TheOPINIONATOR

***07/04/09 UPDATE*** This Butt Deserves the BOOT! -- Muslim Dentist Continues to Coerce Patients with Islamic Rules

***FOR UPDATE SEE BELOW***

Islamic proselytizer Dentist Omer Butt (brother of "reformed terrorist - Hassam Butt)  is once again being true to his last name as he continues to insist upon shrouding non-veil wearing muslim women and 'de-jewelry-ise' men before he will perform any dentistry on them.

Way back in September of 2007 I wrote about this obnoxious, unprofessional man. Clearly instead of following General Denistry Council standards - he chooses to adhere to the  Code of Ethics of The Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association UK (M.D.D.A. UK) where I recently exposed:

"Please note under section 2 Objects and powers that their main object is to ADVANCE THE ISLAMIC RELIGION IN THE UK and to promote and preserve the good health of MUSLIMS in the UK.

2. Objects and powers

2.1 The objects of the association shall be:-
2.1.1. To advance the Islamic religion in the practice of medicine in the United Kingdom
2.1.2. To advance medical education in relation to the doctrines, practices and traditions of the Islamic religion.
2.1.3. To promote research in various aspects of medical science and to disseminate and publish the useful results of such research.
2.1.4. To promote the preservation and protection of the good health of Muslims in the United Kingdom.

(As an aside - NO WHERE IS IT FOUND THAT THE MUSLIM DOCTORS AND DENTISTS HAVE AS THEIR PRIME OBJECTIVE THE GOOD HEALTH OF THE NON MUSLIM BRITISH PEOPLE- in fact- the British people in general are not even given a mention as only muslims are a worthwhile. It is obvious that this lack of concern, by muslim doctors,  for non muslim patients in not exclusive just to the UK but would extend worldwide.)

So here we are - nearly four years later (see below) and this bullying healthcare provider is still thumbing his nose at the British laws governing dentistry - despite a "warning" from the UK General Dentistry Council (GDC)and STILL coercing his patients to abide by Islamic rules.

"Dr Omer Butt ordered female patients to wear headscarves and forced men to take off gold jewellery before allowing them into the dentists' chair. He even kept a box full of hijabs at his practice so he could lend them to women before checking their teeth."

For the second time Omer Butt appeared before the GDC panel - the panel concluded:

......that Butt, of Prestwich, Greater Manchester, sought to impose a dress code on Muslim patients while working at the Unsworth Smile Clinic in Bury, Greater Manchester, between April 2005 and June 2007.

The GDC committee found: 'Your evidence was that you regard yourself as a Muslim first and a dentist second, and it is clear that you were using your position as a dentist to seek to influence patients as to non-clinical issues.

'You have explained that you had a moral and religious obligation to persuade other Muslims to comply with Islamic requirements.

'You admitted that you would offer rewards to some patients who complied with the dress code.

'The committee concludes that these actions are more consistent with a person who has gone beyond mere persuasion or request and is seeking to impose a dress code.'

The committee heard how the dentist, who is the older brother of extremist Hassan Butt, put up signs asking women to cover their heads in his surgery and asking Muslims to observe religious law.

'Your evidence was that issues in respect of dress code would be raised with patients on a frequent basis,' the committee said.

.....The GDC panel, which is sitting in London, will now consider whether this impaired Dr Butt's fitness to practise and, if so, what penalty to impose on him."

Thus we have overt Islamic fanaticism by Dr. (and I use the word loosely) Omer Butt - it will be interesting to see if this panel has the guts to actually 'strike off' this religious zealot. A large fine would also be in order. But past performance of UK officials in disciplining muslims - using lame excuses to explain muslim bad behaviour- does not bode well for real punishment.

It is also high time that the British General Medical Council  and the General Dentisty Council review the Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association of the UK - as clearly any member of this group would also consider him or herself as a muslim first and a doctor/dentist second.  This group should be banned or forced to change their Code of Ethics.

But don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen.

Article in full:

 

Radical Muslim dentist refused to treat patients unless they wore traditional Islamic dress 

Dentist Omer Butt faces being struck off after refusing to treat women patients not wearing a headscarf

A dentist faces being struck off after refusing to treat Muslim patients unless they wore Islamic dress.

Dr Omer Butt ordered female patients to wear headscarves and forced men to take off gold jewellery before allowing them into the dentists' chair..

He even kept a box full of hijabs at his practice so he could lend them to women before checking their teeth.

Butt enforced his religious dress code despite previously being warned by the General Dental Council for the same offence.

The dentist ordered two women to wear head scarves before he would see them and their families, the professional conduct committee of the GDC found.

One woman was forced to leave the clinic in pain after refusing to cover her head while another wore the garment but was outraged after Butt asked her son if he prayed.

The panel concluded that Butt, of Prestwich, Greater Manchester, sought to impose a dress code on Muslim patients while working at the Unsworth Smile Clinic in Bury, Greater Manchester, between April 2005 and June 2007.

The GDC committee found: 'Your evidence was that you regard yourself as a Muslim first and a dentist second, and it is clear that you were using your position as a dentist to seek to influence patients as to non-clinical issues.

'You have explained that you had a moral and religious obligation to persuade other Muslims to comply with Islamic requirements.

'You admitted that you would offer rewards to some patients who complied with the dress code.

'The committee concludes that these actions are more consistent with a person who has gone beyond mere persuasion or request and is seeking to impose a dress code.'

The committee heard how the dentist, who is the older brother of extremist Hassan Butt, put up signs asking women to cover their heads in his surgery and asking Muslims to observe religious law.

'Your evidence was that issues in respect of dress code would be raised with patients on a frequent basis,' the committee said.

'It may be that you were not successful in every case and the committee has heard that some female Muslim patients were treated without wearing a head scarf.

'Nonetheless, the committee is satisfied that you had a general policy to seek to impose a dress code with the intention that the patient in question would agree to it.'

The GDC panel, which is sitting in London, will now consider whether this impaired Dr Butt's fitness to practise and, if so, what penalty to impose on him.

This is the second time that the dentist has appeared before a disciplinary committee for his stance on traditional Muslim dress.

In September 2007, Butt received an admonition from the GDC after being found guilty of discriminating against a female patient by refusing to treat her unless she wore 'appropriate Islamic dress'.

The patient said staff at his clinic told her Muslim women had to wear a head scarf and Muslim men could not wear gold jewellery.

***07/04/09 UPDATE***

TO NO SURPRISE - Dr BUTT HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO CONTINUE TO PRACTISE - apparently the Coucil believe he has "changed his ways".

SEE

Dress Code Dentist Can Continue to Practise

 

Are The British Finally FED UP With Islam? Part II

I recently wrote a blog asking the question Are the British Finally FED UP with Islam?  This blog was in response to the recent pro-military demostrations prompted by the muslim led ANTI British military protests in Luton. Many British people had been outraged by the disrespect shown to the military by the muslim louts -in particular - the mocking of the fallen troops  by the perpetually hate-filled muslim cleric, Anjem "Choudary.

The pro-military demonstration stood in stark contrast to both the Luton muslim protests and the earlier anti-semetic/anti-Israel protests in London - where thousands of people protested - "pelting the police with missiles and fireworks" and millions of pounds in damage was done to London businesses and properties. A paltry three protesters were arrested by the "treat them with kid gloves" retreating police. 

Thus - in response to the Luton muslims - you had the much smaller group of approximately 300 -500 pro-British military demonstrators (described as a mob by the media) and not surprisingly the truncheon wielding police arrested 8 of their lot.  Only two were ever charged with very minor offenses (one from a previous order). ZERO damage was inflicted by this "mob".

Once again we find the British military subjected to the insults and venomous, provoking shouts by muslims and the hijacking of another military homecoming parade - this one by 3 Commando.

3 Commando suffered more fatalities -in this past deployment -  than any other brigade:

"The number of UK troops killed on operations in Afghanistan since 2001 stands at 169, after a soldier from the 1st Battalion Welsh Guards was killed in an explosion in Helmand province on 19 June.

More than one in five of those have come from 3 Commando."

Thus - what should be another happy homecoming parade - with brave men and women having completed their admirable mission - of protecting the Afghani (muslim) people -  and safely returned home - is marred (again) by malicious muslim rancor.

"They were caught up in some of the heaviest fighting seen by British troops since the Second World War as they held key positions, prepared for the arrival of U.S. troops, helped to maintain security for the elections and tackled the drugs trade."

Number of muslim and "permanent" protesters arrested = ZERO. 

Number of British people 'Fed Up With Islam" = mushrooming!

Royal Marines abused by anti-war protesters as they hold homecoming parade

By Daniel Bates and Daniel Martin

It was supposed to be a show of thanks for the most battle-worn of all the troops.

But the march of 3 Commando from Buckingham Palace to Parliament was today hijacked by anti-war protesters who screamed abuse at them.

Five militants waving Iraqi flags accused the marines of 'genocide' and shouted 'How many have to die for your filthy little lie?' and 'Not in my name'.

3 Commando's march from Buckingham Palace to Parliament was marred by anti-war protesters, who shouted at the troops as they went past

As they screamed into a megaphone in an attempt to drown out the Royal Marines band, those watching clapped and cheered loudly to overcome them.

One protestor was restrained by police until the 120 servicemen and women had gone into the House of Commons, where they were met by Armed Forces Minister Bill Rammell and other dignitaries.

It was the only slight on what was a special day for 3 Commando, which has suffered more fatalities than any other Brigade on their last tour.

Some 33 troops died and and hundreds were injured on the gruelling six-month winter slog in the southern Helmand province.

Protesters were eventually drowned out by applause from others

Police moved the protesters away, but Scotland Yard said there were no arrests

They were caught up in some of the heaviest fighting seen by British troops since the Second World War as they held key positions, prepared for the arrival of U.S. troops, helped to maintain security for the elections and tackled the drugs trade.

3 Commando Brigade Royal Marines is the elite fighting force of the Royal Navy.

The 3,500-strong brigade is an amphibious rapid reaction force, highly trained for combat in extreme weather conditions and on difficult terrain.

On the last tour they were involved in operation Sond Chara, or Red Dagger, the biggest offensive since the Iraq invasion of 2003 which involved attacking insurgent strongholds near Nad-e-Ali in Helmand.

The troops also took part in operation Diesel, a raid on a Taliban drug factory in Upper Sangin Valley.

