives' bodies as he does his land.  This verse is overtly sexual.  There is some dispute as to whether it is referring to the practice of anal intercourse, which it has been used historically to justify.  If this is what Muhammad meant, however, then it would appear to contradict what he said in Muslim (8:3365).

Qur'an (4:3) - (Wife-to-husband ratio) "Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four"

Qur'an (53:27) - "Those who believe not in the Hereafter, name the angels with female names."  Angels are sublime beings, and would therefore be male.

Qur'an (4:24) and Qur'an (33:52) - A man is permitted to take women as sex slaves outside of marriage.

This is not only a British problem but a problem for Western cultures -Islam teaches muslims to not only feel entitled to attack and rape our "inferior" women but see this as a victory over the infidel on their path to Islamization of the world or Global Caliphate. It is time to look at big picture and see the ever growing numbers of attacks on "kuffar" women as not just a muslim crime but also an act of terrorism.

Article in full:

Keighley woman spat at and punched in Keighley attack

By Steve Wright »

A young woman motorist was spat at and punched in a racial attack as she sat in her car in Keighley town centre.

The 23-year-old victim was left distressed by the incident, which happened as she waited at traffic lights with her window wound down.

Police say the “disturbing” assault was racially motivated and are appealing for help to trace the “cowardly” gang responsible.

The woman, who is white, had pulled up at the lights in North Street, at 5pm on Saturday when she was approached by a group of Asian men.

They began to racially abuse her and spat at her through the open window.

One of the males punched her while trying to grab her car keys.

After a short while the victim managed to wind up the window and drive away from the scene.

She was not seriously hurt but was left distressed. The group of men then left the area, heading up Devonshire Street.

The main aggressor is described as Asian, in his late teens, 5ft 5ins, and of skinny build.

He had brown eyes and was wearing a plain grey hooded top.

Detective Inspector John Mountain, of Airedale and North Bradford CID, said: “This was a disturbing racial assault and attempted robbery on a young woman in her own car who was minding her own business and appears to have done nothing to provoke it.

“The attack happened at a busy time of the day in the town centre and I am appealing for anyone who saw what happened, or may know the identities of any of this group, to come forward.

“Fortunately incidents such as this are rare and I now appeal to residents from all sections of the community in Keighley to assist us in finding those responsible for this cowardly attack.”

UK Labour Government To Make British Tax Law ---> Sharia compliant

Clearly the dhimmified Labour government will not be content until all the British people are living under sharia law. How can anyone feel anything but contempt for these traitors?  Supposedly a 'snap' election is coming -none too soon: 

"While May 6 remains the likely general election date, Labour’s recent bounce in the polls has meant that party chiefs are now preparing for an early March 25 poll.>....Labour headquarters are accelerating the process of selecting parliamentary candidates, with bosses set to take new powers in the new year to parachute party loyalists into winnable seats."     SOURCE

I have a better idea = anyone who is stupid enough to vote Labour should be promptly boarded on a plane and air dropped into Saudi Arabia - parachutes optional.

Fans of PM Gordon Brown?

SHARIA LAW SNEAKED INTO LABOUR BUDGET

THE Treasury plans to rewrite Britain’s tax rules to usher in a new wave of Sharia law for the country’s financial system.

The one-line revelation is buried in the 212-page pre-Budget report.

It is among a string of startling details which barely merit a mention in Alistair Darling’s controversial mini-Budget – prompting fresh accusations that Labour is “burying bad news”.

The Government wants to tap into the fast-growing Sharia finance market, set to top £205billion a year, and turn London into the “global gateway for Islamic finance”.

Many conventional financial products are not Sharia compliant because Muslim clerics view conventional loans, which involve interest payments, as sinful.

The UK Government was one of the first Western countries to issue a state-backed sukuk, an Islamic bond. It now wants to rewrite tax laws to stop Muslim businessmen being unfairly taxed when they try to raise money on their companies.

Conventional loans allow them to take equity out of their business, using the property as collateral, but to be Sharia compliant a Muslim “sells” the business to the bank and then rents it back. That leaves the businessman facing a bill for capital gains tax and the Treasury wants to level the tax playing field.

Mohammed Amin, head of Islamic finance at PricewaterhouseCoopers, said: “The UK has become the leading Western country in Islamic finance by taking a series of measures to ensure that Islamic finance is taxed no worse and no better than conventional finance.

“The pre-Budget report continues this progress by including measures to equalise the tax treatment of property refinancing transactions.” Ministers are also considering issuing Government bonds to Islamic banks to help them comply with new financial regulations.

With three independent Islamic banks and high street names at the forefront of compliant accounts, London is one of the world’s largest centres for Islamic finance.

Sharia-compliant mortgages, car insurance and even baby bonds are available for Muslims wanting to avoid “riba” – interest payments.

Supporters say the Government is wisely getting in on the ground floor of a market which could net the City billions in the future.

Critics warn Labour is rushing into a financial system it does not fully understand and question how far laws should be rewritten to accommodate Islamic practices. The Financial Services Authority says its policy is one of “no obstacles, no special favours” for Islamic finance.

Last week’s pre-Budget report includes the revelation that bankers will still net £4.5billion in bonuses this year despite the so-called super-tax on the City.

Ministers also used the cover of the report to admit the Homeowner Mortgage Support Scheme, permitting deferment of interest payments, has been an abject failure.

Shadow Housing Minister Grant Shapps said: “It’s gone the way of many other Brown initiatives. We’ve stumped up for the expensive consultancy bills but the actual scheme has failed to help more than a handful of hard-pressed families.”

A Communities and Local Government spokeswoman said: “The Government has widely publicised that fortunately only 15 families have so far needed the backstop help of the Homeowner Mortgage Support Scheme.”

Muslim Pedophile Rape Gang Arrested in Rotherham

The despicable muslim Rape Jihad continues in Britain.  Once again young, vulnerable white British girls are plundered like war booty by muslim men. For that is just what this girls are = war booty = as muslims continue their invasion and colonisation of Great Britain bringing with them their contempt for the Western world and it's indigenous people, culture and customs - particularly women and girls.

The government and social policies of multiculturalism and appeasement have given muslims a sense of entitlement to all things British - from sponging off taxpayer paid benefits to establishing no-go areas for white British to the rampant raping and beating of British women and children. Meanwhile the police and courts continue to coddle muslims whilst the media keeps muslim criminals identities frequently out of the front pages of national newspapers. Search for muslim rape or rape jihad in the blogosphere - and the truth about muslim crime quickly becomes glaringly evident.

I (and many other bloggers) have written extensively about the muslim rape of British women and children - and yes - even men.

A small sampling:

THE MUSLIM RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE OF BRITISH GIRLS

WORSE than a "pack of animals" - 3 Muslim Men Jailed for Rape of 16 yr old British girl

Muslim Millionaire Pedophiles Buying British Little Girls for Sex

MUSLIM MEN RAPE FOUR BRITISH SCHOOLGIRLS AT AMUSEMENT PARK

UK EPIDEMIC - MUSLIM TAXI DRIVERS RAPING BRITISH GIRLS & WOMEN

MUSLIM MAN KIDNAPS 14 YR OLD BRITISH GIRL FOR SEX

THE BEAT GOES ON ----- MUSLIM ATTACKS ON BRITISH WOMEN

JAILED PEDOPHILE CONVERTS TO ISLAM

MUSLIM PEDOPHILES RAPE UK TAXPAYERS

Once again:

Whilst dhimmi judges act the role of apologists for muslim criminals

MUSLIM MEN ARE RAPING OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN 

Whilst dhimmi police play hijab dress-up and coddle muslims

MUSLIM MEN ARE RAPING OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN

Whilst politicians are cajoling and paying for muslim votes

MUSLIM MEN ARE RAPING OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN

Whilst the media continues to hide muslim crime/criminals (see below)

MUSLIM MEN ARE RAPING OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN

Whilst church leaders embrace the muslim invasion and exploitation of the British people

MUSLIM MEN ARE RAPING OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN

Obviously the feckless British police - as shown by their persistent refusal to publicly condemn & swiftly deal with such actions, are happy to continue to keep quiet about (gangs of) muslim pedophile's exploitation and rape of young girls - under the guise of "community cohesiveness".

The media are also consistently to blame as this current story - below - is allowed to remain (hidden) local news rather than national. I addressed this national cover-up of muslim rapes in my blog British women pay high price for multiculturalism.

It is time for this insanity to STOP and for the British people to protect their own as clearly they cannot rely upon the 'powers that be' to do so for them.

Article in full:

Eight men charged with sexual offences

 

Eight men are due in court this morning, charged in connection with a police investigation into alleged serious sexual offences in Rotherham.

 

The men were all arrested in March this year and had been on police bail until yesterday.

Following consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service, all eight were charged yesterday with a total of 18 sexual offences against four girls aged 13 to 17 years, and remanded in custody.

The men due before Rotherham magistrates this morning are:

Shazad Akbar, aged 22, of Shirecliffe Lane, Shirecliffe, Sheffield, charged with raping a woman aged over 16;

Adil Hussain, 20, of Nelson Street, Rotherham town centre, charged with raping a girl aged 13 to 15;

Saeed Hussain, 28, of Hatherley Road, Eastwood, Rotherham, charged with inciting a girl aged 13 to 15 to engage in sexual activity;

Shaizaad Hussain, 21, of Clough Road, Masborough, Rotherham, charged with two offences of raping a girl aged 13 to 15;

Mohsin Khan, 21, of Haworth Crescent, Moorgate, Rotherham, charged with four offences of raping a girl aged 13 to 15, and one offence of rape of a woman aged over 16;

Zafran Ramzan, 21, of Broom Grove, Broom, Rotherham, charged with three offences of rape of a woman aged over 16, and one offence of raping a girl aged 13 to 15;

Razwan Razaq, 29, of Oxford Street, Clifton, Rotherham, charged with two offences of rape of a girl aged 13 to 15;

Umar Razaq, 23, of Oxford Street, Clifton, Rotherham, charged with raping a woman aged over 16 and engaging in sexual activity with a girl aged 13 to 15.