The number of UK troops killed on operations in Afghanistan since 2001 stands at 169, after a soldier from the 1st Battalion Welsh Guards was killed in an explosion in Helmand province on 19 June.

More than one in five of those have come from 3 Commando.

3 Commando Brigade Royal Marines is the elite fighting force of the Royal Navy

Armed Forces minister Bill Rammell said: 'It is absolutely right that we honour the troops from 3 Commando in this way.

'I have seen first hand how committed and dedicated they are and we must thank them for all they have achieved in Afghanistan, particularly in controlling the narcotics trade and ensuring the elections were as secure as possible.'

A small crowd gathered outside Wellington barracks to cheer on the troops as they marched down Birdcage Walk, through Parliament Square and through the Carriage Gate to the Royal Marines Band

One young boy waved a union jack while others including tourists from Germany, the U.S. and Japan clapped and cheered.

Lance Corporal Frank Wyatt, 25, from Oxford, said the support made a difference.

He said: 'People need to appreciate what we're doing and the more they know about it the better.'

The demonstrators maintain a permanent presence in Parliament Square to protest the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan

Medical Assistant Roxanne Starsmeare, 23, from Taunton in Somerset, had just completed her first six-month tour of Afghanistan.

She said: 'For the last three months I was one of the front-line medics and treated everything from cut knees to troops who had been seriously injured, of which there were unfortunately a lot.

'It was hard work but I learned a lot and made some good friends. I think people are increasingly appreciating what we do an it's a real boost to know the country is behind you.'

Onlooker Sterling Lacey, 73, a retired teacher, said: 'It's the last we can do to show our gratitude for all they've been through.'

Last weekend some 30,000 people turned out to show support for the troops on Armed Forces Day. 3 Commando will be holding a day of remembrance for fallen colleagues in Exeter on Saturday, where they are based, and some 1,000 personnel from the Brigade are expected to attend.

The five who shouted abuse are protestors who maintain a constant presence in Parliament Square to demonstrate against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Scotland Yard said there were no arrests.

Creeping Sharia = Civitas Finds 85 Sharia Courts Operating in Britain

Is anyone really surprised that the numbers of Sharia Courts - operating in Great Britain - was/is grossly underestimated?

Note the muslim reponse to this report (or any type of criticism) is to use their typical, vociferous accusation of (the Myth of) Islamophobia.

If you think that these courts only deal with "domestic, marital and business disputes" - I have a bridge to sell you in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, USA.

It will be interesting to see if Civitas will actually be able to stop this latest example of the Islamisation of Great Britain ----- I'm not optimistic.


Article in full - emphasis mine: 

 At least 85 sharia courts' operating in Britain, says Civitas report

At least 85 separate sharia "courts" are now openly functioning in Britain, almost 20 times as many as previously believed, a report by Civitas claims.

A study by the thinktank found that scores of unofficial tribunals and councils regularly apply Islamic law to resolve domestic, marital and business disputes, many operating in mosques.

It led to claims of a "creeping" acceptance of sharia principles in British law, but the Muslim Council of Britain dismissed the report as "scaremongering".

The study follows the outcry over remarks by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, last year that the adoption of aspects of Muslim law in Britain, such as in divorce proceedings, "seems inevitable".

Lord Phillips, who was then the Lord Chief Justice, attracted controversy by saying that there was "no reason why" sharia principles could not form the basis of mediation in disputes.

Some decisions of Islamic tribunals are already considered legally binding and could theoretically be enforced in civil courts in England and Wales.

Other officially recognised bodies can agree to grant Muslim "divorces" as part of a parallel system of religious law in Britain.

"This whole business is creeping up on us without anyone really noticing," said Dr David Green, director of Civitas.

The existence of a network of five court-like sharia bodies in London, Bradford, Birmingham, Coventry and Manchester, expanding to other cities under the umbrella of the Muslim Arbitration Tribual (MAT) has already been widely reported.

But Civitas estimates that the real number of Islamic "courts" operating in Britain is at least 85, as a result of scores of unofficial courts sitting in mosques in which imams make judgments on day-to-day disputes.

It argued that they are unlikely to treat women as equals and could even be against human rights law.

The organisation called for a change in the law to stop the decisions of such bodies being legally enforceable.

The MAT, which deals primarily with disputes between business partners or mosques, says that as a legally constituted arbitration body under the 1996 Arbitration Act, its decisions could be enforced in county courts.

That claim has yet to be challenged in a test case but a similar status for Jewish tribunals is already long established.

Another organisation, the Islamic Sharia Council, has a panel of seven judges based in London, dealing largely with divorce and issuing "fatwas" on issues such as how to bring up children.

Mufti Abdul Kadir Barkatulla, one of its judges, said that the organisation had been operating peacefully alongside the civil courts for 25 years without any major problems.

He also confirmed that dozens of informal sharia bodies sit across the country.

"Every imam, if they are qualified can have a hearings and make decisions according to sharia," he said.

Inayat Bunglawala, of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: "To term them sharia courts is ridiculous, it's just scaremongering."

Qamar Bhatti, a member of the governing body of the MAT, said: "We don't have a court, it's an arbitration, we don't have a judge sitting with a gavel in his hand but that's the image that this report is creating."

MUSLIM CLERIC - ANJEM CHOUDARY - "ISLAMIC ROADSHOW" CONVERSION OF 11 YR OLD BRITISH BOY - ISN'T THIS A "HATE CRIME"?

The below article - aside from making your blood boil - is as clear a case of child abuse of a minor child as I've seen...........and/or a "hate crime".

Let's remember what happened when Christian preachers tried to pass out religious literature on the streets of Manchester - to adults:

"Two Christian preachers were stopped from handing out Bible extracts by police because they were in a Muslim area, it was claimed yesterday.

They say they were told by a Muslim police community support officer that they could not preach there and that attempting to convert Muslims to Christianity was a hate crime." LINK

Yet the predatory Anjem Choudary can brainwash an eleven year old child - on the streets of Birmingham, England - whose parents were not present to protect their child or to given consent to Choudary's forced Islamic conversion. Nor, did any parent give consent to the filming of their son during Choudary's 'Islamic Roadshow'.  For VIDEO go HERE

Where were the "vigilant" British police??  Why is this not considered a "hate crime" as in the incident of the Christian preachers?  I think we all know the answers to those questions.

Choudary needs to be locked up for CHILD ABUSE - or better yet - deported.

ARTICLE IN FULL:

Row after Islam cleric converts schoolboy on Birmingham street

Jun 28 2009 by Ben Goldby, Sunday Mercury

A YOUNG schoolboy was “converted” to Islam on the streets of Birmingham by a radical Muslim preacher, the Sunday Mercury can reveal.

The bewildered-looking 11 year-old, who gives his name as Sean, was filmed repeating Arabic chants and swearing allegiance to Allah.

The white schoolboy is prompted throughout by controversial cleric Anjem Choudary, a follower of exiled hate-preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed.

The incident was filmed during a demonstration by Choudary’s Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah group in Birmingham city centre earlier this month.

Choudary, 42, was one of the masterminds behind sick protests at the homecoming parade of heroic British soldiers in Luton back in March.

He praised protesters who branded British troops “murderers” and later appeared at a press conference flanked by thugs who took part in the demo.

When contacted by the Sunday Mercury, Choudary defended the young boy’s “reversion” to Islam – but admitted his parents were not with him and were not consulted.

“The child was genuinely interested in Islam,” he said.

“The boy told us he wanted to become a Muslim and, of course, some people are intellectually more mature than they are physically.

“I don’t see there is any harm in this.

“He was with his friends, but I didn’t see if his parents were there.

“There were a lot of people at the event.’’

A message on Choudary’s website offers advice for those who become Muslim at his Islamic Roadshow.

“Conversion packs are already provided to those who revert to Islam in the Islamic Roadshows,” it says.

“They include a booklet on ‘Everything a Muslim must know’ and a free DVD with a brief guide on how to pray in Islam.”

Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah, is a splinter group of the controversial Al-Muhajiroun sect.

Last month we revealed that the sect, founded by exiled Bakri, is planning to reform.

Al-Muhajiroun, which has recruited hundreds of fanatics in the Midlands, fell apart in 2004 just months before Bakri was stopped from coming back to the UK under terror laws.

He has now set his sights set on a return for the extremist group, though the Home Office is understood to be closely monitoring its activities.

The ranting cleric was investigated by Scotland Yard back in 2000 after telling the Sunday Mercury that then Prime Minister Tony Blair was a “legitimate target” for assassination.

Since his exclusion from Britain, right-hand man Anjem Choudary has run Ahlus Sunah wal Jama’ah and the Islam For The UK website.

Choudary was secretly filmed by the Sunday Mercury at a youth centre in Alum Rock, Birmingham, last February, calling for strict Sharia law to be introduced in the city.

British High Court Worries More About Safety of Muslim Criminal than the British People

Chalk up another ludicrous ruling by Britain's High Court into the "you couldn't make this up" category.

Just yesterday The Royal Courts of Justice ruled that :

"A judge ruled that the 'undesirable' immigrant, who 'embarked on a criminal career' in the UK and still poses a threat of further offending, must be freed from detention.........Daq, an alcoholic and drug addict, committed 18 offences between 1998 and 2004, using 13 aliases. They included robbery, assault and burglary. The High Court was told Ahmed Daq, 32, must be released on bail because the Home Office has already held him for three years to facilitate his removal from the UK but there is still no prospect of deportation. "

Now it's not like this thug has been a model prisoner:

"Over the past three years, he has been repeatedly in trouble for violent outbursts against other inmates, and detectives fear he will be a menace on the streets."

Yet once again the simpering, politically correct, British Courts are worried more about crooks then the British men, women and children.

"His [Daq] latest appeal hearing has been delayed as the legal debate continues over whether it is safe to return criminals and failed asylum seekers to the violent and war-torn east African state."

You know what? - WHO CARES?!?!  Who gives a rat's arse whether or not a lying/bogus muslim asylum seeker -who should have been deported back in 2004 - and who looks to the British people to provide him a home and $welfare$ and "free" legal aid - then goes on to rob, assault & burglarize these same generous and innocent people - is deported back to his muslim HOMELAND = SOMALIA? 

Would seem to me that Daq made that choice himself when he decided to victimise the British people.