A ninth man arrested was subsequently released without charge.

 

Colorado Sheriff's Joke Causes Muslim Woman's 'hurt feelings'

Some quick comments:

Oh here we go again - a poor muslim suffering from hurt feelings - oh the inhumanity of it all!!!!!  Now a voluntary Christmas tree trimming party is "politically incorrect" and Larimer County Sheriff Jim Alderden's joke has caused hurt feelings to a muslim woman who chooses to remain unnamed!

You know what I think is politically incorrect? - having people come into or live in the USA (or Great Britain or any other Christian nation) and tell us our Judeo/Christian traditions are 'politically incorrect' then go on to force our public schools and buildings to be rebuilt to accomodate their medieval religion/customs with footbaths, special toilets they can squat on, separate swimming/pool times for boys/men and girls/women, halal meals, and prayer rooms that are quickly turned into mosques thus no other faith can use it - otherwise the room are defiled- etc etc/ 

Then this woman goes on to spout the typical, over-used twaddle:

"We can't let our religion be hijacked by extremists," she said.

Oh really??

Why there are 1.5 BILLION  muslims in the world  including the supposedly small number of extremists - so the extremists are clearly outnumbered by moderate muslims therefore why don't the moderates eradicate those who do not represent them and threaten their countries and people? - those who cause bloodshed and terrorism?  Instead these "mainstream" muslims trot out the above statement (or facsimile) as some kind of shield that protects them from the truth & reality.  Ask a muslim man or woman the above question and don't hold your breath waiting for an answer.

Especially when the true feelings of many muslims is voiced again by this unnamed 'volunteer" who also suffers from unverified "threats" (from who??) :

 "an elected official jesting about the killing of Muslims goes beyond politically incorrect."

Surely US Marines helping to eliminate the "muslim extremists" would be welcome by 'moderate' muslims who are angry these 'extremists' are "hyjacking their religion & killing their people". 

But no - they/she view them as one of her own = muslim............

So which one is it?

Hear the doublespeak?

Sheriff's Muslim jokes draw concerns

Article:

A volunteer for the nonprofit Muslims Against Hunger group is not upset Larimer County Sheriff Jim Alderden plans to hold a Christmas tree-trimming party - an event Alderden proudly calls politically incorrect.

But the woman, a Muslim who lives in Northern Colorado, is concerned about a comment Alderden made while giving a speech at a Marine Corps Ball last month. The sheriff briefly posted a transcript of the speech on his Web site.

In the speech, Alderden joked about bumper stickers and highlighted one which read, "U.S. Marines: Travel agents to Allah."

The speech has been removed from the sheriff's Web site, and he declined to comment about the speech.

9NEWS also asked a dozen former Marines who heard his speech for their thoughts. None of them wanted to be quoted.

The woman, whose name is not being published because she has received threats, said an elected official jesting about the killing of Muslims goes beyond politically incorrect.

"Anytime you put someone down, whether it's for religion or race or anything, it doesn't just hurt the individual, it actually hurts the community where we live, and it's really not time to start doing things like this," she said.

The Muslim-American community contributes much to society, she said, and she also pointed out Muslim-American soldiers have died in the current wars while fighting for the United States.

"We're proud to be in this country," she said.

Cases like that of Nidal Malik Hasan, the man accused of shooting fellow soldiers at Fort Hood, are the exception rather than the rule, she said.

"We can't let our religion be hijacked by extremists," she said.

UK Muslim Benefit Scrounger - Milked over £70,000 in Benefits - spared jail

The below article is another example of the ever increasing and on-going benefit fraud conducted by many recent (and some not so recent-see below) immigrants and asylum seekers (many of whom just so happen to be muslim.  They not only seek the generosity of their new hosts - the British people - but also - these greedy, selfish, lazy people seek to illegally and legally plunder the pockets of those same taxpayers.

The below muslim woman, Leyla Yusuf, knowing and intentionally lied and committed fraud so her greedy paws could latch on to British taxpayer money.  But after her "fiddling the taxpayer for seven years "the judge spared her a prison term because she has children. To give her this pass has less to do with the fact she has children (many men and women service jailtime have children) and much to do with the fact that she is a MUSLIM woman with children - and we all know - based on the plethora of past blogs I have written - that the dhimmified British judges/courts repeatedly give 'a pass' to muslim crooks, rapists, paedophiles, etc.

Another ludicrous example is muslim Afghani Toorpakai Saiedi, 36, and her seven children who receive a staggering £170,000 a year in benefits and who live in luxury in the seven-bedroom home in Acton, West London at a cost - to British taxpayers of £12,458 a month. Designer clothes and brand new cars decorate this family as well as their smug knowledge that "'No one is going to throw us out of this house. We're here to stay.' As infuritating as it is - it appears they are right.  SOURCE

In yesterday's front page news: a muslim Somali family are living in a luxury £1.8million five- story house in central London funded by the taxpayer. Nasra Warsame, 40, has lived with seven of her children and her elderly mother in the six-bedroom house since October. Westminster council pays the £1,600-a-week rent for the former asylum seeker.... The fully-furnished house, within walking distance of the West End, has three sitting rooms and four bathrooms. The main lounge has two leather sofas, a flat-screen television and a glass coffee table. Annual rent for the house would cost £83,200.  Meanwhile, Mrs Warsame's husband Bashir Aden, 50, and another of their children are living in a separate property in nearby Camden. Yes, TWO homes and living in the lap of luxury - with no bother to work - but plenty of time to continue to have additional children- courtesy of the working British. - And - by the way - this family has been living in the UK since 1991. SOURCE

It is no secret in order for the Labour government to continue fund the lavish benefits on this coddled group of benefit scroungers the government has cut many benefits to the British people - the most recent finds millions of British elderly pensioners in danger of losing thousands of pounds in benefits under Gordon Brown's flagship plan for home care (or lack thereof) for the neediest elderly.

Disgusting!!

£70k benefits cheat had property in Dubai

A MUM who created a false identity to milk over £70,000 from the benefits system has been spared jail.

Leyla Yusuf, 31, of Garthorne Close, Moss Side, posed as a penniless asylum seeker from Somalia in a scam to double the amount she received in state handouts.

In reality, the mother-of-five has Dutch nationality and enjoyed a comfortable lifestyle with property in Dubai.

Yusuf had been fiddling the taxpayer for seven years when she was caught by a sting earlier this year.

Suspicious officials at Manchester council's benefit department set up simultaneous appointments for Leyla Yusuf and her fraudster alter ego, 'Leyla Hassan'.

When the same woman turned up for both appointments the department's suspicions were confirmed and in October Yusuf was arrested.

But when Yusuf appeared at Manchester Crown Court a judge spared her a prison term for the sake of her children – the youngest of whom is just six weeks old.

She was handed a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for two years with supervision, plus 300 hours unpaid work.

Soon after arriving in Britain on a Dutch passport in 2002 with her husband and two of her children, Yusuf invented 'Leyla Hassan'. She gave her persona the same year of birth, telephone numbers, and even some of her own children.

Once she had immigration status under the false name she was able to get a national insurance number and make claims for child benefit, housing, council tax, income support, tax credits and community care grants, while claiming an empty property at Rosebery Street, Moss Side as her address.

Yusuf was sentenced to a 12-month jail sentence suspended for two years after admitting six counts of false accounting and one charge of failing to declare.

A further four counts relating to an extra £30,000 she fiddled by claiming she was living apart from her taxi driver husband were left to lie on file.

Sentencing, Judge Anthony Hammond said Yusuf had perpetrated a 'cynical milking of the system' which was 'well-executed to say the least'.

Ian Birch, defending, said that Yusuf had paid £1,500 to a 'Somali lawyer' who told her she could not claim benefits as a Dutch citizen and advised her to create another identity.

On hearing this His Hon. Judge Hammond said: "There are one or two dubious practitioners in that area making an awful lot of money from legal aid."

Yusuf is currently making repayments to Manchester City Council and it is understood that Department of Work and Pensions investigators may try to recoup some of the cash by going after her property in Dubai.

Passing sentence, His Hon. Judge Hammond said: "You have defrauded this country of over £70,000 by a deliberate and cynical manipulation of the benefits system 'you richly deserve to go to prison and your husband is lucky he's not in the dock with you.'

He added: "As it is you have five children, the youngest of them is only six weeks of age and the next youngest is two years of age. Were I to be sending you to prison it's going to be very difficult for someone to look after the two-year-old, the youngest child would go with you into the prison."

Burka Wearing Gunmen Pistol Whip Post Office Manager in failed Robbery Attempt - Manningham England

The muslim population of Great Britain has put strong effort into convincing the British that it is a right and mandate for muslim women to wear the face and body covering shroud know as the burka. The dhimmi British politicians (and police) have bought the arguments - hook, line and sinker - so far to the point that muslim women are even given burka hospital gowns. But other EU countries are not so gullible. Face veils are now banned in the Netherlands for justified security reasons and other EU countries such as - Germany - France - Belgium - are considering and/or have already instituted a ban or restrictions. 