Unfortunately for all - the asinine British courts also appear to choose to victimise the British people - people who have spoken loudly and clearly about their immigration/asylum seeker concerns  and feel that rampant immigration and multiculturalism  are causing "cultural suicide":

"A 2008 YouGov poll, commissioned by Channel 4, indicated that 83 per cent of people felt there was an immigration crisis at present. Eighty-four per cent were in favour of stopping immigration completely and a further 66 per cent felt their livelihoods were being 'undercut' by migrants." LINK

and inflict yet (another) known violent criminal into their midst.

You couldn't make this up...............Unquestionably - Reality is far more disturbing.

For article go to:

Scandal of the migrant criminals: High Court frees Somali thug Britain couldn't deport

Media Ignores Muslim Councillor Sons' Violent HATE Attack Against British Couple

*******ADDENDUM ADDED 26/06/09 - SEE BOTTOM OF BLOG *********

Undoubtedly anyone who reads or watches the news KNOWS that if a NON muslim person were to get into any type of physical or verbal altercation with a muslim the media, politicians, police, etc etc would immediately rush to label the person "racist" and condemn the actions as a race hate attack - or an example of (the Myth of) Islamophobia.

Yet - the past has shown that when muslims attack non-muslims and the attack is obviously race motivated- Kuffarophobic (even if it occurs on the same street as the most despicable race hate crime in Scotland - the muslim gang torture and murder of 15 yr. old schoolboy Kriss Donald) - the media, etc are MUM or downplay the FACTS. 

Factually just who are the largest group to be the victims of serious hate crime in the UK?

"Nearly half of all victims of racially motivated murders in the last decade have been white, according to official figures released by the Home Office. .... The disclosure will add to the intense debate over multiculturalism in British society. The figures also overturn the assumption that almost all racial murders are committed against ethnic minority victims."

"......Senior police officers have admitted that 'political correctness' and the fear of discussing the issue have meant that race crime against white people goes under-reported. One chief constable has claimed that white, working-class men are more alienated than the Muslim community." LINK

This is clearly the case with the below vicious and physically damaging muslim Street Jihadist gang attack which included Waqar Mohammed Younis, 20, and his brother Khawar Younis, 17. These young men, along with their thug pals, brutally beat Lianne Clayton,18 and James Ryder, also 18 -  in an unprovoked attack.

 According to Miss Clayton:

"Me and James were walking down the street, when a red jeep pulled up next to us and eight lads jumped out. The next thing I knew they were circling us and hitting James. I tried to pull them off him, but then I just remember being pushed back and being punched in the face, I think I was knocked out because when I woke up I was on the floor."

Besides a huge and embarrassing gap in her front teeth, Lianne Clayton is left frightened and tramatised. 

Lianne Clayton shows the gap in her teeth following the attack

While Miss Clayton and Mr. Ryder were recovering from their injuries, Waqar and Khawar Younis were busy canvassing the streets for their County Councillor father - Mohammed Younis..

"I am relieved they have pleaded guilty and that I don’t have to give evidence in court. Even seeing them in the waiting room with my family around, left me in tears and fearful. Every time I see a red car I freeze. I saw them earlier this month canvassing for their dad who has just been elected and I literally turned round and ran home."

Apparently it also helps to quell the press when you father is a recently elected Lancashire County Councillor.

County Councillor Mohammed Younis celebrating his recent election

Miss Clayton's further statement sums it up:

"They shouldn’t be allowed to help with an election when they can be so violent. They have never apologised."

Can you imagine if Lianne Clayton and James Ryder had been the perpetrators rather than the victims?  The vocal demands for their punishment would be deafening! Not to mention they would swiftly be on their way to some type of muslim "sensitivity" course or training in addition to jail time.

County Councillor Mohammed Younis apologised for his sons - leaving me wondering why these cowardly gang members didn't do so themselves. He also stated: "they are now moving on with their lives, education and future."  But of course they are - no one beat them up and left them traumatised and permanently damaged with a gaping hole in their front teeth.

Then comes this: 

"Recorder Geoffrey Lowe told the pair: "This case is adjourned for pre-sentence reports so that the court can learn more about you before sentencing. I must make you aware that a custodial sentence is clearly an option. You have pleaded guilty to serious crimes."

What is there to learn? Waqar and Khawar admit they were part of a Street Jihadist gang that targeted an innocent couple - who were minding their own business.  These  men then chose to brutally beat and maim this couple.

Lianne Clayton and James Ryder were assaulted because of their not being "Asian" and because they are white British = RACE HATE CRIME.

Don't you hear the enormous outcry and the wheels of justice turning?  (.........crickets chirping.........)

Article in Full - Interesting that this story was found on the Asian News web site:

Councillor defends his violent sons

Vanessa Cornall
June 23, 2009

TWO sons who helped get their father elected into County Hall have pleaded guilty to knocking out the front teeth of a teenage girl.

Waqar Mohammed Younis, 20, and his brother Khawar Younis, 17, both of Nuttall Street, Accrington, appeared at Burnley Crown Court last Tuesday charged with occasioning actual bodily harm and grievous bodily harm with intent.

The pair, whose father is newly-elected Lancashire County Councillor Mohammed Younis, who defeated Doreen Pollitt by a margin of only 22 votes for the seat of Accrington North, were due to go to trial until they pleaded guilty to ABH and a lesser charge of GBH without intent.

Victim Lianne Clayton, 18, of Lime Road, Accrington, has spoken out about the attack which left her without two upper front teeth and James Ryder, also 18, her boyfriend, with deep cuts and bruises and needing a CT Scan.

Child care apprentice Lianne said: "This was easily the worst thing that has ever happened to me. I still don’t know why they picked on us. I think we were just in the wrong place at the wrong time.

"Me and James were walking down the street, when a red jeep pulled up next to us and eight lads jumped out. The next thing I knew they were circling us and hitting James.

"I tried to pull them off him, but then I just remember being pushed back and being punched in the face, I think I was knocked out because when I woke up I was on the floor."

The incident happened on 24 November last year.

Lianne, now has to wear a plate covering the gap left by her missing teeth, hopes to be fitted with permanent screw in replacements in July which will take six months to heal and set.

She said: "Wearing this plate is a nightmare. I hate eating in front of people at work because the plate falls out and looks horrible. I get really self-conscious and down about the mess it has left me in.

"I am relieved they have pleaded guilty and that I don’t have to give evidence in court. Even seeing them in the waiting room with my family around, left me in tears and fearful.

"Every time I see a red car I freeze. I saw them earlier this month canvassing for their dad who has just been elected and I literally turned round and ran home.

"They shouldn’t be allowed to help with an election when they can be so violent. They have never apologised."

County Councillor Younis, a Tory councillor, won his seat after one of the borough’s closest margins, which saw the votes having to be counted twice.

He said: "This is a very regrettable incident. It was out of character for my sons. They are both very sorry about the whole incident and they will never behave like this in the future.

"I am very proud of my sons and they are now moving on with their lives, education and future."

The Younis brothers will now reappear on Monday 27 July to be sentenced.

Recorder Geoffrey Lowe told the pair: "This case is adjourned for pre-sentence reports so that the court can learn more about you before sentencing. I must make you aware that a custodial sentence is clearly an option. You have pleaded guilty to serious crimes."

*************************************ADDENDUM 26/06/09***********************

For anyone who may question whether or not the mainstream media hypes hate/racist crimes against "Asians" the majority of times - whilst staying silent on the clear racially motivated attacks of muslims against non-muslim/white British PLEASE GO TO THE FOLLOWING LINK:

Girl hurt in racist attack

British Man Raped by "Asian" Taxi Driver

I have chronicled many of the growing numbers of rapes perpetrated by muslim taxi drivers - but these rapes have all been of women -  this latest victim of taxi driver rape is a man.

"A man was raped by a taxi driver who followed him into his block of flats after driving him home. The 20-year-old victim got into the cab at Quay Street in Manchester city centre in the early hours of Sunday after a night out. When the taxi arrived at Salford Quays, the driver refused to take payment. The man went into his flat block, but was grabbed by the driver as he waited for the lift. He was raped in the stairwell of the building, police said.

....The rapist was described as being in his late 20s or early 30s, dark skinned, possibly Asian, and of middle eastern or Iraqi appearance."

The horrible crime has left the violated young man "traumatised".

It is interesting that the taxi driver refused to take a fare from his soon-to-be victim as a fare played a role in another muslim taxi driver rape - although it was the NON payment of a fare.  I suppose I could speculate that the muslim driver's not taking a fare was due to guilt - but that would rely on a morals system being in place - and a rapist with morals is a glaring dichotomy.

This above rape was not the only sexual assault - by a muslim - to happen this past weekend.

  A 26 year old woman was walking alone in Walthamstow (North East London) when she was sexually assaulted by a man of "Asian appearance". The police are not treating it as a rape although the assault took place near where the heinous "Asian"  "Night Stalker" is suspected of committing a rape and murder. 

The "night stalker" has raped both men and women.

Not surprisingly - women in the area are feeling at risk - yet another woman received this response (or lack thereof) from the police:

".......... she was out jogging shortly before the attack took place when she was approached by an Asian man in a car, who made suggestive comments to her.

"When I told the police, they didn't really take much notice as they said women normally know their attackers," Ms Wright said."  LINK

This lame generalization "women normally know their attackers" falls into the same category as the police recitation of what I call the BIG LIE  - when discussing muslim rapes ------- "incidents like this are rare" ------- seems to be the favorite politically correct claptrap used. This BIG LIE is just about as accurate as the police reported low numbers of gun crimes in Britain.

I wonder if raped men also supposedly "know" their attackers?  Clearly the young male victim above didn't know his.

 

** One less serious muslim related incident happened last Thursday in North East Leeds: Three 12 year old girls were walking when an "Asian" man approached them and wanted them to go into the bushes. Whilst making the demands the man exposed himself and then ran off. We should be thankful that this incident was just a "flash" yet it certainly isn't the experience one would want for a 12 year old child.  LINK

Nevertheless people shouldn't worry ....undoubtedly police are sure that "incidents like this are rare".

UK - Muslim Woman Wins Payout for "Red Dress Hurt Feelings"

Hiring muslim women (and men for that matter) should come with a giant WARNING notice to all potential UK employers. In fact - in light of this most recent case of a muslim woman's shakedown of an employer for CASH makes one wonder why anyone would bother hiring a muslim at all - especially when it may leave the employer and his/her business financially destroyed.

33 yr old Fata Lemes willingly took a job as a COCKTAIL WAITRESS - note we did not say a job at a day care center for babies, or bookkeeper in a office or as a hairdresser (oops! last one is a BAD example!! That has proved to be a lucrative lawsuit for another muslim woman) Nope - Ms Lemes chose to work in a bar - a bar that clearly serves alcoholic beverages and where she would serve alcohol - which surprisingly didn't enter into her lawsuit - maybe because it didn't prove profitable for this fellow muslim.

No it wasn't the alcohol that offended Fata - it was the dress - a dress that was considered the summer uniform for the cocktail waitresses. (See picture below)Yep - Ms Lemes found a nice little earner for her "hurt feelings"..............in a dress. 

So as she tossed the"alcohol is haraam" offense under the bus Ms Lemes pulled out her muslim modesty and declared the " short, low-cut dress was "disgusting" and made her look "like a prostitute". " One wonders how she didn't notice the sleeveless RED DRESS being worn by other cocktail waitress when she applied to work at the bar? 

That aside Fata told the employment tribunal hearing her reasons why she should receive compensation for being asked to wear what all the other cocktail waitresses wear:

 "Miss Lemes told the tribunal that she "might as well be naked" in the dress, adding: "I was brought up a Muslim and am not used to wearing sexually attractive clothes."

Guess her muslim parents must have skipped over the no alcohol and working in a bar Quran lessons.

But here is the greater travesty - Despite the panel at Central London Employment Tribunal making these determinations :

1)  It accepted that Miss Lemes genuinely believed that the short, low-cut dress was "disgusting" and made her look "like a prostitute". -------Even though a photo of Miss Lemes on Facebook, however, showed her wearing a low cut T-shirt revealing her cleavage.----(Guess patrons in a bar seeing her in a red dress is worse than millions of internet users seeing Fata with her breasts bulging out of her low cut T-shirt. But then again - Facebook isn't worth some easy money.)

Revealing: Fata Lemes on Facebook

2) It found Miss Lemes "overstated" her trauma (No?!? Really??) at being asked to wear the sleeveless dress that was open at the back.

3) It rejected Miss Lemes' claim that she was left with no choice but to walk out of her job after just eight days.  (Bet the employers were real unhappy to have her go??)

4) It branded her compensation claim of £20,000 including £17,500 for hurt feelings - as "manifestly absurd". (and a bold sign of her greediness - wouldn't you say?)

And -- here comes the BIG BUT-----Despite ALL of the above  -- in its final ruling the Tribunal panel says:

""In our judgment, the effect of requiring her to wear the dress was to violate her dignity. We further consider that it created for her an environment which was degrading, humiliating and offensive." It pointed out that a summer uniform of "brightly coloured, figure-hugging garb" had not been introduced for male waiting staff."

Thus it awarded her £2,919.95 for hurt feelings and loss of earnings"

In other words -the panel contradicted its prior rulings in order to justify handing a financial payout to a muslim woman -- even after deciding the other "offenses" against her amounted to naught.

Just when I thought there was a glimmer of hope --- muslim pandering and dhimmitude again rears their ugly heads.

One needs no better example - than Ms Lemes -  as to why so many muslims have turned British employers - via the soft headed, muslim pandering British judicial system -into "hurt feelings" cash cows. 

For article go to:

Muslim waitress wins nearly £3,000 for hurt feelings over skimpy dress

Muslim cocktail waitress - Fata Lemes - in the "offensive" red dress.

"OFFENSIVE" UNION JACK BADGE ORDERED REMOVED FROM COPS UNIFORMS

One simple question:

DOES THIS OFFEND YOU?

                                                                        

 

Well it seems that it DOES offend some UNNAMED MET officials who have now banned armed cops at Heathrow Airport from wearing the tiny Union Jack flag badge on their clothing.  These Union flag badges have been worn to show support for British military troops. Approximately 70% of these armed cops have served in the Forces and/or have children or other family members currently serving in Afghanistan.

 

Now who might you imagine would find the British flag as "offensive"?  Who might be whining and complaining about it ?? -- Should we suspect muslims and their muslim wannabee sympathizers?

 

Clearly muslims have made an issue - worldwide - of crosses - or any object bearing any form of a cross (including National flags) as being offensive to them and clearly many dhimmis are tripping over each other to pander to these muslims -- here are just a few instances:

 

In today news! --A Labour minister has sparked controversy by claiming that an alternative symbol is needed for the Red Cross because of the logo's supposed links to the Crusades.  Foreign Office minister Chris Bryant  wants to replace it with a red "crystal".

 

JAIL bosses have sparked fury by banning a cross from their new chapel in case it offends Muslims....But while the room features heated spas for Muslims to wash their feet, there is only a portable Christian altar which can be wheeled in and out when necessary.

 

Turkish lawyer files complaint with Union of European Football Associations stating that the Inter Milan's team shirts consists of a big red cross on a white background. This has apparently reminded the Turks of an emblem of the order of the Templars, which is therefore deemed offensive to Muslims. The cross is the emblem of Milan

Hospital bans traditional Easter Hot Cross Buns = offensive to non=Christians ie: muslims.

Cross banned from chapel after being in the chapel for over 60 years --at the College of William and Mary in Virginia, USA - offends muslims.

Cross of St George is also used by Barcelona football team from Spain - on their badge - similar to the Inter-Milan incident it was deemed racist and offensive to muslims. Many muslim nations are altering the Barcelona shirts so it will not look like a cross.

Prison officials in Britain are concerned that tie pins worn by officers featuring the St. George's Cross – the symbol on England's flag – could offend Muslims who might associate it with the Crusades of the 11th, 12th and 13th centuries. " 

 

These are just a few of the assaults made by muslims against the any representation of the  Christian cross and/or National flags with cross symbols. A brief search of the web will find MANY more as well as affirm that no other ethnic, religious or otherwise groups voice any objection to or appear offended by the cross symbol.

 

Clearly muslims are methodically working towards incremental eradication of any form of the Christian cross from public view on their way to the Islamisation of Europe.  With the help of pandering, multicultural worshipping, politically correct dhimmis - including these Heathrow (and other) officials - British police  and politicians  -one can predict -  in Great Britain -  muslims could very well succeed.

 

Article in full:

 

Soldier badge is banned

 

ARMED cops patrolling Heathrow Airport have been banned from wearing tiny Union Jack badges in support of British troops.

Top brass claimed the tie-pin badges - which cost £1 with proceeds going to the Help for Heroes charity - were OFFENSIVE.

But one officer asked: "How can the Union Jack be offensive?

Pride

About 100 officers in the Metropolitan force's SO18 Aviation branch, which patrols Heathrow, bought the inch-square badges.

Seventy per cent of them served in the Forces and many have children fighting in Afghanistan.

Another cop said: "We're wearing the badges with pride. Most importantly, they are to show support for our soldiers at war.

"Nobody has put out orders to remove rainbow symbols that gay and lesbian officers wear. Why discriminate against us?"

A statement from the Met said: "The dress code states only approved corporate badging may be used."

"This ruling is even more absurd coming this weekend on the 65th anniversary of the D-Day landings.

"We must be the only country ashamed to display our national flag."

Son Brutally Murdered By "Asians" Yet Grieving British Mum Worries About Safety of Local Muslims

In what can only be described as the ultimate in charity and Christian values a Bradford mother is asking for there to be no retailiation on muslims for the brutal beating and murder of her son.

"But his mother Christina Baxter said she fears people in Shadsworth, where her son lived, are intent on taking the law into their own hands. "........“That is the last thing I want to happen. I do not want any other family to have to go through what me and my family had suffered this week. "

Police state that the murder was not racially motivated - yet the facts seem to point to the opposite - Street Jihad. Likely the police are covering up the truth as this is not Blackburns first "taste" -of often baseball bat wiedling- Street Jihad - see here 

The latest victim, Christopher Folkes, 35, was described as a slight, timid man who would not seek any type of confrontation. He was walking in Queen’s Park, Blackburn on his way to see his mother who was suffering from intense arthritis pain and could not pick him up for his weekly visit. Sadly, the grieving Mum feels guilty about this - thinking that had she done so her son would still be alive. LINK

This despicable crime bears much resemblence to the recent brutal stabbing - by a muslim "youth" - of 20 year old, Oliver Hemsley. Mr Hemsley was also a slight, nonconfrontational man - and in an unprovoked attack he was kicked and punched by a several muslim men during which Nazrul Islam stabbed Oliver from behind through the heart and lungs. The vicious attack left the promising young artist paralysed from the neck down.

Mr. Folkes was targeted, chased and attacked by three muslim men - no reason or motive given - thus what other possibility is there other than he was being singled out for his being a lone, white British and slightly built male?  It is clear that lone men (often slightly built), or elderly men or young boys are frequently the victims of violence perpetrated by muslim thugs/gangs. I have cited such incidents numerous times in my blog. See below for just a FEW of these posts:

MUSLIM STREET JIHAD LEAVES BRITISH MAN BRAIN DAMAGED

BRITISH BOY BEATEN TO A PULP AND ROBBED BY MUSLIMS

DISABLED ELDERLY MAN LATEST VICTIM OF BRITAIN'S "STREET JIHAD"

GANG OF 15 BASEBALL BAT WIELDING MUSLIMS ATTACK BRITISH MAN

2nd LONDON EAST END PRIEST ATTACKED & BEATEN BY MUSLIMS

MUSLIM GANG USES IRON PIPES AND CLUBS TO BLUDGEON 14 YR OLD ENGLISH BOY

12 & 13 YR. OLD PAPERBOY BROTHERS ATTACKED & BEATEN BY MUSLIM GANG

14 YEAR OLD SCHOOLBOY VICTIM OF "HONOUR" BEATING & KIDNAPPING

There was no robbery or any other connection to these muslim thugs -yet they chose to attack and batter Christopher Folkes into unconsciousness and then proceeded to repeatedly kick his head and brain "like a football" smashing it into an unrecognisable pulp. To quote the mother -"Not even animals would behave like that.

Can you imagine - in reversing the above circumstances - that the unprovoked, intentional targeting, beating and murder of a muslim "Christopher Folkes" - would be considered anything but a race hate attack?

Article in full:

Blackburn murder victim's mum calls for calm to avert 'revenge attacks'

PEOPLE are being urged not to resort to any kind of racist ‘revenge’ attacks after a man was fatally attacked in a park.