Now comes the latest crime by two crooks wearing burkas - this one in no-go area Manningham:

"Two robbers – dressed in full-length women’s burkhas – pistol-whipped a post office manager during a daylight raid in Bradford. The attackers bundled their 38-year-old victim into the premises as he opened the shop. They brutally struck him on the head with the butt of a handgun when he was unable to open a safe. But the raiders then panicked and fled empty-handed when they saw a customer peering through the window of the post office, in Oak Lane, Manningham."  See article below

This is not the first time the burka has been used in Great Britain to commit a crime - the trailblazer in the UK, murderer Mustaf Jama, wore a burka to flee the UK even going through security at London's Heathrow airport. We all remembers the 21/7 terrorist/bomber, Yassar Omar, who fled london wearing a burka. 

 

As well as, two robbers disguised in Afghan-style robes stole £200,000  worth of jewellery from an exclusive London store. And, about one and a half years ago, "Asian" robbers -  wearing a burka AND pushing a pram - shovelled £200,000 of 24-carat gold jewellery into bags before fleeing with their (male) accomplice in two getaway cars.  In fact using the burka as a disguise to commit crimes has become the Modus Operandi for a plethora of muslim criminals and terrorists worldwide.  Well know author and speaker, Daniel Pipes, wrote a long article regarding this - see it here.

 

Also trotted out is the now trite response of the dhimmified British police:

 

"Attacks on post offices are rare. But these were determined individuals who were prepared to use violence in order to steal from innocent members of the public.” 

 

Perhaps post office robberies are not as common as others (tell that to the Craig Hodson-Walker family) but there is NO doubt that Britain is now the most violent country in Europe - even surpassing South Africa and the United States. A sad post script on a country that historically was known for it's non-violence  - with the British Bobby (police) not even carrying guns.

Clearly it is time for the British government and police to wake up and "smell the burka" and decide - just like the Netherlands - that the safety of the British public is at issue and a burka ban needs to become law. But none of us will hold our breath waiting for the British politicans to place the general public welfare before the demands of muslims.

Article in full:

Gunmen in burkhas raid post office in Manningham

8:00am Saturday 28th November 2009

By Steve Wright »

Two robbers – dressed in full-length women’s burkhas – pistol-whipped a post office manager during a daylight raid in Bradford.

The attackers bundled their 38-year-old victim into the premises as he opened the shop.

They brutally struck him on the head with the butt of a handgun when he was unable to open a safe.

But the raiders then panicked and fled empty-handed when they saw a customer peering through the window of the post office, in Oak Lane, Manningham.

They jumped into a waiting getaway car – a stolen silver Volvo S60 with a 54 registration plate – which contained at least one other man.

The car was found a short time later, abandoned and on fire at Bradford Salem rugby union club in Shay Lane, Heaton. The raiders are then thought to have made their escape on foot through Heaton Woods.

The raid happened at about 9am yesterday – the day of the major Muslim holiday and festival, Eid.

Police believe the men had been lying in wait for the post office manager and pounced on him as he opened the shop.

After the gunmen fled he was taken to hospital and treated for a cut head and bruising.

Detective Inspector Steve Snow, of Bradford South CID, said it had been a planned attack and the violence used had caused extreme distress to the manager.

He said: “Thankfully, the victim received minor injuries and will make a full recovery.

“Attacks on post offices are rare. But these were determined individuals who were prepared to use violence in order to steal from innocent members of the public.”

Police are hunting two Asian males, who were slim and thought to be in their 20s, and both wearing burkhas. It is believed another one or two men were in the getaway car.

Det Insp Snow appealed for anyone who saw anything, or anyone acting suspiciously in the area at the time, to come forward. He also wants to hear from anyone who saw the silver Volvo parked near the post office, or en route to Shay Lane.

And he appealed for dog walkers who might have seen the suspects running through Heaton Woods after dumping the car to contact police.

He added: “The offenders did not get away with any money, but I would urge the public to offer any support they can.”

This is not the first time the burka has been used in Great Britain to commit a crime - the trailblazer in the UK, murderer Mustaf Jama, wore a burka to flee the UK even going through security at London's Heathrow airport. We all remembers the 21/7 terrorist/bomber, Yassar Omar, who fled london wearing a burka. 

 

As well as, two robbers disguised in Afghan-style robes stole £200,000  worth of jewellery from an exclusive London store. And, about one and a half years ago, "Asian" robbers -  wearing a burka AND pushing a pram - shovelled £200,000 of 24-carat gold jewellery into bags before fleeing with their (male) accomplice in two getaway cars.  In fact using the burka as a disguise to commit crimes has become the Modus Operandi for a plethora of muslim criminals and terrorists worldwide.  Well know author and speaker, Daniel Pipes, wrote a long article regarding this - see it here.

 

Also trotted out is the now trite response of the dhimmified British police:

 

"Attacks on post offices are rare. But these were determined individuals who were prepared to use violence in order to steal from innocent members of the public.” 

 

Perhaps post office robberies are not as common as others (tell that to the Craig Hodson-Walker family) but there is NO doubt that Britain is now the most violent country in Europe - even surpassing South Africa and the United States. A sad post script on a country that historically was known for it's non-violence  - with the British Bobby (police) not even carrying guns.

Article in full:

Gunmen in burkhas raid post office in Manningham

8:00am Saturday 28th November 2009

By Steve Wright »

Two robbers – dressed in full-length women’s burkhas – pistol-whipped a post office manager during a daylight raid in Bradford.

The attackers bundled their 38-year-old victim into the premises as he opened the shop.

They brutally struck him on the head with the butt of a handgun when he was unable to open a safe.

But the raiders then panicked and fled empty-handed when they saw a customer peering through the window of the post office, in Oak Lane, Manningham.

They jumped into a waiting getaway car – a stolen silver Volvo S60 with a 54 registration plate – which contained at least one other man.

The car was found a short time later, abandoned and on fire at Bradford Salem rugby union club in Shay Lane, Heaton. The raiders are then thought to have made their escape on foot through Heaton Woods.

The raid happened at about 9am yesterday – the day of the major Muslim holiday and festival, Eid.

Police believe the men had been lying in wait for the post office manager and pounced on him as he opened the shop.

After the gunmen fled he was taken to hospital and treated for a cut head and bruising.

Detective Inspector Steve Snow, of Bradford South CID, said it had been a planned attack and the violence used had caused extreme distress to the manager.

He said: “Thankfully, the victim received minor injuries and will make a full recovery.

“Attacks on post offices are rare. But these were determined individuals who were prepared to use violence in order to steal from innocent members of the public.”

Police are hunting two Asian males, who were slim and thought to be in their 20s, and both wearing burkhas. It is believed another one or two men were in the getaway car.

Det Insp Snow appealed for anyone who saw anything, or anyone acting suspiciously in the area at the time, to come forward. He also wants to hear from anyone who saw the silver Volvo parked near the post office, or en route to Shay Lane.

And he appealed for dog walkers who might have seen the suspects running through Heaton Woods after dumping the car to contact police.

He added: “The offenders did not get away with any money, but I would urge the public to offer any support they can.”

Britian - Muslim Social Networking Sexual Predator Texted Apology to Victim

Clearly social networking sites are becoming the latest place for muslim (and other) sexual predators to meet their victims.

This past October I wrote about Abdelali Nachet, 34. Nachet subjected a woman who had travelled from Hong Kong, to a degrading and humiliating sex ordeal after he offered his flat as a place to sleep for travelers on the internet. In a premeditated manner, Nachet lured the woman into his bedroom where he repeatedly raped and sexually assaulted her. Nachet also threatened to murder the woman and made sure any rape evidence was removed from her body. .....upon hearing his guilty verdicts: "dramatically collapsed in the dock and began wailing hysterically. Security guards were forced to drag him away to the cells where he repeatedly banged his head on the floor." SOURCE

After he recovered from his hissy fit he proceeded to condemn the jury as "racists".  Apparently, to Nachet, his correctly being found guilty violent rape is a clearcut sign of (the Myth of)Islamophobia.

Along comes Pakistani, Farhan Hussain, 21- who recently used the internet to worm his way into the life of a young woman and then use that friendship as an opportunity to rape her sleeping friend.  Another indication that Hussain 'set up' both women with the intent of his future crime is that he used an alias, Steven Johnson, rather than his real name.

To show the depraved opinion that Hussain (an many other muslim men) have of women - 5 days after committing the sexual assault he sent a text message to the woman he had attacked, saying:

“I raped my girlfriends mate shame!! I do apologise for dat and Im saying sory 4rm my heart. Please 4giv me.”

Did he really think that his apology would make up for the trauma suffered by his victim and undoubtedly the guilt and distrust now felt by the woman he initially met online?

Clearly so. Recall that Islam/sharia law has gone high-tech - on other male/female matters - as now it as simple as a few finger taps on a cellphone for men to divorce their wives:

A Saudi man has divorced his wife by text message, a newspaper said on Thursday.The man was in Iraq when he sent the SMS informing her she was no longer his spouse. He followed up with a telephone call to two of his relatives, the daily Arab News reported. A court in the Red Sea city of Jeddah finalised the split -- the first known divorce in Saudi Arabia by text message -- after summoning the two relatives to check they had received word of the husband's intention, the paper said. Saudi Arabia practises a strict form of Islamic Sharia law, and clerics preside over Sharia courts as judges.

Under the law a man can divorce his wife by saying  ""Inti talaq -"I divorce you" three times. SOURCE

In fact, Sharia law considers the uttered fatwa to be valid even if it was typed or uttered whilst the man/husband is drunk. Hmmm..... Isn't drinking alcohol haraam = against sharia law???

Thus it's not so farfetched for Farhan Hussein (aka Steven Johnson) to think his quick text apology would suffice.  Still at least he could have done is gone to the 'inconvenience' of texting the message three times as in the text-divorce Islamic rules.

Unfortunately for the -not the brightest bulb on the tree- Hussein -(FYI -a muslim being associated with Christmas in any way is also haraam) the police used his texted message to track him down and arrest him. Farhan is currently serving four years in jail and will supposedly be deported back to Pakistan when he is released. (But don't count on it)

Article in full:

Jail for sex attacker who said sorry by text

November 27, 2009

Farhan Hussain, 21, of London, was jailed for four years after he admitted attempted rape

-----A SEXUAL predator who used the internet to meet women tried to rape a victim - then apologised by text.

Farhan Hussain, 21, texted his victim five days after the attack, saying: “Please 4giv me.”

But the message proved his downfall as police traced his mobile and arrested him.

Now he has been jailed for four years after he admitted attempted rape.

Asleep

A court heard Hussain used the internet to befriend women and he had met a woman from Stockport at the end of 2007, using the name Steven Johnson.

He went to her flat in March 2008 and spent the day drinking before going to sleep on the floor of the apartment while she slept in the bedroom.

But we woke during the night and went into the front room where he tried to rape the woman's friend, who was asleep on a couch.

The other woman woke up and noticed Hussain was no longer on the bedroom floor and discovered him attempting to commit the rape.

She confronted Hussain and he left the flat. Five days later he sent a text to the woman he had attacked, saying: “I raped my girlfriends mate shame!! I do apologise for dat and Im saying sory 4rm my heart. Please 4giv me.”

Visit

Police traced the phone that sent the message and Hussain was arrested.

Hussain, of Green Lane, London, was jailed for four years after he admitted attempted rape at Minshull Street Crown Court.

He was also ordered to sign the sex offenders' register for life.

He will be deported to Bangladesh when he has served his sentence.

Internet

After the hearing, Det Con James Campbell said: “Hussain was an active internet user who contacted many women.

“He befriended the victim's friend, wormed his way into their lives and attempted to rape one of the women who was drunk and totally unaware of what he was doing.

“He is a danger to women and has rightly been jailed where he no longer poses a threat.”

SHOCKER!! Muslim No-Go Areas Harming Community Cohesiveness in Britain

Who couldn't have seen this coming? No go areas  in Yorkshire are devisive and not helpful to community race relationships.

"A COUNCIL in West Yorkshire council has warned community and race relations in the region show an "extremely worrying downward trend", two years after residents raised concerns over "no-go" areas...Fewer than half of those questioned in Dewsbury, Mirfield and Heckmondwike thought people within different ethnic groups were getting on...The most pessimistic outlook was in Heckmondwike (42 per cent), followed by Mirfield on 43 per cent."

Now what possible 'ethnic group' could be at the crux of this growing "race" problem........could it be muslims??? 

Bradford = "In 2006, it was estimated that ...Nearly half of all Asians living in Yorkshire and the Humber live in Bradford, with one district, Frizinghall, having the highest concentration of Pakistanis in England and Wales, making up 73% of the local population.^[10] Accordingly, the city has a large Islamic population, with 16.08% of the population identifying themselves as Muslim in the 2001 census.^[30]

The crime rate in Bradford is significantly higher than the national average.^[36]... The city was shown to have the highest level of gun crime in the country, and was amongst the top 5 for incidents of burglary, rape, assault and vehicle crime."^[37][38  SOURCE

What might cause the indigenous people of Yorkshire to take issue with the opprobrious muslim population in their midst? - Here are a few - but far from all - of the possible reasons:

2 young muslim men planned on blowing up local political group

Dewsbury born mufti hates British way of life

Leeds - home of 'hidden pocket' of Islamic (Pakisatani) militancy & 3 of the London Underground bombers

Young British boy beaten to a pulp and robbed by muslims

Violent muslim protests cause Mecca bingo hall to change its 100+ year old name

Yorkshire - Eastern Europeans targeted and attacked by angry muslim men

Muslims protest building of dog food factory - say smoke emissions will cause port to rain down on their heads 

Muslim men - who groomed young British girls for sex - sent to prison

Kirklees female mayor snubbed by muslim constituency

Muslim prisoners sue for millions because they were offered ham sandwiches

Anti British hate speech being preached at Leeds Grand Mosque

Drugs and hardening hatred of British festering in Leeds

Muslims furious that some Walker's crisps contain miniscule amounts of alcohol

Muslim man jailed for selling DVDs that glorified 9/11 attacks/murders

Dhimmi classes set for Kirklees police officers

Clearly much of the muslim population is not a group that wants to assimilate into Britain but rather a group that loudly, obnoxiously and violently wants to convert Britain into an Islamic nation.

Also causing deep resentment among not just the Yorkshire people but majority of all British people is the incessant use of the word "racist" to annihilate anyone who wants to express concern with anti-social/assimilation muslim behaviours or points out problems with rampant muslim immigration. All this occurs even though muslims are not a race - a fact the mainstream media occasionally trots out - when it suits their purposes. How many times have we read or heard someone preface a comment or statement of clear fact regarding muslims or any minority group with "I'm not a racist, but......"? 

Incredulous as it sounds the majority of the British culture and indigenous people are deemed "racist" by their virtual being. Yes, the British people en masse -living their lives in the land of their ancient ancestors - are now marginalised and condemned.  Parts of Yorkshire are now so Islamicised that many white British people feel like an alien in their own home town.  

Add to that the myriad of British/Western customs, laws, mores, etc that are now denounced as offending muslims   (aka Islamophobia) - by muslims living in Britain and their Western-hating-multiculturalist dhimmis - and you can understand why the British people fear the decline of Britain.  as the Country marches down the one-way street of Islam.

The harsh reality is the political ideology called Islam is THE block to muslim integration - thus to expect lasting community cohesiveness in any area with a burgeoning muslim population is an illusion at best.

Article in full:

Race relations go downhill two years after 'no-go area' fears

by Andrew Robinson

A COUNCIL in West Yorkshire council has warned community and race relations in the region show an "extremely worrying downward trend", two years after residents raised concerns over "no-go" areas.

Opinion polls in Kirklees have revealed a rise in the numbers of people who believe divisions have built up between different groups within the community.

Fewer than half of those questioned in Dewsbury, Mirfield and Heckmondwike thought people within different ethnic groups were getting on.

 

In 2006, 58 per cent said relations were good but this had fallen 12 per cent by 2008.

The most pessimistic outlook was in Heckmondwike (42 per cent), followed by Mirfield on 43 per cent.

Kirklees Council leader, Labour councillor Mehboob Khan, said community cohesion is "showing an extremely worrying downward trend" in places such as Mirfield.

"The findings are a concern, but we have identified this issue at an early stage," he said. "The survey data we collect has allowed us to tailor our follow-up work to the needs of each area. We are being proactive in understanding and tackling perceptions in Mirfield and other areas before it becomes a bigger problem.

"It is important to stress that Mirfield is far from being alone, in Kirklees, regionally or nationally, in showing these perceptions. This isn't an unusual trend

"The survey figures, although worrying, do not indicate any particular tensions, but we are working with our partners and with the community to find out more and help improve things."

Coun Khan spoke to the Yorkshire Post following a political row about the council paying consultants £14,000 to carry out further research on community relations across Kirklees – including Mirfield – including giving £25 shopping vouchers to those attending meetings.

Mirfield Tory councillor Vivien Lees described the £25 payments as a waste of money and a bribe.

"I was appalled to hear that the council are actually paying people to attend such meetings. This is nothing more than a bribe.

"There are eight such meetings, six of which are in North Kirklees (Dewsbury area), and payment to those attending will amount to £2,000.

"A total budget of £14,000 has been allocated for these forums and a private firm has been employed to oversee this project.

"Even allowing for room hire for these forums there will be a handsome profit for the company involved. It is money for old rope and a scandal to be using council taxpayers' money in this way when there is a recession on and council employees are in fear of losing their jobs."

Coun Khan hit back, saying: "The Tories began the incentives payments when they were in control; we have continued them as they are common practice in consultations where groups are asked to help shape future strategy."

He added: "It's a matter of a few hundred pounds in shopping vouchers and this work helps us to find out the reasons for poor community cohesion.

"The only effective way of doing this is to invite a cross-section of the community. They then receive a thank you for giving up several hours of their time, but this is standard best practice in the public and private sector."

The concerns about community relations in Kirklees were raised in a 2007 report in which white and ethnic minority residents claimed there were "no go" areas for different races.

The report said that schools were "highly segregated" and that "white flight" was a factor in the segregation of schools along ethnic lines.

It warned that confusion and doubt were hampering progress and leaders were not doing enough to challenge misconceptions.

 

WTF!! What DOES it take for a muslim lawbreaker to go to jail?

Just when I think it can't get any more idiotic in the UK - it always does.

The latest tale comes on the heels of my Friday post regarding the multiple chain and blade slicing machine carrying muslim Mohsin Khan who avoided jailtime when the judge/jury swallowed the excuse that Khan kept the flagellator (Zanjeer) as a spare in his car just in case he got the urge for some self mutilation and didn't intend to use it as an "offensive weapon".  Now comes the news that a muslim man - with criminal record taller than the gallons of ale you'll want to drink after reading about the below insanity -stays out of jail when he admits to brandishing an........offensive weapon (along with other violent acts).