Christopher Folkes, 36, died after he was attacked in Queen’s Park, Blackburn, and police said that they do not believe the attack was racially motivated.

But his mother Christina Baxter said she fears people in Shadsworth, where her son lived, are intent on taking the law into their own hands.

And a councillor joined her in urging people to remain calm as police said they were working in the community to avert any ‘revenge’ attacks.

Mrs Baxter, who also lives in Shadsworth, said: “People are convinced that the attack was racist and I hear all of the time that people around here want revenge.

“People are saying that they are going to start fights or attack Asians because of what happened to Christopher.

“That is the last thing I want to happen. I do not want any other family to have to go through what me and my family had suffered this week.

“Violence is not the answer and the police have said that it was not a racist incident.”

Det Supt Neil Hunter said that there have been no reports from witnesses that racism was a part of the attack.

He said: “We are not treating this as a racist incident. There were white and Asian people who were a part of the group that we believe the attacker came from.

“Officers are working in the community to reassure people.”

Police said Mr Folkes was attacked by up to three Asian men But Mrs Baxter said: “I don’t think there was racism involved. These are just horrible and nasty people who have got nothing better to do than attack a vulnerable man.

“I think it was just a random attack and I am sure that he did not know the people who attacked him.“ Coun Salim Mulla, who represents the Queen’s Park area, said it was the responsibility of community leaders like himself to urge people to shun violence.

He said: “That sort of behaviour is not acceptable in any society. All we can do is appeal to all parts of the community that they should be living in a peaceful way.

“I would appeal for all to remain calm and pray that there are no other incidents of this nature.

“We have a responsibility to get the message out condemning what has happened.”

Mr Folkes was attacked by the lake in Queen’s Park at 9.30pm on Saturday and died in hospital at around 6pm on Sunday.

His family have been unable to plan his funeral yet because his body has not been released by investigators. A second post mortem is due to take place this week.

• A 16-year-old youth from Blackburn has been remanded in custody after being charged by police with the murder of Mr Folkes.

London Police Search for Muslim Serial Rapist & Murderer

Within 2 days of my last post regarding the sexual assault of an elderly British woman by a muslim man comes the report of another - even more brutal rape and murder of a woman in Walthamstow, London.

35 year old Michelle Samaraweera endured a horrific rape and her young body, which had the life strangled out of it, was found discarded like trash in a park.  Detectives link her rape to two more recent sexual assaults of British women:

"The murder was quickly linked with two similar attacks. The first took place at an address close to Queens Road on March 24 when a 59-year-old woman was forced inside her home and raped.

The second, in which a 46-year-old woman was attacked in an alleyway off Lea Bridge Road, took place in the early hours of April 22."

Description of the suspected rapist (and now murderer):

"The suspect has been described as of Asian appearance, or with dark skin, and is aged between 30 and 40 years."

Like politically correct clockwork - the police immediately trot out the well worn BIG LIE :

'While stranger murders and sexual assaults are incredibly rare we have to be mindful of the terrible ordeal these ladies endured."

NO THESE MUSLIM PERPETRATED RAPES ARE NOT "RARE"!

And also - true to form - the police back up the above ABSURD obfuscation with the caveat:

"Waltham Forest borough commander Chief Superintendent Mark Benbow said patrols have been stepped up but women must be 'especially vigilant'."

"Especially vigilant"? - why  if such crimes by muslims (or others) against women are so "rare"?

The police are conducting house to house inquiries and are asking for DNA samples from men that match the rapist/murderer's description.  This is a daunting task considering:

 "Waltham Forest has the fifth largest Muslim population in England and the third largest in London (coming after its neighbouring boroughs, Newham and Tower Hamlets)."

One can only wait for the howling accusations of "Islamophobia" and "racism" to emanate from London's muslim community leaders.

Meanwhile British women -living in "multicultural" England - remain future prey and past victims of those "rare" muslim perpetrated rapes.

Article in full:

Police launch mass DNA screening to catch rapist killer after woman's body is found in park

Detectives hunting a killer and suspected serial rapist began a mass voluntary DNA sweep today.

Investigators believe whoever raped and murdered Michelle Samaraweera, 35, in a park in Walthamstow, East London, lives nearby.

They have begun house-to-house inquiries and are asking anyone who matches the suspect's description to provide a sample of DNA.

Officers said the man may also be responsible for two other violent rapes in the Walthamstow area in March and April.

Victim: Police believe whoever raped and murdered Michelle Samaraweer lives nearby. They are asking anyone who matches the suspect's description to provide a DNA sample

Detective Superintendent Vic Rae, who is leading the investigation, said: 'The DNA test is designed solely to apprehend the individual responsible for Michelle's brutal murder and the two linked sexual assaults.

'Much consideration and planning has gone into this decision and we feel this is the quickest and most comprehensive way to eliminate men from our investigation.

'While stranger murders and sexual assaults are incredibly rare we have to be mindful of the terrible ordeal these ladies endured.

'Michelle suffered a terrifying assault and the physical abuse against the other two women was significant.

'All three endured horrendous sexual abuse and it is therefore with the whole community in mind that we work to trace this man.'

Ms Samaraweera's body was discovered in a small park and play area in the early hours of May 30. She had been strangled and raped.

The murder was quickly linked with two similar attacks. The first took place at an address close to Queens Road on March 24 when a 59-year-old woman was forced inside her home and raped.

The second, in which a 46-year-old woman was attacked in an alleyway off Lea Bridge Road, took place in the early hours of April 22.

The suspect has been described as of Asian appearance, or with dark skin, and is aged between 30 and 40 years.

Police have released two CCTV stills of Ms Samaraweera captured at a branch of Somerfield, in Markhouse Road, shortly before her death.

Mr Rae said: 'Michelle was wearing a very distinctive black jacket with white parallel lines down the sleeves.

'We know she was in Somerfield between 1am and around 1.15am but we have no other sightings of her between 10pm on May 29 and the time her body was found at around 5.50am on May 30.

'We need to hear from anyone who saw Michelle or who has any information which could help.'

Waltham Forest borough commander Chief Superintendent Mark Benbow said patrols have been stepped up but women must be 'especially vigilant'.

Two men arrested on May 30 have been released with no further action. A further two men arrested the next day have been bailed until July pending further inquiries.

Anyone with information should call 020 8345 3715 or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

"Asian" Man Rapes Elderly British Woman in Her Own Home

Whereas the rape of any woman is despicable there is something particularly vile about the rape of a child OR an elderly woman  Perhaps because - being on either end spectrum of age - brings an added vulnerabilty to these women/men/children for which we - in a civilised Western society -feel the utmost need to care and protect. 

So whenever a new case of child sexual grooming/rape or elderly woman rape comes into the news - yet another wave of stomach churning nausea results along with great anger and hatred of the perpetrator. There is NO room for sympathy for these - in this and so many other incidents - MUSLIM predators. (and infuriating that too many British judges go "soft" on muslim sexual predators)

The latest reported case is of a 71 year old woman, minding her own business, walking along canal towpath in the Openshaw section of muslim-enriched Manchester, England.  The "Asian" (media speak for muslim) man approached her and began his planned assault by talking to the woman as she walked home. Likely the woman felt safe as it was a "busy time of day".

The man went on to sexually assault the lone woman inside her own home:

"Detective Inspector Trish Owen said: “The victim was put through a terrible ordeal and this man must be caught."

But then - true to form - the Detective Inspector spouts clearly a lie when she states:

"While incidents like this are rare...."

No these incidents are NOT rare  (although it is true that saying so can get you sacked) and to perpetrate this clear lie is not only a disservice to the British women and children that the police are supposed to protect but also serves to set up yet another woman  or child for a predator.  AND isn't the next statement proof of the overt lie that such muslim perpetrated rapes and assaults being "rare":

"....we ask people to be vigilant and walk in groups where possible."

Perhaps the muslim assaulter believes that according to Islam - women are worth less than men - or what was stated by the senior muslim cleric in Australia, Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali, that women not wearing an Islamic veil are "uncovered meat" and thus guilty of attracting sexual predators.  Clearly the Shiek is not alone in these Islamic beliefs as Rape Jihad in Western Countries continues to climb in numbers.

As Lord Pearson has recently said:

"...the Government “may be disturbingly complacent about the fact that Sharia law is incompatible with the values and law of this country”."

Complacent is far too generous a term -as the British government is actively promoting the Islamisation of Britain.

I have written MANY blogs about British women and children suffering rape and other violence at the hands of the growing muslim male population - so much so that many may wonder why I continue to bang the drum.

Why?

Because it is up to US - to YOU and I - to protect the vulnerable among us.  Our silence adds credence to the "DI Ownes" lie - that such heinous acts are rare - and thus makes us complicit in these abhorrent crimes. We must loudly deny such dishonesty and demand that the police, government and others in power stop their politically correct pandering to the muslim population and enforce British laws and Judeo/Christian mores.

The lives and safety of all of us - men - women and children depend upon it.

Article in full:

Woman, 73, sexually assaulted

June 06, 2009

A WOMAN of 73 was followed home and sexually assaulted by a man.

She was walking along the canal towpath off Ashton Old Road, Openshaw at 5pm on June 4.

A man approached her and started talking to her. He walked along with her and sexually assaulted her in her home.

Detective Inspector Trish Owen said: “The victim was put through a terrible ordeal and this man must be caught.

“While incidents like this are rare, we ask people to be vigilant and walk in groups where possible.

“The man befriended the victim at a busy time of day so it is likely that people passed or saw them as they walked.”

The man is described as Asian, slim with short, dark hair.

Call police on 856 3240 or Crimestoppers on 0800 555111.

Former Gitmo Detainee Becomes XBox Star

File in the category of "You couldn't make this stuff up", former Gitmo detainee,  Moazzam Begg, is on his way to starring in a new X-box game. The new game, Rendition, is being developed by a software firm in Scotland and lets players control a Guantanamo detainee who is trying to shoot his way out of the prison. Begg's "expertise" was called upon as the game's creators needed to know the layout of the prison thus he was initially hired as a consultant.

Needless to say the game maker is being criticized:

"We have had a lot of hate mail about this, mainly from America, saying things like, 'Don't dare put out a game that shows them killing our soldiers," Zarrar Chishti, director of Scottish software company T-Enterprise, told the U.K.'s Daily Mail."