Yes - yet another boneheaded (obviously dhimmified) judge has made yet another asinine decision. Prompting one to repeat the oft asked question  -- what does it take for a muslim to be sent to jail in Britain?.  

Britain is already the number one destination for throngs of asylum seekers  and  illegal immigrants  looking to take advantage of generous free (taxpayer paid) benefits and healthcare - many if not most being muslims.  Now it appears that the judicial system is vying to get the top award for judicial buffoonery.

29 year old Wajid Hussain brandished a Samurai dagger

and threatened "I'm going to cut you" to two boys who annoyed him. This was after he threw a bed frame down a stairway then slashed two tyres with the knife & frightened several neighbors. Add in the fact that Hussain is a repeat offender and already been in jail numerous times including for possession of an........ "offensive weapon".

"Hussain, who has almost 30 previous convictions and has been to jail for robbery and attempted robbery, admitted affray and possessing an offensive weapon. The defendant, now of Bicknell Street, Blackburn, received 26 weeks in jail, suspended for two years, with 12 months supervision and the Controlling Anger and Learning to Manage it programme. He must pay £100 costs."

WTF!!!! suspended jail term??? - 12 months nanny supervision??? and taking a course in how to control his anger???!!!

You've got to be having a laugh.............but yet again we find the only one left smiling and laughing is the muslim thug, in this case -Wajid Hussein, who found another one of Britain's politically correct imbecilic judges - Judge Jonathan Gibson. Judge Gibson undoubtedly possesses an overdeveloped fear of being called Islamophobic and/or racist- (Horrors!!) thus he allowed the muslim Hussein to remain free - free to continue to live his felonious life preying on the law abiding British people.

Maybe I should sign up for the Anger Control programme?

Man armed with Samurai dagger escapes jail

November 23, 2009

A KNIFEMAN who chased and threatened two 17 year old boys with a samurai dagger has walked free from court.

Burnley Crown Court heard how Wajid Hussain, 29, then living at an upstairs flat in Clayton-le-Moors, was said to have had a confrontation with the two teenagers, who lived in the flat below.

He then brandished the knife and threatened to cut them with it, as a horrified neighbour cleaning his car watched the early afternoon rumpus in terror.

Hussain, who has almost 30 previous convictions and has been to jail for robbery and attempted robbery, admitted affray and possessing an offensive weapon. The defendant, now of Bicknell Street, Blackburn, received 26 weeks in jail, suspended for two years, with 12 months supervision and the Controlling Anger and Learning to Manage it programme. He must pay £100 costs.

Sentencing, Judge Jonathan Gibson told the defendant: "This was a knife with an eight inch blade. Its inevitable I pass a custodial sentence."

Sarah Statham, prosecuting, told the court on the morning of the incident Hussain had thrown a bed frame down the stairs to prevent the two teenagers going upstairs and there had been some kind of altercation.

Hussain picked up the dagger and chased both the young men out into the street. He was seen by a man cleaning his car at 1.15pm and he reported the defendant had the knife raised in an aggressive manner, shouting after the pair: "I'm going to cut you." They managed to run away. Hussain then tried to slash the tyres of two pedal cycles. The witness was scared and alerted the police.

Miss Statham said the defendant then simply went into the premises and when officers arrived, he was standing at one of the downstairs windows. Police arrested him and recovered a knife from the floor of his lounge.

He was questioned and told officers the two young men had gone into his flat when he was asleep. He claimed they had dropped the knife and he was responsible for chasing them into the street. He had 27 previous convictions and in June last year had been convicted of violent disorder after arming himself with a weapon. His licence ended in February.

Martin Hackett, defending, said it was accepted Hussain had a poor record for offences of public disorder, but he had not been looking for problems that day.

He had found the two young men in his flat. He accepted he chased them out and he had the knife and was brandishing it.

Obama tosses US citizens Under the ICC Bus while giving Muslim Terrorists USA Constitutional Rights

Recently President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder made the controversial decision to bring 9/11 Islamic terrorist Khalid Sheik Mohammed along with four other muslim terrorists (currently held at Guantanamo Bay) to New York City to face civilian trial. The decision is seen, by many, as pandering to the Democratic Party's lefty leaners by a President whose once phenomenal popularity is sinking faster than the Titanic.

Many Americans believe that this will only place the safety of the residents of New York City in jeopardy as well as cause the survivors and family members of the victims of 9/11 to face years of 'in your face' memories and testimony while the trials slowly progress through the US judicial system. Then there are at least three other problems:

* Military commissions are the appropriate venue for trials of unlawful combatant. The US military seized these terrorists on foreign battlefields -- and so didn't read them Miranda rights. The evidence against them was collected by soldiers under war-fighting conditions -- not with sterile gloves and clear plastic bags. And much of the best evidence against them is classified, because making it public would compromise the sources and methods of US intelligence gathering.  In short, these cases do not fit the mold of a typical murder trial in a civilian court.

* The administration is again blurring the line between ordinary crimes and acts of war. Likening terrorists at war with the United States to common shoplifters is wrongheaded. These are not members of our society who refuse to obey our laws: They are enemies of the United States, engaged in war against America and all that it stands for.

* The administration has offered no clear criteria for deciding which terrorists will be charged as criminals in federal court and which ones will face military commissions. Attorney General Holder, in announcing the decision, suggested that the five cases were appropriate for civilian trial simply because the evidence against the terrorists is so strong that they'll surely be found guilty. SOURCE

Despite the above concerns Obama and Holder are insisting upon giving foreign Islamic terrorists the Constitutional rights of United States citizens.

Now comes the news that Pres. Obama is not so interested in the reverse - in preserving the Constitutional rights of US citizens in other countries. In fact he is in the process of negotiating a treaty with the International Criminal Court  (ICC) to give the Court jurisdiction over American citizens who commit certain crimes by 2010:

"President Obama has dispatched a delegation this week to The Hague to explore issues involving the United States' possible participation in the International Criminal Court, an organization critics charge could be used to prosecute Americans under international legal standards for actions that are not crimes in the U.S. 

Additional explanation of how this could affect Americans:

"Supposing the U.S. engages in a military action and that action results in civilian casualties. We do an investigation of the matter and find no guilty party. If we are a member of the court, if we are a party to the Rome Statute, the ICC at that point has the opportunity to second-guess us," he said. "They may be able to use evidence and they may be able to pursue routes of trial that would not be portable in the U.S. because of the different standards established in the U.S. legal system and the rules set forth in the Rome Statute."

His warning is that the ICC could, "in essence … come and prosecute U.S. citizens, U.S. soldiers, U.S. officials for actions the U.S. deems entirely lawful." SOURCE

Yes the is the exact same treaty which former US President George W. Bush refused to sign - or in essence unsigned - for obvious reasons.

So there you have it - President Barack Hussein Obama is more than willing to toss US citizens under the ICC "bus" by placing Americans under the jurisdiction of the international court and thus preventing these citizens from accessing their Constitutional rights. 

But sitting securely on the top of the bus we find Obama - in full dhimmi mode and twisting himself in judicial pretzel knots - to ensure NON US citizens/ confessed muslim terrorists will be imported into the United States and given Constitutional rights and defenses even though doing so places actual US citizens lives at risk and will cost - the already financially strapped US taxpayers ---multi millions of dollars.

You couldn't make this up - nor would you want to. Sure as hell infuriates me!
 

In Britian - When is a weapon NON Offensive? Hint = Muslim

Does the below look like it could be used as an "offensive weapon" to you?

Looks to me like it could do some serious damage -but I'm wrong according to a jury in London's Southwark Crown Court. Background:

"Mohsin Khan, 21, who said he had been beating himself regularly with them since the age of six, had been driving to a West End nightclub with a friend when he was pulled over as part of a routine police check in London's Charing Cross Road.  His car was searched and the flagellator - a handle with five metal chains each tipped with a sharp 10in blade - was found under his seat.....he was subsequently charged with two counts of possessing an offensive weapon "

Of course then comes the muslim excuses - which are normally eaten like candy by British judges.....and now juries.

(Khan) He explained it was used by Shia Muslims to whip themselves during Muharram, the month of mourning - something he had been doing ''since I was six''.

Interesting that in a Country whose Health & Safety hawks virtually force children to be wrapped in cotton wool and have banned playground games on the grounds they could cause injury would not be appalled and think it abusive/criminal that a six year old would have been allowed to self flagellate himself and/or considered the child as having mental illness. Of course he may have been encouraged to do so by his "devout muslim" child abusive father. 

Furthermore Khan produced pictures of his bloodied back as proof that his he carried his portable Zanjeer as a spare - just in case the got the urge for more sadistic, self mutilation during the (now past) month of Muharram, the Shia branch of Islam month of mourning.

"The jury, which was shown two photographs of his bloodied and scarred back following a previous self-beating session, decided he was telling the truth and cleared him of possessing the Zanjeer as an offensive weapon. "

Of course one would think that a man who touts himself as a "devout" muslim wouldn't be driving himself to an alcohol imbued "West End nightclub"..........would he?

Which brings us to the next interesting observation. Note the type of flagellator used by Shia's in Iraq:

Now compare the above picture to the weapon (aka flagellator) used by Mohsin Khan. Big difference isn't there?  And wouldn't you have thought that the jury or at least the judge would have noticed or questioned this? Clearly they didn't.

Add the above to other evidence found in Khan's auto - a knuckleduster (brass knuckles) in his door pocket:

Of course Khan had his excuse all ready - the above isn't a knuckle duster but rather a belt buckle. A belt buckle he removed because it "dug into his stomach" - something tells me it wasn't HIS stomach that got the injury. Unfortunately for Khan the jury didn't buy these lies and FINALLY convicted him of carrying an offensive weapon.

The moral of the story:

If you are going to carry an offensive weapon in Britain - make sure it resembles some type of tortuous "religious" implement.....and..... make sure you're a muslim.

Should offer the British people some 'comfort' to know that Moshin Khan is currently a second year law student and could soon be representing clients in a courtroom near you.

Article in full:

Student's flagellator was not an offensive weapon, court rules

A Muslim student caught with a bladed flagellator used by Shias to ritually scourge themselves was cleared of possessing it as an offensive weapon.

Published: 1:43PM GMT 19 Nov 2009

Shia Muslims whip themselves during Muharram, the month of mourning Photo: GETTY

Mohsin Khan, 21, who said he had been beating himself regularly with them since the age of six, had been driving to a West End nightclub with a friend when he was pulled over as part of a routine police check in London's Charing Cross Road.

His car was searched and the flagellator - a handle with five metal chains each tipped with a sharp 10in blade - was found under his seat.

Officers also discovered a knuckle-duster in a door pocket.

The second-year law student, from Birmingham, was subsequently charged with two counts of possessing an offensive weapon on January 30 last year.

But he told those trying him at London's Southwark Crown Court that the flagellator was a ''sacred implement'' called a Zanjeer.

He explained it was used by Shia Muslims to whip themselves during Muharram, the month of mourning - something he had been doing ''since I was six''.

Khan, a former pupil at one of Birmingham's King Edward VI Grammar Schools, and currently studying at Queen Mary College, London, told jurors he had put the flagellator in the car with the intention of using it on himself 11 days before he was stopped.

But he ended up using another one instead and forgot his was still under the driver's seat.

The jury, which was shown two photographs of his bloodied and scarred back following a previous self-beating session, decided he was telling the truth and cleared him of possessing the Zanjeer as an offensive weapon.

However, they convicted him of a mirror-image count involving the knuckle-duster, after rejecting his defence that it doubled as a belt-buckle which he had taken off because it was digging into his stomach.

Khan, who insisted he was not a violent person and avoided physical confrontations, showed no reaction as the verdicts were returned.

But his mother, who was sitting in the public gallery, burst into tears.

Adjourning the case to December 22 for pre-sentence reports, Judge Peter Testar told the student that while he could remain on bail in the meantime ''you must not think I am making any promises''.

Muslim Major Shouts 'Allahu Akbar' as he Massacres 13 soldiers Injures 38

*****UPDATE -11/7/09 -  The media and muslim apologists continue to dance around the truth of the Ft. Hood massacre. Many rushing to blame the military or Hasan's co-workers for his state of mind and subsequent murderous rampage.  Lame excuses such as Hasan was supposedly "harassed" by other military personnel don't hold water. Hasan was an officer - and anyone who had been in the military KNOWS that particularly officers do NOT get harassed. To do so would be the end of the offenders military career.

News comes that the man responsible for the massacre of 13 US Army soldiers, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, was shouting "Allahu Akbar"  as he opened fire on the unsuspecting men and women:

"Soldiers who witnessed the shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas that left 13 people dead reported that the gunman shouted "Allahu Akbar!" before opening fire, the base commander said Friday." SOURCE

Recall Allahu Akbar was also screamed by the 9/11 Al Qaeda terrorists as they plunged their airplanes into the twin towers of the World Trade Center killing 2993 innocent people.

This "devout muslim" was also under investigation by the FBI for statements made supporting muslims killing US soldiers:

"The army psychiatrist who shot dead 13 people in murderous rampage at America's biggest military base was facing an FBI investigation for expressing sympathy with suicide bombers....Hasan posted a series of comments on a website which drew parallels between terrorists and a US soldier who sacrificed himself to save his comrades. Investigators were tipped off six months ago by the devout Muslim's worried colleagues."SOURCE

Also extremely disturbing is a video, from the morning of the massacre, showing Hasan wearing a muslim white robe and cap:

"In the video, the individual believed to be Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan appears wearing clothes that would be abnormal for someone of Palestinian descent - Hasan's family is from Jordan. CBS News correspondent Sheila MacVicarreports that the man is wearing a shalwar kameez - long robes far more common in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

He is also wearing white, which in Islam is associated with death or mourning. The prayer cap on his head is also more closely associated with Southeast Asia than with the Arab world." SOURCE

Major Nidal Malik at a local Texas 7 Eleven Store the morning of the massacre

Does the above look like an Army major to you??

LINK TO VIDEO

This "devout muslim" - earned a six figure income after receiving his "free" psychologist's degree courtesy the USA taxpayers via the US Army:

Hasan, graduated from Virginia Tech in 1997 and earned a doctorate in psychiatry from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda. He spent at least six years at Walter Reed before moving to Fort Hood.  SOURCE

Has repaid those same taxpayers by killing and injuring their sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers.

More on Hasan:

On his blog is a link to an article "Martyrdom in Islam vs Suicide Bombing"

He was happy about the Muslim solider who shot and killed a soldier and wounded another at a Little Rock Military recruiting station. Hasan said Muslims should rise up against the aggressors. Maybe we should have more of these.....strapping bombs on and going into Times Square".

The officials had access to Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan's military record. They said he received a poor performance evaluation while at Walter Reed. SOURCE

One has to wonder what psychological damage he has done while counseling soldiers returning from active duty in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The glaring question is why wasn't Hasan booted out of the Army - and instead was promoted and assigned to Fort Hood?  Was it due to the insidious Political Correctness and fear of the Army being labeled "Islamophobic"? The ongoing investigation will shed light on this - but sadly far too late for those who had their lives snuffed out by a supposedly "Lone Wolf"  terrorist.

This cold blooded military Jihadist needs to face severe punishment for his heinous mass murders - let's hope it is death............and he's shouted his last "Allahu Akbar".

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

************UPDATE -11/7/09 -  Muslim apologists and the lefty mainstream media continue to try to spin Islam out of and dance around the truth of the Ft. Hood massacre. Many are rushing to blame the military or Hasan's co-workers for his state of mind and subsequent murderous rampage.  Lame excuses such as Hasan was supposedly "harassed" by other military personnel don't hold water. Hasan was an officer - and anyone who had been in the military KNOWS that particularly officers do NOT get harassed. To do so would be the end of the offenders military career.

Another hyped up explanation for Hasan is that he feared going to Afghanistan and being in active combat with fellow muslims - again the ludicrousness is obvious. Medical officers - particularly psychiatrists - are not and do not get sent into battle thus Hasan's supposed worries were unfounded. 

 

As shown above -Hasan is not the victim -  outrageous behaviors were primarily one way - inflicted by Hasan onto the soldiers around him. Since I wrote this blog other information has been revealed such as Army Major Hasan stating he viewed himself as "a Muslim first and an American second." and got into frequent arguments with fellow soldiers "who supported the (Iraq & Afghanistan) wars". A recent classmate said Hasan once gave a jarring presentation to students in which he argued the war on terrorism was a war against Islam, and “made himself a lightning rod” when he felt his religious beliefs were challenged". 

 

Hasan also "attended the controversial Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Great Falls, in 2001 at the same time as two of the September 11 terrorists.....His mother's funeral was held there in May that year. The preacher at the time was Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born Yemeni scholar who was banned from addressing a meeting in London by video link in August because he is accused of supporting attacks on British troops and backing terrorist organisations.

Hasan's eyes "lit up" when he mentioned his deep respect for al-Awlaki's teachings, according to a fellow Muslim officer at the Fort Hood base in Texas, the scene of Thursday's horrific shooting spree. As investigators look at Hasan's motives and mindset, his attendance at the mosque could be an important piece of the 'jigsaw'" SOURCE

 

Recent records also show Hasan privately bought the FN 5.7  (aka 'Cop Killer") gun along with an older model Smith & Wesson .357-caliber revolver, at store called "Guns Galore" in Killeen, Texas. The morning of the massacre he gave away many of his possessions to his neighbors- including passing out copies of the Qu'ran.

 

Clearly Hasan agreed with the statements of a muslim man identified only as Mustafa - interviewed Friday at one of London's largest mosques: "Asked his views on the killings at Fort Hood, he said: “Killing military members is all right. If you are killing people who are fighting against Muslims then that’s okay.”  SOURCE

 

Hasan's cowardly, murderous attack on his unsuspecting fellow soldiers was planned & calculated in advance.

 

Time to stop the dhimwitted excuses and call this horror what it is - Islamic Terror.

*******************ADDENDUM***********************

Hassan also served on President Barack Obama's White House transition team:

NEW YORK - Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the alleged shooter in yesterday's massacre at Fort Hood, played a homeland security advisory role in President Barack Obama's transition into the White House according to a key university policy institute document...... Hasan is listed on page 29 of the document as a Task Force Event Participant   SOURCE

 

 

 

Police Ignore MORE Muslim Race Hate Attacks in No-Go Area in Dewsbury England

Another week in Dewsbury, England and more reports of muslim violence (aka Street Jihad)- each - to no surprise - has been minimized by the dhimmified British police and ignored for what they really are = MUSLIM RACE HATE CRIMES.

FIRST - ANOTHER horiffic race hate attack against a 14 year old white British lad who was set upon and brutally stabbed with a screwdriver and savagely beated by 15 "Asian" gang thugs - then "left for dead":

"The gang hurled racist abuse at him, constantly referring to the colour of his skin, yet police refused to classify the attack as racially-motivated.