Hate mail?  Sounds more like adamant requests not to make an outrageous "true to life" game about killing American (or British) soldiers - can't imagine why anyone would find that offensive and unacceptable - can you?

Zarrar Chishti, director of the software company, insists that only "mercenaries" will be killed - mercenaries at Gitmo? - now that sounds a bit NON-realistic. 

Chishti further states: "We are expecting an extreme reaction to the game in the US. But we think it will sell well in the Middle East."

Well - guess that should come as no surprise - but you can be sure that the "extreme reaction" in the USA WON'T look like THIS or THIS over THIS. 

At a cost of £250,000 or $405,000, the game/atrocity is scheduled to go on sale this coming October.

Just another glaring example of:  For many people - when it comes to money - there is no morality.

For article go to:

Former terror detainee stars in Gitmo Xbox game

Moazzam Begg plays himself in Rendition: Guantanamo

Another Case of a British Judge Going Soft on a Muslim Sexual Assault Criminal

Well here you have it.....yet another British judge goes soft on a muslim criminal - this time a muslim man feigned a position of authority and used it to sexually assault a 17 year old girl........yet gets NO jail time just some forced "community service" . **

You know what I mean --'community service' = those charity, service clubs, hospital, school etc. etc tasks you and I gladly volunteer our time to do. That's considered a "punishment" for sexual assault crime by Judge Peter Fingret.   

34 year old, Muhammad Bashir, a cleaner in the London Underground, posed as a ticket inspector in order to take advantage of a teenage girl.

"He accosted a 17-year-old from Edinburgh in February last year, accused her of wrongly having a child's ticket and ordered her to follow him....

He led the tearful girl through corridors at Euston station as she worried about being caught with the wrong ticket by a man she believed was an inspector.

Andrew Collings, prosecuting, said matters turned "sinister" when Bashir got her on her own and told her he would let her off if she kissed him on the lips, before pushing her up against a wall to kiss her."

One can imagine what else might have occurred if the young girl had not immediately "raised an alarm" and called for help.

Muhammed plead guilty to the sexual assault - but the judge was then given the typical list of supposed mitigations: 1) He was a man of PREVIOUS good character 2) He felt "deep shame and regret" 3) A sense of genuine "bewilderment" came over him that day.

None of which come close to what the young victim endured.  Perhaps some may consider this a minor crime?  Not when you read the detrimental impact the assault had on the teenage girl :

"Sentencing Bashir today, Judge Peter Fingret said: "This appalling offence is aggravated by your posing as a person of authority on the station where you were working as a cleaner. This pretence was made towards a young girl of 17 who clearly needed help and not the depravity of a person such as yourself.

You exploited her fragility and, having taken her through various corridors which must have been a very scary situation for her, you then kissed her on the lips, forcing her into that position."

He told the court the teenager's victim impact statement revealed the "drastic" effect of his actions.

The judge said: "She finds it hard to trust any member of the London Underground staff. She has problems sleeping and distrusts men and it has had a severe impact on her studies and this is all your fault.

I'm quite sure that Muhammed Bashir will be deeply contemplating and repenting the harm he has done to this young victim......while he's FORCED to help out his community.

** Muhammed Bashir also has his name placed on a "sexual offender's register"-limited to 5 years.

For Article Go To HERE

 

Are The British Finally FED UP With Islam?

Today's UK media have front page news articles about the "March for England" in Luton.  Whereas some call it "anti-Islam" what it really is going on is the people of England have finally reached their flashpoint and are FED UP with the path their politicians have led the Country AND the Islamic invasion of their Land.

Self-serving politicians and others have forced multiculturalism down the throats of the British and we now find that multiculturalism has shown itself to be anti the indigenous culture - in fact it causes native cultural suicide. Every other culture/people, particularly muslims, take priority over the British. The British are supposed to twist into bowknots trying to appease muslims until their own culture, traditions and mores disappear as they are "offensive to muslims". Their country is becoming Balkanized with no-go areas for non-muslims and virtually absent assimilation. Outrageous and sometime violent muslim behaviours are rewarded with more taxpayer subsidized schemes and more condescension from lawmakers and judges.  Many muslims seem to want to avail themselves of British benefits but don't want to respect the British people and culture. Muslim violence against British men, women and children is rampant and legitimized by some mullahs.

It is a misnomer to call muslim "immigrants" as clearly -through  Population Jihad - they have become colonisers.

The British people are FED UP!  Fed up with watching their pubs, parades, flags, holidays, school plays, children's stories etc etc disappear and the "last straw" was watching their brave soldiers -- disrespected.

We all know where FED UP! can lead.................

As far as I'm concerned IT'S ABOUT TIME!!!! 

****NOTE - The below sensationalised headline reads NINE arrested - but later information finds only two were charged - one man for carrying stones in his pocket (deemed a weapon) and a woman for violating a previous  anti-social behaviour order.  Not exactly bomb carrying thugs - eh? LINK

ARTICLE LINK:

Nine Arrested after masked mob's march against muslim extremists turns violent

Violent?????????

Which do you deem more violent?

THIS? 

Anti-Israel - pro Muslim Gaza - riots in London this past January - three arrests unsure if anyone charged and millions of pounds in property damage -LINK

OR THIS = "Troublemakers" in Luton "riot" =  9 arrests - 2 charged - no noted property damage

 

SADISTIC MUSLIM "MONSTER" CONVICTED OF SLAUGHTERING TWO SISTERS

Two sisters died a horrific death because the British immigration and asylum service is broken.  Repeatedly stories emerge of bogus muslim (and other) asylum seekers living off the the purses of British taxpayers while these shams live their politically correct immigration service-facilitated lives built upon dishonesty and lies.

Thus is the situation that allowed Mohammed Ali to come into Britain - where he spun his tale of deceit and was given - by some soft headed bureaucrat - "exceptional leave" to remain in the UK. (The bureaucrat undoubtedly worried that denying Ali would bring the ususal muslim cries and accusations of "Islamophobia" and "racism".)  Ali went on to brutally rape and slaughter two young sisters, Yasmine and Sabrina Larbi-Cherif- stabbing them with a ferocity that even horror fiction writer, Stephen King, couldn't fathom the carnage. Ali also performed sick, necrophiliac acts and left their bloody bodies shamefully exposed.

But this tragedy is not just about the broken British immigration service it is also about a murderer- likely influenced by the Islamic teachings regarding the worth of women and the punishment of "disobedient" women as well as the cycle of denial, hope and fear of domestic abuse.    

Yasmin eventually found the courage to break away from her abuser. Sadly she and her sister paid the ultimate price for this quest for freedom.  

They lie dead - killed by a man  -who shouldn't have even been living in the UK.

Sadistic asylum-seeking sex killer convicted of stabbing to death girlfriend and her sister

By Andy Dolan and David Wilkes
Last updated at 4:29 PM on 22nd May 2009

An 'evil, controlling monster' who stabbed his girlfriend and her sister to death in a frenzied attack may have lied about his past to gain entry to Britain, it was revealed today.

Mohammed Ali, 29, left behind a scene of what police called 'unimaginable carnage and destruction' after killing Yasmine and Sabrina Larbi-Cherif in their city centre apartment.

Ali - who had been charged with raping his 'on-off' lover Yasmine, 22, months before he killed her and her 19 year old sibling - was today found guilty of murdering them both after a 12 day trial.

Tragic sisters: Yasmine, 22, (right) and Sabrina Larbi-Cherif, 19, were both stabbed to death in their flat

And today it emerged he is suspected of duping immigration officers into believing he is an Iraqi from Baghdad when he arrived in the UK ten years ago.

His claim for asylum was refused, but he was given 'exceptional leave' to remain here because of the situation in Iraq, an immigration source said. Four years later he was granted indefinite leave to remain.

But Birmingham Crown Court heard Ali had boasted to friends that he was actually from Morocco. Police are also convinced he is North African, if not from Morocco then, like his victims, from neighbouring Algeria.

He met Yasmine in a Birmingham bar in 2006 and the pair became involved in a turbulent relationship which saw her fall pregnant twice, both times having an abortion.

[caption

She had moved to Birmingham from the family home in Wembley, North London, to study, but had dropped out of her chemistry degree at Birmingham University to become a translator.

Sabrina, who was due to start a French degree at the same unviversity, followed her north two weeks before they were murdered.

The sisters, who had obtained British citizenship in 2004, shared a room in the two-bedroom flat, which they shared with a third tennant. 

Ali was captured on CCTV entering their Birmingham apartment block before leaving again - dressed in his victims' clothes - 44 minutes later. In between, he had launched a ferocious attack using knives from the girls' kitchen. It was so brutal he broke two knives in the process.

Sabrina was stabbed 35 times in her right breast alone. Police believe Ali may have turned on her after she arrived home to discover him attacking her sister in the lounge. Yasmine was stabbed in the heart, with the blade almost coming out of the other side of her body.

Ali then dragged the sisters' bodies into the bedroom where he 'sexually interfeared with them', leaving the bodies naked from the waist down together on a bed.

The alarm was raised by their family, who had contacted the building's concierge after becoming alarmed when the girls didn't call home as usual.

Ali was caught about to board a ferry at Dover docks two days after the murder in September last year.  Police had circulated his name after identifying him as the prime suspect because of the rape allegations Yasmine made against him months earlier.

Carnage: The bodies of Yasmine and Sabrina had been dragged from the lounge into the bedroom in their blood-soaked flat

She had gone to police in February last year with allegations which resulted in Ali being remanded in custody charged with six rapes, five sexual assaults and one count of actual bodily harm.

In June, Yasmine retracted her complaint, claiming she could not face the ordeal of giving evidence in court and Ali was released the following month when all charges were dropped.

Shortly afterwards, the pair resumed their relationship, although in the days leading up to the killing text messages suggested Yasmine had wanted to end it, accusing Ali of failing to 'respect' her.

Ali, who lived in a hostel in Birmingham, admitted the manslaughter of the women but denied their murder.

He but told the jury he had 'snapped' and stabbed Yasmine when she laughed at him as they discussed his time behind bars and the earlier terminations, then turned on Sabrina when she returned from a walk during the attack.

But he walked out of the witness box when he was cross-examined about his claims, and did not return to court for the rest of the trial. He will be sentenced at a later date.

After the verdicts, Detective Chief Inspector Joanne Clews said: 'I believe that Ali is a violent, controlling and evil man, who had no respect for Yasmine during their relationship. 

His attack on the girls was completely depraved. From what I have learnt during this investigation, I believe that Mohammed Ali is a monster.'

Today the sisters' family said in a statement: 'Yasmine’s only mistake was her refusal to submit to such an abusive, vicious and evil individual, whilst Sabrina’s was her brave attempt to stop this monster from killing her sister.

'This verdict will not bring back our ‘angels’, but it will ensure that this barbaric killer will be placed behind bars for a very long time, and he will never get the chance to inflict any such suffering on any other family.'

A UK Borders Agency spokesman said: 'Any non-EEA foreign national sentenced to 12 months or more is automatically considered for deportation.'

UK Muslim Vampire Rapist Causes Severe Blood Loss to Victim

I have written MANY blogs about muslim men raping British women (and children) and one thread very often links them all - the muslim rapist/criminal claims and/or sees himself as the victim. Why not? - as this defense frequently works with British judges who swallow the excuses and are soft of muslim criminals.

You be the judge:

A teenager meets a man at a nightclub. The teenage woman insists she does not want intimacy but agrees to go with a man - who then drives her to "an address" to talk . While they were sitting on the couch - the man makes unwanted advances. The teen says to stop. The man then forces the woman to commit a "sex act" on him (also known as RAPE) and then proceeds to rape her another two times. During the course of his raping the woman - he repeatedly bites her causing her bleeding wounds and to lose a significant amount of blood (3 pints)-  the man only stops the rape when he realized the severity of her injuries and the heavy loss of blood. The woman seeks medical attention-on her own- and recounts her rape to the staff. She says that she experienced the "WORST PAIN" during the attack.

First the man says that the young woman made sexual advances to him and they were "unsuccessful" - he tells how he was "disgusted" by the sight of the blood. Then his story changed saying that he is the victim - that the woman raped him and he never bit her. He is the victim.

So who do you believe? Did the teen rape the man? Did she cause the bite marks and wounds that led to her losing approximately 1/3 of the total blood in her body? Was the accused muslim rapist, Abas Hassan, really the victim?

You can decide for yourself ------but for me the facts are clear-this is yet another case - undoubtedly the most bizarrely vampirish case - of muslim men raping young British girls.

Article in full:

Bristol man 'raped and bit teen'

Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 07:00

A Bristol man raped and bit a teenager he met in a nightclub, a court heard.

Abas Hassan's alleged victim lost more than three pints of blood from injuries suffered in the attack, a jury at Bristol Crown Court was told yesterday.

But when arrested, the 23-year-old man told police she forced herself on him and it was he who was the rape victim.

Hassan, of High Street, Easton, denies three counts of rape in November last year.

Paul Grumbar, prosecuting, told the jury the 18-year-old woman met Hassan in a Weston-super-Mare nightclub and, although she stressed she didn't want intimacy, he drove her to an address "just to talk".

When they were on a sofa for what she thought would be a chat, Hassan's mood changed, the court heard.

Mr Grumbar said: "According to (the complainant) he turned into a completely different person. He kissed her and said 'come on, take your clothes off'.

"When she said she just wanted to talk he said they could talk in a bit."

The jury was told Hassan took his clothes off, and then the complainant's, and forced her to commit a sex act on him.

Though she repeatedly said she was not in the mood, said Mr Grumbar, Hassan then forced himself on her twice.

Mr Grumbar said during the assault Hassan bit the woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, on her face. The jury heard he only stopped when he realised the woman was injured and losing blood.

After Hassan left the scene the woman was able to get a lift to the accident and emergency department of Weston General Hospital.

Mr Grumbar said she made an immediate complaint of rape on the journey and recounted what had happened to her to medical staff.

Numerous cuts were detected on her body, Mr Grumbar said, and she was estimated to have lost 1.5 litres (three pints) of blood.

The jury heard that when Hassan was arrested at his Easton home he told police the woman was keen to have sex, they weren't successful, and he was "disgusted" when he realised she was injured.

Contradicting her account, he said she was the one who had started intimacy.

Hassan denied biting her and told police he was the one saying "stop", not her.

Mr Grumbar told the court: "He said: 'She was trying to rape me, not me raping her. She started the sex and now I'm here for all the wrong reasons… She wasn't crying out in pain, not at all. She raped me; it was not me raping her, if you look at it fairly'."

The case continues at Bristol Crown Court.

SLAVERY - RAPE & ABUSE - MODERN DAY REALITIES FOR MIDDLE EAST MAIDS

While browsing the web, yesterday, I viewed the Arab Times online site and came across several news articles about the rape and abuse of maids in Kuwait. I was surprised at the cluster of cases so I searched the web for more information and was nearly knocked off my chair when I realized the enormous extent of the huge numbers of foreign maids suffering abuse at the hands of their Middle East "sponsors".  To use the term "maid" is a misnomer - these women (and boys) are nothing more than modern day SLAVES.  Slaves to be abused, raped, tortured, maimed, and killed. 

Many of these maids come into the Middle East (particularly Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Lebanon) from Indonesia, the Phillipines, Sri Lanka and Ethiopia - smaller numbers come from India and Bangladesh. Saudi Arabia has the largest number of these imported domestics estimated at 200,000 in 2004. These maids are seen as inferiors to their Middle Eastern masters and many countries do not even recognize them as being covered by labor laws - including minimum wage:

"The plight of domestic workers in Lebanon rose to the spotlight during the summer of 2006, when Israel launched a thirty-four-day military offensive on Lebanon. In Arabic, the term "Abed" is used to denote a "black" person or "slave" and the word is sometimes heard in reference to Africans or Sri Lankans. Non-Arab Afro-Asian migrants in Lebanon are physically looked upon as inferior due to their positions as servants. These workers remain excluded under Article 6 of Lebanese labour laws and are often victims of abuse by both employers and agencies." LINK

The vast majority of these women are seeking an opportunity to earn money and send remittances back to their families - 

".......Phillipines, where the economy relies heavily on remittances from nearly eight million Filipinos working overseas. Of that eight million, about 73,000 work in Kuwait. Some 60,000 are women employed mainly as maids and earning less than $200 a month on average, labor groups say.

Some of these woman do quickly realize the danger and manage to escape in a few days. But, many of the remaining "servants" are left in a living nightmare.

Here are some of the sickening stories of abuse, etc that I came across with a quick net search:

Saudi employer accused of Ramadan abuse on Indonesian maid - burned her with hot iron and lye, forced to eat feces, smashed her teeth and jammed broken teeth down her throat

Widespread gang rape of slave boys by Arab masters

 

Saudi man/sponsor beat maid - whipped her with an electric wire, burned her genitals & broke her front teeth --- and never paid her

 

Man fractures maid's spine

 

Saudi couple beat Indonesian maid for one month - maid's hands and feet are amputated due to gangrene

 

15 "youths" try to gang rape maid

 

Saudi man beats 2 Indonesian maids to death puts 2 others in Intensive Care

 

Filipino woman hired as beautician jumps from window after being beaten by female employer and told she must now be a maid

 

Indian maids in Kuwait - beaten and tortured by employers then tossed onto road

 

Bahrain - Ethiopian maid jumps from second floor window to escape abuse

 

Maid arrested for bewitching her employer

 

Saudi maid kept as slave for 18 yrs - never paid and starved

 

Saudi maid kept as slave and never paid salary for 10yrs

 

Bahrain Maid sets trap for "sex pests"

 

Lebanon - maids abandoned and dumped at hospitals if sick

 

Domestic workers are dying (suicide, murder)in Lebanon at a rate of more than one per week

 

Is it any wonder many of these maids choose to run away? - 

 

"In what can be termed a modern-day slave trade, Sri Lankan women arrive in Lebanon only to find themselves abused, imprisoned, raped, hungry, defenseless and alone. Siriani P., 27, came to Beirut in a desperate attempt to save her family from a life of poverty. Just ten months later, however, she grabbed the first opportunity to run away from her employers. LINK

 

Unfortunately, more often than not, this often makes these women more vulnerable to predators  and they soon find their hoped for emancipation leads them directly into  prostitution.

 

It is interesting that instead of seeing the hundreds of women/maids who flee their sponsor's home as a reason to investigate and reflect upon the domestics plight and their widespread abuse - this "maid flight" is seen as an irritation and enormous inconvenience for their muslim employers:

 

"Families in Jeddah and Riyadh live in constant fear of maids running away. Maids are sometimes like a rope that we place around our necks with them in control."  LINK

 

More from Saudi Arabia:

 

"About 20,000 runaway housemaids from Indonesia, the Philippines and Sri Lanka have escaped from their employers for alleged abuse and maltreatment.

 

But the real story is not the above quote - but the POLICE spokesman who proceeds into a major WHINE complaining the abused, runaway maids cost their employers and the Kingdom money.

 

The shame of modern day slavery is not exclusive to the muslim countries as it appears that muslims are bringing their maid slavery behaviors into "multicultural" Western countries - a few examples:

 

Irvine CA Couple -Abdelnasser Eid Youssef Ibrahim and Amal Ahmed Ewis-abd Motelib -found guilty of child slavery

 

Long Island NY - Millionaires arrested after half naked Indonesian maid escapes mansion

 

Germany refuses to help slaves of Persian Gulf sheiks

 

Colorado USA -Saudi man "sex slave" trial begins 

 

Brussel's officials raid hotel and remove 17 girls who were enslaved by Arab Royal family

 

So what is the solution to such a far reaching travesty of humanity?

 

Stopping women from going to the Middle East to be maids?

 

Ethiopia bans citizens from working in "abusive" Lebanon

 

Abuse causes Sri Lanka to send fewer maid to Arab countries

 

Concern?

 

Indonesian Embassy concerned about maid abuse

 

Writing story books?

 

Lebanon launches series of books to sensitize population to foreign maids

 

Ad campaigns?

 

Saudi Arabia begin "Be nice to your maid" ads

 

Better yet - How about swift arrest and LONG term jail sentences for those who abuse/rape etc these (or any) women :

 

Saudi Man gets 27 years for keeping women a "sex slave"

 

The above USA trial resulted in the conviction of Homaidan al-Turki. This conviction, in turn,  brought seething protests from muslims that al-Turki was "framed" and accusations of "Islamophobia" against the United States judiciary/prosecution. The Saudi press claimed he would never have been convicted in Saudi Arabia. LINK 

 

The Saudi press is right.