Joseph’s dad Jonathan, 42, of Thornhill, said: “It was a racist attack.

“They were calling him ‘white trash’ and white this, that and the other.

“This is why people are angry about what is happening in this country.

“If it had been an attack by whites on an Asian lad it would have been a definite race attack. When it’s the other way round they don’t want to know.”

.....Joseph was off school all week and tensions were said to be running high at Thornhill Community Science College.

....Mr Haigh said: “They went to stab him in the face and it was only because he had his hands up that they missed.

“He was stabbed in one hand, his other hand was broken and a cut on his forehead was down to the bone.

“If they had hit him a bit harder with the house brick they could have killed him.

“They just left him for dead.”

....A police spokesman said the initial police report had not classified the attack as racially-motivated but inquiries were continuing. Insp Jenny Thompson, of Dewsbury police, said: “This was a vicious, unprovoked attack on a young boy which left him with some serious injuries." SOURCE

SECOND finds the police denying that the 'muslim enriched' Savile Town area of Dewsbury has become a no-go area for white people - even in light of a string of brutal assaults:

"On Saturday night a white teenage boy was attacked and beaten (knocked to the ground and kicked) by a gang of Asians some wearing masks. The victim, thought to be about 18, was walking in Savile Road, near the old cricket ground, when he was followed by a gang of about 10 Asian youths, all wearing hoodies. Fortunately a couple came along and forced the attackers to run off.

The woman, who lives in Thornhill Lees, said the boy told them the gang had followed him and told him to “run”.

When he tried to ignore them they came after him and one said: “No one walks through Savile Town.”"

ONE day later a man called to report 'Asians" were throwing stones at cars passing on Savile Road - cars being driven by WHITE drivers.

They were just targeting white drivers,” said Mr Cutler. “As far as I’m concerned it’s racist and it needs to be reported - while he was calling police another WHITE British man pulled up to complain of the same.

Just last week Robert Dyson was walking home on Savile Road and was attacked by an "Asian" gang - he required medical treatment for his head and face injuries.

What a surprise! ONCE AGAIN WE FIND MUSLIM APOLOGIST -Insp Jenny Thompson, of the Dewsbury police force, making a statement...."Savile Town is not a ‘no-go’ area and it would be unhelpful to label it in this way." SOURCE

So there you have it -'multicultural worshipping police - telling the British people "Move along now - Nothing to see here" -- when in reality these muslim perpetrated race hate crimes against the white British people are as clear as the nose on this inspector's face -or maybe I should say the hijab on her head.?

Perhaps if the perpetrators were not muslims but rather a 6 year old girl OR a mentally challenged boy - the police would take note and immediately act to quell the "racism".

Would seem the most glaring absence in muslim 'no-go areas' is police honesty!

No deportation for Muslim Serial Rapist as UK Immigration Officials let him get away

Innumerable times I have reported on the myriad of muslim terrorists, rapists, murderers, paedophiles, fraudsters, etc. that have been convicted of their heinous crimes -- served jail sentences -- only to be released and NOT deported thereby being permanently inflicted upon the British people. Proving time and time again that the Labour government and British courts place the safety of the British people far below that of lawbreakers - in particular muslim lawbreakers.

So, FINALLY the British government decides to actually deport failed muslim asylum seeker and convicted "horrific" rapist, Imtiaz Hussain, 44 -- back to Pakistan (after he served a 'whopping' 50% of his jail sentence) -- and the dunderheads at immigration let the violent sex attacker slip through their incompetent fingers! Maybe law enforcement ought to 'investigate' area curry houses?

Thus we find ANOTHER serial rapist is back on the streets of England.

You couldn't make this stuff up..........but it sure as hell makes you sick!

Article in full:

Convicted rapist escapes immigration officials days before he was due to be deported to Pakistan

Imtiaz Hussain: The convicted rapist is on the run after escaping guards

A convicted rapist is on the run after escaping security guards at the Pakistan High Commission in London days before he was due to be deported.

Imtiaz Hussain, 44, had been transported from prison, where he was serving a nine-year sentence for rape, to the Pakistan High Commission to get a new passport in preparation for his deportation.

But the serial rapist gave immigration officials the slip, escaping through a window after claiming he needed the toilet.

He was last seen running along Sloane Square.

Police have now launched an nationwide manhunt for the sex attacker said to be 'very dangerous' and a 'serious threat to women'.

The failed asylum seeker was convicted on May 14, 2004 of rape and false imprisonment after attacking two prostitutes at knife-point in March of that year.

He was jailed for nine years, but after serving half of that his sentence expired last week.

But Hussain was still being held in a prison in the north of England pending his deportation to Pakistan.

Last Thursday he was transported in a secure prison van to Colnbrook immigration removal centre in Slough.

The following day he was escorted by immigration officials to the Pakistan High Commission in Victoria for his appointment about a replacement passport.

He was due to be sent back to prison following the interview, but he escaped at 2.30pm on Friday.

Scotland Yard is now liaising with police officers in Derbyshire, where he last lived.

At his trial at Derby Crown Court, the jury heard Hussain had threatened two women with a knife, beaten and raped them when they  refused to do what he wanted.

Sentencing him, Judge David Pugsley said: 'You have perpetrated two rapes in circumstances which were horrific.'

Yesterday Detective Chief Inspector Brent Lancaster said: 'This individual is believed to very dangerous and we need to apprehend him as soon as possible.

'If anyone sees him, please don't approach him but call or alert police immediately.'

Hussain is described as around 5ft 5ins, of medium to chubby build, with dark cropped hair, and was wearing a blue T-shirt, blue jeans and white trainers.

David Wood, head of Criminality and Detention for the UK Border Agency said: 'A 44-year-old Pakistani male has absconded whilst on an escorted visit to the High Commission in London.

'Police were immediately informed. His details have been placed on the Police National Computer and watch-lists.

'We are actively searching for this individual to return him in to custody and remove him from the UK.'

 

"Asian" Clerk Snubs British Mum for Supporting Injured Troops

This despicable "Asian" clerk has one hell of a nerve snubbing Beth Hoyle for showing her support of injured British troops - after all it is those same men and women who have their necks on the line keep his ilk free and fighting for the freedom of his 'relatives'. Perhaps this clerk supports these cowards instead?

Also interesting - but not surprising - is Beth Hoyle first thought it was the crucifix around her neck that caused the 'offense" to the 'Asian' clerk.

Even more despicable is the Asda supervisor who backed the Asian clerks snub. To make matters more worse - the store spokeswoman accused Beth Hoyle of lying by stating that there was " no evidence that the incident happened in their store."

Time to voice your concerns to Asda & boycott the Rochdale store.

MUM-of-three Beth Hoyle claims an Asda till worker refused to serve her because she was wearing a wristband backing injured troops.

Beth says the checkout lad told her the band for Help for Heroes - aided by The Sun - meant she supported the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And when she complained to a supervisor, he BACKED the Asian youth, saying he was entitled to his view.

Beth, 40, who has two brothers in the services, said the checkout worker told her he didn't want to serve her because of "what she was wearing."

Shocked Beth, of Whitworth, Greater Manchester, said that at first she thought the youth at Asda's Rochdale store meant a cross round her neck.

"He pointed to my Help for Heroes wristband and accused me of supporting the war. I told him it was nothing to do with the war, but about supporting our injured troops.

"I immediately complained to a supervisor, but he said it was his right not to serve me. I was disgusted."

An Asda spokeswoman said they were "shocked" by the claims but had found no evidence that the incident happened in their store.

She added: "We are big supporters of the Help for Heroes campaign and we sell the pin badges and wristband in hundreds of our stores."

a.taylor@the-sun.co.uk

 

UK - Muslim Rapist Used Social Networking Site to find Victim

Below is a prime example of how the use of the word 'racist'  has entered the realm of absurdity AND how many muslim men seem to believe their claims of racism will relieve them of being punished for the most heinous illegal behaviours.

Father-of-one Abdelali Nachet, 34, subjected a woman who had travelled from Hong Kong, to a degrading and humiliating sex ordeal after he offered his flat as a place to sleep for travelers on the internet.

Nachet had used the website courchsurfing.com to "meet new people" and he advertised he "wanted to offer the best of me and Moroccan hospitality." The Couchsurfing site is a social networking site which allows travelers to find willing hosts in various countries -- hosts who offer up sleeping accomodations at no cost. The site touts the "safety" of their hosts yet to me their verification, etc is minimal at best.

Along comes a 29 year old woman from Hong Kong who had apparently used the Couchsurfing site successfully throughout her European travels. That is until she opted to partake of Nachet's advertised "Moroccan hospitality".

In a premeditated manner, Nachet lured the woman into his bedroom where he repeatedly raped and sexually assaulted her. Before the rapes began Nachet proclaimed that he 'wanted to marry' the woman - one wonders if he was really contemplating using a  muslim 'temporary marriage' which is nothing more than an Islamic loophole that allows muslim men to partake of prostitutes, (or in Nachet's case - rape) etc with a clear conscience.

Nachet also threatened to murder the woman and made sure any rape evidence was removed from her body:

"During her ordeal Mr Phillips said Nachet told her "if you try to run away I will kill you and after that I will kill myself." It is claimed that Nachet forced the woman to have a bath after the alleged rapes to get rid of incriminating forensic evidence. Mr Phillips said the morning after Nachet did some vacuuming before leaving the flat with the woman."

It is concerning that after his arrest and first trial the jury was unable to come to a verdict. But, the second trial quickly produced a guilty verdict............and here is where "racism" claims come to play.