 

That is the sad and unfortunate reality for the thousands of women living as maids in the Middle East. Abusive employers receive NO punishment --- whereas a beaten, gangrenous, hospitalized maid --- who reports torture at the hands of her muslim employer - will get the Islamic Court ordered 79 lashes for her complaints along with a continued life of abuse or even death.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Muslim Asylum Seeker Poses as Boy then Rapes Girl in Same Children's Care Home

The whole issue of asylum seekers - most of which make their way across all of Europe to reach the bonanza of taxpayer paid benefits the British government generously doles out to them -  has totally gone out of control in Great Britain. Couple that with an influx in supposed illegal immigrant and asylum seeking children/orphans who Social Services are then "duty bound" to provide care and you have the perfect scenario for paedophiles to descend upon Britain and victimize it's vulnerable children.

In this case Social Services had a gut feeling that this bogus asylum seeker was posing as a minor/boy and was really much older than his stated age of 13. You can be sure that political correctness gagged them from investigating these concerns as being called a "racist" is the death knell for any Social Service worker (or others). Unfortunately for the children, these care workers are supposed to protect, are then left exposed to the enemy being in their midst - as in this instance where this despicable paedophile used his placement in a children's home to rape a young girl living in the same home.

Article in full:

Asylum seeker who 'posed as boy' arrested over care home rape claims

May 10 2009 by Jeanette Oldham, Sunday

AN asylum-seeker has been arrested after the alleged rape of a young girl from a children’s home – where he had been placed after apparently lying about his age.

The Afghan presented himself to Birmingham Social Services and claimed he was a 13 year-old minor, but staff suspected that he was really over the age of 18.

He was placed at the council-run children’s home after producing medical evidence at an immigration hearing which seemingly backed his claims of being just a boy.

But the Afghan was later arrested following the suspected rape of a 13 year-old girl from the care home – and police found an immigration card which appeared to confirm that he was really 19.

Social services have now begun an investigation after the asylum-seeker was quizzed about the suspected sex attack, a case which has seen another adult charged with rape.

“The Afghan presented himself some time ago as a minor, seeking asylum,” said a source. “He claimed to be 13 years old but from the outset social services had doubts.

“Yet if someone’s an asylum-seeker and a minor then social services are duty bound to look after them.

‘‘Birmingham social services’ experts were involved in challenging his claim that he was 13 at two immigration hearings and at one hearing he was legally declared an adult.

‘‘But at an appeal he produced a letter from a doctor claiming he had some characteristics of a child, so the court had to accept he was a child.’’

The asylum-seeker is currently on police bail after being arrested on suspicion of the rape, which is alleged to have occurred in Birmingham last month.

Here's an incovenient truth: the Islamisation of Europe

Excellent opinion piece taken from the online UK Telegraph.  I'm posting it in full as it is well worth the read. I do agree with most - but not all of it.

Also you may also want to read: British Women Pay High Price for Multiculturalism  and/or Non Compatible Muslim Immigration and "Racism"

Article in full:

Here's an inconvenient truth: the Islamisation of Europe

Posted By: Ed West at May 6, 2009

 

For years the world ignored climate change. As the evidence for man-made environmental disaster built up, the majority of people took part in a passive conspiracy of silence, like there was a nutter in the carriage and no one wanted to acknowledge the fact.

Many did so out of ignorance, others out of bigotry against environmentalists who, they thought, wanted us all to live in huts, or worshipped the earth, or at the very least didn't use deodorant. Still others purposefully ignored it because they had a vested economic interest in doing so. Some simply couldn't believe something so awful could happen, some believed it but were fearful of the terrible consequences of acting – economic unrest, war, perhaps mass murder. Still others believed it but thought it was inevitable and so pointless worrying about.

I interviewed a storm chaser back in 2004 for Nuts magazine. I just wanted tales of derring-do, but his tone was so downbeat I wanted to chop my own head off. He was in despair at humanity's refusal to face this disaster that engulfed us all. 

"I hate to say it, I really do, but it will take a catastrophe on American soil, and many dead, before something happens". I think they took that bit out of the interview – people buy Nuts to think about sex, not death.

But the following summer Hurricane Katrina did happen, and, very quickly, man-made climate change become almost universally accepted. In fact no one talks about anything else.

Climate change denial was, and still is, an overwhelmingly conservative vice, and it's a historical black mark against the Right (and, ahem, we have a few). But there is a corresponding liberal conspiracy over an issue that is as important to our society, if not to our planet.

Ten or even five years ago few people were prepared to say in public that, whatever the media consensus, mass immigration didn't in fact benefit our economy, but placed a strain on services, damaged the social fabric of society, and made England more violent and unequal and unhappy, and even threatened our very democracy. Anyone who dared to say so was presented as the sort of man who ran an army surplus shop and collected old SS daggers and empty cans of Zyklon B.

But while sociology is not a hard science, the evidence has been mounting up - and ignored. Some chose to ignore it because of their bigotry against "Colonel Blimps", "Daily Mail readers" and "racist Little Englanders". Some - such as the many employees in the enormous race relations industry - had a vested interest in denial. Many others thought it true but that to admit it would unleash man's worst trait - racial hatred - and result in murder and violence against black and Asian Britons, and their friends and loved ones – British people born here – being shipped off somewhere. Better just to leave London and choose the quiet life or sing the benefits of immigration from your Dorset country home.

No particular event changed broke the taboo - not 7/7, which I think had the opposite effect of showing just how amazing London is as an experiment and how tolerant Londoners are at getting along. The Danish cartoon protests certainly opened a lot of eyes and had unlikely people talking about "Islamicisation". Most likely there was not any particular event; it was simply that the increasing popularity of blogs broke the mainstream media's silence on the issue.

But all over Europe people have had their Katrina moment. As the respected American journalist Bruce Bawer writes in this devastating piece, in Norway, Denmark and Holland voters are turning to parties that openly oppose mass immigration. These are ordinary people who work regular jobs and travel abroad and have friends of every race and creed, but who do not want to be a minority in their own country or capital, just as no Indian or Ugandan or Moroccan would want to be a minority in his.

The media tried to paint these parties as racist and fascist. Never mind that Pim Fortuyn's party was led by an openly gay man and an openly, er, black woman.

What has prompted this rightward shift? Bawer points to several factors. One is the prosaic one of numbers:

One source estimates that Britain’s Muslim population rose from about 82,000 in 1961 to 553,000 in 1981 to 2 million in 2000—a demographic change roughly representative of Western Europe as a whole during that period. According to the London Times, the number of Muslims in the U.K. climbed by half a million between 2004 and 2008 alone—a rate of growth ten times that of the rest of that country’s population.

Secondly, there is the financial impact of a immigration, a taboo within a taboo in Left-wing circles, a sub-taboo.

For while some immigrant groups in Europe, such as Hindus and East Asians, enjoy relatively low unemployment rates and healthy incomes, the largest immigrant group, Muslims, has become such a burden that governments have made extensive cutbacks in public services in order to keep up with welfare payments—closing clinics and emergency rooms, reducing staff in hospitals, cutting police and military spending, eliminating course offerings at public universities, and so on. According to a report issued last year by the think tank Contribuables Associés, immigration reduces France’s economic growth by two-thirds. In 2002, economist Lars Jansson estimated that immigration cost Swedish taxpayers about $27 billion annually and that fully 74 percent of immigrant-group members in Sweden lived off the taxpayers. And in 2006, the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise warned that Norway’s petroleum fund—which contains the massive profits from North Sea oil that have made the nation rich—could wind up drained to cover outlays to immigrants. (This in a country whose roads, as a report last year indicated, are in worse shape than Albania’s.)

But perhaps most importantly is the growing realisation among some European liberals that continued immigration, predominantly from the reactionary Muslim world, is destroying liberalism. One of the most striking signs of this is the collapse of the Rainbow Alliance, so that Bawer (who is himself gay) writes:

Owing to the rise in gay-bashings by Muslim youths, Dutch gays—who ten years ago constituted a reliable left-wing voting bloc—now support conservative parties by a nearly two-to-one margin.

The same could also be said about European Jews, who have traditionally voted for Left-wing parties because of the Right's bigotry. Last year the Conservatives won the Jewish vote in the London elections, the first time in history that the capital's Jews had voted for a Right-wing party (it didn't help that Ken had a fondness for barking mad Islamists and making concentration camp gags to Jewish journalists).

And, as David Goodhart first pointed out in Prospect magazine four years ago, the welfare state and mass immigration are mutually exclusive, or at the very least the welfare state works best in small, homogenous societies. Yet the same people who would want us to be more like Sweden in our social model are pushing our demographics in the direction of vibrant and exciting but also violent and brutally unequal multi-racial countries like the United States, Brazil or South Africa.

First, social-democratic welfare systems work best, to the extent they do work, in ethnically and culturally homogeneous (and preferably small) nations whose citizens, viewing one another as members of an extended family, are loath to exploit government provisions for the needy. Second, the best way to destroy such welfare systems is to take in large numbers of immigrants from poor, oppressive, and corruption-ridden societies, whose rule of the road is to grab everything you can get your hands on. And third, the system will be wiped out even faster if many of those immigrants are fundamentalist Muslims who view bankrupting the West as a contribution to jihad. Add to all this the growing power of an unelected European Union bureaucracy that has encouraged Muslim immigration and taken steps to punish criticism of it—criminalizing “incitement of racism, xenophobia, or hatred against a racial, ethnic, or religious group” in 2007, for example—and you can start to understand why Western Europeans who prize their freedoms are resisting the so-called leadership of their see-no-evil elites.

Don't expect Polly Toynbee et al to admit this any time soon – the Left is paralysed by its fear of racism, which is why Europe will continue rightwards.

However, while Holland and the Nordic countries have built up a decent, anti-Islamist right, in other countries the void left by mainstream conservatism's cowardice has been filled with neo-fascists – Austria's Freedom Party, the Flemish Vlaams Blok and our very own British National Party. If the Conservative Party fails to take up its position as Fortuyn's heirs, then the vacuum will only get bigger. The space is open for either dissident Conservatives, UKIP or some other non-fascist party to take up that mantle.

I hope they will, for as Bawer warns: "Who will win the war for the soul of Western Europe? The Islamofascists and their multiculturalist appeasers, many of whom seem to believe that their job is not to defend democracy but to help make the transition to sharia as smooth as possible? The nativist cryptofascists? Or Pim Fortuyn’s freedom-loving heirs?"