The cowardly Mr Nachet who had overpowered, humiliated, threatened and raped a lone, young woman - upon hearing his guilty verdicts:

"dramatically collapsed in the dock and began wailing hysterically. Security guards were forced to drag him away to the cells where he repeatedly banged his head on the floor."

This is when Nachet also believed that playing the racist card would somehow change or halt his prison destination.

"As he was taken away to serve his sentence Nachet screamed: "I want to go back to my country. I want to go back to Morocco. This is not right. I want to be sentenced in Morocco. This is racist."

Who can blame him? Crying and begging has indeed worked for muslim criminals in the past . And clearly Nachet has seen what you and I see on a near daily basis: Muslims in Britain have sucessfully and repeatedly used the racism taunt to quell the media and to access all sorts of condecensions and special treatment from the British politicians,  lawmakers,  judges,  quangos,  jails  etc. etc.

Let's hope that after his jail time is served that indeed authorities send this sorry excuse for a man packing back to Morocco. Unfortunately for the British people, based on past cases, human rights laws and the inane immigration courts & judges will see to it that Mr. Nachet will be inflicted upon the British people in perpetuity. 

Article in full:

Leeds couchsurfing.com rapist jailed

Published Date: 29 October 2009

A Moroccan national who raped and threatened to murder a woman in his flat after meeting her on the popular global website couchsurfing.com has been jailed for 10 years.

Father-of-one Abdelali Nachet, 34, allegedly subjected the woman who had travelled from Hong Kong, to a degrading and humiliating sex ordeal after he offered his flat as a place to sleep for travellers on the website.

A jury had previously failed to reach a verdict but following a retrial another jury yesterday found him guilty of two counts of rape and one of sexual assault.

As the foreman read out the majority verdicts Nachet dramatically collapsed in the dock and began wailing hysterically. Security guards were forced to drag him away to the cells where he repeatedly banged his head on the floor.

During the trial the court heard that volatile Nachet, of Leeds, had an entry on the legitimate site where he said he liked to meet new people
and offer them hospitality.

The court heard that he "wanted to offer the best of me and Moroccan
hospitality."

Prosecutor Simon Phillips said his 29-year-old victim was from Hong Kong and was travelling in Europe when she got in touch with Nachet, looking for a place to stay.

The jury heard that throughout her travels she had been using the website couchsurfing.com.

Mr Phillips said: "This is a site that enables travellers to find free
accommodation with like-minded individuals to stay the night.

"Amongst the travelling community it is well known on an international basis.

"She trusted the website and had previously stayed with other people, including single men, without incident."

She wanted to visit Leeds and contacted Nachet after spotting his entry on the website.

After exchanging e-mails the woman travelled from the West Midlands to Leeds on March 5 and met Nachet before going back to his flat with him.

Prosecutors claim once there Nachet raped her twice and sexually assaulted her in an ordeal that lasted throughout the night.

Mr Phillips told the court that Nachet had started making sexual advances after putting some music on and asking the woman to dance.

The jury heard that at that point she decided to go to bed but as she was getting ready Nachet asked her to come into his bedroom so he could show her some family photos.

Shortly after this the defendant shut the door, dimmed the lights and pushed her on to his bed.

He then told her that he wanted to get married and wanted to make love to her, telling the woman that if she let him make love to her it would be over very quickly.

The court heard that the woman told Nachet that he shouldn't do this and that she didn't want to make love to him.

During her ordeal Mr Phillips said Nachet told her "if you try to run away I will kill you and after that I will kill myself."

It is claimed that Nachet forced the woman to have a bath after the alleged rapes to get rid of incriminating forensic evidence.

Mr Phillips said the morning after Nachet did some vacuuming before leaving the flat with the woman.

She got on a bus back to the West Midlands and alerted police after telling a male friend she had met on couchsurfing.com what had happened.

The jury heard the night after the alleged rape, three people Nachet had met on the same website had travelled to Leeds to stay at his flat.

Sentencing him to 10 years in prison Recorder of Leeds Peter Collier QC said: "When your partner left you, you intentionally used the couchsurfing website to attract women to your home.

"Having observed you during the course of this trial I'm satisfied you believe that you are irresistible to women."

He added that Nachet had subjected his victim to a "long and persistent
physical assault", used "emotional blackmail" and put her "through indignity after indignity violating her again and again."

He said that the sustained attack was an "abuse of trust of those who sign up to the social networking site to come and stay in your home."

As he was taken away to serve his sentence Nachet screamed: "I want to go back to my country. I want to go back to Morocco. This is not right. I want to be sentenced in Morocco. This is racist."

 

 

Time to call a spade a spade - OR - a crime a crime

Once again we have muslim (aided and abeted by the mainstream media) peverting our English words into contranyms ( A contranym is word that has two opposing meanings) 

First was the word honour/honor (honesty, fairness, or integrity) - a word with a plethora of positive meanings and connotations. But with the muslim we have seen the word honor twisted into a bizarre interpretation as it is (mis)used to describe  the murder of innocents - usually women. Murdered because a muslim man or family has designated themselves God and decided thatthe woman has disgraced her family and must be killed.  More often than not her 'sin' against the family is becoming 'too Westernized'.  Apparently Papa or Husband and the rest of the family partaking of taxpayer paid benefits provided by these Western nations - does not fall into the same offensive 'Westernization'.

Now we have another formerly respected (esteem, veneration) word (pun intended) being misused ---RESPECT. Under the title - "Islamic scholar 'stabbed his father-in-law in respect row'".  In this case we have Islamic scholar, Mohammed Saghir, 33 attempting to murder his father-in-law, 55-year-old Mohammed Zaman, by stabbing him in the stomach.  Why? Because Mr Zaman went to the defense of his daughter - and to broaden his statements- the defense of many muslim women living in Britain:

"Mr Zaman said his son-in-law had become 'abusive' towards him and his daughter and Saghir's wife, Shasta Kausir, 30.

Mr Zaman said: "I said to him when you bring husbands over to this country, as soon as they get their British citizenship they become disrespectful.

"They don't respect their wives, they don't respect their mother-in-laws, they don't respect anyone.

"They call our daughters bitches and they call themselves religious.

"He is a religious person and he is the one who stabbed me.

"He is a scholar of his religion and he should have known, 'my father-in-law is like my father, I must respect him.'

"I gave my daughter to him in marriage and he gets the British citizenship and he starts stabbing me."

The above statement speaks loudly about the abuse that British muslim women receive at the hands of their imported muslim husbands. Abuse ranging from being seen as a easy passport to British citizenship (and benefits) to being at the receiving end of physical and mental injury. Mr. Zaman was upset that Mohammed Saghir was disrespecting his wife; Mr Zaman's beloved daughter.

Why then was Mr. Zaman stabbed by his daughter's spouse?- why because Mohammed clearly felt his father-in-law was guilty of not respecting Mohammed - more so than Mohammed was guilty of DISrespecting his wife thru abuse. Thus Mohammed saw himself as the REAL victim and proceeded to show his own Islamic 'self-respect' by displaying a murderous lack of respect for his elder father-in-law.  There you have it - another mangled interpretation of a word and another faux reason for a muslim  'Islamic scholar'  to pull out a knife and try to commit murder.

I admire Mr. Zaman for coming to the defense of his daughter and speaking the words  muslim apologists and enablers refuse to acknowledge.

Now if we could just stop the media from the misuse of our English language - in media headlines - in order to obfuscate,  excuse or mitigate muslim illegal behaviors and demand the media start accurately describing these acts for they truly are = VIOLENT CRIMES.

'Respect' and 'stabbed' have no more business being in the same sentence then 'honor' and 'killing'.

Article in full:

Islamic scholar 'stabbed his father-in-law in respect row'

October 23, 2009

AN Islamic scholar tried to kill his father-in-law in a row about Pakistani men who marry British brides, a court heard.

Mohammed Saghir, 33, is accused of attempting to stab 55-year-old Mohammed Zaman to death.

Saghir denies attempted murder.

Manchester Crown Court heard that on April 14 an argument flared up between the two men at Saghir's home in Chesham Street, Oldham.

Mr Zaman said his son-in-law had become 'abusive' towards him and his daughter and Saghir's wife, Shasta Kausir, 30.

Mr Zaman said: "I said to him when you bring husbands over to this country, as soon as they get their British citizenship they become disrespectful.

"They don't respect their wives, they don't respect their mother-in-laws, they don't respect anyone.

"They call our daughters bitches and they call themselves religious.

"He is a religious person and he is the one who stabbed me.

"He is a scholar of his religion and he should have known, 'my father-in-law is like my father, I must respect him.'

"I gave my daughter to him in marriage and he gets the British citizenship and he starts stabbing me."

Defending, Tahir Khan claimed Mr Zaman had punched Saghir on April 14.

On April 19, the family had celebrated Shasta Kausir's birthday.

Saghir bought her a £600 Gucci bag.

But later that day, Saghir burst into Mr Zaman's Oldham house.

Mr Zaman then claimed to have heard Shasta shout: 'Dad he's got a knife, he's going to kill you,' before hearing Saghir shout, 'I'll kill you.'

Saghir was said to have jabbed towards his father-in-law with a knife causing an injury to the stomach before bursting into tears.

Mr Zaman also claimed that religious and family elders had urged him to write a letter and forgive Saghir.

Mr Zaman said: "The elders got involved and I was advised only criminals go to court and we don't wish to go to the courts.

"I do forgive but am not sure whether the law of this land will forgive him."